Citations

Clear

63 citation(s) found for "Teo, KS".

Overall Survival Among Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With External Beam Radiation Therapy: Individual Patient Data Outcomes From a Multinational Cohort
Yanagihara, Ted K. , Dawson, Laura A., Yu, Jeong Il, Lawrence, Theodore S. , Kim, T S, Yan, Michael, Iwata, Hiromitsu , Nabavizadeh, Nima , Apisarnthanarax, Smith , Dunne, Emma M., Lock, Michael , Chuong, Michael D., Chiang, Chi Leung, Katoh, Norio , Sioshansi, Shirin, Numata, Kazushi, Liu, Howard , Wakatsuki, Masaru , Chen, YiXing, Pollom, Erqi L., Gkika, Eleni , Dutta, Debnarayan , Hajj, Carla , Hallemeier, Christopher L. , Feldman, Aharon, Romero, Alejandra Méndèz , Tan, Xianming , Tepper, Joel E. , Torres, Ferràn , Bergman, Alanah M., Crane, Christopher, Cuneo, Kyle C., Grindrod, Natalie, Grosu, Anca-Ligia, Far, R. El, Funaoka, Akihiro, Gilbert, Marissa, Itasaka, Satoshi , Lee, Sung Uk , Mases, Joel , Ogino, Hiroyuki , Qu, Vera , Park, Hee Chul, Rahmani, Ramtin, Shing, Lee Ann, Stanescu, Teodor, Thonglert, Kanokphorn , Toom, Wilhelm den , Uchinami, Yusuke , Zeng, Zhaochong, Moon, Andrew M , Yanagihara, Ted K , Lawrence, Theodore S , Kim, Tae Hyun , Iwata, Hiromitsu , Nabavizadeh, Nima , Apisarnthanarax, Smith , Lock, Michael I , Chuong, Michael , Chiang, Chi Leung , Scorsetti, Marta , Katoh, Norio , Liu, Howard Yu-Hao , Iwamoto, Hideki , Pollom, Erqi Liu , Gkika, Eleni , Jabbour, Salma K , Munoz-Schuffenegger, Pablo , Dutta, Debnarayan , Hajj, Carla , Ueno, Masayuki , Hallemeier, Christopher Leigh , Feldman, Aharon M , Méndèz Romero, Alejandra , Tan, Xianming , Tepper, Joel E , Torres, Ferran , Reig, Maria , Dawson, Laura A. , Yu, Jeong Il , Dunne, Emma Maria , Chuong, Michael D. , Numata, Kazushi , Mollà, Meritxell , Crane, Christopher H. , Cuneo, Kyle Clifford , Grindrod, Natalie , Franzese, Ciro , Gilbert, Marissa, Lee, Yoo Young , Lee, Ann‐Shing, Shirono, Tomotake , Stanescu, Teo

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 15, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 1784-1797

10.1200/jco-25-02399 | PMID 42139645 Get It

PURPOSE External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has gained delayed acceptance as a recommended first-line treatment modality for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), given limited evidence that it improves overall survival (OS). We analyzed individual patient data (IPD) from an international cohort to assess OS among patients with HCC treated with EBRT. METHODS We performed a systematic review of publications that assessed EBRT, met prespecified technical standards for HCC, and reported OS (search date December 15, 2022). Corresponding authors were invited to submit IPD for the study. We performed Kaplan-Meier survival analyses to determine OS and restricted mean survival time (RMST) stratified by Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage and treatment status (ie, treatment-naïve and experienced). We performed random effects Cox proportional hazards modeling to assess clinical characteristics associated with OS. RESULTS Data were provided on 4,913 patients treated with EBRT with a median follow-up time of 5.0 years. The median OS was 6.8 years (95% CI, 5.7 to 8.7) for BCLC-0 and 4.6 years (95% CI, 4.1 to 5.1) for BCLC-A. Among treatment-naïve patients, the median OS was not reached (95% CI, 8.6 to not reached) for BCLC-0 and was 5.4 years (95% CI, 4.5 to 6.7) for BCLC-A. In multivariable models, more advanced BCLC stage, higher tumor burden, worse performance status, and Child-Pugh class B or C were associated with a higher risk of mortality. Ablative radiation dose and more recent year of treatment were associated with a reduced risk of death. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this study represents the largest multinational cohort of patients with HCC treated with EBRT. OS outcomes with EBRT for very early- and early-stage HCC appear to be comparable with resection, thermal ablation, and other ablative locoregional therapies. These data support the inclusion of EBRT in the BCLC HCC clinical decision-making process.
Threshold-Based Overlap of Breast Cancer High-Risk Classification Using Family History, Polygenic Risk Scores, and Traditional Risk Models in 180,398 Women
Ho, Peh Joo , Loo, Christine Kim Yan , Lim, Ryan Jak Yang, Goh, Mui Heng, Abubakar, Mustapha , Ahearn, Thomas U. , Andrulis, Irene L. , Antonenkova, Natalia, Aronson, Kristan J. , Augustinsson, Annelie , Behrens, Sabine , Bodelón, Clara , Bogdanova, Natalia , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Brantley, Kristen D. , Brenner, Hermann , Byers, Helen L., Camp, Nicola J. , Cessna, Melissa H., Chang-Claude, Jenny, Choi, Ji-Yeob , Czene, Kamila , Dörk, Thilo , Eliassen, A. Heather , Engel, Christoph , Eriksson, Mikael , Evans, D. Gareth , Fritschi, Lin , Genkinger, Jeanine M. , Geurts-Giele, Willemina R.R. , Glendon, Gord, Hall, Per , Hamann, U. , Ho, Cecilia Y.S., Hooning, Maartje J. , Hoppe, Reiner , Humphreys, Keith , Ito, Hidemi , Jakubowska, Anna , Jernström, Helena , John, Esther M. , Johnson, Nichola , Kang, Daehee , Kim, Sung‐Won , Kitahara, Cari M. , Ko, Yon-Dschun, Kraft, Peter, Kwong, Ava , Lambrechts, Diether, Larsson, Susanna C. , Li, Shuai , Lindblom, Annika , Linet, Martha, Lissowska, Jolanta , Lophatananon, Artitaya , MacInnis, Robert J. , Mannermaa, Arto, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Matsuo, Keitaro , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Taib, Nur Aishah Mohd , Murphy, Rachel A. , Newman, William G. , Obi, Nadia , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., Panayiotidis, Mihalis I. , Park, Sue K. , Park‐Simon, Tjoung‐Won , Patel, Alpa V , Peterlongo, Paolo , Plaseska‐Karanfilska, Dijana , Pylkäs, Katri , Rashid, Muhammad Usman , Rodríguez, Juan , Sandler, Dale P. , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Scott, Christopher G. , Shahi, Shamim , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Shulman, Katerina, Simard, Jacques , Southey, Melissa C., Stone, Jennifer , Taylor, Jack A. , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Teras, Lauren R. , Vachon, Celine M., Houdt, Maxime Van , Verhoeven, Jelle , Weinberg, Clarice R. , Wolk, Alicja , Yamaji, Taiki , Yip, Cheng Har , Zheng, Wei , Hartman, Mikael , Li, Jingmei , Investigators, on behalf of the ABCTB, Investigators, kConFab, Investigators, MyBrCa, Investigators, SGBCC, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Lambrechts, Diether , Lambrechts, Diether , Hamann, Ute , Hooning, Maartje J. , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Czene, Kamila , Dörk, Thilo , Eliassen, A Heather , Engel, Christoph , Eriksson, Mikael , Evans, D Gareth , Fletcher, Olivia , Fritschi, Lin , Genkinger, Jeanine , Hall, Per N , Ho, Cecilia Y S , Humphreys, Keith , Ito, Hidemi , Jakubowska, Anna , Jernström, Helena , Johnson, Nichola , Kim, Sung-Won , Kitahara, Cari M , Kwong, Ava , Larsson, Susanna C , Li, Shuai , Lindblom, Annika , Lissowska, Jolanta , Lophatananon, Artitaya , Maclnnis, Robert , Matsuo, Keitaro , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Mohd Taib, Nur Aishah , Murphy, Rachel A , Newman, William G , Obi, Nadia , Panayiotidis, Mihalis I , Park, Sue K , Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won , Peterlongo, Paolo , Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana , Pylkäs, Katri , Rashid, Muhammad U , Rennert, Gad , Rodriguez, Juan , Sandler, Dale P , Sawyer, Elinor J , Scott, Christopher , Shu, Xiao-Ou , Simard, Jacques , Stone, Jennifer , Taylor, Jack A , Teo, Soo H , Teras, Lauren R , Houdt, Maxime Van , Verhoeven, Jelle , Weinberg, Clarice R , Wolk, Alicja , Zheng, Wei , Hartman, Mikael , Li, Jingmei , Lambrechts, Diether , Behrens, Sabine , John, Esther M , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Lambrechts, Diether , Augustinsson, Annelie , Brenner, Hermann , Camp, Nicola J , Brantley, Kristen D , Lim, Ryan Jak Yang, Byers, Helen, Castelao, Jose E. , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Colonna, Sarah V. , Daly, Mary Beryl , Derouane, Françoise , Fletcher, Olivia , Gago-Domínguez, Manuela , Ho, Weang-Kee , Howell, Anthony , Iwasaki, Motoki , Ko, Yon‐Dschun, Mannermaa, Arto , Manoukian, Siranoush , Margolin, Sara , Milne, Roger L. , Muir, Kenneth , O’Brien, Katie M. , Rennert, Gad , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Southey, Melissa C. , Terry, Mary Beth , Torres, Diana , Investigators, on behalf of the ABCTB, Investigators, kConFab, Investigators, MyBrCa, Investigators, SGBCC

Mayo Clinic

Cancers | November 3, 2025 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 3561

10.3390/cancers17213561 | PMID 41228354 Get It

Background: Breast cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS) and traditional risk models (e.g., the Gail model [Gail]) are known to contribute largely independent information, but it is unclear how the overlap varies by ancestry, age, disease type (invasive breast cancer, DCIS), and risk threshold. Methods: In a retrospective case–control study, we evaluated risk prediction performance in 180,398 women (161,849 of European ancestry; 18,549 of Asian ancestry). Odds ratios (ORs) from logistic regression models and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were estimated. Results: PRS for invasive disease showed a stronger association in younger (<50 years) women (OR = 2.51, AUC = 0.622) than in women ≥ 50 years (OR = 2.06, AUC = 0.653) of European ancestry. PRS performance in Asians was lower (OR range = 1.62–1.64, AUC = 0.551–0.600). Gail performance was modest across groups and poor in younger Asian women (OR = 0.94–0.99, AUC = 0.523–0.533). Age interactions were observed for both PRS (p < 0.001) and Gail (p < 0.001) in Europeans, whereas in Asians, age interaction was observed only for Gail (invasive: p < 0.001; DCIS: p = 0.002). PRS identified more high-risk individuals than Gail in Asian populations, especially ≥50 years, while Gail identified more in Europeans. Overlap between PRS, Gail, and family history was limited at higher thresholds. Calibration analysis, comparing empirical and model-based ROC curves, showed divergence for both PRS and Gail (p < 0.001), which indicates miscalibration. In Europeans, family history and prior biopsies drove Gail discrimination. In younger Asians, age at first live birth was influential. Conclusions: PRS adds value to risk stratification beyond traditional tools, especially in younger women and Asian ancestry populations.
A global real-world study assessing total time to adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism
Ter, Charmaine , Koh, Xuan Han , Tran, Hieu , Araujo‐Castro, Marta , Boillos, Marga González , Gkaniatsa, Eleftheria , Reincke, Martín , Adolf, Christian, Tran, Thang Viet , Nayak, Drishya, Grytaas, Marianne Aardal , Matrozova, Joanna, Sukor, Norlela , Ismail, Farhana, Parasiliti‐Caprino, Mirko , Tsuiki, Mika , Ng, Chee Keng , Katabami, Takuyuki , St‐Jean, Matthieu , Saffari, Seyed Ehsan , Teo, Ada Ee Der , Bancos, Irina , Araujo-Castro, Marta , Gkaniatsa, Eleftheria , Reincke, Martin , Adolf, Christian , Stowasser, Michael , Turcu, Adina F , Sukor, Norlela , Kocjan, Tomaz , Parasiliti-Caprino, Mirko , Baudrand, Rene , Murakami, Masanori , Yang, Jun , Ng, Chrislyn , Katabami, Takuyuki , Naruse, Mitsuhide , St-Jean, Matthieu , Ceccato, Filippo , Saffari, Seyed Ehsan , Puar, Troy H , Bancos, Irina , Bassiony, Mohamed A. A. , Paja, Miguel , Stowasser, Michael , Nayak, Drishya, Grytaas, Marianne Aardal , Turcu, Adina F. , Ismail, Farhana, Kocjan, Tomaž , Baudrand, René , Uslar, Thomas , Murakami, Masanori , Yang, Jun , Ceccato, Filippo

Mayo Clinic

European Journal of Endocrinology | June 26, 2025 | Volume: 193 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 65-75

10.1093/ejendo/lvaf124 | PMID 40570195 Get It

Abstract Background Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a common treatable cause of hypertension. When caused by unilateral adrenal disease, it is potentially curable by adrenalectomy. However, specialized tests and other factors may delay definitive treatment. We assessed the time to adrenalectomy (TTA) for patients worldwide. Methods We conducted an international, multicentre retrospective study involving 39 centres from 15 countries to determine the total time taken from the first presentation to adrenalectomy and the intervals between each stage (screening, confirmatory, subtyping, and adrenalectomy). We included patients with PA who underwent adrenalectomy from January 1, 2018, to October 30, 2022. Post-adrenalectomy outcomes were evaluated using the Primary Aldosteronism Surgery Outcome criteria. We performed multivariable quantile and linear regression to identify characteristics associated with longer TTA. Results We included 861 patients, mean age 49.3 ± 11.1 years, and 44.5% were women. Overall median TTA was 13.5 months, IQR: 6.6-24.5. Median intervals were 0.1 months (screening), 1.0 months (confirmatory), 4.1 months (subtyping), and 4.3 months (adrenalectomy). On multivariable analysis, median TTA was increased by 5.4 months for each additional adrenal vein sampling (AVS) procedure. Other factors associated with longer TTA included adrenalectomy post-COVID-19, younger age, and additional screening tests. Compared with countries with routine AVS, those without AVS had a shorter TTA (6.1 vs 15.1 months, P &lt; .001), but greater likelihood of absent/partial biochemical success post-adrenalectomy (27.4% vs 12.4%, P &lt; .001). Conclusion Primary aldosteronism management is time-consuming worldwide, especially for subtyping tests and adrenalectomy. While omitting AVS reduces overall time, patients are less likely to achieve biochemical cure post-adrenalectomy.
Ultrafast Measurement of Circulating Ceramides in Human Cohorts
Tham, Wai Kin , Teo, Guo Shou, Vasile, Vlad C. , Meeusen, Jeffrey W. , Torta, Federico , Chang, Jing Kai , Teo, Guoshou , Ekroos, Kim , Futerman, Anthony H. , Kuan, Win Sen , Choi, Hyungwon , Wenk, Markus Rene

Mayo Clinic

Analytical Chemistry | June 25, 2025 | Volume: 97 | Issue: 26 | Pages: 13789-13798

10.1021/acs.analchem.5c00058 | PMID 40561519 Get It

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia After Cardiac Arrest and Prevention Strategies: A Narrative Review
Geetha, Harinivaas Shanmugavel , Teo, Yi Xiang , Ravichandran, Sharmitha, Lal, Amos , Lal, Amos

Mayo Clinic

Medicina | January 6, 2025 | Volume: 61 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 78

10.3390/medicina61010078 | PMID 39859060 Get It

Background and Objectives: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) poses a significant threat to the clinical outcomes and hospital stays of mechanically ventilated patients, particularly those recovering from cardiac arrest. Given the already elevated mortality rates in cardiac arrest cases, the addition of VAP further diminishes the chances of survival. Consequently, a paramount focus on VAP prevention becomes imperative. This review endeavors to comprehensively delve into the nuances of VAP, specifically in patients requiring mechanical ventilation in post-cardiac arrest care. The overarching objectives encompass (I) exploring the etiology, risk factors, and pathophysiology of VAP, (II) delving into available diagnostic modalities, and (III) providing insights into the management options and recent treatment guidelines. Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases for articles about VAP and Cardiac arrest. We used the MeSH terms “VAP”, “Cardiac arrest”, “postcardiac arrest syndrome”, and “postcardiac arrest syndrome”. The clinical presentation, diagnostic, and management strategies of VAP were summarized, and all authors reviewed the selection and decided which studies to include. Key Content and Findings: The incidence and mortality rates of VAP exhibit significant variability, yet a recurring pattern emerges, marked by prolonged hospitalization and exacerbated clinical outcomes. This pattern is attributed to the elevated incidence of drug-resistant infections and the delayed initiation of antimicrobial treatment. This review focuses on VAP, aiming to offer valuable insights into the efficient identification and management of this fatal complication in post-cardiac arrest patients. Conclusion: The prognosis for survival after cardiac arrest is already challenging, and the outlook becomes even more daunting when complicated by VAP. The timely diagnosis of VAP and initiation of antibiotics pose considerable challenges, primarily due to the invasive nature of obtaining high-quality samples and the time required for speciation and identification of antimicrobial sensitivity. The controversy surrounding prophylactic antibiotics persists, but promising new strategies have been proposed; however, they are still awaiting well-designed clinical trials.
Vesalius and His Manikin: An Enduring Influence on Modern Anatomic Teaching
On, Thomas J. , Xu, Yuan , Jubran, Jubran H. , Castillo, Andrea L. , Alcantar-Garibay, Oscar, Dagi, Teo Forcht, Preul, Mark C., Meybodi, Ali Tayebi

Mayo Clinic

Neurosurgery | October 17, 2024 | Volume: 96 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 235-250

10.1227/neu.0000000000003187 | PMID 39813067 Get It

Anatomic teaching has long informed surgical knowledge, experience, and skills. One tool for teaching that emerged during the Renaissance was the fugitive anatomic sheet, which used flap layers to reveal different levels of anatomy. In 1538, Vogtherr introduced the first fugitive sheets, which included illustrations of male and female figures with a torso paper flap that, when lifted, revealed the internal organs in a cartoonish style. The popularity of these anatomic fugitive sheets spurred an increase in small print-and-sale workshops. In 1543, Vesalius included fugitive anatomic sheets in his books Fabrica and Epitome , containing large paper flapped models that could be created by cutting out and gluing images of human internal anatomy onto a base layer. Students could tack these manikins up to a nearby wall during dissection. Significant collaboration between Vesalius and his publisher occurred to coordinate the integration of large foldable sheets featuring the cutout models into his works. Vesalius's groundbreaking discoveries, his use of the most advanced printing techniques, and his innovative teaching style are fundamental aspects of the legacy of medical education. This article shows these remarkable fugitive anatomic sheets from the original publications of Fabrica and Epitome together for the first time. It explores the innovative concepts and applications of Vesalius's unique printings.
Germline mutations in a G protein identify signaling cross-talk in T cells
Ham, Hyoungjun , Jing, Huie , Lamborn, Ian T. , Kober, M. , Anderson, David E. , Druey, Kirk M. , Mandl, Judith N. , Isidor, Bertrand , Freeman, Alexandra F. , Ganesan, Sundar , Karsak, Meliha , Mustillo, Peter , Teo, Juliana , Zolkipli‐Cunningham, Zarazuela , Lecoquierre, François , Schmid, Jana Pachlopnik , Kuhns, Douglas B. , Xu, Xuehua , Al–Herz, Waleed , Terhal, Paulien A., Muurinen, Mari , Barlogis, Vincent , Danielson, Jeffrey J. , Stewart, Helen , Rading, Sebastian, Keren, Boris , Pfundt, Rolph , Potocki, Lorraine , Olivier, Kenneth N., Faivre, Laurence , Wong, Melanie , Puel, Anne , Chou, Janet , Tusseau, Maud, Moutsopoulos, Niki M. , Matthews, Helen, Simons, Cas , Fink, Danielle , Kong, Heidi H. , Kabát, Juraj , Kim, Woo Sung , Bierhals, Tatjana , Meguro, Kazuyuki , Gu, Jingwen , Stoddard, Jennifer , Banos-Pinero, Benito, Slack, Maria A., Trivellin, Giampaolo , Mazel, Benoît , Li, Samuel T. , Watts, Val J. , Rodriguez-Quevedo, Maria F. , Bruel, Ange‐Line , Lehalle, Daphné , Torres, Daniel , Sullivan, Kathleen E. , Duffourd, Yannis, Similuk, Morgan , Blanc, Pierre , Jin, Tian, Geha, Raif S., Casanova, Jean‐Laurent , Mäkitie, Outi , Edery, Patrick , Germain, Ronald N. , Billadeau, Daniel D. , Zhang, Yu , Lenardo, Michael J. , Kober, Megan M , Koval, Alexey , Anderson, D Eric , Druey, Kirk M , Mandl, Judith N , Isidor, Bertrand , Ferreira, Carlos R , Freeman, Alexandra F , Karsak, Meliha , Mustillo, Peter J , Teo, Juliana , Chatron, Nicolas , Lecoquierre, Francois , Oler, Andrew J , Schmid, Jana Pachlopnik , Kuhns, Douglas B , Xu, Xuehua , Hauck, Fabian , Al-Herz, Waleed , Wagner, Matias , Terhal, Paulien A , Muurinen, Mari , Barlogis, Vincent , Loid, Petra , Keren, Boris , Pfundt, Rolph , Zarember, Kol A , Vill, Katharina , Olivier, Kenneth N , Lesca, Gaetan , Faivre, Laurence , Puel, Anne , Chou, Janet , Moutsopoulos, Niki M , Simons, Cas , Soldatos, Ariane , Masle-Farquhar, Etienne , Pittaluga, Stefania , Brink, Robert , Kong, Heidi H , Kabat, Juraj , Bierhals, Tatjana , Hsu, Amy P. , Gu, Jingwen , Trivellin, Giampaolo , Mazel, Benoît , Soomann, Maarja , Li, Samuel , Watts, Val J , Stratakis, Constantine A , Rodriguez-Quevedo, Maria F , Bruel, Ange-Line , Lipsanen-Nyman, Marita , Saultier, Paul , Lehalle, Daphne , Torres, Daniel , Barbarot, Sébastien , Neu, Axel , Similuk, Morgan N , McWalter, Kirsty , Blanc, Pierre , Bézieau, Stéphane , Geha, Raif S , Casanova, Jean Laurent , Makitie, Outi M , Edery, Patrick , Christodoulou, John , Germain, Ronald N , Goodnow, Christopher C , Sakmar, Thomas P , Billadeau, Daniel D , Kury, Sebastien , Katanaev, Vladimir L , Zhang, Yu , Lenardo, Michael J , Su, Helen C , Berchiche, Yamina A. , Wagner, Matias , Cruz, Phillip , Lesca, Gaëtan , Tusseau, Maud , Taft, Ryan J. , Pittaluga, Stefania , Baños-Piñero, Benito, Stratakis, Constantine A. , Jain, Rashmi, Bezieau, Stéphane , Jin, Tian , Kubisch, Christian , Küry, Sébastien , Su, Helen C.

Mayo Clinic

Science | September 19, 2024 | Volume: 385 | Issue: 6715 | Pages: No page available

10.1126/science.add8947 | PMID 39298586 Get It

Humans with monogenic inborn errors responsible for extreme disease phenotypes can reveal essential physiological pathways. We investigated germline mutations in GNAI2 , which encodes G αi2 , a key component in heterotrimeric G protein signal transduction usually thought to regulate adenylyl cyclase–mediated cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production. Patients with activating G αi2 mutations had clinical presentations that included impaired immunity. Mutant G αi2 impaired cell migration and augmented responses to T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation. We found that mutant G αi2 influenced TCR signaling by sequestering the guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase)–activating protein RASA2, thereby promoting RAS activation and increasing downstream extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)–AKT S6 signaling to drive cellular growth and proliferation.
Establishing Consensus for Mohs Micrographic Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Melanoma in Situ for Future Clinical Trials: A Modified Delphi Study
Curtis, K., Fakult, Nathan J., Strunck, Jennifer L. , Aasi, Sumaira Z. , Ahn, Christine , Alam, Murad, Bar, Anna, Behshad, Ramona, Bichakjian, Christopher K. , Bolotin, Diana, Boone, Susan L., Brewer, Jerry D., Carr, David R. , Castillo, Jason R., Christensen, Sean R. , Clark, Melanie A., Collins, Lindsey K., Demer, Addison M. , Eisen, Daniel B. , Feng, Hao , Firoz, Bahar, Grekin, Roy C. , Hirshburg, Jason M., Holmes, Todd, Huang, Conway C. , Jennings, Thomas , Konda, Sailesh , Leitenberger, Justin J. , Lewin, Jesse M., Ng, Elise, Orengo, Ida, Samie, Faramarz H. , Saylor, Drew K. , Soleymani, Teo, Tate, Jesalyn A. , Vidal, Nahid Y. , Vij, Alok , Wysong, Ashley , Xu, Yaohui G. , Carroll, Bryan T. , Curtis, Kristen K., Bordeaux, Jeremy S. , Carr, David R., Carucci, John A. , Jiang, Shang I. Brian , Maher, Ian A. , Sharon, Victoria R. , Swetter, Susan M. , Beek, Marta J. Van , Yu, Wesley Y.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | July 30, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.6004/jnccn.2024.7036 | PMID 39079545 Get It

Background: Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a promising treatment modality for melanoma in situ (MIS). However, variations in surgical technique limit the generalizability of existing data and may impede future study of MMS in clinical trials. Methods: A modified Delphi method was selected to establish consensus on optimal MMS techniques for treating MIS in future clinical trials. The Delphi method was selected due to the limited current data, the wide range of techniques used in the field, and the intention to establish a standardized technique for future clinical trials. A literature review and interviews with experienced MMS surgeons were performed to identify dimensions of the MMS technique for MIS that (1) likely impacted costs or outcomes of the procedure, and (2) showed significant variability between surgeons. A total of 8 dimensions of technical variation were selected. The Delphi process consisted of 2 rounds of voting and commentary, during which 44 expert Mohs surgeons across the United States rated their agreement with specific recommendations using a Likert scale. Results: Five of eight recommendations achieved consensus in Round 1. All 3 of the remaining recommendations achieved consensus in Round 2. Techniques achieving consensus in Round 1 included the use of a starting peripheral margin of ≤5 mm, application of immunohistochemistry, frozen tissue processing, and resecting to the depth of subcutaneous fat. Consensus on the use of Wood’s lamp, dermatoscope, and negative tissue controls was established in Round 2. Conclusions: This study generated 8 consensus recommendations intended to offer guidance for Mohs surgeons treating MIS. The adoption of these recommendations will promote standardization to facilitate comparisons of aggregate data in multicenter clinical trials.
AMBASSADOR Alliance A031501: Phase III randomized adjuvant study of pembrolizumab in muscle-invasive and locally advanced urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) vs observation.
Sonpavde, Guru , Kim, William Y. , Grivas, Petros , Chatta, Gurkamal , Reichert, Zachery R. , Bilen, Mehmet Asım , Srinivas, Sandy, Halabi, Susan , Burbano, Gabriela Perez , Halabi, Susan , Apolo, Andrea B , Ballman, Karla V. , Berg, Stephanie , Parikh, Rahul A , Teo, Min Yuen , Sweis, Randy F. , Geynisman, Daniel M. , Kim, Joseph W. , McGregor, Bradley A. , Morris, Michael J. , Rosenberg, Jonathan E

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 29, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: LBA531-LBA531

10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.lba531 Get It

LBA531 Background: Muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) is an aggressive disease with high relapse rates. Neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard of care in patients (pts) who are cisplatin (Cis)-eligible. However, many pts are Cis-ineligible or have persistent muscle-invasive disease after NAC and surgery. We evaluated pembrolizumab (Pembro) as adjuvant therapy in pts with high-risk MIUC following surgical resection. Methods: The AMBASSADOR study is an open-label, randomized, phase III trial that enrolled pts with histologically confirmed MIUC of the bladder, upper tract, or urethra who (1) had ≥ pT2 and/or pN+ or margins+ at surgery (radical cystectomy, nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, or ureterectomy) following NAC or (2) ≥ pT3 and/or pN+ or margins+ at surgery without NAC and were either Cis-ineligible or declined adjuvant Cis-based therapy. Pts were registered ≥4 to 16 weeks after surgery and randomized 1:1 to receive Pembro 200 mg every 3 weeks for 1 year or observation (Obs). Randomization was stratified by pathologic stage, centrally tested PD-L1 status, and prior NAC. The dual primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with a target sample size of 739 pts and required 387 DFS and 320 OS events for final analysis. Secondary objectives included evaluation of DFS and OS in PD-L1-positive and -negative pts and assessing safety. Here we present the interim DFS and OS results. Results: Between 09/2017 and 08/2021 a total of 702 pts were randomized prior to early closure due to US FDA approval of nivolumab for MIUC pts: 354 pts to Pembro and 348 pts to Obs; 13.0% vs 21.6% withdrew from study without event in the Pembro vs Obs arms, respectively. 74 pts (21%) in the Obs arm received an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Median follow-up was 22.3 months (mos) for DFS and 36.9 mos for OS. The DFS endpoint (based on 319 events needed for interim analysis) crossed the efficacy boundary. Median DFS was 29.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 21.8‒not evaluable (NE)) with Pembro and 14.0 months (95% CI 9.7‒20.20) with Obs (hazard ratio (HR) 0.69 [95% CI 0.55–0.87]; p=0.0013). At the interim analysis (n = 257 events), median OS was 50.9 months (95% CI 43.9‒NE) with Pembro and 55.8 months (95% CI 53.3‒NE) with Obs (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.76–1.26]; p=0.88). Grade 3+ adverse events occurred in 48.4% and 31.8% of pts in the Pembro and Obs arms, respectively. Conclusions: Adjuvant Pembro demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in DFS vs Obs for high-risk MIUC pts after radical surgery. The OS endpoint may have been impacted by pts on the Obs arm receiving a checkpoint inhibitor. Pembro was tolerable with no new safety signals. These results support adjuvant Pembro as a new therapeutic option for pts with MIUC with high risk for recurrence. Additional follow-up is ongoing for the final DFS/OS, PD-L1 subgroups, and ctDNA analyses. Clinical trial information: NCT03244384 .