Citations

Abstract Objective The validity of progression-free survival (PFS) as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) in the antibody-drug conjugate (ADCs) era remains uncertain. We evaluated the association between treatment effects on PFS and OS in randomized trials of ADCs for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and explored the surrogate threshold effect (STE). Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for published randomized controlled phase II–IV trials evaluating ADCs in mBC and reporting hazard ratios (HRs) for both PFS and OS. A meta-epidemiological approach was used. The primary metric was the ratio of hazard ratios (rHR = HR_PFS/ HR_OS), with rHR < 1 indicating a larger effect on PFS. Trial-level associations were assessed using weighted linear regression (R²) and Spearman’s correlation. Results Twenty-one trials (n = 21; 18 phase III) evaluating nine ADCs were included. The pooled rHR was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73–0.86), indicating a larger relative effect on PFS than OS. Numerically, the largest discrepancies were observed in triple-negative disease (rHR 0.72) and trials allowing crossover (rHR 0.71). Concordant statistical significance between endpoints occurred in 76% of the trials, whereas 24% showed a significant PFS benefit without OS improvement. The trial-level association between PFS and OS was moderate (R² = 0.62; ρ = 0.67). Conclusion Treatment effects on PFS consistently exceeded those on OS, although effect directions were highly concordant between endpoints. These findings provide an exploratory framework to contextualize the relationship between PFS and OS in ADC trials, requiring further validation in diverse clinical settings.

e13076 Background: Progression-free survival (PFS) is frequently used as a primary endpoint in contemporary oncology trials, including antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) studies in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) settings, despite uncertainty regarding its validity as a surrogate for overall survival (OS). A meta-epidemiological analysis was performed to quantify the systematic differences between the treatment effects on PFS and OS in ADC randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Methods: Phase II–III ADC RCTs with MBC patients reporting hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were included. Differences in treatment effects within each trial were quantified using the ratio of hazard ratios (rHR = HR_PFS/HR_OS). Random-effects models were used to pool the rHRs across the trials. Prespecified subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to evaluate the trial characteristics, clinical context, and regulatory status. Sensitivity analyses assessed the robustness across varying assumptions of the within-trial correlation between the endpoints. Results: Twenty-one RCTs evaluating nine ADCs in patients with MBC were included, comprising three phase II (14%) and 18 phase III (86%) studies. The pooled rHR demonstrated significantly larger treatment effects for PFS than for OS (rHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73–0.86), with no between-trial heterogeneity (I² = 0%, τ² = 0). Sensitivity analyses assuming within-trial correlations between PFS and OS ranging from 0 to 0.95 yielded consistent results. Greater divergence between endpoints was observed in trials enrolling patients with triple-negative breast cancer (rHR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61–0.85) and HER2-low disease (rHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62–0.96). Phase III trials showed larger differences than phase II trials (rHR, 0.79 vs. 0.89). When OS was a secondary endpoint, divergence was greater than when OS was primary (rHR, 0.77 vs. 0.87). Across trials, 16 of 21 studies (76%) demonstrated concordant effect directions between PFS and OS: 11 (52%) with a statistically significant benefit for both endpoints and 5 (24%) with neither endpoint significant. Discordance occurred in five trials (24%), all characterized by a statistically significant PFS benefit without a corresponding OS improvement. No trial demonstrated an OS benefit in the absence of a PFS benefit. Conclusions: Across ADC trials, PFS systematically overestimated OS treatment effects, underscoring the limitations of PFS as a standalone surrogate endpoint. These findings support the cautious interpretation of PFS-driven efficacy and reinforce the need for endpoint validation frameworks tailored to the mechanism, disease context, and trial design.

564 Background: HER2+ ILC is rare (~5% of ILC), with limited data on long-term adjuvant trastuzumab outcomes. We investigated late recurrence and immune landscapes of HER2+ ILC vs invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in the phase III NCCTG N9831 trial (NCT00005970) and a real-world cohort. Methods: We evaluated 3304 early-stage HER2+ breast cancer patients (pts) enrolled in N9831 (122 ILC, 3182 IDC). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated (Kaplan-Meier) and compared using multivariable Cox regression adjusting for age, tumor size, grade, hormone receptor (HR), and nodal status. Findings were validated in a real-world cohort of HER2+ pts (Caris Life Sciences CODEai platform). Immune microenvironments were profiled by WTS deconvolution (Quantiseq). Real-world overall survival was calculated from trastuzumab start to last contact. Results: In N9831, ILC pts were older (median 54 vs 49 y), more ER+ (74.6% vs 51.4%), and had more N3 disease (25.4% vs 12.7%) compared to IDC. ILC pts derived a comparable magnitude of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab compared to the overall population (HR 0.58 vs 0.67). However, long-term outcomes diverged: while the 5-year RFS was similar (77.1% vs 82.7%), ILC pts experienced a steep decline between years 5-15 (77.1% to 57.7%; ~20% decline) vs IDC (82.7% to 72.7%; ~10% decline) after multivariable Cox analysis (Table). In the real-world early/advanced cohort (n=1328; 26 ILC vs 1302 non-ILC [subset IDC n=595]) treated with trastuzumab-based therapy, ILC pts had worse mOS (33.7 vs 68.6 m, HR 2.01, 95%CI 1.00-4.07, p=0.04) compared to non-ILC. However, there was no statistically significant difference when compared specifically to IDC (HR 1.77, 95% CI 0.87-3.61, p=0.11). ILC had: i) numerically lower tumor mutation burden (TMB)-high (4.2% vs 9.5%, p=0.38); ii) higher infiltration of B cells, Tregs, and M2 macrophages (p<0.05); iii) upregulated MHC class II expression (HLA-DOA, p<0.05); and iv) downregulated proliferative and DNA repair pathways (E2F, G2M, MYC; FDR <0.25) compared to non-ILC. Conclusions: HER2+ ILC carries late recurrence risk despite initial trastuzumab benefit. The unique immune landscape (Treg/M2 macrophage enrichment and lower proliferative signatures) distinguishes HER2+ ILC from IDC, highlighting the need for tailored strategies. Long-term RFS and OS in HER2-positive ILC vs IDC (N9831 trial). Population N 5-year% (95% CI) 10-year% (95% CI) 15-year% (95% CI) ILC 122 RFS 77.13% (69.9, 85.1) OS 84.04% (77.7, 90.9) RFS 70.57% (62.7, 79.4) OS 76.0% (68.7, 84.2) RFS 57.67% (44.2, 75.1) OS 65.22% (56.6, 75.2) IDC 3182 RFS 82.71% (81.4, 84.1) OS 90.18% (89.1, 91.2) RFS 77.45% (75.9, 78.9) OS 81.81% (80.4, 83.2) RFS 72.68% (70.77, 74.6) OS 76.68% (75, 78.4)

Abstract Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive yet immunogenic subtype of breast cancer (BC) and the only one with FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) - pembrolizumab. Currently, PD-L1 (22C3) is the companion biomarker for predicting pembrolizumab benefit, but its utility is limited by spatial/temporal heterogeneity, assay variability, and modest correlation with treatment response. Chemokines such as CXCL9, CXCL10, and CCL5 recruit CD8+ T cells into the tumor microenvironment and have been associated with improved response to ICI, but their predictive value alongside PD-L1 remains unclear. Here, we examined the relationship between these chemokines, PD-L1, and pembrolizumab efficacy in TNBC. Methods: We analyzed 3662 TNBC tumors profiled by NGS (592, NextSeq; WES/WTS, NovaSeq; Caris Life Sciences). Immune cells were estimated using WTS deconvolution (Quantiseq). PD-L1 positivity was defined as &gt;10% CPS (PharmDx 22C3). CXCL9/CXCL10/CCL5-high (H) and -low (L) TNBC were classified by RNA expression above or below 50th percentile. Real-world median overall survival (mOS) was derived from insurance claims and calculated from start of pembrolizumab to last contact using Kaplan-Meier. Statistical significance was assessed by chi-square and Mann-Whitney U with multiple comparison adjustments (q&lt;0.05). Results: TNBC expressed higher levels of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CCL5 (N = 3662, median TPM: 5.3, 14.8, and 15.1) compared to HER2+ (N = 1344; 4.8, 10.1, 10.6) and HR+HER2- BC (N = 6097; 2.7, 6.6, 9.4), all q&lt;0.05. Moderate correlations were observed between PD-L1 CPS and each chemokine (r = 0.41, p&lt;.01). PD-L1-positive tumors had better mOS (24.3 months (m) vs 18.6 m, HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.6-0.92, p=0.007) compared to PD-L1-negative TNBC post-pembrolizumab. Among PD-L1-negative tumors, those with CXCL9-H had better mOS (26.9 m vs 15.8 m for CXCL9-L, HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.82, p=0.001) post-pembrolizumab. Among PD-L1-positive tumors, CXCL10-H and CCL5-H was associated with improved mOS (CXCL10-H: 25.7 m vs. 20.7 m for CXC10-L, p = 0.03; CCL5-H: 26.7 vs. 18.5 m for CCL5-L, p = 0.03) post-pembrolizumab. PD-L1 negative CXCL9-H, PD-L1 positive CXCL10-H and PD-L1 positive CCL5-H groups showed higher infiltration of CD8+ T cell, B cells, M1/M2 macrophages, Tregs. They also exhibited higher T cell inflamed score, IFNy score and MAPK activation score vs. CXCL9-L, CXCL10-L and CCL5-L groups (Table). Conclusions: In TNBC, a chemokine signature comprising CXCL9, CXCL10 and CCL5 refines PD-L1 based prediction of pembrolizumab benefit. Specifically, high CXCL10 or CCL5 expression in PD-L1-positive tumors, and high CXCL9 expression in PD-L1-negative tumors, were associated with improved survival post pembrolizumab and immune-rich microenvironment. These findings support the use of chemokine profiling to complement PD-L1 and enhance patient selection for ICI therapy in TNBC. Citation Format: S. Gandhi, S. Deshmukh, S. Wu, J. Xiu, G. Sledge Jr., D. Trapani, J. Leone, S. Chumsri, M. Lustberg, C. Hong, S. Yao, K. Takabe, M. Ernstoff, M. Opyrchal, P. Chalasani, C. Paulos, G. Lesinski, A. Madabhushi, S. Badve, K. Kalinsky, P. Kalinski. Chemokine signatures improve PD-L1-based prediction of pembrolizumab response in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-08-14.

Abstract Background: Male breast cancer (MaBC) is a rare malignancy, accounting for approximately 1% of all breast cancer cases. Our previous studies suggest that MaBC is biologically distinct from female breast cancer (FeBC), exhibiting a unique mutational profile and immune-genomic microenvironment. While the impact of these molecular alterations on site-specific metastases has been explored in FeBC, it remains poorly understood in MaBC. This gap limits accurate risk stratification and prediction of disease trajectory in male patients. In this study, we investigated site-specific genomic and immune alterations across metastatic sites in MaBC. Methods: 238 MaBC samples were tested by NGS (592, NextSeq; WES, NovaSeq) and WTS (NovaSeq; Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). We performed analysis in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and HER2-negative (HER2-) subtypes which are most common in male. HR+HER2- was defined as estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) positive and HER2 IHC 1+ or 2+ with negative chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) assay. Immune cells were estimated using WTS deconvolution (Quantiseq). Gene expression profiles were analyzed for T-cell inflamed score, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) score and MAPK Activation Score. We classified patients by site of biopsy/specimen site. Statistical significance was assessed with chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, p&lt;0.05 is considered statistically significant. Results: Our cohort included 86 HR+HER2- MaBC samples biopsied from primary breast cancer (pBC) (n=39), bone (n=15), liver (n=8), lung (n=8), lymph nodes (n=7), and skin (n=9) mets. We report here only the data on statistically significant differences, but the overall landscape has been depicted across all defined-sites investigated. pBC showed a significantly lower prevalence of PIK3CA mutations (23.6% vs. 53.3%, p&lt;0.05) compared to bone mets. ESR1 mutations were absent in pBC but present in 25% of liver and 25% of lung mets (all comparisons p&lt;0.05). Immune profiling revealed reduced infiltration of M2 macrophages (4.3% vs. 6%, p&lt;0.05) and neutrophil (2.2% vs. 6.9%, p&lt;0.05) in pBC relative to bone Mets. Further, CD4+ T cells were lower in pBC compared to lymph nodes (0% vs. 2.4%, p&lt;0.05). pBC had lower expression of immune checkpoint genes (PDCD1LG2, HAVCR2 and CD47) compared to other mets. pBC exhibited lower MAPK pathway activation score (-1.6 vs. 0.17, p=0.03) and a trend toward lower T cell-inflamed gene expression scores (-65 vs. 8, p=0.06) compared to bone mets. Bone mets had higher infiltration of M2 macrophage compared to lung (6% vs. 4.4%, p&lt;0.05) and lymph node (6% vs. 4.5%, p&lt;0.05). Neutrophil infiltration was elevated in bone versus liver (6.9% vs. 2%, p&lt;0.05) but T regulatory cells were lower in bone compared to lymph nodes (1% vs. 2.4%, p&lt;0.05). Bone showed reduced expression of CD47 (median TPM 50.6 vs. 109.9, p&lt;0.05) compared to skin. Further bone had lower IFN-gamma scores (-0.41 vs. -0.17, p&lt;0.05) compared to lymph node. Data on prior number and types of cancer treatment to give a context to the findings will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Our study highlights that each MaBC metastatic site harbors a unique genomic and immune landscape that can influence tumor behavior and potentially impact patient prognosis. Better understanding of metastatic site-specific molecular features in larger cohorts can help in the future research efforts and guiding treatment decisions. Citation Format: D. Trapani, S. Deshmukh, S. Wu, J. Xiu, N. Lin, G. Curigliano, P. Spanheimer, P. Advani, P. Barreto Coelho, M. Lustberg, G. Sledge Jr, S. Tolaney, J. Leone. Site specific Genomic and Immune Landscapes Underpinning in metastatic Male Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-08-04.

Abstract Background: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are increasingly used in the treatment of breast cancer due to their superior efficacy compared to conventional chemotherapy. The management of male breast cancer is largely extrapolated from clinical data in females and evidence regarding the efficacy of ADCs in men remains limited. This study aimed to compare survival outcomes between male and female breast cancer patients treated with ADCs across the spectrum of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression. Methods: We included total of 2,954 (Male: 34, Female: 2,920 breast cancer samples) from patients who underwent treatment with ADCs. We excluded patients with triple-negative breast cancer status due to the rarity of this subtype in males and the worse prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer, so that the cohorts would be more homogeneous without overrepresentation of triple-negative breast cancer in females. We categorized patients by HER2 status as: HER2-null (if there was 0% stain on HER2 IHC), HER2-ultra low (if HER2 IHC was 0 but with stain 1-10%), HER2-low (if HER2 IHC was 1+ or 2+ with a negative chromogenic in situ hybridization [CISH] assay), and HER2-positive (if HER2 IHC was 3+ or 2+ with a positive CISH assay). Real-world median overall survival was derived from insurance claims and calculated from the start of first ADC with either trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) or trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) or sacituzumab govitecan (SG) to last contact using Kaplan-Meier. Statistical significance was assessed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U. Results: The distribution of sex by HER2 expression group was: HER2-null: 8 males vs 612 females; HER2-ultra low 6 males vs 467 females; HER2-low 11 males vs 903 females; HER2-positive 9 males vs 938 females. Median survival from treatment initiation with either T-DXd or SG in the HER2-null cohort was 21.31 months in males vs 15.72 months in females (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.33 - 2.01, p=0.67); in the HER2-ultra low cohort was 17.73 months in males vs 14.47 months in females (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.26 - 2.63, p=0.76); in the HER2-low cohort was 11.08 months in males vs 18.62 months in females (HR 1.53, 95% CI 0.63 - 3.7; p=0.34). In the HER2-positive cohort, 5/9 males (55.5%) and 544/938 females (58%) were treated with T-DXd. Median survival from treatment initiation with either T-DXd or T-DM1 in the HER2-positive cohort was 36.55 months in males vs 46.52 months in females (HR 1.77, 95% CI 0.84 - 3.74, p=0.12). Conclusions: In this study, survival appears to be comparable between males and females with breast cancer across the spectrum of HER2 expression when both are treated with ADCs, although the survival in the HER2-positive cohort appears numerically lower in males, consistent with data on HER2-positive MaBC. An important limitation is the small sample size of the male breast cancer cohorts, and the lack of a categorization of HER2 in HR+ vs HR-, for the small MaBC sample size. However, to our knowledge this is the first analysis evaluating outcomes of men treated with ADCs across the spectrum of HER2 expression. Citation Format: D. Trapani, S. Deshmukh, S. Wu, J. Xiu, N. Lin, G. Curigliano, P. Spanheimer, S. Gandhi, S. Chumsri, S. Graff, M. Lustberg, G. Sledge Jr, S. Tolaney, J. Leone. Comparative efficacy of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in male versus female breast cancer across the spectrum of HER2 expression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-01-13.

1106 Background: TNBC, although an aggressive breast cancer (BC) subtype, is highly immunogenic and the only BC subtype where the ICI pembrolizumab is approved. However, predictive biomarkers for pembrolizumab benefit are limited. The chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 attract CD8 + T cells into the tumor microenvironment (TME) and are associated with chemotherapy benefit, but little is known about their role in prediciting pembrolizumab benefit in TNBC. We investigated the association of CXCL9 , CXCL10 and their cognate receptor CXCR3 with TME and ICI efficacy. Methods: 3,038 TNBC samples were analyzed via NGS (592-gene panel, NextSeq; WES/WTS, NovaSeq; Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) totaled somatic mutations per tumor (high > 10 mt/MB). Immune cell fractions were estimated using WTS deconvolution (Quantiseq). CXCL9 / CXCL10 / CXCR3 -high (H) and -low (L) tumors were classified by RNA expression above or below the 50th percentile. Real-world overall survival (OS) was derived from insurance claims and calculated from start of pembrolizumab to last contact using Kaplan-Meier. Statistical significance was assessed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U with multiple comparison adjustments (q < .05). Results: TNBC expressed higher levels of CXCL9 and CXCL10 (median (TPM): 5.3 and 14.7) compared to N = 1,082 HER2+ (4.8 and 10.3, p < 0.05) and N = 4,918 HR+HER2- (2.7 and 7, q < .05) BC. CXCR3 expression was higher in TNBC compared to HR+HER2- (1.9 vs 1.7, q < .05), but no difference when compared to HER2+ (1.9 vs 2, q = 0.97) BC. CXCL9 / CXCL10 / CXCR3 -H TNBC had higher median OS post pembrolizumab [ CXCL9 -H vs -L: 26.5 vs 15.7 months (mo), HR: 0.65 (95% CI 0.5-0.84); CXCL10 -H vs -L: 26.0 vs 20.6 mo, HR 0.74 (0.57-0.95); CXCR3 -H vs -L: 32.6 vs 18.3 mo, HR 0.68 (0.52-0.88), all p < 0.05 ]. CXCL9 -H, CXCL10 -H and CXCR3 -H had higher PD-L1 positivity (22C3), TMB high, higher T cell inflamed score, TP53 mutations, elevated B and CD8 + T cells infiltration, but not neutrophils, and higher expression of immune checkpoint genes (Table). Conclusions: High CXCL9 / CXCL10 / CXCR3 expression is associated with longer survival in patients with TNBC post pembrolizumab, and characterized by an immune-enriched TME. Further investigation is needed to evaluate this chemokine axis in TNBC and its potential as a therapeutic target to enhance ICI efficacy. TME characteristics by CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCR3 expression. CXCL9 CXCL10 CXCR3 High Low q-value High Low q-value High Low q-value PD-L1 % 54 14 <.05 54 14.7 <.05 49 19 <.05 TMB high % 14.3 8 <.05 12.6 9.7 <.05 12.4 9.8 <.05 B cell (median %) 4.4 3.5 <.05 4.3 3.6 <.05 5 3.4 <.05 CD8+T cell (median %) 1.2 0 <.05 1 0 <.05 1.3 0 <.05 Neutrophil (median %) 4.2 4.5 <.05 4.2 4.4 <.05 4.2 4.3 0.2 T cell inflamed score 100 -84 <.05 98 -84 <.05 108 -100 <.05 CTLA4 (median TPM) 3.2 0.7 <.05 3 0.8 <.05 3.4 0.7 <.05 LAG3 (median TPM) 6.6 2.1 <.05 6.9 2 <.05 6.8 2 <.05 TP53 mutation % 88 81 <.05 90.5 78.6 <.05 86 83 0.08

1098 Background: Leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 15 ( LRRC15) has emerged as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for various cancers due to its high expression in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and role in tumor progression. High LRRC15 expression is associated with poor prognosis in TNBC. This study aims to define the multiomic profile of LRRC15 in TNBC. Methods: 3,038 TNBC samples were analyzed via Next-Generation Sequencing (592, NextSeq; Whole Exome Sequencing, NovaSeq) and Whole Transcriptome Sequencing (NovaSeq; Caris Life Sciences, AZ). Immune cell fractions were estimated using WTS deconvolution (Quantiseq). Stromal cell abundance in the tumor microenvironment (TME) was estimated from RNA expression profiles using MCP Counter. LRRC15 -high (H) and -low (L) tumors were classified by RNA expression above or below the 25th percentile. Real-world overall survival (OS) and treatment-related survival were derived from insurance claims and calculated from tissue collection or treatment initiation to last contact using Kaplan-Meier. Statistical significance was assessed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests with multiple comparison adjustments (q < .05). Results: LRRC15 -H TNBC tumors had higher frequency of PIK3CA (25.9% vs 16.8), PIK3R1 (6.2% vs 1.6%), PTEN (11.3% vs 5.8%), but lower frequency of RB1 (7.8% vs 12.1%) and KMT2D (2% vs 4.4%) compared to LRRC15 -L, all q < 0.05. LRRC15 -H had higher PD-L1 positivity (32.3% vs 24.5%, q < 0.05). Analysis of immune cells showed LRRC15 -H TNBC had higher infiltration of B cells (4.2% vs 3.5%), M1 macrophages (4.3% vs 2%), M2 macrophages (4% vs 2.5%), Tregs (1.9% vs 1.1%), neutrophils (4.9% vs 3.9%), CD8 + T cells (0.4% vs 0.1%), but lower dendritic cells (2.5% vs 3%), all q < 0.05. LRRC15 -H tumors had greater abundance of CAFs (575.6 vs 93.78, 6.14 fold change (FC)) and endothelial cells (7.3 vs 3.7, 1.97 FC), all q < 0.05. LRRC15 -H had higher T-cell inflamed score (71.5 vs -77) and IFNg score (-0.14 vs -1.72), all q < 0.05. LRRC15 -H tumors had higher expression of immune checkpoint genes ( CD274, PDCD1, PDCD1LG2, CTLA4, LAG3, HAVCR2, FOXP3, IDO1, TNFSF14, TIGIT, BTLA, CEACAM1, CD47, CD80, CD86, CD160, CD274 ; FC 1.2-2.5, q < 0.05). LRRC15 -H was associated with better OS (mOS: 24.7 vs 13.6 months; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53-0.7, p < 0.001). Post-pembrolizumab survival was longer for LRRC15 -H patients (mOS: 27.2 vs 19.4 months; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.89, p = 0.01). Conclusions: LRRC15 -H TNBC exhibited better outcomes with pembrolizumab, likely due to higher immune cell fractions and increased CAFs. These findings highlight TNBC heterogeneity and position LRRC15 as a potential biomarker for tumor stratification, a possible adverse prognostic biomarker and a positive predictive biomarker. Ongoing phase I trials targeting LRRC15 show promise. Combining LRRC15 -targeted therapies with immunotherapy may improve TNBC outcomes, warranting further validation in breast cancer models.

Abstract Background: Breast cancer (BC) in males represents a rare clinical entity, accounting about 1% of all breast malignancies diagnosed every year. Emerging evidence suggest that a gender medicine approach is critical in the research and treatment of cancer, based on the possibility that sex hormones, molecular differences, immune system, and other factors might play a crucial role in disease management. Here, we characterized molecular and immune differences between male BC (MaBC) and female BC (FeBC) across BC subtypes. Methods: 10,728 BC samples (male, n=137; female, n=10591) were analysed by next-generation sequencing (592, NextSeq; WES, NovaSeq), Whole Transcriptome Sequencing (WTS; NovaSeq) (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) totaled somatic mutations per tumor (high ≥10 mt/MB). Microsatellite-instability (MSI) was tested by IHC and NGS. Immune cell fractions were calculated by deconvolution of WTS: Quantiseq. Real world treatment-associated survival was extracted from insurance claims and calculated from sample collection to last contact using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Statistical significance was determined using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test with p-values adjusted for multiple comparisons (q &lt; 0.05). Results: MaBC represented higher HR+/HER2+ (6.61% vs 4.76%), HR+/HER2- (80.17% vs 60.66%) and lower HR-/HER2+ (1.65% vs 3.5%), TNBC (11.57% vs 31.08%) molecular subtypes compared to FeBC. Compared to HR+/HER2+ FeBC, MaBC had higher frequency of CHEK2, RAD51B, TSC1 mutation (Table 1) and RARα (100% vs 13.61%), DAXX (10% vs 0.16%) copy number alteration (all p &lt; 0.05). HR+/HER2- MaBC had higher frequency of BRCA2, FOXA1, CREBBP, FLCN mutation (Table 1), and FGF3 (21.62% vs 14.31%), MRE11 (1.75% vs 0.23%), MEN1 (1.75% vs 0.13%) copy number alteration, but lower frequency of TP53, CHD1, ESR1 and AKT1 mutation (Table 1) (all p &lt; 0.05). HR-/HER2+ MaBC had higher frequency of BRCA1 (p &lt; 0.05) mutation (Table 1). Male TNBC had higher frequency of CDKN2A, KMT2D, STK11, ASXL1, MYC, NF2, PPM1D, WT1, EPHA2, AMER1, ARHGAP35 mutation (Table 1) and BCL6 (4.35% vs 0.05%) copy number alteration, but lower frequency of TP53 mutation (all p &lt; 0.05) (Table 1). MaBC had higher AR protein expression (82.5% vs 60%) but lower frequency of fusion variant-AR (0.7% vs 3.9%) (all p &lt; 0.05) compared to FeBC. There was no difference in TMB high (7.1% vs 8.4%, p = 0.5) and dMMR/MSI-H (1.8% vs 0.8%, p = 0.1). Analysis of inferred immune cell infiltrates showed that MaBC had increased immune cell infiltration of B cells (5.8% vs 5.3%) and M2 Mφ (4.9% vs 4.3%), but decreased infiltration of DC (2% vs 2.6%) (all p &lt; 0.05). MaBC had increased expression of MHC class II gene HLA-DQB2 (FC: 1.3), but decreased expression of immune-related genes CD274 (FC: 1.2), IDO (FC: 1.4), IL1A (FC: 1.3) and IL12A (FC: 1.5) (all p &lt; 0.05). Correlative analyses with survival will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: These data indicate that MaBC has a differential mutational frequency, copy number alteration, immune gene expression and immune cell infiltration and overall survival compared to their FeBC counterparts. A better understanding of these sex-based differences with additional research may help inform disease outcomes, provide a rationale for tailored therapeutic approaches and design future treatments. Table 1. Mutation frequency in male and female breast cancer Citation Format: Dario Trapani, Sachin Deshmukh, Sharon Wu, Joanne Xiu, Phil Walker, Pooja Advani, Nancy Lin, Giuseppe Curigliano, Stephanie Graff, Chadi Nabhan, George Sledge Jr, Sara Tolaney, Jose Leone. Molecular and immunological landscape of sex-based differences in breast cancer: a distinct disease in men [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS13-09.

Abstract Background: Metaplastic Breast Cancer (MBC) is rare (0.2-5%), aggressive form of BC characterized by chemotherapy resistance and has worse outcomes in comparison to other BC subtypes. Resistance to chemotherapeutic agents is related to defects in intact intrinsic apoptosis pathway and the BCL2 family of proteins are the central regulators of this pathway. Majority of MBC have triple-negative receptor status and have no standard therapeutic approach and validated prognostic markers. Here, we examine the association of BCL2 family pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic genes expression with metaplastic TNBC (MTNBC) patient survival. Methods: 13,036 BC samples (MTNBC, n=102; metaplastic non-TNBC, n=20) were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (592, NextSeq; WES, NovaSeq), Whole Transcriptome Sequencing (WTS; NovaSeq) (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). A total of 10 pro-apoptotic (BAX, BAK1, BID, BAD, BIK, BCL2L11, BMF, HRK, PMAIP1, BBC3) and 6 anti-apoptotic (BCL2, BCL2L1, BCL2L2, MCL1, BCL2A1, BCL2L10) BCL2 family genes were analyzed. MTNBC with PMAIP1-high(H) and -low(L) expression was classified by top and bottom quartile, respectively. Pathway enrichment was determined by GSEA (Broad Inst). Real world overall survival (OS) was extracted from insurance claims and calculated from tissue collection to last contact using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Statistical significance was determined using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test with p-values adjusted for multiple comparisons (q &lt; 0.05). Results: MTNBC had enrichment of apoptosis (NES: 1.4, FDR: 0.05), glycolysis (NES: 1.48, FDR: 0.03), PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling (NES: 1.43, FDR: 0.05), P53 (NES: 1.51, FDR: 0.06), NOTCH signaling (NES: 1.39, FDR: 0.05), TGFβ signaling (NES: 1.41, FDR: 0.05), WNTβ catenin signaling (NES: 1.41, FDR: 0.05) and IL2/STAT5 signaling (NES: 1.33, FDR: 0.09) pathways compared to metaplastic non-TNBC. MTNBC had higher expression of BCL2 pro-apoptotic genes BAX (Fold Change (FC): 1.6), BAK1 (FC: 1.3), BID (FC: 2), BAD (FC: 1.6), BCL2L11 (FC: 2.5) and BBC3 (FC: 1.5), and anti-apoptotic genes BCL2L1 (FC: 1.6) and BCL2L2 (FC: 1.3) (all p &lt; 0.05) compared to metaplastic non-TNBC. Higher PMAIP1 gene expression was associated with worse MTNBC patient survival (mOS: 14.3 month; HR: 0.37; 95% CI 0.19-1.41; p=0.002) (Table 1), but not in metaplastic non-TNBC (mOS: Inf; HR: 1.96; 95% CI 0.64-6.02; p=0.23). PMAIP1-H MTNBC had higher expression of immune checkpoint genes CD274 (FC: 2.8), PDCD1 (FC: 2.2), TIM3 (FC: 1.8), LAG3 (FC: 2.1) and IDO1 (FC: 5.7) (all p &lt; 0.05), compared to PMAIP1-L MTNBC. PMAIP1-H MTNBC had higher frequency of IHC-PD-L1 positivity (68.4% vs 14.3%, p &lt; 0.05). PMAIP1-H MTNBC had higher expression of stem cell related genes CD44 (FC: 1.7), ALDH1A2 (FC: 2.2), ALDH1A3 (FC: 2.6), SOX2 (FC: 5.21) and NANOG (FC: 2.13) (all p &lt; 0.05) compared to PMAIP1-L MTNBC. Conclusion: This is the first comprehensive analysis of expression and prognostic role of BCL2 family proteins in MBC. Our data suggest a strong association of higher expression of PMAIP1 with worse MTNBC patient survival, potentially attributed to higher immune checkpoint, stem cell-related genes expression, and higher frequency of PD-L1 positivity in PMAIP1-H tumors. These findings indicate PMAIP1 as a potential prognostic biomarker candidate in MTNBC but needs further validation in large prospective studies Table 1. Overall survival of metaplastic TNBC patient based on BCL2 family gene expression. Citation Format: Pooja Advani, Sachin Deshmukh, Sharon Wu, Jacob Andring, Joanne Xiu, Alex Farrell, Milan Radovich, George Sledge Jr, Dario Trapani, Evanthia Roussos Torres, Stephanie Graff, Asher Chanan-Khan. Comprehensive Characterization of BCL2 Family Genes in Metaplastic Triple Negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-24-02.