Citations

Abstract BACKGROUND CNS ependymal tumors rarely demonstrate mixed subependymal and ependymal pathology. The clinical course of these tumors is difficult to predict, but prior studies have identified TERT mutations and loss of chromosome 6 as poor prognostic factors in these tumors when located in the posterior fossa. METHODS In this retrospective single-institution study, patients with a diagnosis of mixed subependymoma/ependymoma were identified and chart reviewed to describe demographics, pathological findings, treatment courses and clinical outcomes. RESULTS Eleven patients (median age 57, 2 female, 9 male) were identified. Ten tumors were in the posterior fossa and 1 in the cervical spine. At diagnosis, 2 underwent gross total resection, 8 underwent subtotal resection, and 1 was only biopsied. Radiotherapy was administered to 5 patients at initial diagnosis (54Gy in 30 fractions). Systemic therapy (temozolomide and bevacizumab) was administered at recurrence to 2 patients. Loss of chromosome 6 was present in 5 /11 patients and TERT mutations were present in 4/11 patients, with both present in 3/11 patients. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 90.1 months (95% CI: 90.1–NA), with 3 progression events observed at 22, 90, and 107 months. Median follow-up duration was 27.9 months. Receiving radiotherapy had a longer mPFS (98 vs 22 months, p=0.15), although non-significant. At the time of data cut-off none of the patients were deceased. CONCLUSIONS Mixed subependymoma/ependymoma is a rare diagnosis with varying clinical outcomes. Our case series demonstrated that the majority of patients did not exhibit the previously identified poor prognostic factors. Although non-significant due to limited case numbers, radiotherapy was suggestive of longer mPFS.

Abstract BACKGROUND High grade astrocytoma with piloid features (HGAP) is a newly recognized tumor with a distinct DNA methylation profile. Its clinical course, treatment response, and outcomes remain poorly understood. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study across three Mayo Clinic sites including adults with a HGAP diagnosis confirmed by DNA methylation profiling. RESULTS 17 patients were included (median age 38 years, Q1, Q3: 29–59; 9 male). DNA methylation-based tumor classification using the NCI/Bethesda classifier (v2) indicated a match to HGAP with high confidence (calibrated score >0.9) in 14 cases and was suggestive in 3 cases. All had MAPK pathway alterations (NF-1 mutation in 11, FGFR1 mutation in 2, KIAA1549::BRAF fusion in 2, FGFR1 transcript variant suggestive of internal tandem duplication in 1, KANK2::NTRK2 fusion in 1). All tumors also had CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion and 9 lost ATRX expression. Tumors were infratentorial (n=8), supratentorial (n=7), and spinal (n=2) at initial presentation. First line treatment included surgery followed by chemoradiation with temozolomide (n=12), surgery followed by radiation (n=4), radiation alone (n=1), and surgery alone (n=1). Gross total resection was achieved in 3/17, 8/17 had subtotal resection and 5/17 had biopsy. 14/17 received a median RT dose of 5700 cGy (range, 4005–6000) in 30 fractions. The median follow-up duration was 34.9 months. 8 patients experienced disease progression. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 30.3 months (95% CI: 15.4–NR). 6/8 underwent surgery; 3/8 underwent RT. Systemic therapies were administered in 5/8 (lomustine, bevacizumab, pembrolizumab, temozolomide, trametinib, tovorafenib). 3/17 patients died due to progressive disease with an OS of 54.2, 94.6 and 17.4 months, respectively. The mOS for the whole cohort was 54.2 months (95% CI: 54.2-NR). CONCLUSION While the optimal management of this newly recognized entity has yet to be established, our cohort demonstrates a clinical behavior consistent with CNS WHO grade 3, aligning with current WHO interpretations.

Abstract BACKGROUND The majority of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are effectively managed with medical therapy, surgery, and/or radiation therapy; however, a subset of pituitary adenomas exhibit aggressive behavior. Temozolomide is thought to be an effective treatment option for patients with PitNETs. METHODS We identified and retrospectively reviewed 11 patients with pituitary tumors treated with temozolomide. We then conducted a review of the literature, combining 114 previously published cases with our cohort. RESULTS 125 cases were identified with diagnoses of pituitary adenomas (n=45), aggressive pituitary tumors (n=61), and pituitary carcinoma (n=19) treated with temozolomide. 79 patients were male (68.1%) with a median age of 47.5 (range 9-72). A variety of tumor types were represented: 50 corticotroph adenomas (40.7%), 37 prolactinomas (30.1%), 22 hormone nonfunctioning adenomas (17.9%), 8 somatotroph adenomas (6.5%), 6 other functioning adenomas (4.9%), and 2 cases where the functional status was not mentioned. Median treatment duration was 9 cycles (n=91, 150-200 mg/m2 days 1-5, 28-day cycles; n=2, 75 mg/m2, days 1-21, 28-day cycles; n=1, 75 mg/m2 daily). 27 patients received concurrent therapy with a dopamine agonist/somatostatin analogue (n=10), other chemotherapy agent (n=9) or radiotherapy (n=8). Radiographic responses included stable disease (n=40), partial response (n=35), complete response (n=8), and progressive disease (n=30). Hormonal responses included complete response (n=13), partial response (n=32), and no response (n=16). 22 patients (47.8%; out of 46 patients where progression/recurrence was assessed) experienced progression/recurrence following temozolomide initiation with a median progression free survival (PFS) of 24 months. There was no significant association between MGMT methylation status and radiological or hormonal response. No unexpected toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION In this cohort, temozolomide was well-tolerated with a median PFS of 24 months. MGMT methylation status did not predict temozolomide response. Temozolomide is an option with a survival benefit for patients with PitNETs.

Abstract BACKGROUND Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is a hereditary cancer syndrome characterized by development of multiple neoplasms, including central nervous system (CNS) hemangioblastomas, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), and retinal hemangioblastomas. Belzutifan, a hypoxia-inducible factor 2-alpha (HIF-2α) inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in treating VHL-associated tumors. This study evaluates our institutional experience with belzutifan in patients with VHL-related tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study across three Mayo Clinic sites, including patients aged ≥18 years with genetically confirmed VHL disease who received belzutifan between October 2021 and March 2025. Clinical/radiological data, and adverse events (AEs) were extracted from electronic health records. Tumor responses were assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria for RCC, pNET, CNS hemangioblastoma. Retinal hemangioblastoma responses were evaluated through ophthalmologic assessments. RESULTS Forty-five patients were included (median age 44 58% female). Sixty-seven percent had RCC, 91% had CNS hemangioblastomas, 53% had pNETs, and 62% had retinal hemangioblastomas. The median duration of belzutifan therapy was 22.6 months (range 1.0-41.4 months). Among patients with RCC (n=26), overall response rate (ORR) was 19% and median time to best response (MTBR) was 7.4 months. Five patients had partial response (PR), 15 had stable disease (SD), and 1 had progressive disease (PD). For CNS hemangioblastomas (n=41), ORR was 12%, MTBR was 6.2 months. 5 patients had PR, 30 had SD, and none had PD. For pNET (n=17), ORR was 41%, MTBR was 8.2 months. One patient had CR, 6 patients had PR, 6 had SD, none had PD. For retinal hemangioblastomas (n=28), 6 (21%) showed improvement, 9 (32%) remained stable, and 3 (11%) showed progression. MTBR was 6.7 months. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 98% of patients. Common AEs included anemia (89%), fatigue (80%), hypoxia (18%), and headache (13%). Grade 3 AEs were observed in 20% of patients, including anemia (7%), hypoxia (9%), fatigue (4%), pneumonitis (2%), loss of consciousness (2%). One patient experienced a grade 4 event (status epilepticus). Anemia management involved iron supplementation (n=11), RBC transfusion (n=3), dose reduction (n=2), treatment holiday (n=8), permanent discontinuation (n=1). Hypoxia management included dose reduction (n=1), treatment holiday (n=3), discontinuation (n=1). CONCLUSION Belzutifan shows clinical activity across various VHL-associated neoplasms in real-world practice, with a manageable safety profile. The lower ORR compared to the phase III trial may reflect differences in baseline disease, including lower tumor burden in our cohort. These findings support its continued use in VHL disease, with attention to monitoring and managing treatment-related AEs.

Abstract BACKGROUND Gliomas are rare and aggressive CNS tumors with limited survival, making clinical trial (CT) participation indispensable, particularly in progressive cases. Cross-national disparities in glioma CT access remain underexplored. This study investigates temporal trends and socioeconomic correlates of glioma CT activity across eight European countries, using lung cancer trials as a benchmark. MATERIAL AND METHODS Glioma CTs registered after 2004 and conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Denmark, Poland, Hungary, Greece, or Turkey were extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov. A comparable lung cancer dataset was created. National-level data on population, gross national income (GNI) per capita, human development index (HDI), and cancer incidence were obtained from public sources. Trial access was defined as active CTs per estimated annual new cases. RESULTS Of 3,292 glioma CTs globally, 640 involved at least one target country. France (n=287), Germany (n=192), Italy (n=151), and Denmark (n=61) hosted the most; Turkey (n=5), Hungary (n=13), Greece (n=10), and Poland (n=26) contributed minimally. Over time, France, Germany and Italy showed significant upward trends in glioma CT activity (p < 0.05). Denmark, despite lower absolute numbers, showed strong growth relative to population. Turkey remained the least active participant, with no significant increase in glioma trial activity. When adjusted for estimated glioma cases, Denmark had the highest trial access, followed by France and Germany. Trial access positively correlated with GNI per capita (ρ = 0.76, p = 0.028) and moderately with HDI (ρ = 0.69, p = 0.058). In contrast, lung cancer trials were more abundant and equitably distributed (p = 0.0078), without significant correlation with national socioeconomic indicators (ρ =0.14, p=0.7 gor GNI per capita and ρ =0.19 p=0.7 for HDI). Despite having similar or lower GDP per capita compared to other countries in the analysis, Poland and Hungary showed substantially higher lung cancer trial access than glioma trial access, highlighting the underrepresentation of glioma research in resource-limited settings. Notably, Turkey exhibited the lowest glioma CT access (0.0010 per patient), despite a moderate volume of lung cancer trials. CONCLUSION Glioma CT access varies widely across Europe and is closely tied to GNI and HDI, unlike lung cancer trials, which are more equitably distributed. These disparities may relate to differences in the availability of trained neuro-oncology professionals and structured care systems, warranting further study. Targeted policy efforts are needed to improve access and inclusion in glioma research across all regions.

e13893 Background: For individuals with CNS tumors who have experience difficulties with in-person (IP) evaluations due to disease-related neurologic disability or the costs associated with travel, telehealth (TH) offers a convenient and timely alternative for accessing specialized neuro-oncology care. We report our institution’s experience with telehealth utilization in neuro-oncology. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who had at least one neuro-oncology telehealth visit between August 2021 and May 2024 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Reasons for visits, outcomes of appointments, acute care utilization following visits was reviewed. Results: A total of 660 patients who had at least one TH visit between August 2021 and May 2024 were included in the analysis. Median age was 56 (range 20-98), 49% were female, and 92% were white. Most patients resided in the US Midwest (84%), followed by the South (8%), West (5%), Northeast (1%), and US Territories (< 1%). Less than two percent were international patients. The most common primary visit diagnosis was glioblastoma (GBM, 26%), followed by astrocytoma, IDH-mutant (17%), meningioma (17%), oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, 1p/19q codeleted (7%). Of 6657 visits reviewed, 2745 (41%) were conducted via TH. Telehealth visits served various purposes, including consultation for newly diagnosed tumors or abnormal MRIs (n = 26), second opinion for an established tumor diagnosis (n = 119), discussion about clinical trial participation (n = 108), tumor-related treatment discussions (n = 719), chemotherapy education (n = 161), new symptom assessment (n = 117), symptom management (n = 366), and tumor surveillance (n = 1694). Outcomes from telehealth visits included enrollment in clinical trials (n = 28), proceeding with tumor-directed surgery (n = 46), initiation of radiation therapy (n = 88), starting or changing systemic therapy (n = 377), continuing existing systemic therapy (n = 932), transition to supportive care (n = 45), tumor diagnostic workup (n = 28), continuation of tumor surveillance (n = 1254). Acute care utilization, defined as an emergency department visit or hospitalization within one month of an appointment, was the same following telehealth visits compared to in-person visits (6.9% for IP vs 5% for TH, p = 0.507). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that telehealth can effectively support all aspects of neuro-oncology care, ranging from initial diagnosis discussions to systemic therapy management and transitions to supportive care. Telehealth offers a convenient and accessible method of care delivery option for patients faced with neurologic illness. Additionally, THs do not lead to increased acute care utilization compared to IP evaluations.

Abstract BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome is caused by pathogenic germline variants in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, predisposing individuals to malignancies, including glioblastoma (GBM). MMR-deficient tumors are resistant to monofunctional alkylators such as temozolomide but not to bifunctional alkylators such as the nitrosourea lomustine. Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pembrolizumab represents another treatment option, which is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of mismatch repair deficient cancers. METHODS We present a patient with multifocal GBM and Lynch syndrome who experienced rapid progression following standard-of-care chemoradiation, followed by durable responses to lomustine and then to pembrolizumab. RESULTS A 58-year-old man with Lynch syndrome (MSH2 mutation) and prior history of colon cancer presented with seizures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain identified right frontal and left parietal masses. Right frontal tumor was resected; pathology was consistent with GBM, IDH wildtype, MGMT-unmethylated. Both lesions were treated with radiation therapy (60 Gy, 30 fractions) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. After two cycles of adjuvant temozolomide, his left parietal tumor progressed and was subtotally resected, followed by four cycles of lomustine (stopped due to myelotoxicity). He remained progression-free for 15 months. Surveillance MRI identified new enhancement involving the left frontal lobe, left periventricular white matter, and right internal auditory canal, concerning for leptomeningeal dissemination. MRI spine identified no additional lesions. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology was negative for tumor cells on two occasions. Patient was treated with pembrolizumab. He remains on treatment with stable disease four months after ICI initiation and 31 months after GBM diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Patients with MMR-deficient GBM resist standard chemoradiation. Alternatives such as nitrosourea or ICI therapy may achieve durable responses. While data is insufficient to administer these agents as upfront therapy in this specific setting, both should be considered as options for recurrent disease.

Abstract BACKGROUND BRAF pathway alterations are frequent in glial/neuroepithelial tumors. BRAF-targeted therapy with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) and/or MEK inhibitors (MEKi) has proven efficacy in clinical trials, though mainly enrolling pediatric patients. We sought to investigate real-world data for adult patients with BRAF-pathway mutant glial/neuroepithelial neoplasms treated with BRAFi/MEKi. METHODS Adults with BRAF-pathway mutated glial/neuroepithelial neoplasms treated with BRAFi/MEKi were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS Five patients (n=4 female, median age at diagnosis 36) were identified (tumor types: glioblastoma n=1, high-grade astrocytoma with epithelioid features n=1, low-grade neuroepithelial tumor n=1, pilocytic astrocytoma n=1, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma n=1). Four had BRAF V600E and one had NF1 p.S2687Cfs*5 mutant tumors. Prior to targeted therapy initiation, patients underwent a median 2.4 treatments including surgery (n=4), radiation therapy (n=4), chemotherapy (temozolomide n=4; carboplatin/vincristine n=1). BRAF-targeted therapies included dabrafenib/trametinib (n=4), binimetinib/encorafenib (n=2), binimetinib (n=2). One NF1-mutant glioblastoma received binimetinib followed by binimetinib/bevacizumab. Median BRAFi/MEKi treatment was 15.2 months (range: 6-36 months). Toxicities included leukopenia (n=3), peripheral edema (n=1), reduced ejection fraction (n=1), skin rash (n=5), transaminitis (n=1) with all patients requiring dose reductions and 3 cases requiring discontinuation. Among patients where BRAFi/MEKi was discontinued due to toxicity, 2 received other treatments at progression, then switched to a different BRAFi/MEKi combination, which they tolerated (duration 6-10months). Best radiographic response was partial response, noted in 3 patients treated with dabrafenib/trametinib. Four patients remain alive and continue BRAFi/MEKi. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of heavily-pretreated patients with glial/neuroepithelial neoplasms, BRAF-targeted therapy was associated with durable responses. Interestingly, two patients who were unable to tolerate one combination of BRAFi/MEKi were able to tolerate a different combination with sustained response. Our findings support ongoing use of BRAF targeted therapy for CNS tumors. Optimal timing and duration of treatment requires further prospective evaluation in adult patients.

Abstract BACKGROUND Pituitary adenomas are often effectively managed with medical therapy, surgery, and radiation therapy. However, up to 15% of pituitary neoplasms exhibit rapid growth, invasive behavior, or, rarely, metastasize despite optimal standard treatments. Temozolomide is associated with a survival benefit for patients with these aggressive pituitary tumors. METHODS We present a case series of 8 patients with an aggressive pituitary tumor (APT) or pituitary carcinoma (PC) treated with temozolomide. RESULTS Eight patients (3 female, median age at diagnosis 44) with APT (n=6) or PC (n=2) were treated. A variety of pituitary tumor types were represented (1 prolactinoma, 5 corticotroph adenomas, 1 gonadotroph adenoma, 1 thyrotropinoma). Prior to temozolomide initiation, patients underwent a median 5 treatments including medical management (n=4), surgery (n=7), radiation therapy (n=7). Temozolomide was started at median 3.5 recurrence. Median treatment duration was 6 cycles (n=6, 150-200 mg/m2 days 1-5, 28-day cycles; n=1, 75 mg/m2, days 1-21, 28-day cycles). Seven patients experienced progression after temozolomide treatment, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4 months. One patient remains on treatment, progression-free at 5 months. MGMT methylation status was assessed for 3 tumors. Among 2 patients with MGMT promoter methylated tumors, PFS was 4 months for one patient, the other remains on treatment. For one patient with MGMT promoter unmethylated corticotroph adenoma, PFS was 9 months. No ≥ grade 4 toxicities were noted. Most common toxicities were nausea (n=5), thrombocytopenia (n=3), and fatigue (n=2). CONCLUSION In this group of heavily pretreated patients, temozolomide monotherapy was well-tolerated and associated with median PFS of 4 months. Interestingly, PC patients had longer PFS at 9 months and 24 months. Our findings support use of single-agent temozolomide chemotherapy for patients with APT/PC, but further prospective analysis is needed to identify patients more likely to benefit from treatment and optimal timing of chemotherapy initiation.

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas are a primary malignancy of the central nervous system (CNS) malignancies, most commonly affecting adults under the age of 55. Standard of care therapy for IDH-mutant gliomas involves maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. However, despite good initial responses to multimodality treatment, recurrence is virtually universal. IDH-mutant gliomas represent a life-limiting prognosis. For this reason, there is a great need for novel treatments that can prolong survival. Uniquely for IDH-mutant gliomas, the IDH mutation is the direct driver of oncogenesis through its oncometabolite 2-hydroxygluterate. Inhibition of this mutated IDH with a corresponding reduction in 2-hydroxygluterate offers an attractive treatment target. Researchers have tested several IDH inhibitors in glioma through preclinical and early clinical trials. A phase III clinical trial of an IDH1 and IDH2 inhibitor vorasidenib yielded promising results among patients with low-grade IDH-mutant gliomas who had undergone initial surgery and no radiation or chemotherapy. However, many questions remain regarding optimal use of IDH inhibitors in clinical practice. In this review, we discuss the importance of IDH mutations in oncogenesis of adult-type diffuse gliomas and current evidence supporting the use of IDH inhibitors as therapeutic agents for glioma treatment. We also examine unresolved questions and propose potential directions for future research.