Citations

Clear

19 citation(s) found for "Shapiro, Jeremy".

Endothelial Cell Loss 1 Year After Successful DMEK in the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study
Lass, Jonathan H. , Lass, Jonathan H., Benetz, Beth Ann, Verdier, David D., Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta B., Bauza, Colleen E., Reed, Zachariah W., Greiner, Mark A., Mian, Shahzad I., Patel, Sanjay V., Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis W., Soper, Mark C., Terry, Mark A., Titus, Michael S., Kollman, Craig, Beck, Roy W., Price, Marianne O., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Gang, Anjulie, Hall, Taylor, Lucas, Katelyn, Lynn, Ashlyn, Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Baratz, Keith H. , Hardtke, Elainey, Treichel, Emily J., Hood, Christopher , Nallasamy, Nambi , Verkade, Angela , Jones, Kristin, Shapiro, Jeremy N. , Leavy, Lisa, Sinkey, Chris, Tenkman, Lawrence R., Gordon, DJ, Ketcherside, Christopher, Fox, Jenni, Coonfield, Kristy, Vislisel, Jesse M., Sharma, Yogi, Young, Angela M. , Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James, Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Phillips, Paul, Maloney, Charlene, Jun, Albert S. , Maria, Christina, Boyce, Michelle, Kam, Yong, Crosser, Vicki, Chen, Jessica , Straiko, Michael D., Bauer, Alex, Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Veldman, Peter B., Evans, Que, Majmudar, Parag A., Epstein, Rachel , Vaidya, Neal, Rosselson, Marie, Nykaza, Jim, Jurkunas, Ula V., Venkateswaran, Nandini, Cheung, Michael K., Ayres, Brandon D. , Haught, Drew Monteleone, Prasad, Elizabeth, Toti, G, Wier, Jim, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Hansen, Mark, Hardten, David R., Reeves, Sherman, Dreyer, Allison, Mack, Megan, Hamill, M. Bowes , Nguyen, Jessica, Koo, Ellen, Stanfield, Ryan, Greenwood, Michael, Ernst, L, Messer, Brooke, Risbrudt, Nick, Stofferahn, Seth, Saville, Alyson, Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Potts, Luke B. , Alexander, Jamie, Rinn, Jennifer, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Sica, Chris, Buckman, Natalie, Ansin, Amy, Clover, Jameson , Pivoney, Charles, Vizzerra, Anthony, Elbanhawy, Lindsey, Mullins, Monica, Statz, Brianne, Fout, Elizabeth, Drury, Donna, Tavolazzi, Trisha, Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta, Richards, Leslie, Raghupathy, Sangeetha, Spruill, Rashad, Bauza, Colleen, Kollman, Craig, Garrett, Kaitlyn, Reed, Zachariah, Benetz, Beth Ann, Lê, Jimmy T. , Redford, Maryann , Arafah, Baha M. , Greiner, Mark, Johnson, Paula C, Keeler, D. K., Monnier, Vincent M. , Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Soper, Mark, Velhuisen, Paul Van, Hawkins, Barbara S., Macsai, Marian S., Patel, Sanjay, Mian, Shahzad, Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Gabrielson, Deanna, Barton, Glenn, Bear, Andrew, Das, Pravamaya, Dawson, Lauren, Dingess, Ryan, Madere, Mark, Sengupta, Pratim , Wadleigh, Garth, Greiner, Mark A. , Lass, Jonathan H., Benetz, Beth Ann, Verdier, David D., Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta B., Bauza, Colleen E., Reed, Zachariah W., Greiner, Mark A., Mian, Shahzad I., Patel, Sanjay V., Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis W., Soper, Mark C., Terry, Mark A., Titus, Michael S., Kollman, Craig, Price, Marianne O., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Gang, Anjulie, Hall, Taylor, Lucas, Katelyn, Lynn, Ashlyn, Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Hood, Christopher, Sáles, Christopher S. , Sinkey, Chris, Gordon, DJ, Ketcherside, Christopher, Fox, Jenni, Young, Angela, Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James, Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Srikumaran, Divya S. , Daoud, Yassine J. , Eghrari, Allen Omid , Ali, Muhammad , Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Epstein, Rachel H. , Vaidya, Neal, Jurkunas, Ula V. , Cheung, Michael, Prasad, Elizabeth, Toti, Gwen, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Hansen, Mark, Reeves, Sherman, Dreyer, Allison, Mack, Megan, Nguyen, Jessica, Greenwood, Michael, Messer, Brooke, Saville, Alyson, Omar, Ahmed F. , Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Rinn, Jennifer, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Sica, Chris, Schmidt, Gregory A. , Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Price, Marianne O. , Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta, Richards, Leslie, Bauza, Colleen, Beck, Roy W. , Kollman, Craig, McCarthy, Chris, Garrett, Kaitlyn, Reed, Zachariah, Benetz, Beth Ann, Greiner, Mark, Johnson, Paula, Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Soper, Mark, Aleppo, Grazia , Bateman-House, Alison , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Patel, Sanjay, Mian, Shahzad, Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Gabrielson, Deanna, Barton, Glenn, Bear, Andrew, Das, Pravamaya, Dingess, Ryan, Sengupta, Paromita

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Ophthalmology | October 17, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1053

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.4261 | PMID 41105099 Get It

Importance The effect of cornea donor diabetes on endothelial cell density (ECD) and morphometry after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is not known. Objective To determine whether endothelial cell loss (ECL) and morphometric changes 1 year after successful DMEK are related to cornea donor’s diabetes status. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2022 to July 2024 at 28 US clinical sites (46 surgeons) and 13 eye banks. Included in the trial were the eyes of recipients (some of whom received tissue from donors without diabetes and others who received tissue from donors with diabetes) who underwent successful DMEK, primarily for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, and had at least 1 analyzable postoperative endothelial image. Intervention DMEK performed with a cornea from a donor without or with diabetes, assigned using a minimization procedure to achieve an approximate 2:1 distribution. Main Outcomes and Measures ECD, ECL, coefficient of variation in cell area (CV), and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX) at 1 year from eye bank and postoperative specular central endothelial images. Results A total 1274 eyes of 982 recipients (mean [SD] age, 70 [8] years; 569 female [57.9%]; 816 [64.1%] with tissue from donors without diabetes and 458 [35.9%] with tissue from donors with diabetes) were included in the study. Preoperatively, mean (SD) central ECD in tissue from donors without diabetes and with diabetes were 2676 (290) cells/mm 2 and 2671 (286) cells/mm 2 , respectively. At 1 year, mean (SD) ECL was 28.3% (16.1%) and 28.0% (17.0%), in the donor groups without and with diabetes, respectively (adjusted mean difference = −0.4%; 95% CI, −2.3% to 1.4%), resulting in a mean (SD) 1-year ECD of 1927 (498) cells/mm 2 and 1920 (496) cells/mm 2 , respectively (adjusted mean difference = 10 cells/mm 2 ; 95% CI, −36 to 56; P = .95). No difference in ECD at 1 year associated with diabetes severity was noted ( P = .97). Mean (SD) CV did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (31.5% [4.1%] vs 31.4% [4.1%]; adjusted mean difference = −0.4%; 95% CI, −0.9% to 0.1%; P = .51), and mean (SD) HEX did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (57.7% [5.8%] vs 57.2% [5.8%]; adjusted mean difference = 0.1%, 95% CI, −0.8% to 0.9%; P = .33). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found that ECL and morphometry 1 year after DMEK were not affected by cornea donor diabetes status. With comparable 1-year graft success with tissue from donors with and without diabetes demonstrated in this trial, these findings support the use of corneas from donors with diabetes for endothelial keratoplasty procedures. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05134480
Donor Diabetes and 1-Year Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Success Rate
Price, Francis W. , Szczotka‐Flynn, Loretta , Bauza, Colleen , Reed, Zachariah W., Arafah, Baha M. , Greiner, Mark A. , Johnson, Paula, Keeler, Devon B., Pramanik, Sudeep, Soper, Mark, Terry, Mark A., Titus, Michael S. , Verdier, David D. , Kollman, Craig, Lass, Jonathan H. , Lass, Jonathan H., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Gang, Anjulie, Hall, Taylor, Lynn, A. G., Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Baratz, Keith H. , Hardtke, Elainey, Treichel, Emily J., Hood, Christopher , Nallasamy, Nambi , Verkade, Angela , Jones, Kristin, Shapiro, Jeremy, Leavy, Lisa, Sinkey, Chris, Tenkman, Lawrence R., Gordon, DJ, Ketcherside, Christopher, Fox, Jenni, Coonfield, Kristy, Vislisel, Jesse M., Sharma, Yogi, Young, Angela M. , Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James L. , Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Phillips, Paul, Maloney, Charlene, Jun, Albert S. , Maria, Christina, Boyce, Michelle, Kam, Yong, Crosser, Vicki, Chen, Jessica , Straiko, Michael D., Bauer, Alex, Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Veldman, Peter B., Evans, Que, Majmudar, Parag A., Epstein, Rachel , Vaidya, N. N., Nykaza, Jim, Venkateswaran, Nandini, Ayres, Brandon D. , Haught, Drew Monteleone, Prasad, Elizabeth, Toti, Gwen, Wier, Jim, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Hansen, Mark D., Hardten, David R., Reeves, Sherman W., Dreyer, Allison, Mack, Megan, Hamill, Mark, Nguyen, Jessica , Stanfield, Ryan, Greenwood, Michael , Ernst, Lindsay, Risbrudt, Nick, Saville, Alyson, Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Potts, Luke B. , Alexander, Jamie, Rinn, Jennifer, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Sica, Chris, Buckman, Natalie, Ansin, Amy, Clover, Jameson , Pivoney, Charles, Vizzerra, Anthony, Elbanhawy, Lindsey, Mullins, Monica, Statz, Brianne, Fout, Elizabeth, Drury, Donna, Tavolazzi, Trisha, Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Richards, Leslie, Raghupathy, Sangeetha, Spruill, Rashad, Bauza, Colleen, Beck, Roy, Garrett, Kaitlyn, Reed, Zachariah, Benetz, Beth Ann , Lê, Jimmy T. , Redford, Maryann , Arafah, Baha, Greiner, Mark, Keeler, Devon, Monnier, Vincent M. , Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Velhuisen, Paul Van, Hawkins, Barbara S., Macsai, Marian S., Patel, Sanjay, Mian, Shahzad I. , Pramanik, Sudeep , Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Gabrielson, Deanna, Barton, Glenn, Bear, Andrew, Das, Pravamaya, Dawson, Lauren, Dingess, Ryan, Madere, Mark, Wadleigh, Garth, Price, Marianne O. , Mian, Shahzad I. , Patel, Sanjay V. , Pramanik, Sudeep, Titus, Michael S., Beck, Roy W. , Lass, Jonathan H., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Lynn, Ashlyn, Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Hardtke, Elainey, Hood, Christopher, Shapiro, Jeremy, Sáles, Christopher S. , Leavy, Lisa, Gordon, DJ, Fox, Jenni, Coonfield, Kristy, Young, Angela, Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James, Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Srikumaran, Divya S. , Daoud, Yassine J. , Eghrari, Allen Omid , Ali, Muhammad , Crosser, Vicki, Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Evans, Que, Epstein, Rachel H. , Nykaza, Jim, Jurkunas, Ula V. , Cheung, Michael, Wier, Jim, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Mack, Megan, Hamill, M. Bowes, Nguyen, Jessica, Koo, Ellen H. , Stanfield, Ryan, Risbrudt, Nick, Saville, Alyson, Omar, Ahmed F. , Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Schmidt, Gregory A. , Elbanhawy, Lindsey, Statz, Brianne, Tavolazzi, Trisha, Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Richards, Leslie, Spruill, Rashad, Bauza, Colleen, Beck, Roy, McCarthy, Chris, Reed, Zachariah, Arafah, Baha, Greiner, Mark, Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Velhuisen, Paul Van, Aleppo, Grazia , Bateman-House, Alison , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Patel, Sanjay, Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Barton, Glenn, Das, Pravamaya, Dingess, Ryan, Madere, Mark, Sengupta, Partha Pratim , Wadleigh, Garth

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Ophthalmology | October 17, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1043

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.4253 | PMID 41105094 Get It

Importance If the success of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is not affected by whether the donor has diabetes, then the donor pool should expand. Objective To determine whether the 1-year DMEK success rate is affected by the presence of diabetes in the donor. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2022 to July 2025 at 28 clinical sites (46 surgeons), with donor corneas provided by 13 eye banks in the US. Included in the study were individuals undergoing low to moderate risk DMEK (95% for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy). Study data were analyzed from April to September 2025. Intervention DMEK performed with a cornea from a donor without or with diabetes, assigned using a minimization procedure (comparable with randomization) to achieve an approximate 2:1 distribution, respectively. Main Outcomes and Measures Graft success at 1 year Results A total of 1097 individuals (1421 study eyes; median [IQR] age, 71 [66-76] years; 631 female [57.5%]) were included in the study. The 1-year cumulative probability of graft success was 96.3% (95% CI, 95.0%-97.5%) among 912 study eyes (64.2%) receiving tissue from donors without diabetes and 97.1% (95% CI, 95.5%-98.4%) among 509 study eyes (35.8%) receiving tissue from donors with diabetes (difference between groups = 0.7 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.2 to 2.6; P = .63). The 1-year cumulative probability of graft success was 96.5% (95% CI, 93.6%-98.9%) in the mild donor diabetes severity subgroup (n = 173) and 97.3% (95% CI, 95.4%-98.8%) in the moderate to severe donor diabetes severity subgroup (n = 336), using a diabetes severity rating scale based on medical history. The rates of primary donor failure, early failure related to surgical complications, and subsequent failure were as follows: 2.5% (23 of 912), 0.7% (6 of 912), and 0.3% (3 of 912), respectively, in recipients of tissue from a donor without diabetes, and 2.6% (13 of 509), 0.4% (2 of 509), and 0%, respectively, among recipients of tissue from a donor with diabetes. There were no failures due to graft rejection. Conclusions and Relevance The 1-year success rate in eyes undergoing DMEK with successfully prepared tissue was very high regardless of donor diabetes status. These results, supported by the separately reported finding that endothelial cell loss and cornea morphometry after 1 year were not affected by donor diabetes status, provide strong support for having no restrictions on the use of tissue from donors with diabetes for DMEK. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05134480
Adjuvant nab -Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Results From a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial
Tempero, Margaret A. , Pelzer, Uwe , Oh, Do‐Youn , Li, Chung‐Pin , Tortora, Giampaolo , Chang, Heung-Moon, Lopez, Charles D. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Ko, Andrew H. , Santoro, Armando , Noel, Marcus Smith , Dean, Andrew , Riess, Hanno, Philip, Philip, Moore, Malcolm J. , Goldstein, David , Ferrara, Stefano, Bruchec, Yvan Le, Lu, Brian , Epstein, Richard A. , Vasey, Paul L., Shapiro, Jeremy, Burge, Matthew , Chua, Yu Jo , Harris, Marion , Prager, Gerald W. , Dittrich, Christian , Längle, Friedrich, Philipp‐Abbrederis, Kathrin, Greil, Richard , Stöger, Herbert, Girschikofsky, Michael , Kuehr, Thomas, Laethem, Jean–Luc Van, Laurent, Stéphanie , Ko, Yoo Joung, Dowden, Scot, Kavan, Petr , Tehfe, Mustapha Édouard, Kubala, Eugen, Kohoutek, Milan, Yilmaz, Mette, Parner, Vibeke K., Salminen, Tapio , Soveri, Leena‐Maija , Korkeila, Eija, Taı̈eb, Julien , Artru, Pascal , Guimbaud, Rosine , Turpin, Antony, Kunzmann, Volker , Kreth, Florian, Oettle, Helmut, Karthaus, Meinolf , Folprecht, Gunnar , Kullmann, Frank , Reiser, Marcel , Heinemann, Volker , Wörns, Marcus‐Alexander , Schulz, H. , Garlipp, Benjamin , Chan, Lam Stephen, Juhász, Balázs , Landherr, László, Pintér, Tamás , Kahán, Zsuzsanna , McDermott, Raymond, Power, Derek G. , Siena, Salvatore, Milella, Michèle , Bagalá, Cinzia, Roila, Fausto, Fanello, Silvia, Wilmink, Johanna W. , Groot, Jan Willem de, Creemers, G.J., Rodrigues, Tânia , Tai, David , Mercadé, T. Macarulla, Medina, Manuel Hidalgo, Mena, Alfredo Carrato, Santasusana, Joan Maurel, Oncala, Maria Jose Flor, Martín, Carlos Gómez , Muñoz, Andrés, García, Ruth Vera, Alés, Inmaculada, Rivera, Fernando , Sastre, Javier , Wu, Cheng‐Chung, Tien, Yu‐Wen , Chan, De-Chuan , Hwang, Tsann‐Long , Evans, Jeffry, Wadsley, Jonathan , Chiorean, E. Gabriela , Bendell, Johanna C. , Kindler, Hedy L. , Fernando, Nishan H., Beg, Muhammad Shaalan , LoConte, Noelle K. , Posey, James , Malhotra, Rajat, Sohal, Davendra , Brenner, Warren, Womack, Mark, Seth, Rahul , lyer, Renuka, Bahary, Nathan , Marsh, Robert , Chua, Cynthia C., Reeves, J. N. , Manji, Gulam A. , Sahai, Vaibhav , Messersmith, Wells A. , Zakari, Ahmed, Bullock, Andrea J. , Musher, Benjamin , Kim, Edward , Bajor, David J., Huyck, Tim, Hatoum, Hassan , Xiong, Henry, Pasche, Boris , Lacy, Jill , Olowokure, Olugbenga, Cohn, Allen Lee, Richards, Donald , Martin, Robert C.G. , Paulson, Andrew Scott , Fanta, Paul T. , Krishnamurthi, Smitha , Fuloria, Jyotsna, McDermott, Ray , Turpin, Anthony , O'Reilly, Eileen M , Winter, Jordan Michael , Oh, Do-Youn , Li, Chung-Pin , Tortora, Giampaolo , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Santoro, Armando , Park, Joon Oh , Dean, Andrew , Van Cutsem, Eric , Berlin, Jordan D. , Tabernero, Josep , Biankin, Andrew V , LoConte, Noelle , Taieb, Julien , McDermott, Ray , Prager, Gerald W , Sahai, Vaibhav , O’Reilly, Eileen M. , Frassineti, Giovanni Luca , Shan, Yan‐Shen , Cutsem, Eric Van , Tabernero, Josep , Li, Mingyu , Zhang, George , Biankin, Andrew V. , Reni, Michele , Vasey, Paul, Pavlakis, Nick , Tebbutt, Niall C. , Längle, Friedrich, Dhani, Neesha C. , Tehfe, Mustapha , Pfeiffer, Per , Osterlund, Pia J. , Tougeron, David , Caroli‐Bosc, François‐Xavier , Walter, Thomas , Bachet, Jean‐Baptiste , Block, Andreas, Venerito, Marino , Trojan, Jörg , Lerch, Markus M. , Schulz, Holger, Yau, Thomas , Juhasz, Balazs, Bodoky, Gyorgy , Gianni, Luca , Siena, Salvatore , Falcone, Alfredo , Berardi, Rossana , Costanzo, Francesco Di , Ardizzoni, Andrea , Maiello, Evaristo , Barroso, Eduardo , Sarmento, Cristina, Chee, Cheng Ean , López López, Rafael , Sáez, Berta Laquente, Chan, De‐Chuan , Evans, Jeffry, Corrie, Pippa G. , Cardin, Dana B. , Noonan, Anne M. , George, Thomas J. , Arena, Francis P. , McWilliams, Robert R. , Seth, Rahul, Ramirez, Robert A. , Reeves, James, El-Khoueiry, Anthony B. , Weaver, Robert, Dreicer, Robert , Borad, Mitesh J. , Huyck, Timothy K., Xiong, Henry Q., Oberstein, Paul E.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | December 15, 2022 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2007-2019

10.1200/jco.22.01134 | PMID 36521097 Get It

PURPOSE This randomized, open-label trial compared the efficacy and safety of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine with those of gemcitabine for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01964430 ). METHODS We assigned 866 treatment-naive patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m 2 ) + gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m 2 ) or gemcitabine alone to one 30-40 infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of six 28-day cycles. The primary end point was independently assessed disease-free survival (DFS). Additional end points included investigator-assessed DFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-seven of 432 patients and 310 of 434 patients completed nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine and gemcitabine treatment, respectively. At primary data cutoff (December 31, 2018; median follow-up, 38.5 [interquartile range [IQR], 33.8-43 months), the median independently assessed DFS was 19.4 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 18.8 months (gemcitabine; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.729 to 1.063; P = .18). The median investigator-assessed DFS was 16.6 (IQR, 8.4-47.0) and 13.7 (IQR, 8.3-44.1) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.694 to 0.965; P = .02). The median OS (427 events; 68% mature) was 40.5 (IQR, 20.7 to not reached) and 36.2 (IQR, 17.7-53.3) months, respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.680 to 0.996; P = .045). At a 16-month follow-up (cutoff, April 3, 2020; median follow-up, 51.4 months [IQR, 47.0-57.0]), the median OS (511 events; 81% mature) was 41.8 ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) versus 37.7 months (gemcitabine; HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.687 to 0.973; P = .0232). At the 5-year follow-up (cutoff, April 9, 2021; median follow-up, 63.2 months [IQR, 60.1-68.7]), the median OS (555 events; 88% mature) was 41.8 versus 37.7 months, respectively (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.678 to 0.947; P = .0091). Eighty-six percent ( nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine) and 68% (gemcitabine) of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Two patients per study arm died of treatment-emergent adverse events. CONCLUSION The primary end point (independently assessed DFS) was not met despite favorable OS seen with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine.
Cutting Edge: Enhanced Antitumor Immunity in ST8Sia6 Knockout Mice
Friedman, David J. , Kizerwetter, Monika , Belmonte, Paul , Rajcula, Matthew, Theodore, Keith, Lee, Hyun Se Kim , Shapiro, Michael J. , Dong, Haidong , Shapiro, Virginia Smith , Kim Lee, Hyun Se , Shapiro, Virginia S , Belmonte, Paul J , Dong, Haidong , Friedman, David , Kizerwetter, Monika , Shapiro, Michael Jeremy

Mayo Clinic

The Journal of Immunology | April 4, 2022 | Volume: 208 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1845-1850

10.4049/jimmunol.2101165 | PMID 35379746 Get It

Abstract Inhibitory receptors have a critical role in the regulation of immunity. Siglecs are a family of primarily inhibitory receptors expressed by immune cells that recognize specific sialic acid modifications on cell surface glycans. Many tumors have increased sialic acid incorporation. Overexpression of the sialyltransferase ST8Sia6 on tumors led to altered immune responses and increased tumor growth. In this study, we examined the role of ST8Sia6 on immune cells in regulating antitumor immunity. ST8Sia6 knockout mice had an enhanced immune response to tumors. The loss of ST8Sia6 promoted an enhanced intratumoral activation of macrophages and dendritic cells, including upregulation of CD40. Intratumoral regulatory T cells exhibited a more inflammatory phenotype in ST8Sia6 knockout mice. Using adoptive transfer studies, the change in regulatory T cell phenotype was not cell intrinsic and depended on the loss of ST8Sia6 expression in APCs. Thus, ST8Sia6 generates ligands for Siglecs that dampen antitumor immunity.
Author response: Histone deacetylase 3 represses cholesterol efflux during CD4+ T-cell activation
Lama, Jyoti , Kizerwetter, Monika , Shapiro, Michael J. , McCue, Shaylene , Kennedy, Madeleine M, Rajcula, Matthew, Wilfahrt, Drew N. , Philips, Rachael L. , Shapiro, Michael Jeremy, Kennedy, Madeleine, Zeng, Hu , Shapiro, Virginia Smith

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | December 2, 2021 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.7554/elife.70978.sa2 Get It

Histone deacetylase 3 represses cholesterol efflux during CD4+ T-cell activation
Wilfahrt, Drew, Philips, Rachael L, Lama, Jyoti, Kizerwetter, Monika , Shapiro, Michael Jeremy, McCue, Shaylene A, Kennedy, Madeleine M, Rajcula, Matthew J, Zeng, Hu, Philips, Rachael L. , Wilfahrt, Drew N. , Lama, Jyoti , Shapiro, Virginia S , Lama, Jyoti, Kizerwetter, Monika , Shapiro, Michael Jeremy, McCue, Shaylene A, Kennedy, Madeleine M, Rajcula, Matthew J, Zeng, Hu

Mayo Clinic

eLife | November 16, 2021 | Volume: 10 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.7554/elife.70978 | PMID 34854376 Get It

After antigenic activation, quiescent naive CD4 + T cells alter their metabolism to proliferate. This metabolic shift increases production of nucleotides, amino acids, fatty acids, and sterols. Here, we show that histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) is critical for activation of murine peripheral CD4 + T cells. HDAC3-deficient CD4 + T cells failed to proliferate and blast after in vitro TCR/CD28 stimulation. Upon T-cell activation, genes involved in cholesterol biosynthesis are upregulated while genes that promote cholesterol efflux are repressed. HDAC3-deficient CD4 + T cells had reduced levels of cellular cholesterol both before and after activation. HDAC3-deficient cells upregulate cholesterol synthesis appropriately after activation, but fail to repress cholesterol efflux; notably, they overexpress cholesterol efflux transporters ABCA1 and ABCG1. Repression of these genes is the primary function for HDAC3 in peripheral CD4 + T cells, as addition of exogenous cholesterol restored proliferative capacity. Collectively, these findings demonstrate HDAC3 is essential during CD4 + T-cell activation to repress cholesterol efflux.
Author response: The mitochondrial iron transporter ABCB7 is required for B cell development, proliferation, and class switch recombination in mice
Lehrke, Michael Jonathan , Shapiro, Michael J. , Rajcula, Matthew, Kennedy, Madeleine M, McCue, Shaylene , Medina, Kay L. , Shapiro, Michael Jeremy, Kennedy, Madeleine, Shapiro, Virginia Smith

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | November 11, 2021 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.7554/elife.69621.sa2 Get It

The mitochondrial iron transporter ABCB7 is required for B cell development, proliferation, and class switch recombination in mice
Lehrke, Michael Jonathan , Shapiro, Michael Jeremy, Rajcula, Matthew J, Kennedy, Madeleine M, McCue, Shaylene A, Medina, Kay L, Shapiro, Virginia Smith , Shapiro, Virginia S , Lehrke, Michael J , Shapiro, Michael Jeremy, Rajcula, Matthew J, Kennedy, Madeleine M, McCue, Shaylene A, Medina, Kay L

Mayo Clinic

eLife | November 8, 2021 | Volume: 10 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.7554/elife.69621 | PMID 34762046 Get It

Iron-sulfur (Fe-S) clusters are cofactors essential for the activity of numerous enzymes including DNA polymerases, helicases, and glycosylases. They are synthesized in the mitochondria as Fe-S intermediates and are exported to the cytoplasm for maturation by the mitochondrial transporter ABCB7. Here, we demonstrate that ABCB7 is required for bone marrow B cell development, proliferation, and class switch recombination, but is dispensable for peripheral B cell homeostasis in mice. Conditional deletion of ABCB7 using Mb1-cre resulted in a severe block in bone marrow B cell development at the pro-B cell stage. The loss of ABCB7 did not alter expression of transcription factors required for B cell specification or commitment. While increased intracellular iron was observed in ABCB7-deficient pro-B cells, this did not lead to increased cellular or mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, ferroptosis, or apoptosis. Interestingly, loss of ABCB7 led to replication-induced DNA damage in pro-B cells, independent of VDJ recombination, and these cells had evidence of slowed DNA replication. Stimulated ABCB7-deficient splenic B cells from CD23-cre mice also had a striking loss of proliferation and a defect in class switching. Thus, ABCB7 is essential for early B cell development, proliferation, and class switch recombination.
Response to Rucaparib in BRCA-Mutant Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Identified by Genomic Testing in the TRITON2 Study
Loehr, Andrea , Patnaik, Akash , Campbell, David , Shapiro, Jeremy , Bryce, Alan H. , McDermott, Ray , Sautois, Brieuc , Vogelzang, Nicholas J. , Bambury, Richard , Voog, Éric , Zhang, Jingsong , Hussain, Arif , Ryan, Charles J. , Merseburger, Axel S. , Daugaard, Gedske , Heidenreich, Axel , Fizazi, Karim , Higano, Celestia S. , Krieger, Laurence E. , Watkins, Simon P. , Despain, Darrin , Simmons, Andrew D. , Dowson, Melanie, Golsorkhi, Tony, Chowdhury, Simon, Abida, Wassim , Ryan, Charles J , Daugaard, Gedske , Heidenreich, Axel , Sternberg, Cora N , Watkins, Simon P , Simmons, Andrew D , Golsorkhi, Tony , Bryce, Alan H , Vogelzang, Nicholas J , McDermott, Ray , Patnaik, Akash , Piulats, Josep M.

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Cancer Research | October 1, 2021 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 24 | Pages: 6677-6686

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-2199 | PMID 34598946 Get It

Abstract Purpose: The PARP inhibitor rucaparib is approved in the United States for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and a deleterious germline and/or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alteration. While sequencing of tumor tissue is considered the standard for identifying patients with BRCA alterations (BRCA+), plasma profiling may provide a minimally invasive option to select patients for rucaparib treatment. Here, we report clinical efficacy in patients with BRCA+ mCRPC identified through central plasma, central tissue, or local genomic testing and enrolled in TRITON2. Patients and Methods: Patients had progressed after next-generation androgen receptor–directed and taxane-based therapies for mCRPC and had BRCA alterations identified by central sequencing of plasma and/or tissue samples or local genomic testing. Concordance of plasma/tissue BRCA status and objective response rate and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rates were summarized. Results: TRITON2 enrolled 115 patients with BRCA+ identified by central plasma (n = 34), central tissue (n = 37), or local (n = 44) testing. Plasma/tissue concordance was determined in 38 patients with paired samples and was 47% in 19 patients with a somatic BRCA alteration. No statistically significant differences were observed between objective and PSA response rates to rucaparib across the 3 assay groups. Patients unable to provide tissue samples and tested solely by plasma assay responded at rates no different from patients identified as BRCA+ by tissue testing. Conclusions: Plasma, tissue, and local testing of mCRPC patients can be used to identify men with BRCA+ mCRPC who can benefit from treatment with the PARP inhibitor rucaparib.
ST8Sia6 Promotes Tumor Growth in Mice by Inhibiting Immune Responses
Friedman, David J. , Crotts, Sydney B. , Shapiro, Michael J. , Rajcula, Matthew, McCue, Shaylene , Khazaie, Khashayarsha , Dong, Haidong , Shapiro, Virginia Smith , Dong, Haidong , Shapiro, Virginia S , Friedman, David , Shapiro, Michael Jeremy , Liu, Xin

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Immunology Research | June 1, 2021 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 952-966

10.1158/2326-6066.cir-20-0834 | PMID 34074677 Get It

Abstract Many tumors exhibit increased incorporation of sialic acids into cell-surface glycans, which impact the tumor microenvironment. Sialic acid immunoglobulin-like lectins (Siglec) are receptors that recognize sialic acids and modulate immune responses, including responses to tumors. However, the roles of individual sialyltransferases in tumorigenesis and tumor growth are not well understood. Here, we examined the sialyltransferase ST8Sia6, which generated α2,8-linked disialic acids that bind to murine Siglec-E and human Siglec-7 and -9. Increased ST8Sia6 expression was found on many human tumors and associated with decreased survival in several cancers, including colon cancer. Because of this, we engineered MC38 and B16-F10 tumor lines to express ST8Sia6. ST8Sia6-expressing MC38 and B16-F10 tumors exhibited faster growth and led to decreased survival, which required host Siglec-E. ST8Sia6 expression on tumors also altered macrophage polarization toward M2, including upregulation of the immune modulator arginase, which also required Siglec-E. ST8Sia6 also accelerated tumorigenesis in a genetically engineered, spontaneous murine model of colon cancer, decreasing survival from approximately 6 months to 67 days. Thus, ST8Sia6 expression on tumors inhibits antitumor immune responses to accelerate tumor growth.