Citations

Background Recurrent pericarditis may be mediated through inappropriate activation of the NACHT, leucine‐rich repeat, and pyrin domain‐containing protein 3 inflammasome. Pharmaceutically manufactured cannabidiol is an oral formulation that inhibits NACHT, leucine‐rich repeat, and pyrin domain‐containing protein 3 inflammasome activation and development of pericarditis in a preclinical model. Methods This Phase 2, open‐label, multicenter trial included adult patients with symptomatic recurrent pericarditis: pericarditis chest pain ≥4 on an 11‐point numerical rating scale with an elevated C‐reactive protein (≥1 mg/dL) or at least mild pericardial inflammation on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. At enrollment, patients were on stable doses of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, colchicine, and/or corticosteroids. Cannabidiol was administered during an 8‐week treatment period and an optional 18‐week extension period when background therapy was tapered and discontinued. The primary efficacy end point was change in patient‐reported pericarditis pain. Secondary end points included normalization of C‐reactive protein and percentage of patients with recurrences. Results Among 27 patients (18 women, mean age 53 years), baseline maximal numerical rating scale pain score was 5.8±1.7, and 10 patients had elevated C‐reactive protein. At Week 8, maximal numerical rating scale pain score was 2.1±1.8, and median time to numerical rating scale score ≤2 was 5 days. Among the 10 patients with baseline C‐reactive protein elevation, C‐reactive protein was normal at Week 8 in 8 patients (80%). During the extension period, 17 (71%) of 24 patients remained free of pericarditis recurrence. A serious adverse event leading to cannabidiol discontinuation occurred in 1 patient. Conclusions In symptomatic patients with recurrent pericarditis, pharmaceutically manufactured cannabidiol appears safe and associated with reductions in pericarditis pain and systemic inflammation. Registration URL: clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT05494788.

9030 Background: AI use is ubiquitous among HOT and healthcare workers, but with variable base knowledge and comfort level. Its indiscriminate use may be problematic. To address this educational gap, we developed a WS for HOT to assess their use of AI and educate them on how to employ it in MedEd and patient-centered CP based on LSP. Methods: A faculty member developed a WS on how to use AI in MedEd and CP based on LSP of analogy, contrasting cases, elaboration, generation, and question driven learning. The WS was for HOT, but faculty could join. It had 3 sections: introduction to basic concepts of AI; principles of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and protected health information; AI in MedEd; and AI in CP. Sections had real use case examples of AI, for participants to interact, ask questions, and share their personal use cases. HOT were invited to compare and generate examples during the WS, based on their educational and clinical experience and needs. Participants’ AI use and self-perceived and objective knowledge about it were assessed in a pre activity survey, a post WS survey, and a post 8 week survey to evaluate long term learning. Results: A 2 hour WS with 9 HOT and 2 faculty was completed successfully. 10 participants completed the pre WS survey, and 11 completed the post WS and the post 8 week surveys. 100% of them used generative AI tools before the WS, while 10% had prior training in AI. 90% used AI in personal life and MedEd, 70% used it in CP, and 30% in academic research. Table 1 shows participants’ self-assessed knowledge of AI, comfort level in using AI for MedEd and CP, self-assessed preparedness to implement AI in MedEd and CP, and objective knowledge. 8 weeks post WS, 91% of participants reported increased AI use in CP, leading anywhere from slight to significant decreases in time spent on documentation tasks for 91% of them. In MedEd, 73% reported increased AI use, and 82% described slight to significant improvement in the quality of time dedicated to it. 82% described the WS as extremely relevant to their daily responsibilities, and 91% reported confidence navigating ethical and privacy risks of AI in HemOnc. All participants were interested in having a similar WS in the future. Conclusions: An LSP based WS about AI increased the self-perceived and objective knowledge of HOT about using this tool in MedEd and CP. It also increased HOT comfort level, preparedness, and efficiency using AI. With the ubiquitous use of AI by HOT, ongoing education about it focused on supporting high-quality patient care should be a part of fellowship curriculum. Pre WS % Post WS % Post 8 week % Moderately/Very knowledgeable about AI 50 91 100 Comfortable using AI in MedEd 60 82 82 Prepared to implement AI in MedEd 30 91 73 Comfortable using AI in CP 40 73 82 Prepared to implement AI in CP 0 91 73 Correct answers on objective assessment 53 68 71

Abstract Introduction Cannabidiol has been shown to exert significant anti-inflammatory effects and has demonstrated efficacy in murine models of autoimmune myocarditis, pericarditis, and heart failure. The ARCHER Study assessed whether a pharmaceutically produced cannabidiol formulation showed beneficial effects on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) endpoints known to predict prognosis in this patient population. Methods In a multicentre international double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2 study, we randomly assigned 109 patients within 10 days of CMR confirmed diagnosis of acute myocarditis to 12 weeks of pharmaceutically produced oral cannabidiol (active) or placebo. Dose was titrated up to 10 mg/kg of body weight twice daily. Primary endpoints were the difference in extracellular volume (ECV) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) measured by CMR at week 12. Other CMR endpoints included left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), LV mass, intracellular volume (ICV), LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (LVEDV, LVESV), and left-atrial end-systolic volume (LAESV). Results All randomized patients (56 active/53 placebo) completed the study with no loss to follow-up. Study drug appeared safe and well tolerated. Baseline mean ECV 38.9 ± 10.9 ml, GLS −15.3 ± 3.6%, and LVEF 60.6 ± 9.9% were consistent with mild to moderate myocarditis and predominantly intact LV function. Week 12 mean ECV was 33.6 ml in the active group and 37.3 ml in the placebo group, a difference of −3.7 ml, confidence interval (CI): −7.4 to 0.1; P = .0538; GLS was −16.0% in the active group and −15.9% in the placebo group, difference of −0.1, CI: −1.2 to 1.1; P = .90. Left ventricular mass was significantly reduced in the active group at 121.1 g compared to placebo 130.3 g, a difference of −9.2, CI: −16.4 to −2.1; P = .0117. In terms of remodelling, LAESV was significantly reduced in the active group (−8.1 ml; P = .0376) while the reduction in LVEDV failed to reach significance (−7.4 ml; P = .098). Conclusion In mild-to-moderate acute myocarditis, treatment with pharmaceutically manufactured cannabidiol was not associated with a statistically significant change in myocardial ECV or GLS, although a trend towards reduction in ECV was observed. In addition, improvement in other potential markers of myocardial recovery, including a significant reduction in LV mass, was seen in the active treatment group. Further investigation of the therapeutic potential of this therapy in inflammatory cardiac conditions is warranted.

Background: Recurrent pericarditis results from inflammasome activation and is associated with significant morbidity. Cannabidiol has been shown to block numerous inflammasome signaling pathways, including reducing transcription of pro-IL-1β and NLRP3, and inhibiting secretion of IL-1β and IL-6. Aim: To assess the impact of oral pharmaceutically manufactured (P-)cannabidiol in recurrent pericarditis patients (pts). Methods: Adult pts (≥18 years) with symptomatic, recurrent pericarditis (≥2 recurrences) were eligible for this open-label, multicenter study. Eligible pts had pericarditis chest pain with a numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score ≥4 within 7 days prior to enrollment, together with either elevated (≥1.0 mg/dL) C-reactive protein (CRP) within the prior 7 days or prior pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac imaging. Pts had to be on chronic treatment with NSAIDs, colchicine or corticosteroids (any combination) with stable baseline (BL) doses. Oral P-cannabidiol was uptitrated to 10 mg/kg twice daily (BID), or maximum tolerated dose. The primary efficacy endpoint was improvement in NRS pain score at week 8 (WK8). A secondary efficacy endpoint among pts with elevated BL CRP was the percentage of pts with CRP normalization (≤0.5 mg/dL) at WK8. Results: 27 pts, mean age of 53 years (range 24-77), 18 of female sex, with a median of 3 prior pericarditis episodes were enrolled. CRP was ≥1.0 mg/dL in 10 pts (37%) at BL. Prior evidence of LGE was present in 21 pts (78%). At BL, 41% of pts were receiving corticosteroid therapy. The highest tolerated study medication dose was BID 10 mg/kg in 20 pts (74.1%), 7.5 mg/kg in 4 pts (14.8%), and 5 mg/kg in 3 pts (11.1%). All 27 pts (100%) completed the WK8 visit. Mean NRS score decreased by 3.7, from 5.8 at BL to 2.1 at WK8. In those with CRP elevation at BL, CRP normalized in 8 pts (80%) by WK8, with mean CRP decreasing from 5.71 to 0.31 mg/dL. Study medication was discontinued due to AEs in 2 pts (7.4%). 24 pts (89%) tolerated P-cannabidiol with a treatment response and proceeded into the 18-week extension period (EP) where background therapy is weaned. Conclusions: Among pts with symptomatic pericarditis recurrence, oral administration of P-cannabidiol led to a clinically relevant reduction in pericarditis chest pain (measured by NRS score) and in CRP. P-cannabidiol was shown to be safe and generally well tolerated, with the majority of pts reaching the target dose and continuing into the study EP.