Citations

Background: There is growing evidence that social determinants of health (SDOH) are associated with disparities in access to care and hand and upper extremity health. Quality measures represent an opportunity to evaluate disparities in access and outcomes that can inform improvement interventions. We performed a systematic review of evidence regarding health disparities within hand surgery and aimed to develop suitable quality measures that are clinically important, feasible, usable, and scientifically acceptable. Methods: We performed a systematic review including common hand surgery terms to identify health disparities in hand surgery related to SDOH. Candidate quality measures were constructed based upon evidence from the systematic review. A consortium of 11 US-based hand and upper extremity surgeons completed a modified RAND/UCLA Delphi Appropriateness process to evaluate the importance, feasibility, usability, and scientific acceptability of the candidate quality measures. Panelists rated each measure on a scale of 1 ( definitely not important/feasible/usable/scientifically acceptable ) to 9 ( definitely important/feasible/usable/scientifically acceptable ) in 2 voting rounds separated by a face-to-face discussion. Agreement among panelists and validity were assessed using predetermined criteria. Results: Fourteen candidate quality measures addressing health disparities were identified based on evidence from the systematic review, including time to surgery and emergency department use after hand surgery based on insurance type, clinical outcomes based on social deprivation, among others. All 14 measures were accepted. Conclusions: Fourteen candidate quality measures were identified and accepted based upon consensus to address health disparities in hand surgery, although future investigation will be needed to evaluate their effectiveness.

Introduction: Evidence suggests that the distal radioulnar joint injury associated with an operatively treated displaced fracture of the distal radius does not benefit from specific treatment after the radius is realigned. To better understand variation in treatment of the distal radioulnar joint we performed a scenario-based experiment presenting radiographs of displaced distal radial fractures accompanied by clinical scenarios with randomized aspects. Methods: In a survey-based experiment, participants of the Science of Variation Group viewed a random subset of five of 10 sets of radiographs showing displaced fractures of the distal radius before and after anterior plate fixation. Each was accompanied by a clinical scenario with trauma energy level, age and gender randomized. Participants indicated their preferred distal radioulnar joint treatment: none, cast immobilization, operative reattachment of ligaments or ulnar styloid fixation, or distal radioulnar joint pinning. Factors associated with any treatment and with reattachment were sought in multivariable regression. Results: Surgeons recommended distal radioulnar joint treatment in 67% (404 of 607) of the scenarios, most commonly cast immobilization in 41% (247 of 607). Recommendation for any distal radioulnar joint treatment was associated with younger patient age, and for reattachment specifically, was associated with younger patient age, high-energy trauma and fracture of the base of the ulnar styloid. Conclusions: The observation of frequent recommendation for distal radioulnar joint treatment, relatively more so for younger patients with higher energy injuries, and some tendency to repair an aligned ulnar styloid base fracture may diverge from existing evidence.

Background: Early surgical intervention in nerve palsies with a high probability of nerve integrity and natural recovery risks unnecessary surgery. Understanding the variables influencing surgeons to offer surgery might provide insight into variations in surgeon beliefs and guide treatment recommendations. Methods: Sixty-nine surgeons of the Science of Variation Group participated in a survey consisting of 6 traumatic and 3 nontraumatic nerve palsy scenarios. Participants were asked what their preferred treatment was and how likely they were to offer surgery on a scale from 0 to 10. Participants were randomized to choose for themselves (n = 31) or for a patient of their age and sex (n = 38). Results: There was no difference in the overall likelihood of offering surgery or in the types of treatment offered to patients compared with oneself. Surgery was least recommended for idiopathic palsies and most for ulnar (β = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.10 to 1.7; P = 0.027) or radial (β = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.12 to 1.7; P = 0.025) nerve palsy following closed distal radius or humerus fractures. Longer symptom duration increased the likelihood of offering surgery. Conclusions: Surgeons were moderately likely to recommend surgery for nerve palsies, with no variation in opinions regardless of whether they were deciding for themselves or for patients. For specific nerve palsies with a documented benign natural history, this likely represents overtreatment. Future studies can assess whether balancing awareness of a benign natural history with the pressure to act and the sense that recovery is “taking too long” might limit the offer of unnecessary surgery.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created unique logistical challenges for vaccine transportation, inventory management, allocation and distribution at multiple levels — the federal government, states and healthcare institutions. Unpredictable weekly vaccine allocation from state health departments, changing population priorities, stringent vaccine requirements for ultracold storage, transportation, reconstitution and 2-dose administration intervals have presented challenges never seen before in the history of mass vaccination programmes, including those at Mayo Clinic. To meet the challenges, an efficient system of allocation and administration for COVID-19 vaccines was developed through collaboration with process engineering. To understand the challenges, ten health systems engineers from the Department of Management Engineering & Consulting at Mayo Clinic facilitated the institution-wide COVID-19 vaccine project, collaborating closely with diverse multidisciplinary teams that included physicians, nurses, pharmacists, administrative services, information technology, human resources, scheduling operations and public affairs. The internal consultants designed tools and solutions based on systems and process engineering methodologies to solve a myriad of complex problems, including identifying priority populations, using resources efficiently and minimising vaccine waste. Tools designed included a vaccine resource playbook; dynamic staffing models based on vaccine allocation, storage, inventory and distribution processes using a hub-andspoke model; workflows and staffing models for face-to-face and drive-through vaccine administration sites; and end-of-day workflows to reduce vaccine waste. Through the collaboration, modelling and engineering, multiple sites across Mayo Clinic have implemented successful COVID-19 vaccination programmes that are efficient in resource utilisation and have minimal waste. In this paper, we share what we have learned to help other healthcare organisations prepare for future mass vaccination scenarios.

Background Mental health characteristics such as negative mood, fear avoidance, unhelpful thoughts regarding pain, and low self-efficacy are associated with symptom intensity and capability among patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). Knowledge gaps remain regarding the conceptual and statistical overlap of these constructs and which of these are most strongly associated with capability in people with OA. Further study of these underlying factors can inform us which mental health assessments to prioritize and how to incorporate them into whole-person, psychologically informed care. Questions/purposes (1) What are the distinct underlying factors that can be identified using statistical grouping of responses to a multidimensional mental health survey administered to patients with OA? (2) What are the associations between these distinct underlying factors and capability in knee OA (measured using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement [KOOS JR]) and hip OA (measured using Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement [HOOS JR]), accounting for sociodemographic and clinical factors? Methods We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of adult patients who were referred to our program with a primary complaint of hip or knee pain secondary to OA between October 2017 and December 2020. Of the 2006 patients in the database, 38% (760) were excluded because they did not have a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis, and 23% (292 of 1246) were excluded owing to missing data, leaving 954 patients available for analysis. Seventy-three percent (697) were women, with a mean age of 61 ± 10 years; 65% (623) of patients were White, and 52% (498) were insured under a commercial plan or via their employer. We analyzed demographic data, patient-reported outcome measures, and a multidimensional mental health survey (the 10-item Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome-Yellow Flag [OSPRO-YF] assessment tool), which are routinely collected for all patients at their baseline new-patient visit. To answer our first question about identifying underlying mental health factors, we performed an exploratory factor analysis of the OSPRO-YF score estimates. This technique helped identify statistically distinct underlying factors for the entire cohort based on extracting the maximum common variance among the variables of the OSPRO-YF. The exploratory factor analysis established how strongly different mental health characteristics were intercorrelated. A scree plot technique was then applied to reduce these factor groupings (based on Eigenvalues above 1.0) into a set of distinct factors. Predicted factor scores of these latent variables were generated and were subsequently used as explanatory variables in the multivariable analysis that identified variables associated with HOOS JR and KOOS JR scores. Results Two underlying mental health factors were identified using exploratory factor analysis and the scree plot; we labeled them “pain coping” and “mood.” For patients with knee OA, after accounting for confounders, worse mood and worse pain coping were associated with greater levels of incapability (KOOS JR) in separate models but when analyzed in a combined model, pain coping (regression coefficient -4.3 [95% confidence interval -5.4 to -3.2], partial R2 0.076; p < 0.001) had the strongest relationship, and mood was no longer associated. Similarly, for hip OA, pain coping (regression coefficient -5.4 [95% CI -7.8 to -3.1], partial R2 0.10; p < 0.001) had the strongest relationship, and mood was no longer associated. Conclusion This study simplifies the multitude of mental health assessments into two underlying factors: cognition (pain coping) and feelings (mood). When considered together, the association between capability and pain coping was dominant, signaling the importance of a mental health assessment in orthopaedic care to go beyond focusing on unhelpful feelings and mood (assessment of depression and anxiety) alone to include measures of pain coping, such as the Pain Catastrophizing Scale or Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, both of which have been used extensively in patients with musculoskeletal conditions. Level of Evidence Level III, prognostic study.

Background: Shoulder and elbow function is essential to basic basketball actions. Outside of anterior shoulder instability, injuries in these joints are not well characterized in National Basketball Association (NBA) players. Purpose: To describe the epidemiology and associated risk factors of shoulder and elbow injuries in NBA players and identify factors that influence player performance upon return to play. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: Historical injury data from the 2015-2020 NBA seasons were retrieved from Pro Sports Transactions, a public online database. An injury was defined as a health-related concern resulting in an absence of ≥1 NBA games. Primary measures included pre- and postinjury player efficiency rating (PER) and true shooting percentage (TS%) with interquartile ranges (IQRs), stratified by extremity dominance. Multivariate logistic regression analyses with stepwise regression were performed to identify risk factors associated with return-to-play performance. Results: A total of 192 shoulder and elbow injuries were sustained among 126 NBA athletes, with incidence rates of 1.11 per 1000 game exposures (GEs) and 0.30 per 1000 GEs, respectively. Sprain/strain and general soreness were the most common injury types in both the shoulder and the elbow. In the 2 years after injury, baseline PER was achieved in all groups, except for players with dominant shoulder injuries (baseline PER, 16 [IQR, 14-18] vs 2-year PER, 13 [IQR 11-16]; P = .012). Younger age was associated with quicker return to baseline PER (odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.67-0.88]). Shoulder and elbow injuries did not negatively influence TS% upon return to play (baseline TS%, 0.55% [IQR, 0.51%-0.58%] vs 1-year TS%, 0.55% [IQR, 0.52%-0.58%]; P = .13). Conclusion: Dominant shoulder injuries negatively influenced PER during the first 2 seasons upon return to play in NBA players. Therefore, expectations that players with this type of injury immediately achieve baseline statistical production should be tempered. Shooting accuracy appears to remain unaffected after shoulder or elbow injury.