Citations

The NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship offer guidance for health care providers who care for survivors of adult-onset cancer. These guidelines include screening, evaluation, and treatment recommendations for common physical and psychosocial problems resulting from cancer and its treatment and provide a framework for care coordination. They also present guidance for helping cancer survivors to enhance their wellness and maintain a healthy lifestyle. This article summarizes the panel’s current recommendations and recent updates regarding anxiety, depression, distress, and trauma in cancer survivors.

632 Background: Prospective data on the risk of breast cancer (BC) recurrence among young BC survivors who have a subsequent pregnancy are limited. We sought to evaluate the long-term impact of pregnancy and live birth on BC outcomes in the Young Women’s Breast Cancer Study (NCT01468246), a prospective multicenter study of women aged ≤40 years at BC diagnosis. Methods: Women with stage 0-III BC without prior hysterectomy were included. The primary endpoint was breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) between patients with and without a (a) pregnancy and (b) live birth after BC. Secondary endpoints were distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and overall survival (OS). A time-varying Cox proportional hazards model was performed by estrogen receptor (ER) status, controlling for age at diagnosis, tumor stage, HER2 status, tumor grade, parity at diagnosis, and germline pathogenic variant status. Results: Among 1,016 BC survivors at a median follow-up of 12 (range, 0.5-18.5) years, 198 reported ≥1 pregnancy and 165 reported ≥1 live birth post-diagnosis. Among survivors who reported a post-diagnosis pregnancy, median age at diagnosis was 32 (range, 17-40) years; most had stage I (35%) or II (40%) BC, with 72% hormone receptor (HR)-positive and 25% HER2+; 42% were nulligravid and 60% were nulliparous at diagnosis. Among BC survivors who did not become pregnant post-diagnosis, median age at diagnosis was 37 (range, 21-40) years; most had stage I (35%) or II (43%) BC, with 75% HR-positive and 28% HER2+; 25% were nulligravid and 29% were nulliparous at diagnosis. Among BC survivors with ER-positive tumors (n = 737), pregnancy after BC was not associated with a difference in BCFI (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.31-1.16, P = 0.130), DRFI (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.35-1.55, P = 0.416), or OS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.24-1.40, P = 0.227). Similarly, live birth after BC did not impact BCFI (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.45-1.55, P = 0.560), DRFI (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.52-2.06, P = 0.923), or OS (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.34-1.76, P = 0.541). Outcomes among BC survivors with ER-negative tumors (n = 278) were also not affected by post-diagnosis pregnancy (BCFI [HR 1.48, 95% CI 0.70-3.14, P = 0.304], DRFI [HR 1.59, 95% CI 0.68-3.75, P = 0.287], OS [HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.39-2.49, P = 0.975]) or live birth (BCFI [HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.41-2.53, P = 0.974], DRFI [HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.24-2.69, P = 0.722], OS [HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.09-1.69, P = 0.208]). Conclusions: In this multicenter, prospective study with 12 years of median follow-up, pregnancy and live birth after BC did not impact BC events or overall survival, irrespective of ER status. These long-term data from a modern cohort provide reassurance for young BC patients interested in future fertility. Clinical trial information: NCT01468246 .

Abstract Background Whether outcomes of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2)-associated breast cancer differ compared with sporadic tumors is controversial. We explored the impact of gBRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (PV) status beyond established prognostic features. Methods We conducted 2 retrospective, matched cohort studies comparing gBRCA1/2 PV carriers and noncarriers with HER2-negative, stage I-III breast cancer (Clinical Outcomes Quality Database [COQD] cohort: 185 carriers, 555 noncarriers; Young Women’s Breast Cancer Study [YWS] cohort: 113 carriers, 226 noncarriers). Matching factors were age, stage, hormone receptor status, and year of diagnosis. Clinicopathological features, treatments, and survival outcomes were compared between carriers and noncarriers. Results Most patients in COQD had stage I-II disease (87.2%), and more carriers than noncarriers had genetic testing before diagnosis (33% vs 5.6%, P < .001). In YWS, 22.7% of patients had stage III tumors, and few were tested before diagnosis (14.8% of carriers vs 1.7% of noncarriers; P < .001). Carriers in COQD received chemotherapy more often than noncarriers (81.1 vs 67.0%, P < .001), including platinum (P = .010); the proportion was similar for carriers and noncarriers in YWS. After adjusting for chemotherapy, relapse-free survival was longer in carriers than noncarriers in COQD (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.48 [95% CI = 0.26 to 0.87], P = .016), and a favorable trend was observed for other survival outcomes in both cohorts. Triple-negative tumors appeared to drive the differences. Conclusions We observed a trend toward improved outcomes in gBRCA1/2 PV carriers compared with noncarriers. These findings suggest that carriers should not receive more aggressive treatment solely based on their germline mutation status. Prospective clinical trials in this population are warranted.

Abstract Background Breast cancer (BC) diagnosed during pregnancy or postpartum often presents with aggressive features, potentially influenced by hormonal, immunological, and tissue remodeling changes. Studies have suggested that postpartum BC may be associated with worse outcomes, though most evidence is retrospective and constrained by methodological limitations. This study evaluated associations between pregnancy history, recency of childbirth, and long-term outcomes in a prospective cohort of young patients with early-stage BC. Patients and Methods Patients aged ≤40 years with stage I–III BC enrolled in the Young Women’s Breast Cancer Study were categorized at diagnosis as nulligravid, nulliparous, pregnant, or parous (≤5 vs 5 to 10 years postpartum). Analyses were stratified by BC subtype (estrogen receptor-positive [ER+]/HER2−, HER2+, and triple-negative [TNBC]), with distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) as the primary endpoint. Results Among 859 patients, 257 (29.9%) were nulligravid, 50 (5.8%) nulliparous, 37 (4.3%) pregnant, and 515 (60.0%) parous. Pregnant patients had proportionally more TNBC, nodal involvement, T3/T4, and grade 3 tumors. After 11.1 years median follow-up, pregnancy or postpartum status was not independently associated with DRFS in multivariable models adjusted for age, tumor characteristics, and treatment, with consistent findings across ER+/HER2−, HER2+, and TNBC subtypes. Sensitivity analyses, including further categorization of postpartum diagnoses (<2 vs 2 to 5 years), yielded consistent results. Conclusions Pregnancy history and recency of childbirth were not independently associated with long-term DRFS. Despite more aggressive features at diagnosis, patients diagnosed during or after pregnancy had comparable outcomes after adjustment, suggesting no adverse prognostic impact. Clinical trial registration NCT01468246 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01468246? term=NCT01468246&rank=1).

Abstract Background: Women younger than 40 generally fall outside the routine screening population for breast cancer (BC). We aimed to understand factors influencing diagnosis and treatment delays in these patients, and the impact of delays on disease-free survival (DFS). Methods: We included women aged ≤ 40 years at diagnosis of stage 0-IV BC enrolled in the Young Women’s BC Study from 2006-2016. Sociodemographics, initial BC symptoms, and disease status were collected via annual surveys. Medical record review was used to capture tumor characteristics and recurrence status. We used logistic regression to estimate associations between patient and tumor factors and three delay types: (1) self-delay (≥ 90 days from first symptom to presentation to a provider), (2) diagnosis delay (≥ 90 days from healthcare visit to diagnosis), and (3) treatment delay (≥ 60 days from diagnosis to first treatment). Odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated in multivariable models after choosing factors via backwards selection (p≤0.05 retained). Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs for the association between delays and DFS, overall and by stage, were estimated via Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for tumor and treatment factors. Time to event was measured from diagnosis or treatment to recurrence, death, or last follow-up, whichever occurred first. Results: Of 1,297 patients, 1,071 who completed the long-form baseline survey were included. Median time from first symptom to presentation was 14 days (interquartile range (IQR)=2-45), presentation to diagnosis was 14 days (IQR=7-30), and diagnosis to treatment was 41 days (IQR=25-57). Overall, 14% (n=153) had a self-delay and 11% (n=120) had a diagnosis delay. Of 839 patients with self-detected tumors, 18% had a self-delay and 13% had a diagnosis delay. Among those with Stage 1-3 BC (N=928), 22% (n=205) had a treatment delay. In univariable models, income <50K (p=0.01), lower financial comfort (p=0.01), and not living with a partner (p=0.03) were associated with higher odds of self-delay, while pregnancy within 1 year pre-diagnosis (p=0.05) and first-degree family history of any cancer (p=0.04) or BC (p=0.03) were associated with lower odds. Self-delays were more likely for women diagnosed with stage 4 BC (p=0.004) or with HER2+ tumors (p=0.03) and less likely for those with triple negative (TN) BC (p<0.001). In the multivariable model, family history of BC (OR=0.40, 95% CI=0.17-0.80), income <50K (OR=1.97, 95% CI=1.22-3.13) and TN subtype (OR v. luminal A=0.30, 95% CI=0.13-0.60) remained associated. Odds of diagnosis delay were higher among women who were younger (p=0.01) or with Stage 4 BC (p=0.004), and lower for those with luminal B (p=0.04), TN (p=0.01), or high grade tumors (p=0.03). In the multivariable model, younger age (OR per 1-year=0.94, 95% CI=0.89-0.99), and subtype (luminal B v. A OR=0.60, 95% CI=0.38-0.95; TN v. luminal A OR=0.35, 95% CI=0.16-0.70) remained associated. Multivariable models for self-and diagnosis delays remained similar when restricted to self-detected patients.Treatment delays were less likely among unemployed individuals (p=0.001), and women with a positive germline BC risk variant (p=0.002), luminal B (p=0.005) or TN (p<0.001) subtypes, and high-grade tumors (p=0.03). Only tumor factors remained significant in the multivariable model, including subtype (luminal B v. A OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.41-0.86, TN v. luminal A OR=0.25, 95% CI=0.13-0.43), and stage (stage 3 v. 1 OR=0.37, 95% CI=0.20-0.65). Overall and by stage at diagnosis, delays were not statistically significantly associated with DFS before or after adjusting for tumor and treatment factors. Conclusions: Delays in breast cancer care are influenced by multiple psychosocial and clinical factors, and disparities exist by socioeconomic status. It is critical to decrease self- and diagnosis delays to prevent stage 4 breast cancer. Citation Format: B. X. Zhang, T. Sella, Y. Zheng, G. J. Kirkner, K. J. Ruddy, S. M. Rosenberg, V. F. Borges, L. Schapira, S. E. Come, J. Peppercorn, A. H. Partridge, K. D. Brantley. Delays in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in young women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-02-16.

Abstract Background The incidence of early onset breast cancers (BCs) has increased, paralleling rising trends in delayed childbearing. We hypothesize that a distinct postpartum BC (PPBC) subtype, identifiable by time since last birth (TSLB) and biomarker expression, contributes to this trend. Methods We applied GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) to measure associations between TSLB and 71 proteins in 640 BCs from women aged ≤40 years included in the Young Women’s Breast Cancer Study. We analyzed data using univariable linear regression and multivariable sliced inverse regression to account for higher order interactions among biomarkers. Results In keratin-rich segments, progesterone receptor (PR) (P = 1.00 × 10−4) and PTEN (P = 1.00 × 10−3) were associated with longer TSLB; multivariable analyses revealed positive associations for GZMB (P = 4.00 × 10−4), SMA (P = 1.00 × 10−4), and NF-1 (P = 1.00 × 10−3). In keratin-poor segments, univariable significant positive associations were found for PR (P = 2.00 × 10−4) and PTEN (P = 1.00 × 10−3), whereas CD20 (P = 3.00 × 10−4) and CTLA4 (P = 4.00 × 10−5) were negatively associated; multivariable significant associations were found for fibronectin (P = 3.00 × 10−5) and pan-Akt (P = 1.00 × 10−3). Associations persisted after adjustment for multiple comparisons and BC molecular subtypes. Associations including for PR, PTEN, and CD20 were strongest among women with the shortest TSLB. OPAL multiplex immunofluorescence assays for PR, PTEN, CD20, SMA, and CTLA4 replicated several DSP findings, particularly when stratified by subtype and with compartment matching. In TCGA, RNA species linked to proteins associated with TSLB correlated strongly with a T-cell exhaustion signature previously linked to poor prognosis among premenopausal women. Conclusion These data support PPBC as a biologically coherent phenotype defined by TSLB and biomarker profile, with potential implications for prevention and therapy.

Abstract Purpose: The role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) remains unclear in hormone receptor (HR)–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, particularly in young patients, whose immune microenvironment could be altered by age-related host and tumor differences. Experimental Design: Patients with stage I to III HR-positive/HER2-negative tumors were identified from a prospective cohort study of patients with breast cancer diagnosed at age ≤40 years. Multiplexed immunofluorescence and semiautomated quantitative software measured cytotoxic T, non–CD8 T, T regulatory, exhausted T, and PDL1+ cells in stroma and tumor. Univariate analyses assessed differences in clinicopathologic characteristics by high versus low immune infiltration, divided based on median. TIL subtypes were evaluated as a continuous variable per 10% increase in Cox regression analyses for invasive breast cancer–free survival, distant disease–free survival (DDFS), and overall survival, adjusted for clinicopathologic parameters. Results: Among 390 patients, high immune infiltration was associated with increasing age, Black race, grade 3 tumors, and metaplastic or micropapillary histologic subtypes. Over a median follow-up of 8 years, higher stromal and intratumoral non–CD8 T-cell infiltration, T regulatory–cell infiltration, and PDL1 expression were associated with improved invasive breast cancer–free survival. Higher intratumoral non–CD8 T-cell infiltration, T regulatory–cell infiltration, and PDL1 expression were associated with improved DDFS; higher stromal PDL1 expression was also associated with improved DDFS. Higher intratumoral cytotoxic T-cell infiltration and PDL1 expression were associated with improved overall survival. Conclusions: Characterization of immune subpopulations could help refine the prognostic value of TILs in young patients with HR-positive breast cancer, who may benefit from risk stratification for treatment individualization. See related commentary by Salgado and Kok, p. 2133

PURPOSE Given the extended survivorship of young adults with breast cancer, characterizing health care utilization and adherence to surveillance guidelines can inform gaps in care. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients age 40 years and younger at diagnosis of stage 0-III breast cancer enrolled in a prospective cohort study completed a survey 7 years after diagnosis assessing receipt of care and surveillance. We evaluated factors associated with transition to a primary care provider (PCP) for cancer-related follow-up and adherence to mammography and bone density scans. RESULTS Among 660 women, 92% reported having a PCP, although for cancer-related follow-up, 57% saw only an oncology provider, 29% saw both a PCP and oncology provider. In the past 2 years, 68% reported getting a flu shot, 76% a pap test/pelvic examination, 56% cholesterol screening, and 42% (n = 232 endocrine therapy [ET] users) a bone density scan. Among women who had a unilateral mastectomy or lumpectomy (n = 356), 82% reported a mammogram in the past year. In multivariate analyses, those with stage 0 ( v I disease) were more likely to see a PCP for follow-up ( v PCP + oncology provider); ET users and those more concerned about recurrence were less likely. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2) disease were more likely to adhere to mammography; those with a BRCA mutation and those with a unilateral mastectomy were less likely. Patients with a BRCA mutation and who had chemotherapy were more likely to report a bone density scan. CONCLUSION Although most have a PCP, over half of young survivors continue to see an oncology provider for follow-up in long-term survivorship. Mammography uptake was high; uptake of other health maintenance practices was lower. Identification of barriers/facilitators to receipt of guideline-concordant care may inform strategies to optimize survivorship.

Importance Women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age are felt to have a higher risk for locoregional recurrence (LRR) regardless of type of local therapy. Objective To assess the long-term incidence of isolated LRR by molecular subtype in a modern multicenter cohort of young women. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study, a multicenter prospective study named the Young Women’s Breast Cancer Study, enrolled 1302 women diagnosed with breast cancer at 40 years or younger from 2006 to 2016. Treatment information and incident LRR (ipsilateral breast/chest or lymph node recurrence) were self-reported on study surveys and confirmed with medical record review; molecular subtype was determined by record review. Analysis was reported from February 2023 to May 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures Cumulative incidence of isolated LRR was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method; hazard ratios were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression. Results The cohort included 1135 women with stage I through III breast cancer who had a median follow-up of 10.1 years (range, 0.4-16.3 years). The age at diagnosis was younger than 30 years for 145 patients (12.8%), 31 to 35 years for 318 patients (28.0%), and 36 to 40 years for 672 patients (59.2%). There were 59 isolated local recurrences (5.2%) and 4 isolated regional recurrences (0.4%). Among patients with local therapy and subtype data available (n = 1128), 366 (32%) had luminal A–like tumors; 240 (21%), luminal B–like tumors; 231 (20%) luminal ERBB2 positive (+)–like (formerly HER2 positive); 90 (8%) ERBB2 +-like; and 201 (18%) triple negative. A total of 346 women (30%) had breast-conserving therapy (BCT) (98% of whom had radiation), 296 (26%) unilateral mastectomy, and 487 (43%) bilateral mastectomy. Of women who had mastectomy, 425 (54%) had radiation. The cumulative incidence of LRR at 10.1 years by subtype was as follows: luminal A, 4.4% (range, 1.0%-6.9%); luminal B, 4.7% (range 1.8%-7.7%); luminal ERBB2 +, 6.1% (range, 3.1%-8.3%); ERBB2 +, 2.2% (range, 0%-6.3%); and triple negative, 6.5% (range, 4.2%-10.1%). The cumulative incidence of LRR by locoregional treatment type at 10.1 years was 6.7% after BCT (range, 4.3%-10.1%), 6.5% after mastectomy without radiation (range, 0%-7.7%), and 2.4% after mastectomy with radiation (range, 1%-4.2%). Although mastectomy with radiation was associated with the lowest risk of LRR on multivariable analysis, when examined within molecular subtype, there were no differences seen. Conclusions and Relevance In this contemporary cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 years or younger, risk of isolated LRR was relatively low (5.6%) at a median follow-up of 10.1 years, and significant differences were not seen by tumor subtype. Concerns for long-term risk of LRR should not influence surgical decision-making with young women, irrespective of molecular subtype.

The NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship include screening, evaluation, and treatment recommendations for common physical and psychosocial problems resulting from adult-onset cancer and its treatment and provide a framework for coordination of survivorship care. They also include recommendations to help cancer survivors enhance their wellness and maintain a healthy lifestyle. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s current recommendations and recent updates regarding physical activity, nutrition, and weight management for cancer survivors.