Citations

Background/Objectives: In the United States, HF prevalence is projected to progressively rise by 2030. Prior research suggests a strong association between reduced sleep duration and increased cardiovascular disease and HF risk. This study introduces an alternative parameter, the weekend sleep recovery (WSR), measured by the weekend-to-weekday sleep duration ratio (SDR), to evaluate its association with HF risk. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) 2017–2023 to examine self-reported sleep patterns. Participants were classified as WSR (SDR > 1) or non-WSR (SDR ≤ 1). Multivariate logistic regression assessed the association between WSR and HF, adjusting for demographics and comorbidities. Results: Among 8320 participants included in the fully adjusted analysis, WSR was associated with lower odds of HF compared with non-WSR (adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55–0.96; p = 0.026). A significant interaction was observed between WSR and weekday sleep duration (P for interaction = 0.003), whereas no interaction was found with weekend sleep duration. In exploratory subgroup analyses, nominally significant associations were observed in several clinical subgroups; however, after correction for multiple comparisons, only participants without dyslipidemia retained statistical significance. No significant effect modification by race/ethnicity was observed (P for interaction = 0.436). Conclusions: Weekend sleep recovery was associated with lower odds of HF in this cross-sectional study. The association varied according to weekday sleep duration but was generally consistent across racial/ethnic groups. Given the observational design, these findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal and warrant confirmation in prospective studies.

e15708 Background: AFTT is characterized by physical, nutritional, and psychosocial decline. In GIC, AFTT arises from malnutrition, disease progression, or treatment-related toxicity resulting in poor quality of life. We evaluated the association between AFTT and IM, length of stay (LOS), and hospital charges (HC) in hospitalized GIC patients. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (2016-21) was used to identify adult hospitalizations with GIC using ICD-10 codes, which were stratified as primary or secondary diagnoses by AFTT. Clinical characteristics and primary outcomes including IM, LOS, and HC were extracted. Multivariable regression models adjusting for demographics, insurance, comorbidity burden, census tract income, and hospital teaching status were evaluated. Results: Among 2,732,505 GIC hospitalizations, colorectal (46.9%) and pancreatic (20.4%) cancer predominated; 121,035 (4.4%) had AFTT. Patients with AFTT vs non-AFTT, were older (mean = 69.3 vs 66.5 yrs), more often male (58.1% vs 57%), and from the lowest income quartile (27.7% vs 26%). AFTT cohort had higher comorbidity burden (mean CCI = 7.24 vs 6.26), more Black patients (19.1% vs 12.8%), higher Medicare use (62.7% vs 56.0%), increased palliative care consultation (37.4% vs 13.6%), risk of malnutrition, AKI, and dementia (all p< 0.001). AFTT was associated with higher IM, longer LOS, and lower HC. Higher age, males, and self-pay were associated with increased IM and HC, but shorter LOS. Lower CCI was associated with reduced IM, LOS, HC, whereas urban hospitals showed lower IM but higher LOS and HC. Black patients had higher IM and LOS but lower HC, contrary to Hispanic patients. Conclusions: The grave impact of AFTT and variability in survival and practice patterns is driven multifactorially, raising concerns about inequitable care access and differences in healthcare utilization. Standardized guidelines and multidisciplinary interventions are urgently needed to combat AFTT in GIC. Predictor IM aOR (95% CI) LOS Adj. Ratio (95% CI) HC Adj. Ratio (95% CI) AFTT Status (vs. Non-AFTT) 1.96 (1.93-2.00) 1.13 (1.12-1.14) 0.86 (0.85-0.86) Age (/year increase) 1.02 (1.02-1.02) 1.00 (1.00-1.00) 1.00 (1.00-1.00) Sex (vs. Female) Male 1.18 (1.17-1.19) 0.99 (0.98-0.99) 1.05 (1.05-1.06) CCI Score (vs. High, ≥5) Low (≤2) Mid (3-4) 0.33 (0.32-0.33) 0.48 (0.47 - 0.48) 0.87 (0.87 - 0.88) 0.93 (0.93 - 0.94) 0.93 (0.93 - 0.94) 1.02 (1.02 - 1.02) Insurance (vs. Medicare) Private Medicaid Self-Pay 1.03 (1.01 - 1.05) Ref in model 1.29 (1.24 - 1.33) 0.92 (0.91 - 0.92) 0.96 (0.95 - 0.97) 0.98 (0.97 - 1.00) 1.03 (1.02 - 1.03) 1.06 (1.05 - 1.06) 0.96 (0.95 - 0.97) Race (vs. White) Black 1.03 (1.00 - 1.06) 1.07 (1.06 - 1.08) 0.95 (0.94 - 0.96) Facility Status (vs. Rural) Urban Non-Teaching Urban Teaching 0.87 (0.85 - 0.89) 0.78 (0.77 - 0.80) 1.10 (1.09 - 1.11) 1.18 (1.17 - 1.19) 1.64 (1.63 - 1.65) 1.86 (1.84 - 1.87)

Abstract Background Acute pancreatitis, a prevalent gastrointestinal condition, frequently necessitates hospitalization and is associated with potential adverse in-hospital outcomes. Recent data showed the detrimental effects of COVID-19 infection on acute pancreatitis, particularly in patients with severe COVID-19 infections. However, limited information exists on the specific impacts of COVID-19 infection in patients hospitalized for acute pancreatitis. Methods We analyzed the 2020 U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to investigate the effects of COVID-19 infection on cases primarily admitted due to acute pancreatitis. Participants aged 18 and above were identified using relevant ICD-10 CM codes. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for specified outcomes were calculated through multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality, with secondary outcomes including system-based complications. Statistical significance was established at a P value of 0.05. Results We identified 252,435 patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The mean age was 50.1 years; 48.6% were female. Caucasians accounted for 41%, followed by Hispanics. Of these, 1.05% (2,675/252,435) had a concurrent diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. In a survey multivariable logistic and linear regression model adjusting for patient and hospital factors, COVID-19 infection was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (aOR 3.71; 95% CI 2.01, 6.84, P &lt; 0.001), prolonged length of stay (β LOS 1.05; 95% CI 0.46, 1.64, P &lt; 0.001), increased hospitalization charge ( β charge 9,327; 95% CI 820, 17834, P &lt; 0.001), and acute respiratory failure (aOR 2.49; 95% CI 1.75, 3.53, P &lt; 0.001), We observed non-significant, but increased, risks of shock, acute kidney injury (AKI), pancreatic pseudocyst, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 positive patients. Conclusion In conclusion, our study underscores that COVID-19 infection is associated with higher in-hospital mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and increased incidence of acute respiratory failure in patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis. Future longitudinal studies are warranted to comprehensively assess the long-term health sequelae in this population. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background Acute diverticulitis, a prevalent gastrointestinal condition, frequently necessitates hospitalization and is associated with potential adverse in-hospital outcomes. Recent data showed the detrimental effects of COVID-19 infection on acute diverticulitis, particularly in patients with severe COVID-19 infections. However, limited information exists on the specific impacts of COVID-19 infection in patients hospitalized for acute diverticulitis. Methods We analyzed the 2020 U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to investigate the effects of COVID-19 infection on cases primarily admitted due to acute diverticulitis. Participants aged 18 and above were identified using relevant ICD-10 CM codes. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for specified outcomes were calculated through multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality, with secondary outcomes including system-based complications. Statistical significance was established at a P value of 0.05. Results We identified 167,170 patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The mean age was 60.1 years; 56.8% were female. Caucasians accounted for the majority, followed by Hispanics. Of these, 0.90% (1,504/167,170) had a concurrent diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. In a survey multivariable logistic and linear regression model adjusting for patient and hospital factors, COVID-19 infection was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (aOR 8.43; 95% CI 4.32, 16.42, P &lt; 0.001), prolonged length of stay (β LOS 2.02; 95% CI 1.27, 2.77, P &lt; 0.001) and increased hospitalization charge ( β charge 17,813.27; 95% CI 4,080, 31,546, P &lt; 0.001), We observed non-significant, but increased, risks of shock, acute kidney injury (AKI), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 positive patients. Conclusion In conclusion, our study revealed that COVID-19 infection is associated with higher in-hospital mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and increased hospitalization charges in patients diagnosed with acute diverticulitis. Future longitudinal studies are warranted to comprehensively assess the long-term health sequelae in this population. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Background: There is suspicion that estrogen may protect against atherosclerosis. Women who experience menarche earlier, and thus have earlier estrogen exposure, might develop atherosclerosis later. The relationship between menarche age and the onset of angina pectoris, a symptom of coronary artery disease, remains unknown. Goal: This study aims to find the correlation between menarche age and the onset age of angina pectoris, and the association between early menarche (onset of menarche ≤ 10 y/o) and early onset of angina pectoris (onset of angina pectoris ≤ 40 y/o). Methods: A cross-sectional study using a population from the 2017-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The question collects self-reported data on onset of menarche and onset of angina pectoris. The relationship between menarche age and age in onset of angina pectoris was analyzed by linear and logistic regression analysis. Multivariate analysis adjusted for race, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking , diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, and dyslipidemia status. Results: Among 4,816 females who reported their menarche age, 88(1.8 %) have had an angina pectoris. The study involved 82 females who reported both the age of menarche and the age of onset of angina pectoris. The mean ± SD of the age at menarche and the age at onset of angina pectoris was 12.53 ± 1.79 y/o and 51.66 ± 15.16 y/o, respectively. The study found a significant association between the menarche age and the age at onset of angina pectoris. After adjusting for confounders, we found that every 1-year increase in the age of menarche will delay the onset of angina pectoris by 1.43 years, with a 95% CI of 0.01 to 2.86.(Table 1A,Graph 1A-1B) We also found that early menarche has a significantly increased risk 2.8 times (95%CI: 1.3, 6.2) of early onset of angina pectoris.After adjusting for confounders, the association became even stronger. The odds ratio (OR) increased to 3.3 (95%CI: 1.4, 8.0), indicating that women with early menarche were 3.3 times more likely to experience early angina pectoris compared to those with later menarche.(Table 2A) Conclusion: In contrast to our hypothesis, age at menarche is positively associated with onset of angina pectoris. The earlier onset of menarche is linked to the earlier onset of angina pectoris. We suspected that factors beyond estrogen levels may contribute to this unexpected finding. Additional studies are needed to examine the cause of this correlation.

81 Background: Recent data suggest an association between cardiovascular disease burden and biliary cancer patients. However, the outcomes of hospitalized patients for biliary-pancreatic malignancy with concurrent acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) are not well understood. Therefore, our objective is to assess the impact of ADHF on patients hospitalized for biliary-pancreatic malignancy. Methods: We used the 2020 U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to study patients hospitalized for biliary tract and pancreatic malignancy with concurrent acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) identified by ICD-10 CM codes. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for predefined outcomes were determined via multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses. The primary outcome examined was inpatient mortality, while secondary outcomes included complications related to various body systems. Results: We identified 43,009 patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of biliary tract and pancreatic cancer. The mean age was 68.5 years; 49.4% were female. Caucasians accounted for 68%, followed by Hispanics (13%). Of these, 6.27% (3,699/43,009) had a concurrent diagnosis of heart failure. In the survey's multivariable logistic and linear regression analysis, accounting for patient and hospital confounding factors, ADHF demonstrated significant associations with higher in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.63; 95% CI 1.09, 2.44, p = 0.015). In addition, a significant association between ADHF and various adverse in-hospital outcome was observed including prolonged mean length of stay (Beta 1.45; 95% CI 0.67, 2.24, p < 0.001), increased mean total hospital cost (Beta 3,757; 95% CI: 2,641, 36,630, p = 0.024), elevated risk of shock (aOR 2.75; 95% CI: 1.77, 4.26, p < 0.001), higher risk of sepsis (aOR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.09, 2.68, p = 0.018), increased risk of acute respiratory failure (aOR 3.18, 95% CI: 2.25, 4.51, p < 0.001), and heightened risk of acute kidney injury (aOR 1.57; 95% CI: 1.24, 1.99, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Among patients hospitalized for biliary-pancreatic malignancy, concurrent ADHF is linked to increased mortality risk and various in-hospital adverse complications. Additional long-term studies are required for a comprehensive understanding of this association.

80 Background: Disparities in health outcomes exist among racial and ethnic groups in the United States, notably in patients with colon cancer. Metastasis is the primary cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. However, data on the metastasis risks and clinical outcomes on hospitalized individuals with colon cancer is still limited. Therefore, we aim to assess the association between metastatic colon cancer and racial differences. Methods: We analyzed the 2020 U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to explore patients who have colon cancer as the primary diagnosis. Additionally, we identified evidence of metastasis, as recorded by ICD-10-CM. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for specified outcomes were calculated through multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses. The primary outcome was racial differences in organ metastasis and secondary outcomes included mortality and length of stay. Statistical significance was established at p-value of 0.05. Results: We identified 80,130 patients with primary diagnosis of colon cancer at discharge. The mean age was 67.4 years; 49.7% were female. Caucasians accounted for 69.3%, with African Americans at 13.3% and Hispanics at 8.2%. 15% of the patients had liver metastasis, whereas 22% had lung metastasis. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for patient, COVID-19, chemotherapy usage and hospital factors, African Americans had higher risk of lung metastasis (aOR 1.22; 95%CI (1.07, 1.40), p = 0.003), higher risk of liver metastasis (aOR 1.51; 95%CI (1.31, 1.74), p = 0.021) and longer length of stay (b = 0.95; 95%CI (0.56, 1.33), p = 0.001). Hispanics also had higher risk of lung (aOR 1.22, p < 0.05) and liver metastasis (aOR 1.24, p = 0.021). We observed an increase in risk of metastasis and mortality but non-statistically significant in some parameters and races, as shown in table provided. Conclusions: In conclusion, our study revealed that racial difference is associated with higher risk of metastasis, as well as other outcomes. To establish a causal relationship between races, metastasis, and mortality in patients with colon cancer, further longitudinal research is necessary. [Table: see text]

29 Background: Previous research highlights central nervous system (CNS) malignancy as significant contributors to disability-adjusted life-years. However, there's a lack of information on the impact of COVID-19 infection in hospitalized CNS malignancy patients. Methods: Using the 2020 U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS), we investigated the impact of COVID-19 infection affected patients primarily hospitalized for CNS malignancy. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for specific outcomes using multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality, with secondary outcomes including system-based complications. Results: We identified 37,385 patients diagnosed with CNS malignancy, averaging 53.6 years old, with 57.76% being female. Among them, 0.84% (315/37,385) were also diagnosed with COVID-19. After adjusting for patient and hospital factors, COVID-19 infection was linked to higher in-hospital mortality (aOR 4.12, 95% CI: 1.55, 10.89, p = 0.004), longer stays (Beta-coefficient 6.06, 95% CI: 2.97, 9.14, p < 0.001), increased total hospital costs (Beta-coefficient 11,855, 95% CI: 1,410, 22,301, p = 0.026), elevated risks of shock (aOR 3.96, 95% CI 1.03, 15.10, p = 0.018), acute respiratory failure (aOR 4.33, 95% CI: 1.83, 10.22, p = 0.001), and sepsis (aOR 3.96, 95% CI: 1.03, 15.10, p = 0.044). Conclusions: Our study reveals that COVID-19 infection is associated with higher in-hospital mortality and multiple adverse outcomes in patients hospitalized for CNS malignancy. Further longitudinal studies are necessary to thoroughly investigate the causality of these clinical outcomes in this population.

213 Background: Lung cancer patient often encounter disparities in health outcomes, especially in difference racial and ethnic groups. Metastasis is the primary cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. However, data on the metastasis risks and clinical outcomes on hospitalized individuals with lung cancer is still limited. Therefore, we aim to assess the association between metastatic lung cancer and racial differences. Methods: We analyzed the 2020 U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to explore patients who have lung cancer as the primary diagnosis. Additionally, we identified evidence of metastasis, as recorded by ICD-10-CM. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for specified outcomes were calculated through multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses. The primary outcome was racial differences in organ metastasis and secondary outcomes included mortality and length of stay. Statistical significance was established at p-value of 0.05. Results: We identified 103,335 patients with primary diagnosis of lung and bronchus cancer at discharge. The mean age was 68.9 years; 50.5% were female. Caucasians accounted for 74.3%, with African Americans at 12.1% and Hispanics at 4.6%. 10% of the patients had brain metastasis, whereas 14% had bone metastasis. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for patient, COVID-19, chemotherapy usage and hospital factors, African Americans had higher risk of brain metastasis (aOR 1.18; 95%CI (1.02, 1.37), p = 0.002), higher risk of bone metastasis (aOR 1.16; 95%CI (1.02, 1.33), p = 0.025), higher risk of mortality (aOR 1.21; 95% CI (1.01, 1.45), p = 0.039) and longer length of stay (b = 0.85; 95%CI (0.55, 1.16), p = 0.001). Hispanics also had higher risk of brain (aOR 1.36, p < 0.05) and prolonged length of stay (b 0.79, p < 0.005). We observed an increase in risk of metastasis and mortality but non-statistically significant in some parameters and races, as shown in table provided. Conclusions: In conclusion, our study revealed that racial difference is associated with higher risk of metastasis, as well as other outcomes. Further longitudinal research is necessary to establish a causal relationship between races, metastasis, and mortality in patients with lung cancer. [Table: see text]

212 Background: Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Recent data showed the detrimental effects of COVID-19 infection on other neoplasm conditions, causing increased mortality rates and complications. However, data on the precise effects of COVID-19 on hospitalized individuals with lung cancer are scarce. Methods: We analyzed the 2020 U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to investigate the effects of COVID-19 infection on cases primarily admitted due to lung and bronchus cancer. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for specified outcomes were calculated through multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality, with secondary outcomes including system-based complications. Statistical significance was established at a p-value of 0.05. Results: We identified 103,334 patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of lung and bronchus cancer. The mean age was 68.9 years; 50.5% were female. In the non-COVID group, Caucasians accounted for 75%, followed by Hispanics (12%). Of these, 0.36% (374/103,334) had a concurrent diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. In a survey multivariable logistic and linear regression model adjusting for patient and hospital factors, COVID-19 infection was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (aOR 5.39; 95% CI (3.01, 9.64), p < 0.001), higher mean length of stay (b 5.51; 95% CI (2.59, 8.43) p < 0.001), mean total hospital cost (b 10,683; 95% CI (784.32, 20,581.93) p = 0.034), shock (aOR 4.37; 95% CI (1.96, 9.91), p < 0.001), acute respiratory failure (aOR 2.23; 95% CI (1.30, 3.85), p = 0.004), mechanical ventilation usage (aOR 3.12; 95% CI (1.46, 6.66), p = 0.003) and acute kidney injury (aOR 2.71; 95% CI (1.54, 4.74), p < 0.001). We observed non-significant, but increased, risks of sepsis, SIRS, and coagulopathy in COVID-19-positive patients. Conclusions: In conclusion, our study underscores that COVID-19 infection is associated with higher in-hospital mortality and other major clinical outcomes in lung cancer, as well as increased economic burden and cost of stay. To definitively establish causal relationships between the observed factors and the reported clinical outcomes in this population, further longitudinal research is necessary.