Citations

Abstract Purpose To report historical patterns of pharmaceutical expenditures, to identify factors that may influence future spending, and to predict growth in drug spending in 2026 in the United States, with a focus on the nonfederal hospital and clinic sectors. Methods Historical patterns were assessed by examining data on drug purchases from manufacturers using the IQVIA National Sales Perspectives database. Factors that may influence drug spending in hospitals and clinics in 2026 were reviewed—including new drug approvals, patent expirations, and potential new policies or legislation. Focused analyses were conducted for biosimilars, cancer drugs, endocrine drugs, generics, specialty drugs, and vaccines. For nonfederal hospitals, clinics, and overall (all sectors), estimates for growth of pharmaceutical expenditures in 2026 were made based on a combination of quantitative analyses and expert opinion. Results In 2025, overall pharmaceutical expenditures in the US grew 12.7% compared to 2024, for a total of $915.2 billion. Utilization (a 9.3% increase) drove this increase, while growth due to new drugs (0.9%) and price increases (1.2%) had a modest impact. Tirzepatide was the new top drug in 2025, followed by semaglutide and apixiban. Drug expenditures were $42.9 billion (a 9.6% increase) and $190.5 billion (a 19.0% increase) in nonfederal hospitals and in clinics, respectively. In clinics, volume drove drug expense growth, contributing with a 13.6% increase, while price and new drugs each contributed with a 2.7% increase. In nonfederal hospitals, expenditure growth was driven by increases in volume (4.6%), new products (3.7%), and prices (1.5%). Several new drugs that will influence spending are expected to be approved in 2026. Specialty, endocrine, and cancer drugs will continue to drive expenditures. Conclusion For 2026, we expect overall prescription drug spending to rise by 10.0% to 12.0%, whereas in clinics and hospitals we anticipate increases of 14.0%-16.0% and 4.0%-6.0%, respectively, compared to 2025. These national estimates of future pharmaceutical expenditure growth may not be representative of any health system because of the myriad of local factors that influence actual spending

ABSTRACT Background ASP‐1929 photoimmunotherapy—cetuximab conjugated to IRDye 700DX and red light (690 nm) for localized drug activation—results in rapid, selective cell killing. Methods This phase Ib/II open‐label study evaluated ASP‐1929 photoimmunotherapy plus pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC (≥ 1 accessible lesion, PD‐L1 combined positive score ≥ 1, ineligible for standard locoregional therapy). Primary objectives were safety/tolerability and objective response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS). Results Eighteen patients (median age 63 years, 74% male) comprised the photoimmunotherapy‐evaluable population. The confirmed ORR was 27.8% (95% CI 9.7–53.5); four of five responders had complete responses (95% CI, 6.4–47.6). Median OS was 25.6 months (95% CI, 14.6–not evaluable); median PFS was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.4–14.6). The most common serious adverse reactions were dysphagia and tongue edema (each n = 2; 10.5%). Conclusions ASP‐1929 photoimmunotherapy plus pembrolizumab was generally tolerable, with promising efficacy in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC.

Abstract Purpose To report historical patterns of pharmaceutical expenditures, to identify factors that may influence future spending, and to predict growth in drug spending in 2025 in the United States, with a focus on the nonfederal hospital and clinic sectors. Methods Historical patterns were assessed by examining data on drug purchases from manufacturers using the IQVIA National Sales Perspectives database. Factors that may influence drug spending in hospitals and clinics in 2025 were reviewed—including new drug approvals, patent expirations, and potential new policies or legislation. Focused analyses were conducted for biosimilars, cancer drugs, endocrine drugs, generics, specialty drugs and vaccines. For nonfederal hospitals, clinics, and overall (all sectors), estimates of growth of pharmaceutical expenditures in 2024 were made based on a combination of quantitative analyses and expert opinion. Results In 2024, overall pharmaceutical expenditures in the US grew 10.2% compared to 2023, for a total of $805.9 billion. Utilization (a 7.9% increase) and new drugs (a 2.5% increase) drove this increase, while prices remained flat (a 0.2% decrease). Semaglutide was the top drug in 2024, followed by tirzepatide and adalimumab. Drug expenditures were $39.0 billion (a 4.9% increase) and $158.2 billion (a 14.4% increase) in nonfederal hospitals and clinics, respectively. In clinics, increased utilization drove growth, with a small contribution from new products, while prices remained flat. In nonfederal hospitals, new products, price, and new volume each contributed modestly to growth in spend. Several new drugs that will influence spending are expected to be approved in 2025. Specialty, endocrine, and cancer drugs will continue to drive expenditures. Conclusion For 2025, we expect overall prescription drug spending to rise by 9.0 to 11.0%, whereas in clinics and hospitals we anticipate an 11.0% to 13.0% increase and a 2.0% to 4.0% increase, respectively, compared to 2024. These national estimates of future pharmaceutical expenditure growth may not be representative of any health system because of the myriad of local factors that influence actual spending.

Abstract Context Literature suggests patients with thyroid cancer have unmet informational needs in many aspects of care. Patients often turn to online resources for their health-related information, and generative artificial intelligence programs such as ChatGPT are an emerging and attractive resource for patients. Objective To assess the quality of ChatGPT's responses to thyroid cancer-related questions. Methods Four endocrinologists and 4 endocrine surgeons, all with expertise in thyroid cancer, evaluated the responses to 20 thyroid cancer-related questions. Responses were scored on a 7-point Likert scale in areas of accuracy, completeness, and overall satisfaction. Comments from the evaluators were aggregated and a qualitative analysis was performed. Results Overall, only 57%, 56%, and 52% of the responses “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that ChatGPT's answers were accurate, complete, and satisfactory, respectively. One hundred ninety-eight free-text comments were included in the qualitative analysis. The majority of comments were critical in nature. Several themes emerged, which included overemphasis of diet and iodine intake and its role in thyroid cancer, and incomplete or inaccurate information on risks of both thyroid surgery and radioactive iodine therapy. Conclusion Our study suggests that ChatGPT is not accurate or reliable enough at this time for unsupervised use as a patient information tool for thyroid cancer.

Background: C10603/RATFIY was the first AML trial to show the benefit of adding a targeted agent to intensive chemotherapy for a specific genetically determined subset (Stone R et al, NEJM 2017). The addition of the multi-kinase inhibitor midostaurin (M) to chemotherapy in previously untreated adults with FLT3-mutant AML resulted in superior event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to placebo (P) and led to the approval of this agent in combination therapy. Subsequently, additional targeted drugs including gilteritinib for relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutant AML and quizartinib plus chemotherapy in untreated adults with AML with FLT3-ITD disease have gained approval. Long-term follow-up after reporting of the primary endpoint, especially if met, is important in oncology. Objective: We report the EFS and OS data from C10603 using 10 years of follow up to determine the persistence of a midostaurin benefit and to assess the nature of late relapses or toxicity. Methods: C10603 enrolled 717 pts (360 on the M and 357 on the P arm; median age 47.8 years (range 18-61), 398 women (55.5%) of whom 51.7% were randomized to M and 59.4% to P (p=0.04), and 89% white) from 2011-2015 with previously untreated AML who had either a FLT3-TKD or ITD mutation with allelic ratio of >0.05 to receive daunorubicin/cytarabine (3+7) induction (one reinduction permitted) followed by up to 4 consolidation cycles with cytarabine 3 g/m2 every 12h on days 1, 3 and 5. M (50 mg bid) or P was given orally on days 8-22 of each chemotherapy cycle as well as daily during one year of single-agent maintenance. Allogeneic transplantation (alloHCT) was employed at investigator's discretion; study drug was not continued post-HCT. Pts stayed on their randomized arm and were not re-randomized prior to maintenance. Pts were followed for relapse and survival after the end of protocol therapy, regardless of subsequent therapy, for 10 years. Log-rank tests, Kaplan-Meier methods, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the treatment effect in EFS and OS, as well as the alloHCT effect. All p values are two-sided. Results: We have completed the 10-year FU on this trial and data collection has concluded. The median EFS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.5-11.4) on the M arm compared with 3.0 months for P (95% CI, 1.9-6.0) with a HR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.94, p=0.0067). Among the 420 CR pts who achieved complete remission (CR) by the protocol specified time of 60 days, 253 have had an event (death in 69 and relapse in 184); these events were relatively equal on each arm. OS, the co-primary endpoint, remained marginally superior for those randomized to M compared to P; the 10-year OS estimate was 43.7% (95% CI, 38.7-49.3%) vs 38.6% (95% CI, 33.6-44.4%) (p= 0.0485). The hazard ratios for OS favored randomization to M in each key biological subgroup (FLT3-ITD low or high allelic ratio or FLT3-TKD), but smaller subsets precluded statistical significance. There was a 10-year OS benefit in favor of M in men (p=0.005), but not women (p=0.9). A total of 414 transplants were performed: only 5 in the latter half of the follow-up period. Transplantation in CR1 was highly beneficial overall (10-year OS, 56% vs 35.8% without transplantation, p=0.001). Among those transplanted in CR1, randomization to M was marginally better than P (61.5% vs 49%, p=.064). After censoring for alloHCT in CR1, there was an OS trend in favor of M (51.8% v 48.0%, p=0.102). In CR1 patients who were randomized to maintenance therapy, M reduced the cumulative incidence of relapse in ELN 2017 favorable and intermediate risk pts, but not in those with adverse risk disease (HR 0.71, 0.47, and 1.01, respectively); maintenance M had no effect on OS. Only 3 pts relapsed after 5 years (all randomized to M). 25 pts randomized to M vs 13 P pts died after 5 years of follow-up. 5 pts on each arm died of a new primary cancer whereas 17 M and 5 P pts were coded as having died from treatment-related causes. None of the 3 pts who relapsed after 4 years had spliceosome mutations at diagnosis; whereas 18% (21/117) patients pts who had relapsed earlier had spliceosome mutations at diagnosis (p=0.419). Conclusions: The EFS benefit of randomization to midostaurin vs placebo when added to chemotherapy was maintained over time, although the benefit for OS was diminished, likely due in part to aging. Patient and disease factors differed between early vs late relapses, which could suggest the use of alternative therapies during distinct therapeutic stages.

Introduction: ELA026 is a first-in-class human monoclonal antibody directed against signal regulatory protein (SIRP)α/β1/γ and is under clinical investigation in secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH). sHLH is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory condition caused by failure to terminate the activation and proliferation of natural killer (NK), T cells and macrophages after an initial immune response. There are no approved therapies for sHLH. With a mortality rate of approximately 50% at 2 months (Lionel et al. 2023), malignancy-associated HLH (mHLH) is the deadliest subtype of sHLH. Cytotoxic, multi-agent chemotherapy (including etoposide) does not address the poor prognosis associated with mHLH (Xie et al. 2013). Directly targeting the pathogenic SIRP(+) myeloid cells and T lymphocytes represents a novel approach to resolving this severe hyperinflammatory condition. Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, Phase 1b global multicenter study (NCT05416307) evaluating the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ELA026 in adult and pediatric patients with newly diagnosed and previously treated sHLH. The study is expanding enrollment to evaluate a fixed-dose regimen consisting of a priming phase of 0.1 mg/kg Day 1 and 0.3 mg/kg Days 2-4, followed by a maintenance phase of 0.5 mg/kg twice weekly beginning on Day 8. ELA026 is administered intravenously, with the option to transition to subcutaneous administration upon hospital discharge. The treatment period is 12 weeks with the option to extend in patients deriving ongoing clinical benefits. Enrollment in this cohort is restricted to frontline settings based on the experience that relapsed/refractory sHLH patients exhibited poor survival even with HLH disease control and died from complications related to severe baseline comorbidities. Response is evaluated using a modified HLH-2004 criteria (Locatelli et al. 2020) and survival is calculated from the time of HLH diagnosis. All patients receive dexamethasone as background therapy and premedication initially. Patients with mHLH may also receive cancer-directed therapies concurrently. Primary pharmacodynamic (PD) effects (monocyte and lymphocyte reduction) and secondary PD effects (C-reactive protein [CRP], ferritin, and sCD25 reduction) were best evaluated and attributed to ELA026 during windows of treatment without concurrent chemotherapy effects. Results: As of July 15, 2024, 12 treatment-naïve mHLH patients have enrolled in all cohorts of the study, with a median age of 47 years (range 21-78). The following malignancies were represented: 7 T-cell lymphoma, 2 DLBCL, 1 AML, 1 Hodgkin lymphoma, and 1 T-cell ALL. In this group, response rate was 100% with 2 mCR and 9 PR by Week 4 and survival was 88% at 2 months (7/8; 4 patients are alive and have not reached 2 months on study). Median survival has not been reached; median follow-up is 2.3 months (range 0.1-15.9 months). In terms of PD effects, monocyte and lymphocyte reduction generally occurred following the first priming dose and ferritin and CRP were reduced by an average of 40% and 50% by Day 6, respectively, for patients with windows of ELA026 treatment without concurrent chemotherapy effects. Study-wide (all patients dosed), treatment-related infusion reactions (~20%) and cytopenias (~30%) were generally manageable with supportive care and dosing modifications. One serious adverse event, a grade 4 infusion reaction, was assessed as related in a relapsed/refractory mHLH patient with acute liver failure and poor hemodynamic reserve. Infection risks are expected for this patient population, which were mitigated with growth factor support and antimicrobial prophylaxis. No deaths were related to study drug. Updated study results will be provided at the 2024 ASH meeting in San Diego. Conclusion: Data suggest ELA026 is well-tolerated to date in sHLH patients and results in a 100% response rate and improved 2-month survival in treatment-naïve mHLH patients. The study is enrolling in an expanded cohort to further assess efficacy in this patient population.

6026 Background: We examined a large patient dataset based on E1305, a completed phase III randomized trial of platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (Argiris et al. JCO 2019), to evaluate prognostic factors in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (RM SCCHN) and expand on our previous observations in cooperative group trials (Argiris et al. Cancer 2004). Methods: All 403 patients enrolled in E1305 were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was the outcome of interest. Clinical and tumor characteristics were examined using Cox proportional hazards models. Variables which were significant in the univariate setting at a level of ≤ 0.10 were included in a multivariable model, and backwards selection was performed (threshold of p ≤ 0.05). The final multivariable model was then applied to the two treatment arms, separately. Variables for which the hazards ratio (HR) within an arm was more than 10% different than that for the whole cohort, were removed from the final cohort model. Results: The median OS in the whole study cohort was 11.8 months. A prognostic score model for OS was built, using the 4 independent prognostic factors identified in the multivariable model: ECOG performance status (1 vs 0), prior radiation, primary region (non-oropharynx vs oropharynx), and metastatic disease bone or liver (vs other sites/no metastases). Prognostic score was dichotomized (0-2 and > 2). Patients with 0-2 risk factors (n = 249) had a median OS of 15.2 months (90% CI: 13.8, 18.1), while patients with > 2 risk factors (n = 154) had a median OS of 7.6 months (90% CI: 6.5, 9.3); HR of 2.14 (95% CI: 1.73, 2.66), p < 0.0001. Compared to our previous 5-factor model from analysis of older trials in a similar setting, the variable “bone/liver metastasis” is new, but “tumor cell differentiation” and “weight loss” were not significant and not included in the new model for OS. Conclusions: The new proposed model includes 4 prognostic factors for OS (performance status, primary site, prior radiation, presence of bone/liver metastasis) in the first-line treatment of RM SCCHN.