Citations

Abstract Objectives To systematically evaluate the certainty of evidence for treatment strategies across age groups and mood phases in bipolar disorder, and develop an open access web platform to facilitate shared decision making. Design Living umbrella review, evaluation, analysis, and communication hub (U-REACH) project. Data sources PubMed, PsycInfo, and Cochrane library databases, from inception to 19 November 2024. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Systematic reviews with network or pairwise meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials of pharmacological, nutraceutical, psychosocial, brain stimulation, or circadian rhythm based treatments, administered as monotherapy (without concurrent interventions), augmentation treatment (interventions added to an ongoing treatment regimen), or combination treatment (simultaneous initiation of two different interventions), examining any age group, bipolar disorder phase (ie, acute bipolar depression, mania or mixed episodes, or maintenance), treatment, control, or outcome. Results 77 studies met the inclusion criteria (21 network meta-analyses and 56 pairwise meta-analyses), including 116 unique pharmacological (n=74), brain stimulation (n=18), nutraceutical (n=13), psychosocial (n=8), and circadian rhythm based (n=3) treatments as monotherapy, augmentation, or combination therapy, along with five control interventions. These studies covered 133 unique outcomes (45 efficacy outcomes and 88 safety outcomes) resulting in 2510 meta-analyses with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) ratings of the certainty of the evidence as high (n=236), moderate (n=827), low (n=986), and very low (n=461). A communication hub, the Evidence Based Interventions for Bipolar Disorder (EBI-BD) platform, was developed and the full results are freely available ( https://ebibd-database.org ), including the preference based tool (12 interventions and 17 safety outcomes). Interventions effective across outcomes varied by phases. For bipolar depression, effective interventions in adults were cariprazine, divalproex or valproate, fluoxetine, ketamine (augmentation), lamotrigine, lumateperone, lurasidone, olanzapine, olanzapine with fluoxetine, and quetiapine, whereas effective interventions in children and adolescents were lurasidone and olanzapine with fluoxetine. For mania episodes, effective interventions in adults were aripiprazole, asenapine, carbamazepine, cariprazine, divalproex or valproate, haloperidol, lithium, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine (also augmentation), risperidone (also as augmentation), tamoxifen, and ziprasidone, whereas effective interventions in children and adolescents were aripiprazole, asenapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone. For maintenance, interventions effective across outcomes in adults were aripiprazole (also the long acting injectable formulation), asenapine, divalproex or valproate, lithium, olanzapine, group psychoeducation (augmentation), quetiapine, and risperidone long acting injectable formulation. Interventions effective across phases were aripiprazole (also as augmentation and as a long acting injectable formulation), asenapine, cariprazine, cognitive behavioural therapy (augmentation), divalproex or valproate, lamotrigine, lithium, olanzapine (also as augmentation), paliperidone, quetiapine (also as augmentation), and risperidone (also as augmentation and the long acting injectable formulation) (adults). Treatment effects by neuroscience based nomenclature classes are also reported. Conclusions The EBI-BD tool can help clinicians make evidence based, personalised treatment decisions for bipolar disorder. This resource can inform clinical guidelines and provides a foundation for continuously improving bipolar disorder care as new evidence emerges. Trial registration Open Science Framework https://osf.io/pjmvn/ Readers’ note This is a living systematic review and may be updated in the next two years if additional evidence emerges.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) presents as a highly aggressive and malignant brain tumor with limited treatment options. Despite the availability of existing therapies, the invasive characteristics of GBM frequently result in tumor recurrence and poor prognosis. We previously developed a B-cell-based therapy (BVax) that has shown promising results in its ability to induce therapeutic responses in preclinical models of GBM. Our research revealed potency of BVax can be attributed to its robust antigen-presenting capability, cognate antigen specificity with T cells, and ability to generate tumor-reactive antibodies. The present study aims to characterize the unique antigenic reactivity of BVax-derived antibodies by evaluating their immunological effects and therapeutic potential in both murine models and GBM patient-specific samples. Leveraging CD45.1 and CD45.2 congenic mouse models, we first revealed that BVax preferentially migrated to glioma-bearing brains upon intravenous injection, resulting in a CD38+CD20-CD19+ plasmablast phenotype. To further characterize the reactivity of BVax-derived immunoglobulins (Ig), we utilized proteomic analysis and identified preferential targets of Gelsolin, Fibronectin, Versican, Fibrinogen, and collagen type IV alpha, commonly associated with cell motility and the extracellular matrix. Microdialysis data confirmed the increased presence of many of these BVax-derived Igs-recognized antigens in tumor regions compared to normal brain regions in GBM patients. Utilizing purified BVax-derived antibodies from patient specimen, in vitro cell motility assays demonstrated a significant prevention of the invasion and migration of cell lines from patient derived xenograft (PDX). In this study, we concluded that BVax elicits antitumor activity through targeted migration to tumor-bearing regions, differentiation into plasmablasts, and robust secretion of specific Igs that retain the ability to inhibit functionalities associated with cell invasion and migration. Here, we present the first in-depth study that characterizes GBM patients’ antibody reactivity, specifically a subset of inflammatory B cells (BVax) with therapeutic effects that offer an indication for a new direction of immunotherapies.