Citations

Background: Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) is a common, often self-limited condition that frequently leads to inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing in children. Continued reliance on the 2013 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) sinusitis guidelines and limited awareness of newer recommendations—particularly those supporting shorter treatment durations—have contributed to antibiotic overuse. As part of an enterprise-wide antimicrobial stewardship initiative, an intervention was implemented to support outpatient pediatric clinicians in identifying children most likely to benefit from antibiotics and in prescribing a 5-day course of guideline-concordant therapy consistent with the 2024-2027 AAP Red Book. We evaluated the impact of this intervention on prescribing practices and clinical outcomes. Methods A retrospective study was conducted among pediatric outpatients diagnosed with uncomplicated ABRS between January 1 and December 1, 2025 at an urban primary care pediatrics clinic within a large health system. The intervention consisted of a brief, targeted educational lecture delivered at a division meeting by pediatric antimicrobial stewardship leadership (pharmacist and physician), emphasizing updated guidance and promoting use of a sinusitis Epic order set. A one-page summary infographic was also distributed for reference. Data were extracted using Epic SlicerDicer and included patient demographics, clinical presentation, antibiotic selection and duration, use of the sinusitis order panel, and clinical outcomes. Outcomes before and after the intervention (May 14, 2025) were compared. Results A total of 99 pediatric patients with uncomplicated ABRS were included, with 55 treated before and 44 after the intervention. Use of the sinusitis order panel increased from 16% to 39% of encounters. The proportion of patients meeting diagnostic criteria for ABRS decreased slightly from 95% to 91%. Prescribing of 5-day antibiotic courses increased from 11% to 34%. There were no significant differences in prescribing provider type, antibiotic selection, or clinical outcomes—including Clostridioides difficile infection, return outpatient visits, or hospital admissions related to ABRS within 30 days—between patients receiving 5 versus <5 days of antibiotics (p<0.05). Conclusions A single, brief educational intervention paired with promotion of an Epic order set and summary infographic increased prescribing of shorter (5-day) antibiotic courses for pediatric ABRS without adversely affecting short-term clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to assess the durability and long-term impact of this intervention on prescribing behavior.

OBJECTIVE Overuse of broad-spectrum empiric antimicrobials remains common in children hospitalized with respiratory tract infections (RTI). A negative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal swab (MNS) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) result has been shown to have a high negative predictive value for MRSA in RTI. In this quality improvement (QI) initiative, we developed a pharmacist-driven approach to reduce the duration of empiric vancomycin for RTI in children. The primary aim was the time to de-escalation of vancomycin, and the secondary aim was the reduction in vancomycin monitoring in patients hospitalized with RTI. METHODS Baseline duration of vancomycin therapy was assessed by conducting a retrospective chart review. After root cause analysis and engaging key stakeholders, an electronic health record OurPractice Advisory (OPA) was implemented, prompting pharmacists to order an MNS PCR during order verification for vancomycin with an RTI indication. RESULTS Preimplementation (01/01/2021 to 08/31/2023) included 89 patients, and 25 postimplementation (09/21/2023 to 05/31/2024). We found a 36% decrease in mean vancomycin duration from 53 to 34 hours after implementation of the pharmacist-driven OPA. Postimplementation, 24% of patients had a vancomycin concentration obtained, compared with 37% preimplementation. No patients were readmitted within 30 days postimplementation, compared with 1 patient preimplementation. CONCLUSIONS This QI initiative provides preliminary data that empiric vancomycin duration in pediatric patients with RTI may be impacted by pharmacist-facing OPA implementation, prompting ordering of MNS PCR at the time of vancomycin verification. This initiative could be replicated at other institutions seeking to reduce empiric vancomycin usage.

Abstract Background Identification of the microorganisms causing infection in children with central nervous system infection is important. Conventional cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests may provide limited pathogen detection. CSF metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) may provide broader pathogen detection in a single assay. Methods Results of CSF mNGS testing performed at Mayo Clinic on patients and nonpatients between January 2024 and June 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. The subcohort of children treated at Mayo Clinic was analyzed to assess test performance as compared with conventional CSF diagnostics and potential clinical impact. Results In total 134 patients (138 CSF mNGS tests) from 22 US states and 2 international sites were included. Overall positivity was 16% with viruses representing most (59%) detections. In the Mayo Clinic subcohort (n = 15), test positivity was 27%: organisms included single detections of Streptococcus mitis group and HIV type 1, as well as 2 detections of Epstein-Barr virus, all confirmed by conventional tests. Positive results were associated with CSF pleocytosis (P = .026). Higher yield was observed in participants whose care was overseen by pediatric infectious diseases (PID) specialists (P = .026) and when a specimen hold strategy was applied (P = .033). Most results (87%) did not alter antimicrobial therapy, with 2 negative results contributing to antimicrobial de-escalation. Conclusions CSF mNGS demonstrated higher diagnostic yield in patients whose specimens showed CSF pleocytosis and in those who had PID consultation. Diagnostic stewardship strategies were applied, including specimen hold approaches and PID consultation.

Abstract Background Specialty societies, including the Infectious Diseases Society of America, strive to address gender and racial inequities in professional advancement. Microaggressions remain a persistent and pervasive barrier to these goals. Nonprofessional speaker introductions are a manifestation of race- and gender-based microaggressions, which have not been previously assessed at IDWeek. We assessed disparities in speaker introductions at IDWeek over a 7-year period that included formal gender equity initiatives introduced in 2016. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of video-recorded IDWeek speaker introductions from 2013 to 2019. Trained coders reviewed presentation video archives to assess a primary outcome of nonprofessional introductions: when a speaker's professional title was not used as the first introduction. We used descriptive statistics, Fisher exact tests, Cochrane-Armitage trend tests, and multivariable logistic regression to characterize relationships between speaker introductions and presentation year, speaker demographics, and speaker-moderator demographic concordance. Results Of 1940 videos reviewed, 48.9% of IDWeek speakers received nonprofessional introductions during and before 2016 vs 41.5% of speakers after 2016 (P = .0013). There was an increasing linear trend in the frequency of professional introductions by speaker age group from 47.1% for age &lt;40 years to 65.3% for age &gt;60 years (P &lt; .0001). White moderators more frequently used nonprofessional introductions than moderators from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine (47.7% vs 29.1%, P = .0014). Women-men speaker-moderator pairs had more nonprofessional introductions (54.6%, P &lt; .001). Conclusions In the largest assessment of microaggressions in speaker introductions at a national medical specialty conference, we highlighted some progress over time and ample opportunity to further standardize equitable speaker introductions, especially for women and junior speakers

Abstract Background Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO) is a relatively infrequent but significant infection in pediatric patients. As Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of AHO, intravenous and oral first-generation cephalosporins are common therapies. Cephalexin is a commonly prescribed oral therapy for pediatric AHO, although it requires frequent dosing that may affect adherence. Cefadroxil is a comparable oral first-generation cephalosporin with a more desirable dosing schedule. Methods We reviewed pediatric patients admitted to Mayo Clinic between March 2002 and September 2020 for management of AHO who received treatment with a first-generation cephalosporin. We reviewed timing of oral therapy transition, therapy-associated adverse effects, and recurrence of disease after completion of therapy. Results There were 59 patients included in the study. There was similar occurrence of adverse effects in patients receiving cefadroxil and cephalexin, although use of cefadroxil coincided with more gastrointestinal adverse effects and leukopenia and use of cephalexin with more rash and neutropenia. One secondary treatment failure occurred in our study, in a patient receiving cephalexin for treatment of septic arthritis. Conclusions Cefadroxil may be a reasonable alternative oral therapy for methicillin-susceptible S aureus or culture-negative AHO in pediatric patients, particularly when a less frequent dosing schedule is desired. Future study with a larger sample size is warranted.

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can cause serious infections and empiric treatment regimens in children frequently include an anti-MRSA antibiotic. Studies in adults have demonstrated a high negative predictive value (NPV) of MRSA nasal swabs (MNS) in a variety of infectious syndromes. Negative MNS have been utilized as a tool to guide de-escalation of anti-MRSA antibiotics in adults, especially in those with lower respiratory tract infections, but data in children is minimal. The primary objective of this study was to determine the NPV and positive predictive value (PPV) of MNS in children hospitalized for treatment of an infection. Methods: This was a single-site, retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients admitted with a suspected infectious diagnosis who had an MNS performed during their hospitalization between June 1, 2018 and November 25, 2022. Results: This study identified 172 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Eleven (6.4%) nasal swabs were positive for MRSA and 10 (5.8%) microbiological cultures from suspected sources of infection were identified to be positive for MRSA. The MNS was found to have a sensitivity of 20%, specificity of 94%, PPV of 18% and NPV of 95% for all sites of infection. Conclusion: MNS has a high NPV and low PPV in children. MNS can be utilized as an antimicrobial stewardship tool to guide the safe de-escalation of anti-MRSA antibiotics in children.

Abstract Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has become more common in clinical settings. Correspondingly, OPAT-related publications have also increased; the objective of this article was to summarize clinically meaningful OPAT-related publications in 2022. Seventy-five articles were initially identified, with 54 being scored. The top 20 OPAT articles published in 2022 were reviewed by a group of multidisciplinary OPAT clinicians. This article provides a summary of the “top 10” OPAT publications of 2022.

Heterozygous loss-of-function (LOF) mutations in PIK3R1 (encoding phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase [PI3K] regulatory subunits) cause activated PI3Kδ syndrome 2 (APDS2), which has a similar clinical profile to APDS1, caused by heterozygous gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in PIK3CD (encoding the PI3K p110δ catalytic subunit). While several studies have established how PIK3CD GOF leads to immune dysregulation, less is known about how PIK3R1 LOF mutations alter cellular function. By studying a novel CRISPR/Cas9 mouse model and patients’ immune cells, we determined how PIK3R1 LOF alters cellular function. We observed some overlap in cellular defects in APDS1 and APDS2, including decreased intrinsic B cell class switching and defective Tfh cell function. However, we also identified unique APDS2 phenotypes including defective expansion and affinity maturation of Pik3r1 LOF B cells following immunization, and decreased survival of Pik3r1 LOF pups. Further, we observed clear differences in the way Pik3r1 LOF and Pik3cd GOF altered signaling. Together these results demonstrate crucial differences between these two genetic etiologies.

Abstract Background URIs are the most common indication for outpatient antibiotic prescribing. Given high rates of unnecessary prescribing, these indications have been identified as a high-priority target for outpatient antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP). Our primary objective was to evaluate the impact of a system-wide, multifaceted, outpatient ASP intervention bundle on unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for URI. Methods This quasi-experimental study was conducted from 2019 to 2021. ICD-10 codes for URIs were grouped into 3 tiers (i.e., tier I = antibiotics always indicated, tier II = sometimes, tier III = never). Encounters from 5 care specialties (i.e., family medicine, community internal medicine, express care, pediatrics, and emergency department) with a tier III URI primary ICD-10 code but without a secondary tier I or tier II code were included. COVID-19 ICD-10 codes were excluded. Interventions included construction of a prescribing data model, dissemination of clinician prescribing data and education, promotion of symptom management strategies, a patient-facing commitment poster, and a pre-populated URI order panel. Tools were designed at a system level and implemented by regional champions beginning in the 3rd quarter of 2020. The primary outcome was the rate of antibiotic prescribing, and the secondary outcome and counterbalance measure was the rate of repeat URI-related healthcare contact within 14 days. Outcomes were analyzed with chi-square with an α level of 0.05. Results A total of 147403 encounters were included. The overall antibiotic prescribing rate decreased from 24.1% to 12.3% between 2019 and 2021 (p&lt; 0.01). Significant reductions in tier III antibiotic prescribing were demonstrated for each region, care specialty, and syndrome evaluated (Table 1). A reduction in repeat healthcare contact was seen across the total cohort (9.5% in 2019 vs. 8.3% in 2021, p&lt; 0.01); decreases in repeat contact rates were observed in those not initially receiving an antibiotic (10.3% vs. 8.6%, p&lt; 0.01), but not in those who initially received an antibiotic (6.8% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.94). Tier III URI encounter level antimicrobial prescribing rates by region, care specialty, and syndrome Conclusion A multifaceted, outpatient ASP intervention bundle decreased rates of unnecessary antimicrobial prescribing without increasing rates of 14-day repeat URI-related healthcare contact. Disclosures Paschalis Vergidis, MD, AbbVie: DSMB|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support Evan Draper, PharmD, Gilead Foundation: Grant/Research Support Sara Ausman, PharmD, Gilead: Honoraria Christina G. Rivera, PharmD, Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Honoraria|Insmed: Honoraria.

AbstractBackgroundIn 2016, the IDWeek program committee was charged with ensuring gender equity in speaker sessions. Whether this charge also resulted in more opportunities for historically underrepresented speakers is unknown.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of trends in the demographic composition of IDWeek speakers and program committee members between 2013 and 2021. We used descriptive statistics to summarize data, χ2 tests to compare speaker demographics between 2013–2016 (before 2016) and 2017–2021 (after 2016), and Cochran–Armitage tests for trend. Each speaker slot was considered an independent event.ResultsA total of 5482 speaker slots were filled by 3389 individuals from 2013 to 2021. There was a linear increase in female speakers from 38.6% in 2013 to 58.4% in 2021 (P &lt; .001). The proportion of white speakers decreased overall from 84.9% in 2013 to 63.5% in 2021. Compared with white speakers, more slots were filled by Asian speakers after 2016 versus before 2016 (20.1% vs 14.8%, respectively; P &lt; .001). Program committee members from 2013–2021 were &gt;80% non-Hispanic white; &lt;5% of committee members identified as black, American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, or Hispanic. More program committee slots were filled by women after 2016 than before 2016 (52.7% vs 33.9%; P = .004).ConclusionsIntentional consideration of gender equity by the program committee was associated with equitable gender representation of invited speakers at IDWeek after 2016. Gradually, the proportions of IDWeek speakers from historically excluded racial/ethnic approached their respective proportions in the IDSA membership. White speakers remained overrepresented relative to membership proportions until 2021, and gaps in program committee racial/ethnic demographic representation highlights opportunities for continued inclusion, diversity, access, and equity at IDWeek.