Citations

Clear

9 citation(s) found for "Thomson, Richard".

Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2024 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
Binnicker, Matthew J. , Campbell, Sheldon , Chapin, Kimberle C. , Gonzalez, Mark D. , Harrington, Amanda, Jerris, Robert C. , Kehl, Sue C., Pritt, Bobbi S. , Richter, Sandra S. , Robinson-Dunn, Barbara, Snyder, James W. , Telford, Sam R. , Theel, Elitza S. , Thomson, Richard B., Weinstein, Melvin P., Yao, Joseph D. , Pritt, Bobbi S , Miller, J. Michael , Carroll, Karen C. , Leal, Sixto M. , Patel, Robin

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Infectious Diseases | February 23, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/cid/ciae104 | PMID 38442248 Get It

Abstract The critical nature of the microbiology laboratory in infectious disease diagnosis calls for a close, positive working relationship between the physician and the microbiologists who provide enormous value to the healthcare team. This document, developed by experts in both adult and pediatric laboratory and clinical medicine, provides information on which tests are valuable and in which contexts, and on tests that add little or no value for diagnostic decisions. Sections are divided into anatomic systems, including Bloodstream Infections and Infections of the Cardiovascular System, Central Nervous System Infections, Ocular Infections, Soft Tissue Infections of the Head and Neck, Upper Respiratory Infections, Lower Respiratory Tract Infections, Infections of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Intraabdominal Infections, Bone and Joint Infections, Urinary Tract Infections, Genital Infections, and Skin and Soft Tissue Infections; or into etiologic agent groups, including arboviral Infections, Viral Syndromes, and Blood and Tissue Parasite Infections. Each section contains introductory concepts, a summary of key points, and detailed tables that list suspected agents; the most reliable tests to order; the samples (and volumes) to collect in order of preference; specimen transport devices, procedures, times, and temperatures; and detailed notes on specific issues regarding the test methods, such as when tests are likely to require a specialized laboratory or have prolonged turnaround times. In addition, the pediatric needs of specimen management are also addressed. There is redundancy among the tables and sections, as many agents and assay choices overlap. The document is intended to serve as a reference to guide physicians in choosing tests that will aid them to diagnose infectious diseases in their patients.
A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2018 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Society for Microbiologya
Binnicker, Matthew J. , Campbell, Sheldon , Chapin, Kimberle C. , Gilligan, Peter H., Gonzalez, Mark D. , Jerris, Robert C. , Kehl, Sue C., Patel, Robin , Pritt, Bobbi S. , Richter, Sandra S. , Robinson-Dunn, Barbara, Schwartzman, Joseph D., Snyder, James W. , Telford, Sam R. , Theel, Elitza S. , Thomson, Richard B., Weinstein, Melvin P., Yao, Joseph D. , Patel, Robin , Pritt, Bobbi S , Miller, J. Michael , Carroll, Karen C.

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Infectious Diseases | August 31, 2018 | Volume: 67 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 813-816

10.1093/cid/ciy584 | PMID 30169655 Get It

Abstract The critical nature of the microbiology laboratory in infectious disease diagnosis calls for a close, positive working relationship between the physician/advanced practice provider and the microbiologists who provide enormous value to the healthcare team. This document, developed by experts in laboratory and adult and pediatric clinical medicine, provides information on which tests are valuable and in which contexts, and on tests that add little or no value for diagnostic decisions. This document presents a system-based approach rather than specimen-based approach, and includes bloodstream and cardiovascular system infections, central nervous system infections, ocular infections, soft tissue infections of the head and neck, upper and lower respiratory infections, infections of the gastrointestinal tract, intra-abdominal infections, bone and joint infections, urinary tract infections, genital infections, and other skin and soft tissue infections; or into etiologic agent groups, including arthropod-borne infections, viral syndromes, and blood and tissue parasite infections. Each section contains introductory concepts, a summary of key points, and detailed tables that list suspected agents; the most reliable tests to order; the samples (and volumes) to collect in order of preference; specimen transport devices, procedures, times, and temperatures; and detailed notes on specific issues regarding the test methods, such as when tests are likely to require a specialized laboratory or have prolonged turnaround times. In addition, the pediatric needs of specimen management are also emphasized. There is intentional redundancy among the tables and sections, as many agents and assay choices overlap. The document is intended to serve as a guidance for physicians in choosing tests that will aid them to quickly and accurately diagnose infectious diseases in their patients.
A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2018 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Society for Microbiologya
Binnicker, Matthew J. , Campbell, Sheldon , Chapin, Kimberle C. , Gilligan, Peter H., Gonzalez, Mark D. , Jerris, Robert C. , Kehl, Sue C., Patel, Robin , Pritt, Bobbi S. , Richter, Sandra S. , Robinson-Dunn, Barbara, Schwartzman, Joseph D., Snyder, James W. , Telford, Sam R. , Theel, Elitza S. , Thomson, Richard B., Weinstein, Melvin P., Yao, Joseph D. , Patel, Robin , Pritt, Bobbi S , Miller, J. Michael , Carroll, Karen C.

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Infectious Diseases | April 30, 2018 | Volume: 67 | Issue: 6 | Pages: e1-e94

10.1093/cid/ciy381 | PMID 29955859 Get It

Abstract The critical nature of the microbiology laboratory in infectious disease diagnosis calls for a close, positive working relationship between the physician/advanced practice provider and the microbiologists who provide enormous value to the healthcare team. This document, developed by experts in laboratory and adult and pediatric clinical medicine, provides information on which tests are valuable and in which contexts, and on tests that add little or no value for diagnostic decisions. This document presents a system-based approach rather than specimen-based approach, and includes bloodstream and cardiovascular system infections, central nervous system infections, ocular infections, soft tissue infections of the head and neck, upper and lower respiratory infections, infections of the gastrointestinal tract, intra-abdominal infections, bone and joint infections, urinary tract infections, genital infections, and other skin and soft tissue infections; or into etiologic agent groups, including arthropod-borne infections, viral syndromes, and blood and tissue parasite infections. Each section contains introductory concepts, a summary of key points, and detailed tables that list suspected agents; the most reliable tests to order; the samples (and volumes) to collect in order of preference; specimen transport devices, procedures, times, and temperatures; and detailed notes on specific issues regarding the test methods, such as when tests are likely to require a specialized laboratory or have prolonged turnaround times. In addition, the pediatric needs of specimen management are also emphasized. There is intentional redundancy among the tables and sections, as many agents and assay choices overlap. The document is intended to serve as a guidance for physicians in choosing tests that will aid them to quickly and accurately diagnose infectious diseases in their patients.
Point-Counterpoint: A Nucleic Acid Amplification Test for Streptococcus pyogenes Should Replace Antigen Detection and Culture for Detection of Bacterial Pharyngitis
Pritt, Bobbi S. , Patel, Robin , Kirn, Thomas J., Thomson, Richard B., Patel, Robin , Pritt, Bobbi S

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | July 21, 2016 | Volume: 54 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2413-2419

10.1128/jcm.01472-16 | PMID 27440817 Get It

ABSTRACT Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have frequently been the standard diagnostic approach when specific infectious agents are sought in a clinic specimen. They can be applied for specific agents such as S. pyogenes , or commercial multiplex NAATs for detection of a variety of pathogens in gastrointestinal, bloodstream, and respiratory infections may be used. NAATs are both rapid and sensitive. For many years, S. pyogenes testing algorithms used a rapid and specific group A streptococcal antigen test to screen throat specimens, followed, in some clinical settings, by a throat culture for S. pyogenes to increase the sensitivity of its detection. Now S. pyogenes NAATs are being used with increasing frequency. Given their accuracy, rapidity, and ease of use, should they replace antigen detection and culture for the detection of bacterial pharyngitis? Bobbi Pritt and Robin Patel of the Mayo Clinic, where S. pyogenes NAATs have been used for well over a decade with great success, will explain the advantages of this approach, while Richard (Tom) Thomson and Tom Kirn of the NorthShore University HealthSystem will discuss their concerns about this approach to diagnosing bacterial pharyngitis.
Shared Decision-making in the Emergency Department: Respecting Patient Autonomy When Seconds Count
Grudzen, Corita R. , Thomson, Richard, Carpenter, Christopher R. , Hess, Erik P. , Raja, Ali S , Carpenter, Christopher R

Mayo Clinic

Academic Emergency Medicine | June 25, 2015 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 856-864

10.1111/acem.12703 | PMID 26112797 Get It

Executive Summary: A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2013 Recommendations by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM)a
Baron, Ellen Jo , Weinstein, Melvin P., Richter, Sandra S. , Gilligan, Peter H., Thomson, Richard B., Bourbeau, Paul, Kehl, Sue C., Robinson-Dunn, Barbara, Schwartzman, Joseph D., Chapin, Kimberle, Snyder, James W. , Forbes, Betty A., Patel, Robin , Rosenblatt, Jon E., Pritt, Bobbi S. , Miller, J. Michael , Carroll, Karen C. , Dunne, William Michael , Patel, Robin , Pritt, Bobbi S

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Infectious Diseases | July 23, 2013 | Volume: 57 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 485-488

10.1093/cid/cit441 | PMID 23881727 Get It

Abstract The critical role of the microbiology laboratory in infectious disease diagnosis calls for a close, positive working relationship between the physician and the microbiologists who provide enormous value to the health care team. This document, developed by both laboratory and clinical experts, provides information on which tests are valuable and in which contexts, and on tests that add little or no value for diagnostic decisions. Sections are divided into anatomic systems, including Bloodstream Infections and Infections of the Cardiovascular System, Central Nervous System Infections, Ocular Infections, Soft Tissue Infections of the Head and Neck, Upper Respiratory Infections, Lower Respiratory Tract infections, Infections of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Intraabdominal Infections, Bone and Joint Infections, Urinary Tract Infections, Genital Infections, and Skin and Soft Tissue Infections; or into etiologic agent groups, including Tickborne Infections, Viral Syndromes, and Blood and Tissue Parasite Infections. Each section contains introductory concepts, a summary of key points, and detailed tables that list suspected agents; the most reliable tests to order; the samples (and volumes) to collect in order of preference; specimen transport devices, procedures, times, and temperatures; and detailed notes on specific issues regarding the test methods, such as when tests are likely to require a specialized laboratory or have prolonged turnaround times. There is redundancy among the tables and sections, as many agents and assay choices overlap. The document is intended to serve as a reference to guide physicians in choosing tests that will aid them to diagnose infectious diseases in their patients.
A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2013 Recommendations by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM)a
Baron, Ellen Jo , Weinstein, Melvin P., Richter, Sandra S. , Gilligan, Peter H., Thomson, Richard B., Bourbeau, Paul, Kehl, Sue C., Robinson-Dunn, Barbara, Schwartzman, Joseph D., Chapin, Kimberle, Snyder, James W. , Forbes, Betty A., Patel, Robin , Rosenblatt, Jon E., Pritt, Bobbi S. , Miller, J. Michael , Carroll, Karen C. , Dunne, William Michael , Patel, Robin , Pritt, Bobbi S

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Infectious Diseases | July 11, 2013 | Volume: 57 | Issue: 4 | Pages: e22-e121

10.1093/cid/cit278 | PMID 23845951 Get It

Abstract The critical role of the microbiology laboratory in infectious disease diagnosis calls for a close, positive working relationship between the physician and the microbiologists who provide enormous value to the health care team. This document, developed by both laboratory and clinical experts, provides information on which tests are valuable and in which contexts, and on tests that add little or no value for diagnostic decisions. Sections are divided into anatomic systems, including Bloodstream Infections and Infections of the Cardiovascular System, Central Nervous System Infections, Ocular Infections, Soft Tissue Infections of the Head and Neck, Upper Respiratory Infections, Lower Respiratory Tract infections, Infections of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Intraabdominal Infections, Bone and Joint Infections, Urinary Tract Infections, Genital Infections, and Skin and Soft Tissue Infections; or into etiologic agent groups, including Tickborne Infections, Viral Syndromes, and Blood and Tissue Parasite Infections. Each section contains introductory concepts, a summary of key points, and detailed tables that list suspected agents; the most reliable tests to order; the samples (and volumes) to collect in order of preference; specimen transport devices, procedures, times, and temperatures; and detailed notes on specific issues regarding the test methods, such as when tests are likely to require a specialized laboratory or have prolonged turnaround times. There is redundancy among the tables and sections, as many agents and assay choices overlap. The document is intended to serve as a reference to guide physicians in choosing tests that will aid them to diagnose infectious diseases in their patients.