Citations

Clear

17 citation(s) found for "Rosenquist, Richard".

Medical history and lifestyle factors have limited impact on time‐to‐first‐treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Glimelius, Ingrid , Robinson, Dennis P. , Mansouri, Larry, Rostgaard, Klaus , Hjalgrim, Henrik, Hampel, Paul J. , Slager, Susan L., Smedby, Karin E. , Kleinstern, Geffen , Rabe, Kari G. , Hampel, Paul J , Rosenquist, Richard , Niemann, Carsten Utoft , Mattsson, Mattias , Parikh, Sameer A. , Rosenquist, Richard , Cerhan, James R.

Mayo Clinic

eJHaem | August 27, 2024 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 998-1004

10.1002/jha2.1000 | PMID 39415908 Get It

AbstractBackgroundChronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a heterogeneous disease. Whereas some patients have an indolent disease, others experience an aggressive course and early death. Our aim was to investigate if modifiable and non‐modifiable medical history and lifestyle factors prior to diagnosis had an impact on the natural course of the disease.MethodIn 1154 CLL patients, we assessed if the weight, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol consumption or non‐modifiable characteristics including family history of lymphoid malignancy and medical history were associated with time‐to‐first‐treatment (TTFT) and adjusted all results for the CLL‐International Prognostic Index (CLL‐IPI).ResultsTTFT was shorter for patients with high/very high‐risk CLL‐IPI than those with low/intermediate risk CLL‐IPI. In the adjusted analysis we did not find additional impact on TTFT besides CLL‐IPI from any environmental characteristics assessed.ConclusionsWe found limited impact of environmental factors on the natural course of CLL (measured as the TTFT in treatment naïve patients) providing valuable knowledge, and potential relief, to share with patients at the time of diagnosis.
Multiorganizational consensus to define guiding principles for perioperative pain management in patients with chronic pain, preoperative opioid tolerance, or substance use disorder
Dickerson, David , Mariano, Edward R. , Szokol, Joseph W., Harned, Michael , Clark, Randall M, Mueller, Jeffrey T. , Shilling, Ashley , Udoji, Mercy A. , Mukkamala, S Bobby, Doan, Lisa , Wyatt, Karla , Elkassabany, Nabil , Beck, Stacy , Wiechmann, Lisa, Chiao, Franklin, Halle, Steven G, Krishnan, Deepak G. , Cramer, John D. , Esa, Wael Ali Sakr, Muse, Iyabo O. , Baratta, Jaime L., Rosenquist, Richard W. , Gulur, Padma, Shah, Shalini , Kohan, Lynn , Robles, Jennifer, Yang, Stephen C. , Hadeed, Josef G., Schwartz, Gary , Sprintz, Michael, Urish, Kenneth L. , Walton, Ashley , Keith, Lauren, Buvanendran, Asokumar , Dickerson, David M , Muse, Iyabo O , Rosenquist, Richard , Schwenk, Eric S , Schwartz, Gary , Mariano, Edward R , Clark, Randall M., Schwalb, Jason M. , Eloy, Jean Daniel , Schwenk, Eric S. , Allen, Brian F.S. , Englesbe, Michael J. , Walton, Ashley, Keith, Lauren

Mayo Clinic

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine | April 25, 2023 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 716-724

10.1136/rapm-2023-104435 | PMID 37185214 Get It

Significant knowledge gaps exist in the perioperative pain management of patients with a history of chronic pain, substance use disorder, and/or opioid tolerance as highlighted in the US Health and Human Services Pain Management Best Practices Inter-Agency Task Force 2019 report. The report emphasized the challenges of caring for these populations and the need for multidisciplinary care and a comprehensive approach. Such care requires stakeholder alignment across multiple specialties and care settings. With the intention of codifying this alignment into a reliable and efficient processes, a consortium of 15 professional healthcare societies was convened in a year-long modified Delphi consensus process and summit. This process produced seven guiding principles for the perioperative care of patients with chronic pain, substance use disorder, and/or preoperative opioid tolerance. These principles provide a framework and direction for future improvement in the optimization and care of ‘complex’ patients as they undergo surgical procedures.
Genomic profiling for clinical decision making in lymphoid neoplasms
Leval, Laurence de , Alizadeh, Ash A. , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Campo, Elı́as , Davies, Andrew , Doǧan, Ahmet , Fitzgibbon, Jude , Horwitz, Steven M. , Melnick, Ari , Morice, William G. , Nadel, Bertrand , Rosenquist, Richard , Rossi, Davide , Advani, Ranjana H. , Allen, Carl E. , Ansell, Stephen M. , Chan, Wing C. , Cook, James R. , Cook, Lucy , d’Amore, Francesco, Dirnhofer, Stefan , Dreyling, Martin , Dunleavy, Kieron , Hodson, Daniel J. , Klapper, Wolfram , Kim, Won Seog , King, Rebecca L. , Ko, Young Hyeh , LaCasce, Ann S. , Lenz, Georg , Pasqualucci, Laura , Rosenwald, Andreas , Miguel, Jesús F. San , Staudt, Louis M. , Weigert, Oliver , Wilson, Wyndham H. , Wu, Catherine J. , Bagg, Adam , Dirnhofer, S , Bergsagel, P. Leif , de Leval, Laurence , Melnick, Ari , Morin, Ryan D , Nadel, Bertrand , Pileri, Stefano , Rosenquist, Richard , Salaverria, Itziar , Steidl, Christian , Treon, Steven , Zelenetz, Andrew D , Allen, Carl E , Ansell, Stephen M , Chan, Wing C , Cook, James R , Cook, Lucy B , d'Amore, Francesco , Dreyling, Martin , Dunleavy, Kieron , Feldman, Andrew L , Fend, Falko , Gaulard, Philippe , Ghia, Paolo , Gribben, John G. , Hermine, Olivier , Hodson, Daniel J , Hsi, Eric D , Inghirami, Giorgio , Jaffe, Elaine S , Karube, Kennosuke , Kataoka, Keisuke , Klapper, Wolfram , King, Rebecca L , Hyeh, Young , LaCasce, Ann Steward , Lenz, Georg , Piris, Miguel , Pittaluga, Stefania , Pasqualucci, Laura , Quintanilla-Martinez, Leticia , Rodig, Scott J , Rosenwald, Andreas , Salles, Gilles A , San-Miguel, Jesus , Savage, Kerry J , Sehn, Laurie H , Semenzato, Gianpietro , Staudt, Louis M , Swerdlow, Steven H , Tam, Constantine S , Trotman, Judith , Vose, Julie , Weigert, Oliver , Wilson, Wyndham H , Winter, Jane N , Wu, Catherine J , Zinzani, Pier Luigi , Zucca, Emanuele , Bagg, Adam , Scott, David W , Morice, William George , Campo, Elías , Advani, Ranjana H , Dogan, Ahmet , Davies, Andrew , Fitzgibbon, Jude , Horwitz, Steven M , Alizadeh, Ash A , Pileri, Stefano , Salaverría, Itziar , Steidl, Christian , Treon, Steven P. , Zelenetz, Andrew D. , Feldman, Andrew L. , Ghia, Paolo , Hermine, Olivier , Hsi, Eric D. , Inghirami, Giorgio , Jaffe, Elaine S. , Karube, Kennosuke , Martin-Subero, Jose Ignacio , Piris, Miguel Á. , Pittaluga, Stefania , Quintanilla‐Martínez, Leticia , Salles, Gilles , Savage, Kerry J. , Sehn, Laurie H. , Swerdlow, Steven H. , Tam, Constantine S. , Vose, Julie M. , Winter, Jane N. , Zinzani, Pier Luigi , Zucca, Emanuele , Scott, David W.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | August 24, 2022 | Volume: 140 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 2193-2227

10.1182/blood.2022015854 | PMID 36001803 Get It

Abstract With the introduction of large-scale molecular profiling methods and high-throughput sequencing technologies, the genomic features of most lymphoid neoplasms have been characterized at an unprecedented scale. Although the principles for the classification and diagnosis of these disorders, founded on a multidimensional definition of disease entities, have been consolidated over the past 25 years, novel genomic data have markedly enhanced our understanding of lymphomagenesis and enriched the description of disease entities at the molecular level. Yet, the current diagnosis of lymphoid tumors is largely based on morphological assessment and immunophenotyping, with only few entities being defined by genomic criteria. This paper, which accompanies the International Consensus Classification of mature lymphoid neoplasms, will address how established assays and newly developed technologies for molecular testing already complement clinical diagnoses and provide a novel lens on disease classification. More specifically, their contributions to diagnosis refinement, risk stratification, and therapy prediction will be considered for the main categories of lymphoid neoplasms. The potential of whole-genome sequencing, circulating tumor DNA analyses, single-cell analyses, and epigenetic profiling will be discussed because these will likely become important future tools for implementing precision medicine approaches in clinical decision making for patients with lymphoid malignancies.
Development of entrustable professional activities for regional anesthesia and pain medicine fellowship training
Prendiville, Elaine, Booth, Gregory J , Boublik, Jan , Burnett, Garrett W. , Elkassabany, Nabil , Hausman, Jonathan, Klesius, Lisa L. , Le-Wendling, Linda , Machi, Anthony , Maniker, Robert B. , Parra, Michelle C. , Rosenquist, Richard W. , Spofford, Christina M., Tedore, Tiffany , Wilson, Elizabeth H., Zhou, Jon , Woodworth, Glenn E. , Porter, Steven B , Boublik, Jan , Burnett, Garrett W , Le-Wendling, Linda , Machi, Anthony T , Parra, Michelle , Tedore, Tiffany , Zhou, Jon Yan , Woodworth, Glenn , Porter, Steven B. , Allen, Brian F.S. , Suresh, Santhanam

Mayo Clinic

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine | July 25, 2022 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 672-677

10.1136/rapm-2022-103854 | PMID 35878963 Get It

Introduction The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) offers descriptions of competencies and milestones but does not provide standardized assessments to track trainee competency. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) and special assessments (SAs) are emerging methods to assess the level of competency obtained by regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine (RAAPM) fellows. Methods A panel of RAAPM physicians with experience in education and competency assessment and one medical student were recruited to participate in a modified Delphi method with iterative rounds to reach consensus on: a list of EPAs, SAs, and procedural skills; detailed definitions for each EPA and SA; a mapping of the EPAs and SAs to the ACGME milestones; and a target level of entrustment for graduating US RAAPM fellows for each EPA and procedural skill. A gap analysis was performed and a heat map was created to cross-check the EPAs and SAs to the ACGME milestones. Results Participants in EPA and SA development included 19 physicians and 1 medical student from 18 different programs. The Delphi rounds yielded a final list of 23 EPAs, a defined entrustment scale, mapping of the EPAs to ACGME milestones, and graduation targets. A list of 73 procedural skills and 7 SAs were similarly developed. Discussion A list of 23 RAAPM EPAs, 73 procedural skills, and 7 SAs were created using a rigorous methodology to reach consensus. This framework can be utilized to help assess RAAPM fellows in the USA for competency and allow for meaningful performance feedback.
Triggering interferon signaling in T cells with avadomide sensitizes CLL to anti-PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapy
Hagner, Patrick R. , Stokes, Matt, Gandhi, Anita K. , Apollonio, Benedetta , Fanous, Mariam, Papazoglou, Despoina , Sutton, Lesley-Ann, Rosenquist, Richard , Chiu, Hsiling , Lopez‐Girona, Antonia , Janardhanan, Preethi , Jones, Jeffrey A. , Shanafelt, Tait D. , Tallman, Martin S. , Σταματόπουλος, Κώστας , Patten, Piers , Vardi, Anna , Ramsay, Alan G. , Shanafelt, Tait D , Ramsay, Alan G , Patten, Piers E M , Rosenquist, Richard , Ioannou, Nikolaos , Fanous, Mariam, Sutton, Lesley‐Ann, Amini, Rose‐Marie , Awan, Farrukh T. , Kay, Neil E.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | October 7, 2020 | Volume: 137 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 216-231

10.1182/blood.2020006073 | PMID 33024998 Get It

AbstractCancer treatment has been transformed by checkpoint blockade therapies, with the highest anti-tumor activity of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibody therapy seen in Hodgkin lymphoma. Disappointingly, response rates have been low in the non-Hodgkin lymphomas, with no activity seen in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with PD-1 blockade. Thus, identifying more powerful combination therapy is required for these patients. Here, we preclinically demonstrate enhanced anti-CLL activity following combinational therapy with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) and avadomide, a cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD). Avadomide induced type I and II interferon (IFN) signaling in patient T cells, triggering a feedforward cascade of reinvigorated T-cell responses. Immune modeling assays demonstrated that avadomide stimulated T-cell activation, chemokine expression, motility and lytic synapses with CLL cells, as well as IFN-inducible feedback inhibition through upregulation of PD-L1. Patient-derived xenograft tumors treated with avadomide were converted to CD8+ T cell-inflamed tumor microenvironments that responded to anti-PD-L1/PD-1-based combination therapy. Notably, clinical analyses showed increased PD-L1 expression on T cells, as well as intratumoral expression of chemokine signaling genes in B-cell malignancy patients receiving avadomide-based therapy. These data illustrate the importance of overcoming a low inflammatory T-cell state to successfully sensitize CLL to checkpoint blockade-based combination therapy.
Higher-order connections between stereotyped subsets: implications for improved patient classification in CLL
Agathangelidis, Andreas , Chatzidimitriou, Anastasia , Gemenetzi, Katerina , Giudicelli, Véronique , Karypidou, Maria, Plevová, Karla , Davis, Zadie , Yan, Xiao‐Jie , Jeromin, Sabine , Schneider, Christof , Pedersen, Lone Bredo , Tschumper, Renee C. , Sutton, Lesley‐Ann, Gastel, Ellen J. van, Armand, Marine , Tausch, Eugen , Baer, Constance , Navarro, Alba , Septenville, Anne Langlois de, Guido, Valentina, Mitterbauer‐Hohendanner, Gerlinde, Brieghel, Christian , Lawless, Sarah, Meggendorfer, Manja , Brázdilová, Kamila, Ritgen, Matthias , Facco, Monica , Tresoldi, Cristina , Visentin, Andrea , Patriarca, Andrea , Catherwood, Mark , Bonello, Lisa, Sudarikov, Andrey , Roumelioti, Maria, Francová, Hana Skuhrová, Moysiadis, Theodoros , Giannopoulos, Krzysztof , Mansouri, Larry, Karan-Djurašević, Teodora , Sandaltzopoulos, Raphael , Fais, Franco , Kater, Arnon P. , Panovska, Irina, Rossi, Davide , Alshemmari, Salem , Costeas, Paul , Espinet, Blanca , Antić, Darko , Foroni, Letizia, Montillo, Marco , Trentin, Livio , Stavroyianni, Niki, Gaïdano, Gianluca , Celle, Paola Francia di, Niemann, Carsten Utoft , Anagnostopoulos, Αchilles , Pott, Christiane , Fischer, Kirsten , Hallek, Michael , Oscier, David , Jelinek, Diane F., Lefranc, Marie‐Paule , Belessi, Chrysoula, Davi, Frédéric , Rosenquist, Richard , Σταματόπουλος, Κώστας , Jelinek, Diane, Gaidano, Gianluca , Rosenquist, Richard , Espinet, Blanca , Baliakas, Panagiotis , Scarfò, Lydia , Biderman, Bella V. , Bagnara, Davide , Guido, Valentina, Dimovski, Aleksandar J , Vanura, Katrina , Veronese, Silvio , Bödör, Csaba , Panagiotidis, Panagiotis T. , Campo, Elı́as , Stilgenbauer, Stephan , Haferlach, Claudia , Chiorazzi, Nicholas , Pospı́šilová, Šárka , Kossida, Sofia , Langerak, Anton W. , Ghia, Paolo

Mayo Clinic

Blood | September 29, 2020 | Volume: 137 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1365-1376

10.1182/blood.2020007039 | PMID 32992344 Get It

Abstract Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by the existence of subsets of patients with (quasi)identical, stereotyped B-cell receptor (BcR) immunoglobulins. Patients in certain major stereotyped subsets often display remarkably consistent clinicobiological profiles, suggesting that the study of BcR immunoglobulin stereotypy in CLL has important implications for understanding disease pathophysiology and refining clinical decision-making. Nevertheless, several issues remain open, especially pertaining to the actual frequency of BcR immunoglobulin stereotypy and major subsets, as well as the existence of higher-order connections between individual subsets. To address these issues, we investigated clonotypic IGHV-IGHD-IGHJ gene rearrangements in a series of 29 856 patients with CLL, by far the largest series worldwide. We report that the stereotyped fraction of CLL peaks at 41% of the entire cohort and that all 19 previously identified major subsets retained their relative size and ranking, while 10 new ones emerged; overall, major stereotyped subsets had a cumulative frequency of 13.5%. Higher-level relationships were evident between subsets, particularly for major stereotyped subsets with unmutated IGHV genes (U-CLL), for which close relations with other subsets, termed “satellites,” were identified. Satellite subsets accounted for 3% of the entire cohort. These results confirm our previous notion that major subsets can be robustly identified and are consistent in relative size, hence representing distinct disease variants amenable to compartmentalized research with the potential of overcoming the pronounced heterogeneity of CLL. Furthermore, the existence of satellite subsets reveals a novel aspect of repertoire restriction with implications for refined molecular classification of CLL.
International prognostic score for asymptomatic early-stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Condoluci, Adalgisa , Bergamo, Lodovico Terzi di , Langerbeins, Petra , Hoechstetter, Manuela A. , Herling, Carmen , Delgado, Julio , Rabe, Kari G. , Gentile, Massimo , Doubek, Michael , Chiodin, Giorgia , Mattsson, Mattias , Bahlo, Jasmin, Cutrona, Giovanna , Kotašková, Jana , Deambrogi, Clara, Smedby, Karin E. , Spina, Valeria, Bruscaggin, Alessio , Wu, Wei , Moia, Riccardo , Bianchi, Elena , Gerber, B. , Gillessen, Silke , Ghielmini, Michele, Cavalli, Franco , Stüssi, Georg , Hess, Mark A., Baumann, Tycho , Neri, Antonino , Rosenquist, Richard , Forconi, Francesco , Foà, Robin , Pospı́šilová, Šárka , Montserrat, Emili , Gaïdano, Gianluca , Hallek, Michael , Rossi, Davide , Chaffee, Kari G. , Gentile, Massimo , Gaidano, Gianluca , Rosenquist, Richard , Forconi, Francesco , Paoli, Lorenzo De , Mauro, Francesca Romana , Zucca, Emanuele , Ferrarini, Manlio , Morabito, Fortunato , Stilgenbauer, Stephan , Döhner, Hartmut , Parikh, Sameer A. , Wierda, William G.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | April 8, 2020 | Volume: 135 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 1859-1869

10.1182/blood.2019003453 | PMID 32267500 Get It

AbstractMost patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are diagnosed with early-stage disease and managed with active surveillance. The individual course of patients with early-stage CLL is heterogeneous, and their probability of needing treatment is hardly anticipated at diagnosis. We aimed at developing an international prognostic score to predict time to first treatment (TTFT) in patients with CLL with early, asymptomatic disease (International Prognostic Score for Early-stage CLL [IPS-E]). Individual patient data from 11 international cohorts of patients with early-stage CLL (n = 4933) were analyzed to build and validate the prognostic score. Three covariates were consistently and independently correlated with TTFT: unmutated immunoglobulin heavy variable gene (IGHV), absolute lymphocyte count higher than 15 × 109/L, and presence of palpable lymph nodes. The IPS-E was the sum of the covariates (1 point each), and separated low-risk (score 0), intermediate-risk (score 1), and high-risk (score 2-3) patients showing a distinct TTFT. The score accuracy was validated in 9 cohorts staged by the Binet system and 1 cohort staged by the Rai system. The C-index was 0.74 in the training series and 0.70 in the aggregate of validation series. By meta-analysis of the training and validation cohorts, the 5-year cumulative risk for treatment start was 8.4%, 28.4%, and 61.2% among low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients, respectively. The IPS-E is a simple and robust prognostic model that predicts the likelihood of treatment requirement in patients with early-stage CLL. The IPS-E can be useful in clinical management and in the design of early intervention clinical trials.
A Systematic Literature Review of Spine Neurostimulation Therapies for the Treatment of Pain
Grider, Jay S., Lamer, Tim J. , Pope, Jason E. , Falowski, Steven , Hunter, Corey , Russo, Marc , Carayannopoulos, Alexios G. , Shah, Jay M., Harned, Michael , Bolash, Robert , Arle, Jeff, Kapural, Leo, Amirdelfan, Kasra , Jain, Sameer , Liem, Liong, Carlson, Jonathan D. , Malinowski, Mark N. , Bendel, Markus A. , Yang, Ajax , Aiyer, Rohit , Valimahomed, Ali, Antony, Ajay, Craig, Justin, Al‐Kaisy, Adnan , Christelis, Nick , Rosenquist, Richard W. , Levy, Robert M. , Bendel, Markus, Deer, Timothy R. , Grider, Jay S. , Provenzano, David , Slavin, Konstantin V. , Hagedorn, Jonathan M. , Fishman, Michael Alan , Mekhail, Nagy

Mayo Clinic

Pain Medicine | December 18, 2019 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1421-1432

10.1093/pm/pnz353 | PMID 32034422 Get It

AbstractObjectiveTo conduct a systematic literature review of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for pain.DesignGrade the evidence for SCS.MethodsAn international, interdisciplinary work group conducted literature searches, reviewed abstracts, and selected studies for grading. Inclusion/exclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with intractable pain of greater than one year’s duration. Full studies were graded by two independent reviewers. Excluded studies were retrospective, had small numbers of subjects, or existed only as abstracts. Studies were graded using the modified Interventional Pain Management Techniques–Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment, the Cochrane Collaborations Risk of Bias assessment, and the US Preventative Services Task Force level-of-evidence criteria.ResultsSCS has Level 1 evidence (strong) for axial back/lumbar radiculopathy or neuralgia (five high-quality RCTs) and complex regional pain syndrome (one high-quality RCT).ConclusionsHigh-level evidence supports SCS for treating chronic pain and complex regional pain syndrome. For patients with failed back surgery syndrome, SCS was more effective than reoperation or medical management. New stimulation waveforms and frequencies may provide a greater likelihood of pain relief compared with conventional SCS for patients with axial back pain, with or without radicular pain.
CLL with Mutated IGHV4-34 Antigen Receptors Is Clinically Heterogeneous: Antigen Receptor Stereotypy Makes the Difference
Xochelli, Aliki , Hadzidimitriou, Anastasia , Sutton, Lesley‐Ann, Minga, Eva, Tausch, Eugen , Yan, Xiao‐Jie , Boudjogra, Myriam, Davis, Zadie , Sandberg, Yorick , Stavroyianni, Niki, Sudarikov, Andrey , Catherwood, Mark , Kienle, Dirk, Chatzouli, Maria, Facco, Monica , Bahlo, Jasmin, Pedersen, Lone Bredo , Mansouri, Larry, Smedby, Karin E. , Chu, Charles C. , Lefranc, Marie‐Paule , Juliusson, Gunnar , Antić, Darko , Montillo, Marco , Darzentas, Nikos , Pospı́šilová, Šárka , Hallek, Michael , Oscier, David , Belessi, Chrysoula, Jelinek, Diane F., Davi, Frédéric , Baliakas, Panagiotis , Agathangelidis, Andreas , Shanafelt, Tait D. , Plevová, Karla , Rossi, Davide , Navarro, Alba , Vojdeman, Fie Juhl , Scarfò, Lydia , Veronese, Silvio , Τζένου, Τατιάνα , Karan-Djurašević, Teodora , Giudicelli, Véronique , Panagiotidis, Panagiotis T. , Anagnostopoulos, Αchilles , Trentin, Livio , Niemann, Carsten Utoft , Döhner, Hartmut , Langerak, Anton W. , Campo, Elı́as , Chiorazzi, Nicholas , Gaïdano, Gianluca , Stilgenbauer, Stephan , Rosenquist, Richard , Ghia, Paolo , Σταματόπουλος, Κώστας

Mayo Clinic

Blood | November 17, 2019 | Volume: 126 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 5263-5263

10.1182/blood.v126.23.5263.5263 Get It

Abstract The IGHV4-34 gene is very frequent (~10%) in the B cell receptor immunoglobulin (BcR IG) gene repertoire of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Over 30% of IGHV4-34 CLL cases can be assigned to different subsets with stereotyped BcR IG. The largest is subset #4 which represents ~1% of all CLL and ~10% of IGHV4-34 CLL and is considered a prototype for indolent disease. The BcR IG of a great majority (~85%) of IGHV4-34 CLL cases carry a significant load of somatic hypermutation (SHM), often with distinctive SHM patterns. This holds especially true for stereotyped subsets and is suggestive of particular modes of interactions with the selecting antigen(s). In detail, subsets #4 and #16, both involving IgG-switched cases (IgG-CLL), exhibit the greatest sequence similarity in SHM profiles, whereas they differ in this respect from IgM/D subsets #29 and #201. Prompted by these observations, here we explored the extent that these subset-biased SHM profiles in different IGHV4-34 stereotyped subsets were reflected in distinct demographics, clinical presentation, genomic aberrations and outcomes. Within a multi-institutional series of 20,331 CLL patients, 1790 (8.8%) expressed IGHV4-34 BcR IG. Following established bioinformatics approaches for the identification of BcR IG stereotypy, 573/1790 IGHV4-34 CLL cases (32%) were assigned to stereotyped subsets; of these, 340 cases (19% of all IGHV4-34 CLL and 60% of stereotyped IGHV4-34 cases) belonged to subsets #4, #16, #29 and #201, all concerning IGHV-mutated CLL (M-CLL). Clinicobiological information was available for 275/340 patients: #4, n=150; #16, n=44; #29, n=39; and #201, n=42. Comparisons between subsets revealed no differences in gender and age distribution. Interestingly, however, 36-43% of each subset cases were young for CLL (defined as patients aged ≤55 years), which is higher compared to general CLL cohorts, where young patients generally account for ~25% of cases. In contrast, significant differences were identified between subsets regarding: (i) disease stage at diagnosis, with >90% of IgG subsets #4 and #16 diagnosed at Binet stage A versus 83% in subset #201 and 74% in subset #29 (p=0.029); (ii) CD38 expression, ranging from 1% in subset #4 to 10% in subset #201 (p=0.013); (iii) the distribution of del(13q), peaking at a remarkable 92% in subset #29 versus only 37% in subset #16 (p<0.0001). Regarding other genomic aberrations, they were either absent (NOTCH1 mutations) or rare (SF3B1 mutations, trisomy 12, del(11q), TP53 aberrations due to either del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations). The sole exception concerned a high frequency (14%) of TP53 aberrations in subset #29 (p<0.05 compared with the other subsets), which is notable for M-CLL cases in general. Time to first treatment (TTFT) could be analyzed in 228 cases. IgG subsets #4 and #16 had significantly (p=0.036) longer TTFT (median TTFT: not yet reached) compared to the IgM/D subsets #29 and #201 (median TTFT: 11 and 12 years, respectively). In conclusion, we have identified distinct clinicobiological profiles for different stereotyped IGHV4-34 M-CLL subsets, highlighting subsets #4 and #16 as particularly indolent, which is important for both medical and social reasons, especially considering that a significant proportion of patients in these subsets are diagnosed at younger ages. Our findings support the notion that BcR IG stereotypy refines prognostication in CLL, superseding the crude immunogenetic distinction based on SHM load only. Additionally, the observed heterogeneity suggests that not all M-CLL are equal, prompting further research into the underlying biological background with the ultimate aim of tailored patient management. Disclosures Tausch: Gilead: Other: Travel support. Shanafelt:Glaxo-Smith_Kline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Polyphenon E Int'l: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmactckucs: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding. Niemann:Gilead: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Other: Travel grant. Langerak:InVivoScribe: Patents & Royalties: Licensing of IP and Patent on BIOMED-2-based methods for PCR-based Clonality Diagnostics.; DAKO: Patents & Royalties: Licensing of IP and Patent on Split-Signal FISH. Royalties for Dept. of Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, NL; Roche: Other: Lab services in the field of MRD diagnostics provided by Dept of Immunology, Erasmus MC (Rotterdam). Hallek:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards, Research Funding; Boehringher Ingelheim: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards, Research Funding. Ghia:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients with IGHV Genes Carrying Only Silent Mutations Have A Longer Time From Diagnosis to Initial Therapy Than Patients Expressing B-Cell Receptors with No Somatic Mutations
Kaufman, Matthew, Yan, Xiao‐Jie , Rassenti, Laura Z., Oscier, David , Davi, Frédéric , Belessi, Chrysoula, Davis, Zadie , Byrd, John C. , Brown, Jennifer R. , Rai, Kanti R., Ghia, Emanuela M. , Neuberg, Donna , Σταματόπουλος, Κώστας , Ghia, Paolo , Rosenquist, Richard , Agathangelidis, Andreas , Kay, Neil E. , Rai, Kanti R., Kipps, Thomas J. , Chiorazzi, Nicholas

Mayo Clinic

Blood | October 14, 2019 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 288-288

10.1182/blood.v118.21.288.288 Get It

Abstract Abstract 288 BACKGROUND. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients with mutated IGHV genes (M-CLL) have better outcomes than patients with unmutated IGHV genes (U-CLL). It has been proposed that this difference reflects the fact that IGHV mutations alter the structure of the B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) such that it no longer binds stimulatory (auto) antigens and therefore cannot deliver trophic signals to the leukemic cells. For this theory to be correct, only replacement (R) mutations and in particular non-conservative R mutations that would more likely alter amino structure of the IGHV/D/J rearrangements would have relevance. Silent (S) mutations by definition do not change amino acid structure and could not alter antigen binding. We sought to investigate this hypothesis by analyzing the types (S, conservative R, non-conservative R) and distribution of mutations that occur in IGHVs of M-CLL clones and then comparing the time to first therapy (TTFT) in patients with different IGHV features. This analysis expanded an initial study of 1569 CLL cases in the US to include 1858 patients from Europe for a total of 3427 cases. METHODS. Using IGMT software and tools, we analyzed the rearranged IGHV sequences of 3427 cases and characterized their mutations in several respects: first, if IGHV mutations altered amino acid structure (S vs. R); second, if mutations occurred in CDRs (antigen binding domains) or FRs (scaffolds of the BCR); third, if R mutations were conservative or non-conservative as determined by charge, hydropathy, and size. TTFT for patients was examined with various combinations of the above parameters. Differences in TTFT were estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier and assessed using the log rank test. RESULTS. First, TTFT was compared for 4 groups of patients with the following mutation profiles: no mutations; only S mutations (median 1 per sample); only R mutations (median 1 per sample); and mixed S and R mutations (median 16 per sample). These 4 categories were significantly different (P<0.0001), with the median TTFT being 2.0 yrs for no mutations; 2.6 yrs for R only; 2.8 yrs for S only; and 7.3 yrs for mixed. All comparisons used patients with no mutations (n=1234) as the reference group. We identified statistically longer TTFT (2.8 vs 2.0 yrs; P=0.04) in patients with only S mutations (n=62). Patients with only R mutations (n=218) also had superior outcomes (2.6 yrs vs. 2.0 yrs; P=0.008). There was no statistical significance in TTFT between patients with all S vs. all R mutations (2.8 yrs vs. 2.6 yrs; P=0.71). Because exploring the relevance of BCR structural change on TTFT required us to focus on a small subset of patients with only silent IGHV mutations, our sample size was small. Therefore, we expanded the group to include IGHVs with R mutations limited to the FR region (S + R in FR only; n=241) since these mutations would be unlikely to have a major impact on BCR structure, particularly sparing the binding site. When compared to patients with no mutations, this group demonstrated a significantly longer TTFT (2.8 yrs vs. 2.0 yrs, P=0.0002). This finding was upheld when not permitting any non-conservative R mutations in this group, leaving only patients with S plus conservative R mutations in FRs only (n=124); TTFT in this case was 2.8 yrs vs. 2.0 yrs, respectively (P=0.0006). CONCLUSIONS. Our findings show that patients with only S mutations have better outcomes than patients with no mutations, suggesting that a change in BCR structure that could lead to a loss of antigen binding is an unlikely reason for improved clinical course. This is further supported by the finding that the combination of only S plus conservative R mutations located solely in FRs, which probably would not result in major BCR structural changes and therefore antigen binding, is associated with a lengthened TTFT. Therefore, we suggest that the currently accepted paradigm to explain the enhanced survival of M-CLL patients needs to be re-evaluated. Disclosures: Brown: Calistoga: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding. Kipps:Igenica: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbott Industries: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.