Citations

Abstract Introduction Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is characterized by loss of normal REM sleep atonia and dream enactment behavior. iRBD is strongly associated with α-synucleinopathies and risk for developing Parkinson’s disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and multiple system atrophy (MSA), yet phenoconversion risk for long-term outcomes of younger women and men remains undefined. We aimed to ascertain longitudinal outcomes and phenoconversion risk in the Mayo Clinic iRBD cohort. Methods Eighty-nine of 165 registry participants with at least one-year follow-up were included. Retrospective chart review attained baseline demographics, age at presentation, baseline Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, and phenoconversion status (iRBD, PD, DLB, mild cognitive impairment [MCI], MSA, or other). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were analyzed with alpha at p < 0.05. Results 68 men and 21 women had a mean age of 63 years at polysomnographic diagnosis. At follow-up, 64 (71.9%) remained iRBD; 7 (7.9%) developed PD, 11 (12.4%) developed DLB, 3 (3.4%) developed MCI, 1 (1.1%) developed MSA, and 3 (3.4%) developed another dementia. Abnormal TUG (>12 seconds) occurred in 5.9% and abnormal MoCA (< 24) in 23.3%. Phenoconversion rates were similar in women and men (p = 0.44). Older age at PSG predicted phenoconversion, corresponding to a two-fold increase in risk with each 10-year increase (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.15–3.52). Neither abnormal TUG nor MoCA predicted conversion. Cumulative phenoconversion was approximately 1% at 1 year, 7% at 3 years, 10% at 5 years, 30% at 10 years, 34% at 12 years, and 49% at 15 years. Mean and median time to phenoconversion was 7 years (range, 1-18 years). Conclusion We found that iRBD phenoconversion rates were lower than historically reported. Only age at presentation predicted phenoconversion, with risk doubling per decade. At 12 years, cumulative phenoconversion rate was approximately 34%. Support (if any)

Abstract Introduction Emerging evidence suggests that positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment for moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in elderly patients does not improve daytime sleepiness, or quality of life outcomes, despite improving apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). While oral appliance therapy (OAT) is known to be an effective treatment for mild-to-moderate OSA, its efficacy in treatment of elderly patients with severe OSA is unknown. Methods Retrospective chart review of patients ≥ 65 years old with diagnosis of OSA, treated with OAT, who underwent subsequent follow-up sleep testing and clinical assessments, including Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), a measure of daytime sleepiness. Results We studied 66 elderly patients with OSA (31 women, 35 men), including 58 with mild-to-moderate OSA (AHI < 30) and 8 with severe OSA (AHI ≥ 30) treated with OAT. At baseline, patients with mild-to-moderate OSA had a median AHI of 11.6 compared to 41.3 in patients with severe OSA (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in ESS score between patients with mild-to-moderate OSA (median ESS = 8; IQR = 4-12) and severe OSA (median ESS = 6; IQR = 3-9). Following their OSA diagnosis, OAT was offered due to PAP intolerance (n = 32), patient preference (n = 28), or as an alternative treatment option (n = 4). After initiation of OAT, 42 patients with mild-to-moderate and 7 with severe OSA underwent follow-up assessment with home sleep testing (n = 32), oximetry (n = 15), or polysomnography (n = 2). At follow-up assessment, ESS was decreased in patients with mild-to-moderate OSA (median ESS = 5; IQR = 3-8) and severe OSA (median ESS = 5; IQR = 3-7), indicating reduction in daytime sleepiness in response to OAT in both groups. Moreover, 50% of patients with mild-to-moderate OSA and 50% of severe OSA patients saw ≥ 50% reduction in AHI. Conclusion Our study findings suggest that treatment with OAT in mild-to-moderate and severe OSA is tolerable and effective in elderly patients who do not have contraindication for this treatment. OAT should be considered as an alternative treatment specifically for elderly adults with severe OSA not tolerating or improving with PAP therapy. Support (if any)