Citations

Purpose To evaluate return‐to‐sport (RTS) rates and patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) following hip arthroscopic labral repair for femoroacetabular impingement in active basketball players with a minimum of 2‐year follow‐up. Methods All patients who were active basketball players and underwent hip arthroscopy with labral repair for femoroacetabular impingement from 2009 to 2022 were identified. Patients were evaluated for postoperative RTS and revision surgery at a minimum 2‐year follow‐up. RTS was defined as resuming basketball participation, at any level. Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score‐Activities of Daily Living (HOS‐ADL) and Sport (HOS‐Sport), and surgery satisfaction were also collected. Results Sixty‐seven hips in 54 athletes (29 male, 25 female) with a mean age of 22.2 years (range 13‐39 years) were included. Eighty‐six (86%) were recreational or high school basketball players. There was significant improvement in all PROMs from baseline to a minimum 2‐year follow‐up (all P < .001). After excluding for athletes who did not RTS for nonmedical reasons, 78% of athletes returned to basketball following hip arthroscopy. Including patients who cited nonmedical reasons for not returning, the overall RTS rate was 65%. Athletes who RTS had significantly higher mHHS ( P = .012), HOS‐ADL ( P = .006), and HOS‐Sport ( P = .002), as well as lower visual analog scale pain (2.2 vs 3.4, P = .037) than those who did not RTS. Calculated minimal clinically important difference values were 8.3 for mHHS, 7.2 for HOS‐ADL, and 13.4 for HOS‐Sport. Anchor‐based patient acceptable symptom state calculations yielded thresholds of 83.5 for mHHS, 92.6 for HOS‐ADL, and 79.2 for HOS‐Sport—with 70%, 63%, and 67% of patients achieving these thresholds, respectively. Conclusions Basketball players who undergo hip arthroscopic labral repair for femoroacetabular impingement show significant improvements in PROMs with 78% RTS rate at a minimum 2‐year follow‐up. Although many athletes discontinued basketball for reasons unrelated to the hip, 18% cited hip issues. Basketball players who successfully return to basketball report higher PROMs than nonreturners, and cohort‐specific minimal clinically important difference analysis indicates that most athletes achieve clinically meaningful improvements. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic retrospective case series.

Background: Despite the growing clinical relevance of obesity in the context of multiligament knee injuries, there remains a paucity of data evaluating patient-reported outcomes in this population. Purpose: To compare clinical and functional outcomes, including postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complication/revision rates, of multiligament knee reconstruction (MLKR) in individuals with a body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m 2 versus <30 kg/m 2 at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent MLKR between 2001 and 2022 at a single institution. Patients with a BMI >30 kg/m 2 were propensity-matched to patients with a BMI <30 kg/m 2 on a 1:1 basis by age, sex, laterality, and Schenck classification (knee dislocation). Medical records were reviewed for patient characteristics, time to surgery, year of surgery, number and type of ligament interventions, graft choice, single versus staged reconstruction, and concomitant injuries. Postoperative clinical examination findings and PROMs for each cohort, including visual analog scale score, Tegner activity scale score, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, were analyzed and compared. Postoperative complication and revision rates were evaluated and compared. Results: Of 158 patients, 79 patients with a BMI <30 kg/m 2 (mean age, 31.0 ± 11.5 years; mean BMI, 25.8 ± 3.0 kg/m 2 ) were matched to 79 patients with a BMI >30 kg/m 2 (mean age, 32.8 ± 9.5 years; mean BMI, 37.1 ± 5.8 kg/m 2 ). There were no significant differences between cohorts regarding age, sex, laterality, and Schenck classification ( P ≥ .100); however, patients in the BMI >30 kg/m 2 group had greater numbers of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The mean follow-up was 7.5 ± 4.8 years for the BMI <30 kg/m 2 cohort and 7.2 ± 4.8 years for the BMI >30 kg/m 2 cohort ( P = .229). Patients with a lower BMI (<30 kg/m 2 ) had significantly better postoperative mean IKDC (79.3 ± 18.7 vs 67.9 ± 21.2; P = .004), Lysholm (85.1 ± 17.1 vs 75.7 ± 21.0; P = .007), and Tegner (5.1 ± 2.0 vs 4.4 ± 1.7; P = .041) scores. The BMI >30 kg/m 2 group also had significantly more postoperative complications ( P = .028). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 cohorts in terms of reoperation rate or conversion to total knee arthroplasty ( P ≥ .189). Conclusion: Patients who undergo MLKR and have a BMI >30 kg/m 2 demonstrate significantly decreased postoperative PROMs when compared to patients with a BMI <30 kg/m 2 . Increasing BMI significantly increased the incidence of complication rates after MLKR.

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common injury experienced by basketball players. Surgical management with arthroscopic labral repair and femoral osteochondroplasty can lead to successful outcomes for athletes whose nonoperative management fails. Recent studies have demonstrated that athletes undergoing hip arthroscopy in the setting of FAI had favorable return-to-sport (RTS) and sport continuation outcomes. Purpose: To evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and RTS rates at minimum 5-year follow-up in basketball players after hip arthroscopy for FAI. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All active basketball players at the recreational, high school, and collegiate levels who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair for FAI between August 2009 and December 2019 were identified. Postoperative RTS, revision rates, and surgery satisfaction at final follow-up were evaluated. PROMs were also analyzed as follows: visual analog scale, Tegner Activity Scale, modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, and Hip Outcome Score–Sport. Results: Fifty-three patients (64 hips) were included with a mean ± SD age of 21.2 ± 6.0 years. Most athletes played recreational or high school basketball (85%), while 15% played college basketball. Forty-three patients attempted to return to basketball. Of these patients, 35 (81%) returned to basketball after surgery, with 32 (91%) returning to the same level of play. Patients who returned to basketball had significantly improved outcomes on the modified Harris Hip Score ( P = .006), Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living ( P = .007), Hip Outcome Score–Sport ( P = .004), Tegner Activity Scale ( P = .010), and visual analog scale with use ( P = .041) as compared with those who did not return. High school athletes had decreased odds of RTS when compared with recreational athletes ( P = .01). There was significant improvement in all PROMs from baseline to minimum 5-year follow-up ( P < .05). Conclusion: At minimum 5-year follow-up, basketball players demonstrated durable improvements in PROMs and an RTS rate of 81% after hip arthroscopy for FAI. The majority of athletes returned to the same level of competition. There were significantly improved PROMs in patients who returned to sport versus those who did not. High school athletes had decreased odds of RTS when compared with recreational athletes. However, body mass index, sex, age, alpha angle, and basketball position did not significantly correlate with RTS outcomes.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess return to play (RTP), patient-reported outcomes (PRO), and reoperation rates following patellofemoral stabilization surgeries (PSS) for recurrent patellar instability (RPI) in a cohort of competitive wrestlers. Methods: All competitive wrestlers with a history of an RPI and subsequent PSS at a single institution between 2000 and 2020 were identified. Primary PSS ranged from MPFL reconstruction (n = 31; 50%) or MPFL repair (n = 22; 33.5%), and other PSS (n = 9; 14.5%) in the form of tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO), lateral retinaculum release (LRR), and medial retinaculum reefing (MRR). Exclusion criteria included revision PSS, or concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or multi ligament knee injury. All patients were contacted for determination of reinjury rates, current sport status, and PROs. Surgical failure defined as subsequent patellar dislocation despite operative management or need for secondary PSS. Results: Ultimately, 62 knees in 56 wrestlers were included at a mean follow-up time of 6.6 years (range, 2.0 – 18.8 years). RTP occurred in 55.3% of wrestlers at a mean of 8.8 ± 6.7 months. Among the PSS no differences were observed between rates of RTP (P = .676), postoperative pain (P = .176), Tegner activity level (P = .801), International Knee Documentation Committee (P = .378), Lysholm (P = .402), or Kujala scores (P = .370). Recurrent patellar instability was the most common complication in 21% of knees. Among PSS types, MPFL reconstruction had the lowest rate of RPI (6.5% vs. 27.3% vs. 55.6%; P = .005), and surgical failure (9.7% vs. 31.8% vs. 55.6%; P = .008). Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from surgical failure of the entire cohort was 91.9% at 1 year, 77.7% at 5 years, and 65.7% at 15 years. MPFL reconstruction had the highest survivorship when compared to MPFL repair and other PSS up to 10 years after the index surgery (90.3% vs. 64.1% vs. 27.8%; P = .048). Conclusions: Recurrent patellar instability remains a concern for competitive wrestlers after PSS. MPFL reconstruction may serve as a more durable surgical treatment option with lower rates of RPI and failure when compared to other PSS up to 10 years after surgery. [Table: see text]

Background: The extent to which recurrent patellar instability (RPI) affects wrestlers has not been thoroughly examined. Purpose: To assess return to wrestling (RTW), patient-reported outcomes, and reoperation rates after patellofemoral stabilization surgery (PFSS) for RPI in a cohort of competitive wrestlers. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All competitive wrestlers with a history of RPI and subsequent PFSS performed at a single institution between 2000 and 2020 were identified. Primary PFSS procedures included medial patellofemoral (MPFL) reconstruction (n = 31; 50%); MPFL repair (n = 22; 35.5%); or other PFSS (n = 9; 14.5%), such as tibial tubercle osteotomy, lateral retinacular release, and/or medial retinacular reefing. Exclusion criteria included revision PFSS or concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or multiligament knee injury. Surgical failure was defined as subsequent patellar dislocation despite operative management or need for secondary PFSS. Results: Ultimately, 62 knees in 56 wrestlers with a mean age of 17.0 years (range, 14.0-22.8 years) were included at a mean follow-up of 6.6 years (range, 2.0-18.8 years). RTW occurred in 55.3% of wrestlers at a mean ± SD 8.8 ± 6.7 months. Among PFSS types, no differences were observed in rates of RTW ( P = .676), postoperative pain ( P = .176), Tegner activity level ( P = .801), International Knee Documentation Committee ( P = .378), Lysholm ( P = .402), or Kujala scores ( P = .370). RPI was the most common postoperative complication (n = 13; 21.0%). MPFL reconstruction had the lowest rate of RPI (6.5% vs 27.3% [repair] vs 55.6% [other]; P = .005) and surgical failure (9.7% vs 31.8% [repair] vs 55.6% [other]; P = .008). Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from surgical failure of the entire cohort was 91.9% at 1 year, 77.7% at 5 years, and 65.7% at 15 years. MPFL reconstruction had the highest survivorship when compared with MPFL repair and other PFSS up to 10 years after the index surgery (90.3% vs 64.1% vs 27.8%; P = .048). Conclusion: RPI remains a concern for competitive wrestlers after PFSS. MPFL reconstruction may serve as a more durable surgical treatment option with lower rates of RPI and failure when compared with other PFSS procedures at up to 10 years after surgery.

Background: Multiple studies have compared outcomes among patients undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with autograft versus allograft, but these data are inconsistently reported and long-term outcomes depending on graft type are yet to be determined. Purpose: To perform a systematic review of clinical outcomes after revision ACLR (rACLR) with autograft versus allograft. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify studies that compared the outcomes of patients undergoing rACLR with autograft versus allograft. The search phrase used was autograft allograft revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Graft rerupture rates, return-to-sports rates, anteroposterior laxity, and patient-reported outcome scores (subjective International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner, Lysholm, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) were evaluated. Results: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria, including 3011 patients undergoing rACLR with autograft (mean age, 28.9 years) and 1238 patients undergoing rACLR with allograft (mean age, 28.0 years). Mean follow-up was 57.3 months. The most common autograft and allograft types were bone–patellar tendon–bone grafts. Overall, 6.2% of patients undergoing rACLR experienced graft retear, including 4.7% in the autograft group and 10.2% in the allograft group ( P < .0001). Among studies that reported return-to-sports rates, 66.2% of patients with an autograft returned to sports as opposed to 45.3% of patients with an allograft ( P = .01). Two studies found significantly greater postoperative knee laxity in the allograft group as compared with the autograft group ( P < .05). Among all patient-reported outcomes, 1 study found 1 significant difference between groups: patients with an autograft had a significantly higher postoperative Lysholm score when compared with patients with an allograft. Conclusion: Patients undergoing revision ACLR with an autograft can be expected to experience lower rates of graft retear, higher rates of return to sports, and less postoperative anteroposterior knee laxity when compared with patients undergoing revision ACLR with an allograft.

AbstractBackgroundCompared to other sarcomas, myxoid liposarcoma (ML) is known to be radiosensitive, with improved oncologic outcomes. Although these tumors “shrink” following radiotherapy, there is a paucity of data examining the degree of radiosensitivity and oncologic outcome. The purpose of the study was to evaluate pre‐ and postradiotherapy tumor volume to determine if size reduction impacts outcome.MethodsWe reviewed 62 patients with ML undergoing surgical resection combined with preoperative radiotherapy, with pre‐ and postradiotherapy MRI. This included 34 (55%) males, with a mean age of 47 ± 14 years. All tumors were deep to the fascia, and 12 (19%) patients had tumors with a >5% round‐cell component.ResultsThe mean volume reduction was 54% ± 29%. Compared to patients with >25% volume reduction, patients with reduction ≤25% had worse 10‐year disease specific survival (86% vs. 37%, p < 0.01), in addition to an increased risk of metastatic disease (HR 4.63, p < 0.01) and death due to disease (HR 4.52, p < 0.01).ConclusionLack of volume reduction is a risk factor for metastatic disease and subsequent death due to disease in patients with extremity ML treated with combined preoperative radiotherapy and surgery. This data could be used to stratify patients for adjuvant therapies and follow‐up intervals.

Case: This report describes a case of a posterior oblique ligament (POL) bony avulsion fracture associated with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear in a 16-year-old female gymnast. The avulsion fracture was discovered on repeat radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging after the patient developed increased pain after ACL reconstruction. After excising the bony avulsion and repairing the POL, she reported complete resolution of her preoperative pain. Conclusion: Bony avulsion fractures of the POL are rare and challenging to diagnose. Awareness of this injury and the subtle imaging findings will help clinicians appropriately diagnose and treat these lesions.

Aims Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells obtained from bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), has been used as an adjuvant to hip decompression. Early results have shown promise for hip preservation in patients with osteonecrosis (ON) of the femoral head. The purpose of the current study is to examine the mid-term outcome of this treatment in patients with precollapse corticosteroid-induced ON of the femoral head. Methods In all, 22 patients (35 hips; 11 males and 11 females) with precollapse corticosteroid-induced ON of the femoral head underwent hip decompression combined with BMAC and PRP. Mean age and BMI were 43 years (SD 12) and 31 kg/m² (SD 6), respectively, at the time of surgery. Survivorship free from femoral head collapse and total hip arthroplasty (THA) and risk factors for progression were evaluated at minimum five-years of clinical follow-up with a mean follow-up of seven years (5 to 8). Results Survivorship free from femoral head collapse and THA for any reason was 84% and 67% at seven years postoperatively, respectively. Risk factors for conversion to THA included a high preoperative modified Kerboul angle (grade 3 or 4) based on preoperative MRI (hazard ratio (HR) 3.96; p = 0.047) and corticosteroid use at the time of decompression (HR 4.15; p = 0.039). The seven-year survivorship for patients with grade 1 or 2 Kerboul angles for conversion to THA for articular collapse, and THA for any reason, were 96% and 72%, respectively, versus THA for articular collapse and THA for any reason in patients with grade 3 or 4 Kerboul angles of 40% (p = 0.003) and 40% (p = 0.032). Conclusion At seven years, hip decompression augmented with BMAC and PRP provided a 67% survivorship free from THA in patients with corticosteroid-induced ON. Ideal candidates for this procedure are patients with low preoperative Kerboul angles and can stop corticosteroid treatment prior to decompression. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):926–931.

Background: Various analgesic modalities have been used to improve postoperative pain in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Purpose: To systematically review the literature to compare the efficacy of the fascia iliaca block (FIB) with that of other analgesic modalities after hip arthroscopy in terms of postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase up to April 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared postoperative pain and analgesic consumption in patients after hip arthroscopy with FIB versus other pain control modalities. The search phrase used was “hip arthroscopy fascia iliaca randomized.” Patients were evaluated based on postoperative pain scores and total postoperative analgesic consumption. Results: Five studies (3 level 1, 2 level 2) were identified that met inclusion criteria, including 157 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with FIB (mean age, 38.3 years; 44.6% men) and 159 patients among the following comparison groups: lumbar plexus block (LPB), intra-articular ropivacaine (IAR), local anesthetic infiltration (LAI), saline placebo, and a no-block control group (overall mean age, 36.2 years; 36.5% men). No significant differences in pain scores were reported in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) between the FIB and LPB (3.4 vs 2.9; P = .054), IAR (7.7 vs 7.9; P = .72), control group (no FIB: 4.1 vs 3.8; P = .76); or saline placebo (difference, –0.2 [95% CI, –1.1 to 0.7]). One study reported significantly higher pain scores at 1 hour postoperation in the FIB group compared with the LAI group (5.5 vs 3.4; P = .02). Another study reported significantly greater total analgesic consumption (in morphine equivalent dosing) in the PACU among the FIB group compared with the LPB group (20.8 vs 17.0; P = .02). No significant differences were observed in total PACU analgesic consumption between FIB and other analgesic modalities. Conclusion: In patients undergoing hip arthroscopy, the FIB does not appear to demonstrate superiority to other forms of analgesics in the immediate postoperative period. Therefore, it is not recommended as a routine form of pain control for these procedures.