Citations

Significance Repression of the large number of transposable elements in eukaryotic genomes is essential for genome stability. The Piwi-interacting RNA and short interfering RNA pathways are critical for repressing transposable elements in germlines, but the repression of transposable elements in somatic tissues involves other components. While the mammalian Hinfp has been shown to regulate Histone4 and cell-cycle progression, our manuscript provides evidence that a function of the Drosophila Hinfp is to maintain Histone1 expression to repress most transposable elements in somatic genomes. This Hinfp–Histone1 axis provides a venue to study maintenance of genome stability and progression of pathological outcomes.

Both genomic and non‐genomic mechanisms control the acquisition of specialized cellular phenotypes during development. When differentiated cells enter and exit mitosis, chromosomal condensation prevents gene expression. Post‐mitotic re‐activation of transcription is controlled in part by epigenetic marks on DNA and histones that control chromatin accessibility. However, mRNA molecules also appear to be transferred to progeny cells by either symmetrical or asymmetrical transmission. We have shown that the mRNA for the bone‐related transcription factor Runx2 mRNAs is elevated in the G2 phase of the cell cycle, but not translated in osteoblasts. This observation suggests that Runx2 protein is translationally rather than transcriptionally controlled after mitosis to maintain the phenotypic identity of osteoblasts. We used RNA‐seq expression profiling to assess whether there are other gene regulatory factors that are transmitted through mitosis. Our main results show that mRNAs for transcription factors are typically depleted during mitosis. For example, while Runx2 mRNA is retained in mitotic cells, expression of the closely related genes Runx1 and Runx3 is reduced. Strikingly, expression of Osterix/Sp7 and MEF2C, two transcription factors known to cooperate biologically with Runx2 in promoting the osteoblastic state, is selectively retained in mitotic cells. Our data suggest that selective somatic transmission of mRNAs for transcription factors in osteoblasts may be a general mechanism by which cells maintain their identity during cell division in skeletal development. Support or Funding Information NIH R01 AR049069 This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Transcriptional control of Runx2 gene expression through two alternative promoters (P1 and P2) is critical for the execution of its function as an osteogenic cell fate determining factor. Using genomic DNaseI footprinting and in vivo DNA binding assays, we identified a helix‐loop‐helix (HLH) motif that overlaps with a Runx motif in the P1 promoter. The HLH mutation decreases P1 transcription 10‐fold in mesenchymal cells, while mutation of the Runx site enhances transcription 2 fold. Although the HLH element is not cell‐type specific, its function may depend on promoter context. Promoter deletion analysis shows that a GA‐rich region (−200 to −128) positively regulates Runx2 P1 transcription and synergizes with the HLH motif. Examination of the −200/−128 region reveals two tandemly repeated GA‐rich elements (GAY motifs) that each contain recognition motifs for purine‐rich DNA binding factors (i.e., SP1 and KLF10/TGFâ Inducible Factor [TIEG]). Forced expression of SP1 or TIEG modulates Runx2 P1 promoter activity through the GAY motifs. Taken together, our data suggest that the Runx2 gene transcription is regulated by synergistic interactions at multiple conserved composite promoter elements to control Runx2 expression and skeletal development.

AbstractTranscription networks and epigenetic mechanisms including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and noncoding RNAs control lineage commitment of multipotent mesenchymal progenitor cells. Proteins that read, write, and erase histone tail modifications curate and interpret the highly intricate histone code. Epigenetic reader proteins that recognize and bind histone marks provide a crucial link between histone modifications and their downstream biological effects. Here, we investigate the role of bromodomain‐containing (BRD) proteins, which recognize acetylated histones, during osteogenic differentiation. Using RNA‐sequencing (RNA‐seq) analysis, we screened for BRD proteins (n = 40) that are robustly expressed in MC3T3 osteoblasts. We focused functional follow‐up studies on Brd2 and Brd4 which are highly expressed in MC3T3 preosteoblasts and represent “bromodomain and extra terminal domain” (BET) proteins that are sensitive to pharmacological agents (BET inhibitors). We show that small interfering RNA depletion of Brd4 has stronger inhibitory effects on osteoblast differentiation than Brd2 loss as measured by osteoblast‐related gene expression, extracellular matrix deposition, and alkaline phosphatase activity. Similar effects on osteoblast differentiation are seen with the BET inhibitor +JQ1, and this effect is reversible upon its removal indicating that this small molecule has no lasting effects on the differentiation capacity of MC3T3 cells. Mechanistically, we find that Brd4 binds at known Runx2 binding sites in promoters of bone‐related genes. Collectively, these findings suggest that Brd4 is recruited to osteoblast‐specific genes and may cooperate with bone‐related transcription factors to promote osteoblast lineage commitment and maturation.

Cells establish and sustain structural and functional integrity of the genome to support cellular identity and prevent malignant transformation. In this review, we present a strategic overview of epigenetic regulatory mechanisms including histone modifications and higher order chromatin organization (HCO) that are perturbed in breast cancer onset and progression. Implications for dysfunctions that occur in hormone regulation, cell cycle control, and mitotic bookmarking in breast cancer are considered, with an emphasis on epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell activities. The architectural organization of regulatory machinery is addressed within the contexts of translating cancer‐compromised genomic organization to advances in breast cancer risk assessment, diagnosis, prognosis, and identification of novel therapeutic targets with high specificity and minimal off target effects.

Abstract Osteosarcomas are bone tumors that frequently metastasize to the lung. Aberrant expression of the transcription factor, runt‐related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), is a key pathological feature in osteosarcoma and associated with loss of p53 and miR‐34 expression. Elevated RUNX2 may transcriptionally activate genes mediating tumor progression and metastasis, including the RUNX2 target gene osteopontin ( OPN/SPP1 ). This gene encodes a secreted matricellular protein produced by osteoblasts to regulate bone matrix remodeling and tissue calcification. Here we investigated whether and how the RUNX2/OPN axis regulates lung metastasis of osteosarcoma. Importantly, RUNX2 depletion attenuates lung metastasis of osteosarcoma cells in vivo. Using next‐generation RNA‐sequencing, protein‐based assays, as well as the loss‐ and gain‐of‐function approaches in selected osteosarcoma cell lines, we show that osteopontin messenger RNA levels closely correlate with RUNX2 expression and that RUNX2 controls the levels of secreted osteopontin. Elevated osteopontin levels promote heterotypic cell–cell adhesion of osteosarcoma cells to human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells, but not in the presence of neutralizing antibodies. Collectively, these findings indicate that the RUNX2/OPN axis regulates the ability of osteosarcoma cells to attach to pulmonary endothelial cells as a key step in metastasis of osteosarcoma cells to the lung.

AbstractThe RUNX1 transcription factor has recently been shown to be obligatory for normal development. RUNX1 controls the expression of genes essential for proper development in many cell lineages and tissues including blood, bone, cartilage, hair follicles, and mammary glands. Compromised RUNX1 regulation is associated with many cancers. In this review, we highlight evidence for RUNX1 control in both invertebrate and mammalian development and recent novel findings of perturbed RUNX1 control in breast cancer that has implications for other solid tumors. As RUNX1 is essential for definitive hematopoiesis, RUNX1 mutations in hematopoietic lineage cells have been implicated in the etiology of several leukemias. Studies of solid tumors have revealed a context‐dependent function for RUNX1 either as an oncogene or a tumor suppressor. These RUNX1 functions have been reported for breast, prostate, lung, and skin cancers that are related to cancer subtypes and different stages of tumor development. Growing evidence suggests that RUNX1 suppresses aggressiveness in most breast cancer subtypes particularly in the early stage of tumorigenesis. Several studies have identified RUNX1 suppression of the breast cancer epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition. Most recently, RUNX1 repression of cancer stem cells and tumorsphere formation was reported for breast cancer. It is anticipated that these new discoveries of the context‐dependent diversity of RUNX1 functions will lead to innovative therapeutic strategies for the intervention of cancer and other abnormalities of normal tissues.

Abstract Expression of Runx2/p57 is a hallmark of the osteoblast‐lineage identity. Although several regulators that control the expression of Runx2/p57 during osteoblast‐lineage commitment have been identified, the epigenetic mechanisms that sustain this expression in differentiated osteoblasts remain to be completely determined. Here, we assess epigenetic mechanisms associated with Runx2/p57 gene transcription in differentiating MC3T3 mouse osteoblasts. Our results show that an enrichment of activating histone marks at the Runx2/p57 P1 promoter is accompanied by the simultaneous interaction of Wdr5 and Utx proteins, both are components of COMPASS complexes. Knockdown of Wdr5 and Utx expression confirms the activating role of both proteins at the Runx2‐P1 promoter. Other chromatin modifiers that were previously described to regulate Runx2/p57 transcription in mesenchymal precursor cells (Ezh2, Prmt5, and Jarid1b proteins) were not found to contribute to Runx2/p57 transcription in full‐committed osteoblasts. We also determined the presence of additional components of COMPASS complexes at the Runx2/p57 promoter, evidencing that the Mll2/COMPASS‐ and Mll3/COMPASS‐like complexes bind to the P1 promoter in osteoblastic cells expressing Runx2/p57 to modulate the H3K4me1 to H3K4me3 transition.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, and accounts for ~30% of new cancer cases and 15% of cancer‐related deaths. Tumor relapse and metastasis are primary factors contributing to breast cancer‐related deaths. Therefore, the challenge for breast cancer treatment is to sustain remission. A driving force behind tumor relapse is breast cancer heterogeneity (both intertumor, between different patients, and intratumor, within the same tumor). Understanding breast cancer heterogeneity is necessary to develop preventive interventions and targeted therapies. A recently emerging concept is that intratumor heterogeneity is driven by cancer stem cells (CSCs) that are capable of giving rise to a multitude of different cells within a tumor. Studies have highlighted linkage of CSC formation with epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition (EMT). In this review, we summarize the current understanding of breast cancer heterogeneity, links between EMT and CSCs, regulation of EMT by Runx transcription factors, and potential therapeutic strategies targeting these processes.

AbstractOsteoblast differentiation is controlled by transcription factor RUNX2 which temporally activates or represses several bone‐related genes, including those encoding extracellular matrix proteins or factors that control cell‐cell, and cell‐matrix interactions. Cell‐cell communication in the many skeletal pericellular micro‐niches is critical for bone development and involves paracrine secretion of growth factors and morphogens. This paracrine signaling is in part regulated by “A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase” (ADAM) proteins. These cell membrane‐associated metalloproteinases support proteolytic release (“shedding”) of protein ectodomains residing at the cell surface. We analyzed microarray and RNA‐sequencing data for Adam genes and show that Adam17, Adam10, and Adam9 are stimulated during BMP2 mediated induction of osteogenic differentiation and are robustly expressed in human osteoblastic cells. ADAM17, which was initially identified as a tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) converting enzyme also called (TACE), regulates TNFα‐signaling pathway, which inhibits osteoblast differentiation. We demonstrate that Adam17 expression is suppressed by RUNX2 during osteoblast differentiation through the proximal Adam17 promoter region (−0.4 kb) containing two functional RUNX2 binding motifs. Adam17 downregulation during osteoblast differentiation is paralleled by increased RUNX2 expression, cytoplasmic‐nuclear translocation and enhanced binding to the Adam17 proximal promoter. Forced expression of Adam17 reduces Runx2 and Alpl expression, indicating that Adam17 may negatively modulate osteoblast differentiation. These findings suggest a novel regulatory mechanism involving a reciprocal Runx2‐Adam17 negative feedback loop to regulate progression through osteoblast differentiation. Our results suggest that RUNX2 may control paracrine signaling through regulation of ectodomain shedding at the cell surface of osteoblasts by directly suppressing Adam17 expression.