Citations

Background Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) of the breast is associated with a high propensity for lymphovascular invasion and lymph node metastasis. However, whether chemotherapy is associated with improved survival outcomes in these patients remains unclear. Methods This retrospective study analyzed IMPC patients from the SEER database (2010–2018) (n=1,150) and an external validation cohort from Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (n=199). Propensity score matching assessed chemotherapy’s impact on overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in the SEER cohort. A risk stratification model was developed and validated using the external cohort. Results In the SEER cohort, chemotherapy was associated with significantly improved OS (HR = 0.517, 95% CI 0.293-0.910, P = 0.020) but not BCSS. A risk model incorporating marital status, tumor size, subtype, and radiotherapy history identified high- and low-risk groups. Chemotherapy was associated with significantly better OS only for high-risk patients (internal training cohort: HR = 0.577, 95% CI 0.349-0.952, P = 0.029; internal validation cohort: HR = 0.213, 95% CI 0.070-0.647, P = 0.003). External validation consistently confirmed poorer prognosis for high-risk patients (HR = 2.969, 95% CI 1.028-8.571, P = 0.035) and verified the model’s ability to identify patients with differential OS associations with chemotherapy: chemotherapy was associated with better OS in high-risk patients (HR = 0.163, 95% CI 0.031-0.868, P = 0.016), but not in low-risk patients (HR = 0.793, 95% CI 0.153-4.103, P = 0.782). Conclusions Chemotherapy was associated with improved prognosis particularly in high-risk patients with IMPC. However, chemotherapy decisions should be made cautiously for low-risk patients, taking into account a comprehensive assessment of clinical and pathological factors.

1065 Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been shown to display cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7)-dependent transcriptional addition and is sensitive to a CDK7 inhibitor THZ1. As tumor heterogeneity is well known, we sought to identify predictive markers of sensitivity to CDK7 inhibition in TNBC. Methods: Published mRNA microarray data was analyzed to identify genes associated with sensitivity of TNBC cells to the CDK7 inhibitor THZ1. Cell survival assay after THZ1 treatment was performed using Cell Counting Kit-8. Expression of SOX9 was examined by Western blot in cell lines and IHC in breast cancer tissue microarray. Patient survival analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Analysis of published mRNA microarray data showed that SOX9 was overexpressed in the MDA-468 and BT-549 TNBC cell lines, which were sensitive to the CDK7 inhibitor THZ1 and showed decreased SOX9 expression with THZ1 treatment. We treated 10 TNBC cell lines with various concentrations of THZ1 and found that these cell lines displayed a wide spectrum of sensitivity to THZ1, with an IC50 ranging from 20-30 nM in sensitive lines (MDA-468 and MDA-231) to ~300 nM in insensitive lines (BT-20 and MDA-157). There was a strong correlation of SOX9 expression by Western blot and sensitivity to THZ1 in these cell lines (Pearson correlation, r = 0.82, P= 0.01). IHC of two tissue microarrays containing 278 breast cancer samples showed that SOX9 expression was significantly higher in TNBC (n = 59) compared to hormone positive breast cancer (n = 173; P< 0.01). Among the 59 TNBC cases, 43 had high SOX9 expression and 16 had low SOX9 expression. Patients with high or low SOX expression had similar grade, T stage and nodal involvement (All P> 0.20). Finally, with standard of care treatment, TNBC patients with high SOX9 expression had a significantly worse overall survival (OS) compared to patients with low SOX9 expression (2 year OS rate 100% vs 92.9%, 5 year OS rate 93.8% vs 83.3%, log rank P= 0.03). Conclusions: SOX9 expression level in TNBC cell lines was associated with sensitivity to the CDK7 inhibitor THZ1. TNBC patients with high expression of SOX9 had worse OS, and may benefit from CDK7 inhibition as a novel therapy.

e12073 Background: For T1-2N0M0 breast cancer after surgery and axillary staging, the current NCCN guideline recommends radiation therapy (RT) after lumpectomy but not total mastectomy unless there is a positive or less than 1 mm negative margin. This recommendation is regardless of hormonal status. Triple-negative breast cancer is a generally considered more aggressive compared with hormone positive breast cancer. We sought to investigate whether there is a survival benefit of RT in T1-2N0M0 TNBC. Methods: A Population-based retrospective analysis was performed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients included in the analysis were divided into three groups according to surgery modality and RT: breast conservation therapy (BCT, i.e., lumpectomy + RT), mastectomy alone, and mastectomy + RT. The survival endpoints were breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS), and survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 22473 female with T1-2N0M0 TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were included, with 13395 (60%) T1 and 9078 (40%) T2 cases. Surgery, RT and chemotherapy was done in 21674 (96%), 9633 (43%) and 14651 (65%) patients, respectively. Patients who underwent RT were older ( > 50 years, 78% vs 72%, P< 0.001), had fewer T2 (35% vs 44%, P< 0.001) tumor, and had more chemotherapy utilization (72% vs 60%, P< 0.001). 8807 patients had BCT; 8329 had mastectomy alone and 635 had mastectomy + RT. The 5-year BCSS rate was 94.3% for BCT, 93.3% for mastectomy alone ( P= 0.009 vs BCT), and 83.7% for mastectomy + RT ( P< 0.001 vs BCT and P< 0.001 vs mastectomy alone), respectively. The 5-year OS rate was 88.6% for BCT, 83.0 % for mastectomy alone ( P< 0.001 vs BCT), and 79.6% for mastectomy + RT ( P< 0.001 vs BCT and P= 0.190 vs mastectomy alone), respectively. Conclusions: In patients with T1-2N0M0 TNBC, BCT was associated with superior BCSS and OS compared to mastectomy with or without RT. After mastectomy, there was no evidence of survival benefit of RT, with worse BCSS and similar OS.