Citations

ABSTRACT Background Diagnostic interpretation of kidney allograft biopsies using the Banff classification remains variable, but the determinants of this variability are not fully defined. We performed a global, fully digital multi-reader study to identify the principal drivers of disagreement in Banff-based assessment. Methods Thirty-six kidney transplant biopsies were independently scored by 67 renal pathologists on a standardized digital platform. Readers assessed Banff lesions on hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid–Schiff, and Jones’ silver stains; final diagnostic categories were assigned using prespecified Banff-based decision rules. Interobserver agreement was quantified with Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC) statistics. Determinants of diagnostic agreement were evaluated using pairwise mixed-effects logistic regression, and reader similarity was examined by principal component analysis (PCA) with post hoc molecular annotation. Results Agreement for final diagnostic categories was moderate (Gwet’s AC1, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.47–0.63). Lesion-level agreement varied substantially, with lowest agreement for selected threshold-dependent inflammatory or semi-quantitative lesions, including interstitial inflammation in areas of IFTA, peritubular capillaritis and arteriolar hyalinosis. Diagnostic concordance differed markedly across biopsies, indicating strong case-level heterogeneity. In pairwise models, differences in active inflammatory and vascular lesion scoring were the strongest correlates of diagnostic disagreement; reader experience and geography contributed minimally. Principal component analysis showed reader variation was organized along two dominant axes: a rejection-calling threshold axis linked mainly to tubulointerstitial inflammatory injury, and a T cell-mediated (TCMR/TI) and antibody-mediated/microvascular (AMR/MVI) inflammation-oriented phenotypic classification axis. Conclusion Interobserver variation in Banff-based kidney transplant biopsy assessment is structured rather than random and driven mainly by how readers threshold and integrate key inflammatory lesion compartments rather than experience or geographic location.

Abstract The Infectious Diseases Society of America Training Program Directors Committee met in October 2022 and discussed an observed increase in clinical volume and acuity on infectious diseases (ID) services, and its impact on fellow education. Committee members sought to develop specific goals and strategies related to improving training program culture, preserving quality education on inpatient consult services and in the clinic, and negotiating change at the annual IDWeek Training Program Director meeting. This paper outlines a presentation of ideas brought forth at the meeting and is meant to serve as a reference document for infectious diseases training program directors seeking guidance in this area.

Abstract Background Non-dominant right coronary artery (RCA) occlusion is uncommon and usually affects a small area of the myocardium. Rarely, it can complicate fatal outcomes such as shock, cardiac arrest, bradyarrhythmia, or tachyarrhythmia. Case summary A 50-year-old man with no significant medical history presented with ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest. He required prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation and multiple defibrillation shocks to achieve return of spontaneous circulation. ST elevation was noted on inferior leads. Due to refractory VF, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was initiated followed by coronary angiography which demonstrated 100% acute occlusion of proximal RCA (small non-dominant), 90% stenosis of ramus intermedius (RI), and 80% stenosis of obtuse marginal (OM) arteries. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 35%. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the RCA was performed with drug eluting stent. He had excellent clinical recovery without any neurological deficits. The ECMO was weaned off and decannulated within three days. Guideline directed medical therapy was administered. He remained hemodynamically stable and underwent staged PCI of RI and OM to achieve complete revascularization. Discussion Non-dominant RCA lesions are usually considered benign. However, when acute RCA occlusion results in cardiac arrest as seen in our patient, prompt revascularization is necessary. Treatment of cardiogenic shock with appropriate pharmacological and mechanical therapies is important, such as ECMO in our patient.

Abstract Background: Young doctors have made up a substantial part of healthcare forces during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of this study was to determine the rate and level of psychological distress among young doctors during the COVID-19 outbreak. Methods: This cross-sectional cohort study, dedicated to doctors, at or below the age of 40, was conducted in 62 countries as an online survey between September – November 2020. Survey questions covered the following areas: 1. demographics 2. work environment 3.the ‘Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)’ and the ‘Perceived Stress Scale 10 (PSS-10)’. The primary outcome was the rate and level of anxiety/depression and stress among surveyed population defined according to adopted cut off values (HADS>13, PSS-10>14). Secondary outcomes included risk factors for increased HADS and PSS-10 scores.Results: Among 1186 respondents, median aged 32 [29–36], 675 (44.5%) females, 96% reported a high level of anxiety/depression and 97% reported a high level of stress. Factors associated with significantly higher scores for anxiety/depression were increased work hours [OR 1.61 95%CI (1.12–2.34);p=0.01] and loss of pay [OR 5.53, 95% CI (1.57–19.47);p=0.008], while reduced work hours [OR 0.68 95% CI (0.48 - 0.98);p=0.03], increased salaries [OR 0.54 95% CI (0.35–0.85);p=0.003) and good training [OR 0.99 95%CI (0.99– 1.00);p=0.002] were associated with lower scores. Higher scores for stress were associated with higher professional experience [OR 1.08 95% CI (1.02–1.14);p=0.008], reduced salaries [OR 1.74 95% CI (1.01–2.92);p=0.04] and living with a partner [OR 1.53 95% CI (1.08–2.17);p=0.01]. Conclusions: A high rate of young doctors working clinically during the COVID-19 pandemic reported a persistently high level of psychological distress more than six months after the initial outbreak. Improvements in work organization, including reduced work hours and financial security are essential to prevent further psychological suffering among young doctors worldwide.

Abstract Triptolide, which was initially extracted from a Chinese medicinal herb, demonstrates potent antitumor, anti-inflammatory, and immunosuppressive properties, yet it is clinically limited due to its poor solubility, bioavailability, and toxicity. Minnelide, a water-soluble analog of triptolide, has potent antiproliferative activity. It is currently in Phase I/II clinical trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and 7 solid tumor indications, including advanced gastrointestinal tumors, pancreatic cancer, and colorectal cancer. To overcome the potential drug resistance and to improve the drug potency as well as to minimize the drug toxicity, we conducted a high throughput screening (HTS) for drug synergy, combining Minnelide with compounds from the LOPAC and/or Prestwick libraries in 3 different cancer cell lines: BxPC3 (pancreatic), HT29 (colon) and SNU5 (gastric). LOPAC and Prestwick libraries consist of drugs approved by FDA and/or drugs that have reached clinical trial stages, representing 2,274 unique compounds in total. After quality control evaluation and data normalization, hits were selected if greater than 20% inhibition was achieved when combined compared with Minnelide alone. A total of 43, 54, and 47 hits were identified for each cell line, representing an average hit rate of 2.1%. We further prioritized the hits by selecting those that were common in two or more cell lines, which resulted in 9 compounds from Prestwick library and 20 compounds from LOPAC library (Harmane is in common between the two libraries). Only 17 compounds were available for purchase for hits confirmation, which was conducted in a similar manner as in primary HTS, except that drugs were tested in a dose-dependent manner instead of a single concentration done in HTS, a duplicated biological run was performed, and a total of 9 cell lines were screened, with 3 cell lines for each tumor type (pancreatic, colon and gastric). IC50 and Combination Index (CI) values for each drug combination were calculated for each cell line. A fold change of 2 or more for the IC50 values and CI value < 1.0 were used for hit selection. In general, colon lines had the most synergistic combinations and gastric had the least. A total of 15 drug candidates were confirmed to have synergistic effect, representing a confirmation rate of 88%, among which 12 drugs demonstrated synergy in >50% of the cell lines tested, with Harmane and Harmine demonstrating synergy in all 9 cell lines tested. In addition, CGS-15943, Amiloride, Naphthalimide, and Idazoxan indicated good synergy with Minnelide in at least 6 out of 9 cell lines. Interestingly, Phenamil, an irreversible inhibitor of amiloride-sensitive Na+ channels, showed synergy in all cell lines tested for pancreatic and colon cancers, but not in gastric cancer cell lines. Overall, our study shed light on potential drug combinations with Minnlide for clinical use. Citation Format: Nanyun Tang, Chris Sereduk, Ashok Saluja, Mohana Velagapudi, Haiyong Han, Daniel D Von Hoff, Hongwei Holly Yin. Drug combination screen to identify novel synergy with Minnelide [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A142. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-A142