Citations

Abstract Cancer outcomes vary widely between individual patients, each accumulating an irregular record of treatments, diagnoses, measurements, and complications. Current prognostic models reduce this complexity into a single snapshot, focus on narrow clinical settings, and rarely generalize across hospitals. Here we introduce Chronicle , an explainable transformer that learns from entire patient trajectories to predict diverse clinical outcomes throughout the disease course while capturing both short- and long-term temporal dependencies. Trained on 53.7 million longitudinal data points from 51,711 patients spanning 67 cancer types, Chronicle operates natively on irregular data without imputation and jointly predicts eight endpoints within a flexible framework adaptable to additional outcomes. Chronicle outperformed cross-sectional models for overall survival prediction (C-index 0.84 vs 0.76-0.79), stratified patients more accurately than established prognostic systems, including TNM stage, and predicted seven adverse event and transfusion endpoints (AUC 0.80-0.92). Applied without retraining to 69,341 patients in Germany, Switzerland, and the United States, Chronicle generalized across healthcare systems and improved further with local fine-tuning. Integrated explainability traced each risk update to patient-specific clinical factors, revealing distinct temporal persistence of prognostic information, with relevance half-lives ranging from weeks for therapies to nearly one year for baseline characteristics. These findings demonstrate that learning from hospital-wide patient trajectories enables interpretable and continuously updated predictions, providing a scalable framework to support individualized treatment decisions.

Cerebral Cavernous Malformations (CCMs) are low-flow vascular lesions located within the central nervous system, with a reported prevalence in the general population of 0.16–0.5%. Patients with CCMs may remain asymptomatic or present new onset symptoms such as seizures or focal neurological deficits often related to the occurrence of intracerebral hemorrhage. CCM may appear sporadic or as part of familial forms linked to mutations in the CCM-gene cluster, affecting endothelial cell integrity and triggering molecular cascades, including the MEKK3/KLF2/4 signaling pathway. Recent studies have highlighted the roles of inflammatory, angiogenic, and coagulation pathways alongside the emerging evidence of a gut–brain axis influencing microbiome-driven TLR4 signaling. This systematic review aims to describe molecular biomarkers associated with CCM pathophysiology, emphasizing their potential use as diagnostic and prognostic tools. Circulating plasma biomarkers such as CRP, vitamin D, and interleukins may reflect ongoing inflammatory and endothelial processes, while some imaging biomarkers like Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) have shown a correlation with iron deposition and vascular leakage. Leveraging both circulating and imaging biomarkers may improve the therapeutic decision-making process. Further studies are encouraged to validate these findings and to facilitate the development of personalized, evidence-based strategies for the management of CCM.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Brainstem cavernous malformations (BSCM) can result in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), often resulting in significant morbidity. We aimed to assess the functional outcome and identify predictors of functional neurological outcome after single and multiple symptomatic hemorrhages. METHODS: As part of an international multicenter collaboration, institutional databases from 3 different tertiary referral centers included BSCM patients with complete baseline characteristics, MRI Data set, ≥1 ICH, and ≥1 follow-up examination followed at our institutions between 2003 and 2023. Functional neurological outcome was obtained using the modified Rankin Scale at diagnosis, before and after each ICH, and last follow-up. Patients were excluded after surgical removal of the lesion and/or loss of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 383 patients (41.47 ± 15.51 age; 220 [57.4%] female) were included and followed for an average of 63.16 ± 85.75 months. Functional neurological outcome deteriorated in 47.2% ( P = .010) after the second ICH and in 46.5% ( P = .007) after the third ICH. Moreover, the functional neurological status was impaired in 22.3% ( P < .001) of patients at last available follow-up compared with the time of BSCM diagnosis. CONCLUSION: In our study, we observed that the chance of full recovery might decrease with each ICH. We observed a significantly associated neurological deterioration after each ICH compared with initial ICH.

OBJECTIVE Indication for surgery in brainstem cavernous malformations (BSCMs) is based on many case series, few comparative studies, and no randomized controlled trials. The objective of this study was to seek consensus about surgical management aspects of BSCM. METHODS A total of 29 experts were invited to participate in a multistep Delphi consensus process on the surgical treatment of BSCM. RESULTS Twenty-two (76%) of 29 experts participated in the consensus. Qualitative analysis (content analysis) of an initial open-ended question survey resulted in 99 statements regarding surgical treatment of BSCM. By using a multistep survey with 100% participation in each round, consensus was reached on 52 (53%) of 99 statements. These were grouped into 4 categories: 1) definitions and reporting standards (7/14, 50%); 2) general and patient-related aspects (11/16, 69%); 3) anatomical-, timing of surgery–, and BSCM-related aspects (22/37, 59%); and 4) clinical situation–based decision-making (12/32, 38%). Among other things, a consensus was reached for surgical timing, handling of associated developmental venous anomalies, handling of postoperative BSCM remnants, assessment of specific anatomical BSCM localizations, and treatment decisions in typical clinical BSCM scenarios. CONCLUSIONS A summary of typical clinical scenarios and a catalog of various BSCM- and patient-related aspects that influence the surgical treatment decision have been defined, rated, and interpreted.