Citations

Objective: To report the preliminary safety, tolerability, and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) sampling utility of serial injections of concentrated intraventricular nicardipine (IVN) in the treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Methods: We report the clinical, radiographic, and laboratory safety and tolerability data of a retrospective case series from a single academic medical center. All patients with aSAH developed vasospasm despite enteral nimodipine and received serial injections of concentrated IVN (2.5 mg/mL). CSF injection safety, tolerability, and utility are defined and reported. Results: A total of 59 doses of concentrated IVN were administered to three patients with poor-grade SAH. In Case 1, a 33-year-old man with modified Fisher scale (mFS) grade 4 and Hunt-Hess scale (HH) score 4 received 26 doses; in Case 2, a 36-year-old woman with mFS grade 4 and HH score 5 received 13 doses; and in Case 3, a 70-year-old woman with mFS grade 3 and HH score 4 received 20 doses. No major safety or tolerability events occurred. Two patients were discharged to a rehabilitation facility, and one died after discharge from the hospital. Conclusions: A concentrated 4 mg IVN dose (2.5 mg/mL) in a 1.6 mL injection appears relatively safe and tolerable and potentially offers a second-line strategy for treating refractory vasospasm in poor-grade SAH without compromising intracranial pressure or cerebral perfusion pressure.

Background: Ketamine, a dissociative anesthetic, induces improvement in depressive symptoms by antagonizing glutaminergic NMDA receptors. Ketamine has been used previously in outpatient setting for treatment-resistant depression, but we showcase its utility in depression management at the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Research Question: Can ketamine be used for depression treatment in ICU patients? Study Design and Methods: A retrospective chart review of ICU patients was done at a tertiary center from 2018 to 2021, to assess the ketamine usage. Among the patients reviewed, ketamine was used for depression in 12, and for analgesia & sedation in 2322 patients. Ketamine was administered in doses of 0.5mg/kg & 0.75mg/kg for depression. Each course consisted of 3 doses of ketamine administered over 3 days, and 7 in 12 patients received a single course of ketamine. The rest received 3–4 courses 1 week apart. Results: Ketamine was found to improve mood and affect in most of the patients with depression. 11 in 12 patients had a positive response with better sleep. It has a major advantage over conventional anti-depressants since it takes only a few hours to induce clinical improvement. Patients who were observably withdrawn from care team and family, were administered ketamine. Conclusion: A major drawback of ketamine is that the duration of clinical improvement is short, with the response lasting only up to seven days after a single dose. Hence, all the patients in our study were weaned off ketamine with a supporting antidepressant. Ketamine has been documented to cause cardio-neurotoxicity; however, only one patient had worsening lethargy in our study. To conclude, ketamine has a marked benefit in treating depression in the ICU. Although our study was associated with positive outcomes, there is a need for prospective studies with long-term follow-up assessments.

Introduction In the unprecedented era of COVID-19, ongoing research and evolution of evidence has led to ever-changing guidelines for clinical monitoring and therapeutic options. Formulating treatment protocols requires the understanding and application of the evolving research. Objective The primary objective of this study is to present a systematic evidence-based approach to synthesize the necessary data in order to optimize the management of COVID-19. Methods At Mayo Clinic Florida, we developed a multidisciplinary centralized COVID Treatment Review Panel (TRP) of expert pulmonologists, intensivists, infectious disease specialists, anesthesiologists, hematologists, rheumatologists, and hospitalists that in real-time reviews the latest evidence in peer-reviewed journals, the available clinical trials, and help guide the rapid application of therapeutics or interventions to the patient and the bedside provider. Results/Conclusions The multi-disciplinary team approach of synthesizing clinical data and coordinating care is effective in responding to rapidly evolving and changing evidence. Systematic data collection and evidence-based treatment algorithms enable physicians to rapidly translate the current literature to clinical practice, and improve care and outcomes of patients.