Citations

The conventional workup for suspected early-stage lung cancer requires multiple visits, anesthetics, and procedures. Single anesthetic event lung cancer surgery integrates shape-sensing robotic bronchoscopy, cone-beam CT, rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE), endobronchial ultrasound staging, lesion localization, and minimally invasive resection into one operative encounter. In this narrative review, we describe the technical components of this pathway, summarize the supporting literature, and offer expert, institution-based troubleshooting guidance for common intraoperative dilemmas. Reported diagnostic yields for shape-sensing robotic bronchoscopy range from 80 to 96%, with approximately 90% concordance between ROSE and final pathology. Published single-institution series report reductions in time from detection to resection of 15–51 days, cost savings of approximately $3000–$10,000, and perioperative outcomes (length of stay 1.8–3.6 days; complication rates comparable to traditional pathways) similar to staged care. The supporting evidence is retrospective and derived from small, single-institution, high-volume referral cohorts; no prospective comparative trials or long-term survival data yet exist. Single anesthetic event lung cancer surgery is therefore best regarded as an emerging, resource-intensive care pathway for carefully selected patients at experienced centers rather than an established standard of care, pending prospective, multicenter validation.

Autonomous robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has emerged as a promising objective in biomedical technology, further enhanced by miniaturization toward microrobotic-assisted surgery (μ-RAS). This reduction in scale promises minimally invasive, partially or fully automated surgical procedures, with the potential to reduce patient recovery times, lower medical costs, and enable previously unavailable procedural options. This perspective highlights the specific advances in RAS that potentially map to the microscale (μ-RAS), organized across five surgical domains: endovascular, endoluminal, laparoscopic, ophthalmic, and orthopedic. We examine both clinical demands and technological advances in surgical robotics and identify the key innovations required for progress across these surgical fields. Our contribution is distinct in combining the perspectives of both surgical experts and bioengineering innovators, outlining a roadmap for the advancement and eventual integration of autonomous RAS and μ-RAS into mainstream surgical practice.

8077 Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. This study evaluates national trends in surgical management of early-stage SCLC using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), aiming to identify factors associated with improved outcomes and assess the survival benefit of surgical resection. Methods: Patients diagnosed with clinical stage T1–T3 N0 M0 SCLC between 2004 and 2022 were identified from the NCDB. Exclusions included non-SCLC histologies, advanced or missing staging, non-lobectomy surgeries, and incomplete survival data. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance surgical and non-surgical cohorts based on demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic variables. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate overall survival, stratified by T stage. Results: Among 17,762 patients with early-stage SCLC, 3,234 (18.2%) underwent lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection. Surgical rates increased from 5% in 2004, 17% in 2013 to 24% in 2021. Surgery was more common in T1 (26.5%) than T2 (11.4%) or T3 (4.6%) disease. After matching, surgery was associated with improved survival across all T stages, with no significant interaction between T stage and surgical benefit (p=0.43). Older age, male sex, and higher comorbidity scores predicted worse outcomes. Among surgical patients, 2.3% received neoadjuvant therapy and 71.6% received adjuvant treatment. Systemic therapy-both neoadjuvant (HR 0.63) and adjuvant (HR 0.69)-was significantly associated with improved survival. Conclusions: Lobectomy remains underutilized in early-stage SCLC but is linked to significantly improved survival. Albeit small patient's number, neoadjuvant systemic therapy further enhanced survival, supporting broader use of surgery and multimodal treatment in appropriately selected patients Univariable results 1 Multivariable results 2 Characteristic No. deaths Person-months HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value Charlson score <0.001 <0.001 0 761 77727 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1 623 60483 1.06 (0.95,1.18) 1.07 (0.96,1.20) 2 or more 350 27025 1.30 (1.15,1.48) 1.30 (1.13,1.48) Clinical T-stage 0.011 0.014 cT1N0M0 1266 124916 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) cT2N0M0 406 33924 1.18 (1.06,1.32) 1.20 (1.06,1.35) cT3N0M0 62 6393 0.96 (0.75,1.24) 1.00 (0.76,1.31) Residual disease <0.001 <0.001 No residual tumor 1626 158838 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) Residual tumor 92 4699 1.91 (1.55,2.36) 1.91 (1.52,2.40) Neoadjuvant systemic treatment 0.253 0.034 No 1629 154116 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) Yes 30 3495 0.81 (0.56,1.16) 0.63 (0.41,0.97) Adjuvant radiation 0.067 <0.001 No 1209 118925 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) Yes 452 40471 1.11 (0.99,1.23) 1.33 (1.18,1.51) Adjuvant systemic treatment <0.001 <0.001 No 563 44045 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) Yes 1096 113566 0.75 (0.68,0.83) 0.69 (0.62,0.78)

Abstract INTRODUCTION Guidelines recommend non-surgical biopsy for indeterminate pulmonary lesions &gt; 8 mm. Shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) is growing in use to biopsy small pulmonary nodules; however current literature is limited to single center studies with limited follow-up. This study, PRECIsE, assessed safety and performance of the first ssRAB iteration across multiple sites and nascent users. METHODS Prospective, multicenter, observational study evaluating ssRAB without cone-beam CT guidance in patients with nodules 10–30 mm located in or beyond the sub-segmental airways. Patients were followed for 2 years; the primary endpoint was sensitivity for malignancy with diagnostic yield, and safety as secondary endpoints. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to control for factors associated with sensitivity and diagnostic yield. RESULTS A total of 305 procedures were performed across 6 centers. Median nodule size was 17.0 mm (IQR: 14.0–23.0) with bronchus sign present in 37% of cases. Sensitivity for malignancy through 2 years was 81.3% (95% CI: 75.7, 86.1). Multi-level modelling demonstrated female sex, smaller nodule size, lower lobe location, semi-solid density, and higher body-mass-index were associated with lower sensitivity. Diagnostic yield was 74.1% (95% CI: 68.8, 78.9) according to the ATS/ACCP criteria and 77.5% [95% CI: 72.4, 81.8] according to the intermediate criteria. Multi-level modeling demonstrated a non-significant site/center level effect on ATS/ACCP diagnostic yield (P = .36). Pneumothorax requiring intervention was 1.6% (5/305); bleeding was 1.0% (3/305) with two (2) Nashville grade 2 and one (1) Nashville grade 3 events. CONCLUSIONS The first iteration of ssRAB demonstrated encouraging performance and a strong safety profile among nascent users for the biopsy of small peripheral nodules.

Background The use of 3D imaging with navigation bronchoscopy has increased with the introduction of mobile cone-beam CT (mCBCT). Shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) integrated with mCBCT has been introduced to correct for CT to body divergence (CT-BD) during the biopsy of peripheral pulmonary nodules (PPNs). Methods Prospective observational multicentre study, enrolling patients with a PPN of ≤20 mm suspicious for malignancy, assessing tool-in-lesion (TIL), diagnostic yield, sensitivity for malignancy and incidence of pneumothorax or airway bleeding. Non-malignant index biopsies were followed for 12 months. Descriptive statistics are reported for all variables along with 95% CI for primary endpoints. Results 155 consecutive patients were enrolled at six centres. Median nodule size was 14.0 mm (IQR 11.0–17.0), with 54.8% of nodules (85/155) in the upper lobes, 25.8% (40/155) with CT bronchus sign present and median distance to the nearest pleural surface of 8.2 mm (IQR 1.8–20.0). TIL was achieved in 154/155 (99.4%, 95% CI 96.5 to 100.0) procedures. A median of two (IQR 1–3) mCBCT spins were performed, with median dose area product of 25.7 Gy · cm 2 (IQR 11.0–46.7). Diagnostic yield per the American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians (ATC/ACCP) definition was 89.0% (n=138/155; 95% CI 83.0 to 93.5) and sensitivity for malignancy was 91.5% (95% CI 86.4 to 96.5). No pneumothorax (0%, 95% CI 0.0 to 2.4) and two Nashville Grade three bleeding events were reported (1.3%, 95% CI 0.2 to 4.6). Interpretation The first prospective multicentre study of integrated ssRAB and mCBCT for small peripheral nodules resulted in diagnostic outcomes similar to those reported for transthoracic biopsy with a more favourable safety profile. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05562895 .

334 Background: Sarcopenia, or decreased skeletal muscle mass, has been associated with worse surgical and oncologic outcomes across multiple malignancies. This study investigates the impact of sarcopenia on outcomes after multimodal therapy for esophageal cancer. Methods: Retrospective observational cohort study including adult patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy for primary esophageal cancer from January 2000 - December 2021. A fully automated abdominal segmentation using deep convolutional neural network was utilized to calculate skeletal muscle index (SMI) from preoperative CT scans performed at our institution. Males with SMI <52.4 cm 2 /m 2 and females with SMI <38.5 cm 2 /m 2 at any point before surgery were classified as sarcopenic. The relationship between sarcopenia and patient demographics, operative details, and complications were explored using chi-square tests. The relationship between sarcopenia and disease-free survival and overall survival were investigated using parsimonious multivariable analysis retaining variables with p-value <0.05 using backward selection method. Results: We identified 200 patients meeting the study criteria with 142 (71%) having sarcopenia at any time prior to surgery. Patients with sarcopenia were significantly older [65.2 (59.6, 71.2) vs 63 (53.6, 67.5), p = .023] and more likely to have had open surgery [129 (90.8%) vs 46 (79.3%), p = .034]. There were no significant differences in sex, history of diabetes, coronary artery disease, renal disease, smoking, cancer type, cancer stage, tumor size, tumor location, or margin status between sarcopenic groups ( p > .05). Sarcopenic patients were significantly more likely to require blood transfusion ≥3 units after esophagectomy [79 (55.6%) vs 8 (13.8%), p < .001] or to experience complications requiring surgical intervention [36 (24.6%) vs 7 (12.1%), p = .048]. Multivariate analysis revealed that sarcopenia was associated with disease-free and overall survival (Table). Conclusions: Sarcopenia is a prognostic factor in patients undergoing multimodal therapy for esophageal cancer. Interventions that aim to prevent decreases in SMI after initiating neoadjuvant therapy should be investigated. Multivariate analysis with sarcopenia predicting outcomes. Disease free survivalHR (95% CI) p-value Overall survivalHR (95% CI) p-value Age 1.04 (1.02, 1.06) < .001 1.04 (1.02, 1.07) < .001 Epicenter Middle Upper 1.88 (1.21, 2.86)3.16 (1.67, 5.98) .001.005< .001 1.96 (1.26, 3.04)4.00 (1.90, 8.44) < .001.003< .001 Stage Stage II Stage III Stage IV 1.88 (0.95, 3.71)2.90 (1.46, 5.75)16.02 (6.12, 41.93) < .001.069.002< .001 1.65 (0.83, 3.25)2.76 (1.37, 5.55)10.14 (4.03, 25.53) < .001.151.005< .001 Cancer type - - 1.76 (1.03, 3.02) .039 Transfusion > 3 pRBC - - 1.54 (0.99, 2.40) .057 BMI prior to cancer diagnosis - - 0.98 (0.94, 1.01 .208 Sarcopenic 1.76 (1.16, 2.67) .007 1.64 (1.04, 2.60) .033

Background: The AFFINITY trial (NCT05890872) is a prospective, non-randomized, open-label, single-arm study evaluating the safety, immunological impact, and preliminary efficacy of Aliya pulsed electric field ablation in patients with solid tumors. Thirty-one patients were enrolled; thirty received lung lesion ablation prior to continuation on standard-of-care treatment. This manuscript reports six-month local control outcomes and immunological response characteristics. Radiological outcomes were assessed using a modified RECIST 1.1, and immunological impact was evaluated via changes in peripheral blood immunocyte populations and detection of immunoglobulins (Ig) to tumor-associated antigens in serum post-ablation. Methods: Twenty-eight patients underwent radiological assessment of ablated lesions at approximately 1-, 3-, and 6-month post-ablation to evaluate local control. Peripheral blood was collected for immune monitoring using flow cytometry and to detect IgG responses to biopsy-specific and tumor-associated antigens. Results: At 6 months, two cohorts emerged: 12 received ablation only, and 16 received ablation plus systemic and/or focal therapies (radiotherapy or second ablation). In the ablation-only group, imaging showed local control in all ablated lesions (8/12 SD, 4/12 PR), suggesting local efficacy without systemic therapy in those patients. Immunophenotyping showed dynamic changes in circulating immune cells, including T and B cell activation. A subset also exhibited modulation of tumor antigen-specific IgG, indicating a systemic humoral response. Conclusions: This analysis provides preliminary evidence that this form of ablation may promote local tumor control and modulate systemic immune function. These findings support the immunogenic potential of this specialized energy and warrant further investigation. Extended 12-month data for the full cohort will be reported in a future manuscript.

Background: To evaluate the safety of Aliya pulsed electric field (PEF) ablation in lung lesions at the time of biopsy before first-line standard of care (SOC) therapy in patients with metastatic cancer. Methods: Eligible patients requiring diagnostic biopsy for suspected metastatic lung lesions were enrolled. Treatment-naive lesions ≤5 cm were PEF ablated bronchoscopically or percutaneously. Procedure and/or device-related adverse events (AE) or serious adverse events (SAEs) and their effects on subsequent therapy were assessed from PEF ablation through 30 days. Results: Forty-four lesions from 30 enrolled patients were ablated using PEF with 3-dimensional image guidance immediately following diagnostic biopsy under general anesthesia. Ninety percent (27/30) were ablated bronchoscopically with robotic navigation. One to 3 lesions (range: 0.4 to 2.4 cm longest diameter) were ablated per patient, including 17 within 1 cm of the pleura or a fissure. One procedure-related SAE (pneumothorax) occurred at the time of percutaneous biopsy and PEF ablation and resolved without sequelae. No AE impacted planned therapy initiation. Limited changes to the lung parenchyma in and around the PEF ablation zone were observed on CT scans 30 days post-PEF ablation. Conclusion: This study demonstrates PEF ablation of lung lesions at the time of diagnostic biopsy is safe. One PEF-related SAE occurred within 30 days of PEF and resolved without sequelae. Ablation adjacent to sensitive structures was feasible, safe, and without impact on subsequent therapy.

Importance: Lung cancer and pulmonary metastases remain the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. While surgery is the gold standard, local tissue-ablative therapies are increasingly used in unresectable disease or inoperable patients. Minimally invasive local control presents a safe, repeatable approach to slow disease progression and prolong survival. Observations: Ablative techniques (radiofrequency, microwave, cryoablation, pulsed electric field) utilize extreme heat, cold, or energy to induce cancer cell death. Traditionally, ablation occurred percutaneously with image guidance, but transbronchial approaches are gaining popularity due to a potentially improved complication profile with reduced tumoral seeding. Stereotactic body radiotherapy utilizes non-invasive, precise radiation with a steep dose fall-off to protect peritumoral tissue. Transarterial infusions via transarterial chemoembolization and intraarterial chemoperfusion are emerging approaches that exploit tumor vasculature to provide focal cytotoxicity and ischemia. Intratumoral injectables (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiosensitization, oncolytic viruses, adoptive cell therapy, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) directly target the tumor microenvironment, potentially increasing efficacy whilst minimizing systemic adverse effects. Conclusions and relevance: In the age of individualized cancer therapy, a multidisciplinary approach with concurrent modalities can achieve local control. This review provides a comprehensive discussion regarding the role and types of local control, safety, efficacy, and survival outcomes in assessing percutaneous, transbronchial, intraarterial, and intratumoral approaches in nonsurgical patients.

3069 Background: Molecular targeted agents have revolutionized cancer diagnosis and treatment. Intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) is a novel technique that entails performing real-time, in vivo optical imaging during surgery to ensure cancer clearance. A multicenter clinical trial was conducted using abenacianine, a cathepsin targeted near-infrared (NIR) IMI agent to visualize pulmonary nodules during surgery. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of abenacianine in localizing pulmonary lesions, evaluating surgical margin, and identifying unsuspected disease. Methods: Participants scheduled to undergo surgery for known or suspected cancer in the lung received abenacianine (0.32 mg/kg intravenous) preoperatively 12 to 36 hours before surgery. During a standard-of-care surgery, the lung underwent IMI and additional disease not identified by conventional methods were identified and analyzed. Efficacy was measured by frequency of clinically significant events (CSEs) defined as localization of lesions not found by standard surgical techniques, identification of additional cancers, identification of positive surgical margins confirmed by histology, and detection of cancerous lymph nodes. Results: 89 participants were included in the study. The mean age was 67 years and 57 (64%) were female. Of 89 participants administered abenacianine who underwent standard of care surgical resection for known or suspected cancer in the lung, 40 (45%) had at least one CSE. Abenacianine with NIR imaging identified lesions that were not found by standard surgical methods in 34 (38%) participants, synchronous and occult cancers that were not found by pre-operative imaging in 2 (2%), margins within 10 mm of the closest staple line in 8 (9%), and lymph nodes determined to be cancerous in 1 (1%) participant. Tumors visualized by IMI with abenacianine included non-small cell lung cancers (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine tumor) and cancers that metastasized to the lung (breast, colorectal, prostate, thymoma, renal cell, sarcoma). Abenacianine was safe and well tolerated in this study; there were no drug-related serious adverse events. Conclusions: This Phase 2 multicenter study demonstrated that using IMI with abenacianine during standard-of-care lung cancer surgery markedly improved clinical outcomes. Abenacianine localized tumors intraoperatively, identified synchronous and occult lesions, helped assess negative margin status, and identified cancerous lymph nodes enabling a more complete oncologic resection. Clinical trial information: NCT06145048 .