Citations

Abstract Introduction: The relentless surge of prostate cancer rates is rapidly alarming public health officials, leaving a trail of shattered hopes among Black men in the United States. This toll reduces mortality for this population, the urgent need for effective solutions becomes more apparent. Survivorship care plans (SCPs) emerge as a beacon of hope, holding the potential to transform the provision of care. Within this tool lies the encapsulation of vital cancer-related information, passed from the oncology team to the resilient survivor and their primary care physician. However, despite the unwavering support of national governing bodies, a disheartening reality persists for Black male survivors, who never access these life-saving plans. The study purpose was to identify receipt of SCPs and the preferred communication delivery of health information among Black prostate cancer survivors. Methods: Utilizing a grounded theory approach, our study delved into the experiences of a convenience sample of seven Black male prostate cancer survivors. In-person and telephone-based semi-structured interviews we sought to unravel unique narratives. The research inquiries used open-ended questions (1) knowledge, awareness, and understanding of SCPs; (2) interactions with medical professionals; and (3) preferred methods of communication of healthcare information. Employing a line-by-line descriptive force coding method, we extracted pertinent statements by open and axial coding to generate specific codes to encapsulate information collected from an underserved population. Results: Thorough analysis revealed several distinct themes pertaining to survivorship care plans and preferred communication styles. The relevant findings were a lack of SCPs knowledge, an absence of post-treatment care, the profound influence of faith and family support, and the value of group settings. Despite receiving education on treatment, survivors expressed a sense of being left adrift, as if their medical professional team had failed to provide them with a clear roadmap for their survivorship journey. In the absence of proper guidance, survivors resorted to considering pre-treatment risk assessments as a makeshift substitute for a comprehensive survivorship care plan. Conclusion: The impact of our study’s findings resonates deeply, revealing a startling reality: Black male survivors in our sample possessed a distressing lack of knowledge about the post-treatment phase of survivorship. Instead, they relied on the support of their spouses or fellow survivors with whom they connected during treatment sessions. The removal of government mandates aimed at promoting SCPs likely contributes toward a disheartening knowledge disparities among many Black men, leaving them without clear guidance regarding the crucial phase of aftercare. Armed with this data, we have the opportunity to drive change and enhance the development of culturally tailored, interactive care plans specifically designed to support Black male survivors after they conquer prostate cancer treatment. Citation Format: Dottington Fullwood, Charles Waldon, Carol Thomas, Mary Ellen Young, Shannon Pressey, Folakemi T. Odedina, Brandon Snipe, Isela Villasenor. Unsilenced strength: Survivorship perspectives from Black prostate cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B013.

Purpose: To investigate risk factors for recurrent or new tumor in patients with conjunctival melanoma. Methods: Retrospective review of patients with conjunctival melanoma managed on the Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital from 1974 to 2019. Results: There were 540 patients with mean follow-up of 57.6 months, of whom 176 (33%) had recurrent or new tumor formation. Risk factors for recurrent or new tumor on univariate analysis included presentation at older age (OR: 1.02 [1.01–1.03] per 1-year increase in age, p = 0.002), history of prior conjunctival surgery (OR: 1.62 [1.05–2.49], p = 0.03), worse visual acuity at presentation (OR: 1.76 [1.04–2.98] per 1 log-unit increase, p = 0.04), more advanced AJCC clinical T-subcategory (OR: 1.08 [1.02–1.14] per 1 subcategory increase, p = 0.01), tumor primary location in tarsal conjunctiva (OR: 1.80 [1.09–2.98], p = 0.02), and secondary tumor involvement of the fornix (OR: 1.68 [1.06–2.65], p = 0.03), and eyelid (OR: 1.92 [1.07–3.43], p = 0.03). Risk factors on multivariate analysis using all demographics, clinical features, and tumor location included presentation at older age (OR: 1.02 [1.00–1.03], p = 0.01), history of prior conjunctival surgery (OR: 1.84 [1.16–2.94], p = 0.01), and more advanced AJCC clinical T-subcategory (OR: 1.07 [1.01–1.13] per one subcategory increase, p = 0.03). Conclusion: On multivariate analysis, the strongest predictors of recurrent or new tumor formation following treatment of conjunctival melanoma included older age, history of prior conjunctival surgery, and advanced AJCC T-subcategory. These results suggest that earlier detection and the first surgery in conjunctival melanoma management are critical for prevention of recurrent or new tumor, and we recommend prompt referral to an experienced surgeon.

AbstractImportanceThe impact of tumour thickness on radiation complications following plaque radiotherapy for uveal melanoma in the anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) era remains unknown.BackgroundTo evaluate treatment outcomes following plaque radiotherapy and prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab for uveal melanoma based on initial tumour thickness.DesignThis was a retrospective, interventional case series.ParticipantsPatients with uveal melanoma were included in this study.MethodsA review of medical records was conducted of patients with uveal melanoma treated with plaque radiotherapy and prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab from 7 July 2000 to 2 November 2018.Main outcomes measuresRadiation‐related outcomes of cystoid macular oedema (CME), radiation maculopathy, papillopathy, retinopathy, iris neovascularization (NVI) and neovascular glaucoma (NVG) were compared based on tumour thickness (small [<3.0 mm] vs medium [3.1‐8.0 mm] vs large [>8.0 mm]).ResultsOf 1131 eyes, 341 (30%) had small, 633 (56%) medium and 157 (14%) large melanoma. Comparison (small vs medium vs large) at 4 years following radiotherapy revealed large melanoma with greater Kaplan‐Meier estimated risk of CME (37% vs 37% vs 63%, P < .001), earlier onset of CME (33 vs 26 vs 19 months, P < .001) and greater development of NVI (<1% vs 2% vs 13%, P < .001) and NVG (1% vs 2% vs 12%, P < .001). Radiation‐induced maculopathy, papillopathy and retinopathy were not associated with tumour thickness.Conclusions and relevanceCompared with small and medium uveal melanoma, large uveal melanoma demonstrated greater 48‐month risk for CME, shorter time to CME onset and greater development of NVI and NVG following plaque radiotherapy and prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab.

Purpose: To describe the outcome of ultra-low-dose (boom-boom) radiotherapy for choroidal lymphoma. Methods: Retrospective series of three consecutive patients with biopsy-proven choroidal lymphoma treated with ultra-low-dose radiotherapy. Results: The three patients (two male, one female) of mean age 70 years (range, 64–74 years) demonstrated presenting visual acuity in the affected eye between 20/40 and 20/50. The choroidal lymphoma was unilateral in all cases and presented with multifocal yellow patchy choroidal infiltration, located in all four quadrants and measuring mean 2.9 mm (range, 1.9–4.0 mm) in thickness by ultrasonography. Anterior epibulbar extension of 5 mm diameter was noted in one case. By enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography, the choroidal infiltration demonstrated classic undulating appearance (n = 3), with subretinal fluid (n = 2) and intraretinal edema (n = 1). There was no systemic lymphoma in any case. Biopsy was performed in all three cases and was diagnostic (n = 1) or suggestive (n = 2) of B-cell lymphoma. Management involved ultra-low-dose radiotherapy (4 Gy delivered in two fractions, “boom-boom”). On follow-up (mean = 14 months, range = 6–24 months), complete tumor regression on ophthalmoscopy was documented in all three cases, with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography and ultrasonography demonstrating evidence of lymphoma resolution and visual acuity improvement to 20/25–20/40. There were no radiation complications. Conclusion: In this small case series, ultra-low-dose (boom-boom) radiotherapy was effective for choroidal lymphoma with favorable response and minimal side effects.

The risk of viral infections and reactivation occurring in the setting of pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a concern in the pediatric patient, especially with the use of Alemtuzumab (Campath) as a conditioning agent. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of Epstein-Barr virus posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (EBV-PTLD), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and adenovirus among pediatric recipients of alemtuzumab at our institution. We found that EBV-PTLD occurred in 2.1% of transplants (1 matched unrelated donor [MUD] recipient), CMV reactivation occurred in 12.5% of transplants (4 MUD and 2 matched related donor [MRD] recipients) with disseminated CMV in 2.1% of cases (1 MRD recipient), and adenovirus infection occurred in 8.3% of the total transplants (2 MUD and 2 MRD recipients). Alemtuzumab continues to be used as a method of graft-versus-host disease and graft failure prevention among pediatric recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and seems to be safer than previously reported. At our institution, alemtuzumab has not increased the risk for EBV-PTLD, CMV infection, or adenovirus.

High-dose methotrexate has been a treatment for osteosarcoma; however, its nephrotoxic effects are considerable. Carboxypeptidase-G2 (glucarpidase) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2012 for treatment of toxic methotrexate levels. We report our experience using glucarpidase under compassionate use before Food and Drug Administration approval in 2 patients who had delayed methotrexate clearance and prolonged kidney injury despite glucarpidase administration. Our results show that patients with methotrexate toxicity may require repeated doses of glucarpidase in addition to supportive measures, such as dialysis.