Citations

Background: Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) combined with regional anesthetic techniques is commonly used for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of unstable ankle fractures. When compared to general anesthesia (GA), MAC with regional anesthesia has been associated with reduced systemic adverse effects and shorter recovery times, although regional anesthesia carries additional costs and potential complications of its own. A new technique involving the infiltration of high-volume, low-concentration (VL) local anesthetic was therefore developed. When used in conjunction with MAC, we refer to this technique as MAC-VL. This study evaluates outcomes and recovery metrics following outpatient ankle ORIF performed under GA vs MAC-VL without regional anesthesia. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective cohort study was conducted including 159 adults who underwent outpatient ankle ORIF between February 1, 2023, and January 31, 2026. Patients were identified using standardized diagnostic and procedural codes and grouped according to anesthesia type. All patients received a standardized injection of local anesthetic around the proposed operative sites before the procedure; anesthesia type was MAC (n = 48) or GA (n = 111). The primary outcome was time to discharge, defined as the interval from incision closed to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were considered exploratory and included tourniquet, operative, anesthesia time, time in room, Post Anesthesia Care Unit length of stay, conversion from MAC to GA, reported postoperative nausea and vomiting, admissions, and postoperative emergency department visits. Results: Among 160 procedures for which no significant difference in case mix could be detected with the numbers available, MAC-VL was associated with a significantly shorter time to discharge—reducing discharge time by 55.2 minutes ( P < .001) following adjustment for demographic, clinical, and operative covariates—and shortened total anesthesia and operating room time compared with GA. With the numbers available, no significant difference was detected for the remaining secondary outcomes. Conclusion: The MAC-VL protocol was associated with shorter operating room and recovery times and may improve health care resource use. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Purpose: Compared with white-light cystoscopy (WLC), blue-light cystoscopy (BLC) enhances detection of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), especially carcinoma in situ (CIS). However, its effects on health care resource utilization and cost burden have not been fully elucidated. This study assessed the economic implications of BLC vs WLC. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis with claims data from the Optum Research Database between June 2011 and May 2023. Patients who underwent BLC or WLC were identified, and white-light patients were matched 6:1 to blue-light patients by index year and time between bladder cancer diagnosis and cystoscopy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences. Health care resource utilization and total and bladder cancer–specific costs were calculated on a per-patient-per-month basis. Results: The final cohort included 794 blue-light and 4764 white-light patients. Before weighting, claims coded for CIS were more frequent in blue-light patients (19.6% vs 8.8%; P < .001). Blue-light patients underwent more upper-tract imaging (71.8% vs 57.8%; P < .001), BCG (24.2% vs 15.8%; P < .001), and biomarker testing (65.0% vs 34.9%; P < .001). After weighting, blue-light patients had a higher mean number of bladder cancer–related ambulatory visits per month (1.3 vs 1.0; P = .004). However, neither all-cause health care resource utilization (3.47 vs 3.21; P = .11) nor total cost ($2987.93 vs $2886.16, per patient per month, P = .65) differed significantly between cohorts. Conclusions: BLC is associated with greater health care resource utilization for NMIBC without significantly elevating health care costs, suggesting that enhanced diagnostic strategies can be implemented without added financial burden in real-world practice.

Abstract Objectives Embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) are conducted as part of routine clinical care and therefore use data collected from real-world data sources, such as electronic health record systems and administrative claims. A common approach for using these types of data across all phases of trial conduct is to create a computable phenotype (an explicitly defined data query data, including specified data types, data codes, and logical parameters) to capture patients with a clinical condition, exposure, symptom, characteristic, treatment, or outcome of interest. Materials and Methods The Electronic Health Record (EHR) Core Working Group of the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory captured the experiences of investigators in developing, adapting, and applying computable phenotype definitions in their studies. Results Four case studies describe different approaches to developing and using computable phenotypes in pragmatic trials. Discussion We recommend: (1) developing computable phenotypes as part of a team with multiple areas of expertise; (2) appropriate validation; (3) dissemination of salient details regarding phenotype creation; and (4) capturing and reporting any modifications made to phenotypes during the conduct of the trial. Conclusion A range of issues and decisions influence how computable phenotypes are developed and used in pragmatic clinical trials. Multidisciplinary teams that understand the context of the data, including the reason the data are collected and potential sources of bias, are best suited for the development and validation of phenotypes for ePCTs.

Opioids are often the first-line approach to treat moderate to severe cancer-related pain. However, opioids can cause conflict and distress to cancer survivors when prescribed for pain. The objective of this multi-methods study was to explore the psychosocial factors that affect the use or refusal of opioids among breast cancer survivors. We recruited 20 breast cancer survivors treated with opioids to participate in a free-listing exercise and semi-structured interview. Results revealed that survivors felt unprepared for the intensity of pain following cancer treatments, which contributed to the use of opioids. The adverse side effects often influenced their decision to discontinue them from their pain management strategy. Finally, the addictive properties of the medication affected survivors’ use of the medication. Findings identify and recognize clinicians and researchers can promote safer, more personalized approaches to pain management to inform interventions that integrate behavioral health support and improve patient-provider communication.

TPS913 Background: A subset of patients with MIBC who receive neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) prior to radical cystectomy (RC) have a pathologic complete response (pCR) at the time of RC. With pCR rates of 22-42% in patients with MIBC following NAT (+/- ICI), whether a subset of patients with good clinical response to NAT can avoid RC is an important unanswered question, especially with the development of more active systemic therapies. HCRN 16-257 evaluated maintenance nivolumab in lieu of cystectomy in patients with MIBC who experienced clinical complete response (cCR) following neoadjuvant GC and nivolumab. The cCR rate was 48%, but 8/33 (24%) patients who elected bladder preservation subsequently underwent cystectomy for local disease recurrence. The RETAIN trial also evaluated omission of local therapy following neoadjuvant therapy with a 2-year bladder preservation rate in patients with ≤T1 disease following NAC of 54% (22/41). Of the 9/25 (36%) patients on that trial developed metastatic disease, 8/9 developed localized disease before metastasizing. These data illustrate the critical role that local therapy plays in patients with MIBC. For this reason, we believe that radiotherapy to the bladder combined with ICI will improve bladder intact event-free survival (BI-EFS). This trial also allows for patients to opt for bladder preservation based on a good clinical response to NAT. Methods: This is a single arm, phase 2 trial (NCT07061964) evaluating risk-adapted bladder preservation therapy for patients with MIBC following NAT. NAT consists of any NCCN guideline concordant therapy for MIBC. Patients with cT2-T4aN0M0 MIBC who complete NAT will be eligible if they have ≤T1 disease on post-NAT TURBT, confirmed by biopsies of prior tumor sites and systematic sampling (left/right lateral walls, dome, posterior wall, trigone). Patients will receive 55 Gray (Gy) in 20 fractions of radiotherapy (RT) to the bladder with 1 year of pembrolizumab. The primary objective is to evaluate whether 3-year BI-EFS is at least 70% in participants with < = T1 (without multifocal CIS) following NAT and RT with 1 year of pembrolizumab. Secondary objectives include local muscle invasive recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), the rate of salvage cystectomy, and evaluation of the frequency and severity of toxicities in participants who receive RT and pembrolizumab. Plasma and urine will be banked for future correlative studies. S2427 was activated in September 2025 with an accrual goal of 111 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT07061964 .

LBA629 Background: Whether BCG strain influences clinical efficacy is unclear. BCG shortages and a reliance on a single strain may impact disease outcomes. Evidence also suggests that priming with intradermal (ID) BCG vaccination prior to intravesical (IVe) BCG enhances anti-tumor immunity and cancer clearance. Co-primary objectives address these issues. Methods: The trial design calls for 924 eligible patients with BCG naïve non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) (HG Ta/T1 +/- CIS or CIS alone) with negative purified protein derivative (PPD) to be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio, to IVe TICE (Arm 1), IVe Tokyo-172 (Arm 2), or ID + IVe Tokyo-172 (Arm 3) BCG, stratifying on age group and clinical stage. IVe BCG included 6 weekly instillations (induction) and three weekly instillations (maintenance) at 3 and 6 months (mo), then every 6 mo for 3 years. Objective 1 tests whether Tokyo-172 BCG is non-inferior (NI) to TICE BCG, specifying a NI hazard ratio=1.34 (84% power). Objective 2 tests whether priming with ID prior to IVe Tokyo-172 is superior to IVe Tokyo-172 (HR=0.71, 83% power). The primary endpoint is high-grade recurrence-free survival (HG-RFS) censored at last cystoscopy, using a one-sided α=0.021 for each test. A Cox model adjusting for the stratification factors is used. Secondary endpoints include adverse events, 6-mo biopsy-proven complete response (CR) in patients with CIS +/- Ta, T1, duration of CR, PPD conversion and HG-RFS, progression-free survival (PFS) and quality of life. Max follow-up is 5 years. Results: 1000 (984 eligible) patients were enrolled from 2/17-12/20. Median (IQR) follow up is 4.6 (3.6, 5.0) yrs. Median age (range) is 70 yrs (26, 99), 17% are female, 9% are non-white, and 34% had CIS at entry. HG-RFS, CR, duration of CR at 4 yrs, and PFS were similar among arms (Table). PPD conversion occurred in 29% and was not correlated with HG-RFS. Gr 1-2 AE rate was similar (67%, 71%, and 67%) and Gr 3-4 (no Gr 5s) rate was 6%, 11%, and 14% for Arms 1,2, and 3, respectively. Conclusions: Tokyo-172 is non-inferior to TICE BCG in terms of HG RFS and CIS CR and is similar for PFS. Gr 3-4 AE rate is higher with Tokyo-172. Priming with Tokyo-172 BCG does not improve HG RFS. PPD conversion is not prognostic. Clinical trial information: NCT #03091660 . CIS Component N (eligible) 5-yr HG RFS HG RFSHR (95.8% CI) @ 5-yrPFS PFS HR(95% CI) @ CR %(95% CI) 4 yr CR duration Tice Ive 333 (330) 58% 79% 62%; 71/114(53%, 71%) 80% Tokyo Ive 332 (327) 64% *0.82(0.63, 1.08) 79% *0.99(0.70, 1.39) 60%; 66/110(50%, 69%) 83% Tokyo ID + Ive 335 (327) 63% **1.00(0.76, 1.33) 77% **1.07(0.76, 1.51) 63%; 69/109(54%, 72%) 80% 3 mo. PPD + conversionY vs. N 782 evaluable225 (29%)557 (71%) 69%67% ^HR=0.91(0.68, 1.22) * Tokyo-172 vs. Tice, ** Tokyo Priming vs. Tokyo no priming. ^conversion to PPD + vs. – @ adjusted for 2 strat factors (and arms for PPD model). PFS event = MIBC, metastasis, or death.