Citations

Abstract Background: Primary Cardiac Lymphoma (PCL) is an exceptionally rare malignancy. While clinical case reports have postulated an association with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), large-scale epidemiological data corroborating this link are limited. Objective: To determine whether HIV is associated with increased prevalence of PCL in a large, nationally representative sample of US hospitalizations. Methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2019, representing approximately 35 million unweighted hospitalizations. Hospitalizations were identified using a proxy definition for PCL, requiring ICD-10-CM codes for both cardiomyopathy (I42.*) and extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (i.e., C83.39, C85.99). HIV status was identified using codes B20-B24 and Z21. We compared the prevalence of PCL in hospitalizations with versus without HIV and calculated odds ratios using Fisher’s Exact Test, reporting corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values. Results: We identified 569 hospitalizations meeting our operational definition for PCL out of 34,955,252 total discharges. The prevalence of PCL was significantly higher among hospitalizations with HIV (6.2 per 100,000) compared with those without HIV (1.6 per 100,000; p < 0.0001). HIV was associated with a 3.86-fold increased odds of PCL (OR: 3.86; 95% CI: 2.23-6.70; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In this nationwide analysis of 35 million hospitalizations, HIV was strongly associated with a higher prevalence of PCL. Hospitalizations with HIV had nearly 4-fold higher odds of PCL, as defined by co-occurrence of cardiomyopathy and extranodal lymphoma, compared with hospitalizations without HIV. This population-level finding evinces the association previously suggested in clinical case reports. Citation Format: Omar Hozayen, Jay Hozayen, Benjamin Behers, Christoph Stephenson-Moe, Maha Hameed, Matthew Miller, Laura De Jesus Herrera, Anas Abu Jad, Rheiner Kammer, Mohab Idriss, Ahmed Aboutaleb, Bashar Roumia, Patricia Riano, Nicolas Riveros Neira, Brooke Hartenstein, Robert Taylor, Manuel Rosario Espinal, Brett M. Behers, Alya Hozayen, Mohamed Ibrahim, Karen Hamad. Primary cardiac lymphoma and HIV: A nationwide analysis of hospitalizations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 215.

Abstract Disclosure: C.A. Villavicencio Torres: None. S. Ahmadian: None. K. Moehnke: None. V.M. Fell: None. R.L. Taylor: None. S.K. Grebe: None. A.D. Maus: None. I. Bancos: None. Background: Evaluation of adrenal disorders relies on total cortisol measurements at baseline or during dynamic testing. Accurate cortisol assessment that avoids phlebotomy may simplify the work up of adrenal disorders, decrease healthcare costs, and improve patient experience. Objectives: We aimed to compare cortisol and dexamethasone concentrations between venipuncture-based (clinical) and capillary blood samples. Methodology: We conducted a cross-sectional study (July 2024-April 2025) of adults undergoing standard-of-care cortisol measurements. Capillary blood samples were collected alongside clinical samples. Capillary measurements included total cortisol and dexamethasone (mass spectrometry). Clinical samples were tested for total cortisol (Roche immunoassay) and dexamethasone (mass spectrometry). Results: Of 318 patients (243, 77% women, median age 53 years, IQR 39-66), 227 (71%) underwent dexamethasone suppression test (DST) and 88 (28%) cosyntropin stimulation test (CST). Capillary blood collection failed in 13 (4%) patients. In patients undergoing DST, median post-dexamethasone serum cortisol was 1.3 mcg/dL (IQR 0.8-2.2), and serum dexamethasone was 0.41 mcg/dL (IQR 0.27-0.59), while median capillary cortisol was 1.5 mcg/dL (IQR 1-2.5), and capillary dexamethasone was 0.33 mcg/dL (IQR 0.21-0.51). Capillary cortisol (r=0.95, 95% CI [0.93, 0.96], p<.0001) and capillary dexamethasone (r=0.93, 95% CI [0.90, 0.95], p<.0001) showed strong correlation with their respective clinical measurements. In patients undergoing CST, median baseline serum cortisol was 7.5 mcg/dL (IQR 5-10), and median baseline capillary cortisol was 8.5 mcg/dL (IQR 6-12). Median post-CST 60-minute serum cortisol was 23 mcg/dL (IQR 20-25), while capillary cortisol was 25 mcg/dL (IQR 21-28). Baseline (r=0.77, 95% CI [0.66, 0.85], p<.0001) and post-CST 60-minute capillary cortisol (r=0.88, 95% CI [0.81-92], p<.0001) strongly correlated with clinical measurements. Post-dexamethasone cortisol in paired DST samples showed that capillary measurements were higher than serum cortisol (median difference 0.20 mcg/dL (95% CI [0.12, 0.42], p<.0001), while paired capillary dexamethasone concentrations were lower than serum dexamethasone concentrations (median difference 0.04 mcg/dL (95% CI [0.03, 0.07], p<.0001). In CST, paired baseline capillary and serum cortisol concentrations were similar (median difference 0.10 mcg/dL, 95% CI [0.3, 0.3], p=.3660), while paired post-CST 60-minute capillary cortisol was higher than serum cortisol by a median of 2.8 mcg/dL (95% CI [2, 3.2], p<.0001). Conclusion: Capillary cortisol and dexamethasone concentrations demonstrate excellent correlation with venipuncture-based measurements. Following validation with at-home collection, capillary blood measurements may serve as an alternative for evaluating adrenal disorders. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Abstract Disclosure: C.A. Villavicencio Torres: None. S. Ahmadian: None. V.M. Fell: None. K. Moehnke: None. Y. Chai: None. R.L. Taylor: None. S.K. Grebe: None. A.D. Maus: None. I. Bancos: None. Background: Current standard-of-care assessment of adrenal disorders relies on the venipuncture-based total cortisol measurements. Salivary cortisol (SalF) and cortisone (SalE) measurements have advantages such as a more accurate assessment of patients with cortisol-binging globulin abnormalities and the convenience of at-home non-invasive testing. Aims: This study aimed to compare concentrations of cortisol and dexamethasone between clinical (venipuncture-based) and saliva samples. Methodology: We conducted a cross-sectional study (July 2024-January 2025) of adults undergoing overnight dexamethasone suppression test (DST) or cosyntropin stimulation test (CST). Saliva samples were collected alongside clinical samples. Saliva measurements included cortisol, cortisone, and dexamethasone (mass spectrometry), while clinical samples were tested for total cortisol (Roche immunoassay) and, in a subgroup, dexamethasone (mass spectrometry). Results: Of 241 patients (186 (77%) women, median age 53 years (IQR 39-66)), 178 (74%) provided samples as a part of DST and 63 (26%) as a part CST. An inability to provide sufficient saliva for analysis was found in 5 patients (2%). In patients undergoing DST, median post-dexamethasone serum total cortisol was 1.3 mcg/dL (IQR 0.8-2.2), and median serum dexamethasone (SerD) was 0.43 mcg/dL (IQR 0.3-0.6) based on clinical samples, while median SalF was 10.2 ng/dL (IQR 6.6-23.6), SalE was 78.6 ng/dL (IQR 52.8-131.1), and saliva dexamethasone (SalD) was 60 ng/dL (IQR 41-93). SalE (r=0.92, p<.0001) demonstrated a stronger correlation than SalF (r=0.85, p<.0001) when compared with post-dexamethasone serum total cortisol measurements. SalD (r=0.85, p<.0001) correlated with SerD measurements. In patients undergoing CST, median baseline serum total cortisol was 7.2 mcg/dL (IQR 4.6-10) based on clinical samples, while median baseline SalF was 86.6 ng/dL (IQR 38.3-166.3), and median SalE was 707 ng/dL (IQR 347-906). Median peak 60-minute serum total cortisol was 21.5 mcg/dL (IQR 18-24), while SalF was 870.4 ng/dL (IQR 440-2904) and SalE was 2501 ng/dL (IQR 1770-3193). Both baseline (r=0.92, p<.0001) and 60 min peak post-cosyntropin SalE (r=0.84, p<.0001) demonstrated a strong correlation with venipuncture-based measurements. SalF had a weaker than SalE correlation at both baseline (r=0.88, p<.0001) and 60 min peak post-cosyntropin (r=0.79, p<.0001). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that salivary measurements of cortisone, cortisol and dexamethasone strongly correlate with standard-of-care venipuncture concentrations following DST and CST. SalE showed the stronger than SalF correlation with venipuncture-based serum total cortisol concentrations. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Abstract Disclosure: S. Ahmadian: None. C.A. Villavicencio Torres: None. V.M. Fell: None. K.L. Moehnke: None. Y. Chai: None. R.L. Taylor: None. S.K. Grebe: None. A.D. Maus: None. I. Bancos: None. Background: Salivary cortisol (SalF), and cortisone (SalE) interpretation can be influenced by intra-individual variability arising from cortisol secretion cyclicity, assay performance, and sampling techniques. No studies to date have examined the impact of sampling on intra-individual variability. Methods: We conducted a single-center cross-sectional study of adults evaluated with total serum cortisol measurements as a part of the overnight dexamethasone suppression test (DST) or cosyntropin stimulation test (CST), November 2024- January 2025. Participants were provided with two cotton swabs (salivettes) and asked to collect two consecutive saliva samples immediately after the venipuncture for total cortisol. Each cotton swab was kept in the mouth for 2-2.5 minutes. Saliva was tested for SalF and SalE by mass spectrometry. Variability was examined based on cortisol tertiles. Results: A total of 78 paired saliva samples were obtained from 60 participants (45 [75%] women; median age 55 years [IQR 39-66]), who were undergoing either DST (42 [70%]) or CST (18 [30%]). A total of 10 (17%) saliva samples did not contain a sufficient sample for analysis during the first or second saliva collection (7 [12%] from DST group, and 3 [5%] from CST group).Among 53 patients undergoing DST, the median serum total cortisol was 1.3 mcg/dL [IQR 0.9-3], the median first SalF was 20 ng/dL [IQR 7-28], the median second SalF was 12 ng/dL [IQR 6-23], and the median variability was 11% [IQR 3-22%]. The median first SalE was 69 ng/dL [IQR 54-185], while the median second SalE was 63 ng/dL [IQR 56-178], with a median variability of 6% [IQR 4-10].In patients undergoing CST, peak median serum total cortisol was 20 mcg/dL [IQR 18-24], median first SalF was 809 ng/dL [IQR 536-1227], and median second SalF was 1063 ng/dL [IQR 667-1503], with the median variability of 14% [IQR 8-22]. The median first SalE was 2507 ng/dL [IQR1697-2966], while the median second SalE was 2485 ng/dL [IQR 1530-2976], with a median variability of 9% [IQR 3-12].When examining intra-individual variability of SalF, the variability was lowest in the middle tertile, corresponding to serum cortisol of 1.8-8.9 mcg/dL, at 9% [IQR 5-16]. Variability was higher in the lowest tertile (14% [IQR 0-52]) and the highest tertile (12% [IQR 6-16]). Overall, the variability of SalE was lower than that of SalF: 7% [IQR 4-13] in the lowest tertile, 5% [IQR 2-9] in the middle tertile, and 10% [IQR 4-12] in the highest tertile. Conclusion: We show that saliva sampling may impact the results, with 17% patients providing insufficient sample for analysis, and variability of 9-14% for SalF and 5-10% for SalE. Same time-point sampling-related variability should be considered in interpretation of SalF and SalE measurements. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is associated with significant morbidity and mortality throughout the world, predominantly due to lung and cardiovascular injury. The virus responsible for COVID-19—severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2—gains entry into host cells via ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2). ACE2 is a primary enzyme within the key counter-regulatory pathway of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), which acts to oppose the actions of Ang (angiotensin) II by generating Ang-(1–7) to reduce inflammation and fibrosis and mitigate end organ damage. As COVID-19 spans multiple organ systems linked to the cardiovascular system, it is imperative to understand clearly how severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 may affect the multifaceted RAS. In addition, recognition of the role of ACE2 and the RAS in COVID-19 has renewed interest in its role in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease in general. We provide researchers with a framework of best practices in basic and clinical research to interrogate the RAS using appropriate methodology, especially those who are relatively new to the field. This is crucial, as there are many limitations inherent in investigating the RAS in experimental models and in humans. We discuss sound methodological approaches to quantifying enzyme content and activity (ACE, ACE2), peptides (Ang II, Ang-[1–7]), and receptors (types 1 and 2 Ang II receptors, Mas receptor). Our goal is to ensure appropriate research methodology for investigations of the RAS in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and COVID-19 to ensure optimal rigor and reproducibility and appropriate interpretation of results from these investigations.

Abstract Background: Urinary free cortisol and cortisone measurements are useful in evaluation of Cushing syndrome, apparent mineralocorticoid excess, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, and adrenal insufficiency. To reduce analytical interference, improve accuracy, and shorten the analysis time, we developed a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for urinary cortisol and cortisone. Methods: We added 190 pmol (70 ng) of stable isotope cortisol-9,11,12,12-d4 to 0.5 mL of urine as an internal standard before extraction. The urine was extracted with 4.5 mL of methylene chloride, washed, and dried, and 10 μL of the reconstituted extract was injected onto a reversed-phase C18 column and analyzed using a tandem mass spectrometer operating in the positive mode. Results: Multiple calibration curves for urinary cortisol and cortisone exhibited consistent linearity and reproducibility in the range 7–828 nmol/L (0.25–30 μg/dL). Interassay CVs were 7.3–16% for mean concentrations of 6–726 nmol/L (0.2–26.3 μg/dL) for cortisol and cortisone. The detection limit was 6 nmol/L (0.2 μg/dL). Recovery of cortisol and cortisone added to urine was 97–123%. The regression equation for the LC-MS/MS (y) and HPLC (x) method for cortisol was: y = 1.11x + 0.03 μg cortisol/24 h (r2 = 0.992; n = 99). The regression equation for the LC-MS/MS (y) and immunoassay (x) methods for cortisol was: y = 0.66x − 12.1 μg cortisol/24 h (r2 = 0.67; n = 99). Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of the LC-MS/MS method for urinary free cortisol and cortisone offer advantages over routine immunoassays or chromatographic methods because of elimination of drug interferences, high throughput, and short chromatographic run time.

Abstract Background: Metanephrines are biochemical markers for tumors of the adrenal medulla (e.g., pheochromocytoma) and other tumors derived from neural crest cells (e.g., paragangliomas and neuroblastomas). We describe a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the measurement of urinary conjugated metanephrines. Methods: We added 250 ng of d3-metanephrine (d3-MN) and 500 ng of d3-normetanephrine (d3-NMN) to 1 mL of urine samples as stable isotope internal standards. The samples were then acidified, hydrolyzed for 20 min in a 100 °C water bath, neutralized, and prepared by solid-phase extraction. The methanol eluates were analyzed by LC-MS/MS in the selected-reaction-monitoring mode after separation on a reversed-phase amide C16 column. Results: Multiple calibration curves for the analysis of urine MN and NMN exhibited consistent linearity and reproducibility in the range of 10–5000 μg/L. Interassay CVs were 5.7–8.6% at mean concentrations of 90–4854 μg/L for MN and NMN. The detection limit was 10 μg/L. Recovery of MN and NMN (144–2300 μg/L) added to urine was 91–114%. The regression equation for the LC-MS/MS (x) and colorimetric (y) methods was: y = 0.81x − 0.006 (r = 0.822; n = 110). The equation for the HPLC (x) and LC-MS/MS (y) methods was: y = 1.09x + 0.05 (r = 0.998; n = 40). Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of the MS/MS method for urinary conjugated metanephrines offer advantages over colorimetric, immunoassay, HPLC, and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry methods because of elimination of drug interferences, high throughput, and short chromatographic run time.