Citations

Clear

17 citation(s) found for "Powers, Harry R".

Time Is Key: Early Diagnosis of Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder Presenting as Primary CNS Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Altunbas, Asli , Desai, Aarti, Muniz, Andrea , Alasi, Hussien , Chaudhary, Rajvi, Bangari, Laxmi Raj , Dadwal, Surbhi, Ruiz, Jose, Leoni, Juan , Hammack, Julie, Powers, H. R. , Foran, James, Goswami, Rohan , Desai, Aarti , Desai, Aarti , Al-Asi, Hussien , Powers, Harry R , Leoni, Juan Carlos , Goswami, Rohan M , Dadwal, Surbhi , Ruiz, Jose , Hammack, Julie E.

Mayo Clinic

Current Oncology | June 4, 2026 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 333

10.3390/curroncol33060333 | PMID 42346233 Get It

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) involving the central nervous system (CNS) is a rare but serious life-threatening complication seen in recipients of solid organ transplant. Primary CNS encompasses 5–15% of all types of PTLD diagnoses, and heart transplant recipients represent 3–5% of those reported cases. Diagnosis is often delayed due to the highly variable presentation, with some cases remaining undiagnosed for years. Multidisciplinary collaboration is crucial for early diagnosis and management. A 53-year-old woman patient presented with altered mental status. MRI revealed nodular ventriculitis and bilateral periventricular hyperdense infiltrates. CSF studies demonstrated lymphocytic pleocytosis, elevated protein, and EBV-PCR-positive results. A stereotactic brain needle biopsy confirmed the presence of EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, consistent with primary CNS PTLD, 14 months after her heart transplant. Despite appropriate management, the patient experienced progressive neurological decline and ultimately suffered a fatal intracerebral hemorrhage. We demonstrate the importance of the early diagnosis and variable presentation of post-heart-transplant PTLD. The importance of surveillance regardless of EBV status and close monitoring of disease progression due to potential life-threatening complications, such as fatal hemorrhages. Therefore, primary CNS-PTLD remains a challenging disease and is being increasingly recognized with improved transplant recipient survival and prolonged exposure to chronic immunosuppression.
Erythema Nodosum Leprosum in a Patient with Borderline Lepromatous Leprosy: A Case Report
Chiriboga, Guido , Guo, Qianyu , Zuberi, Eric , Powers, H. R. , Prada, Libardo Rueda , Powers, Harry R , Rueda Prada, Libardo , Yang, Vivienne , Zuberi, Eric C.

Mayo Clinic

Infectious Disease Reports | July 11, 2025 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 83

10.3390/idr17040083 | PMID 40700329 Get It

Background: Leprosy, caused by Mycobacterium leprae, presents on a spectrum ranging from tuberculoid to lepromatous disease. Borderline lepromatous leprosy represents an unstable immunological state that predisposes patients to immune-mediated reactions, including erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL), a severe inflammatory complication. Case Presentation: We report a case of a 62-year-old female with borderline lepromatous leprosy who presented with recurrent facial cellulitis and later developed disseminated ENL. She was initially diagnosed following a series of facial infections and confirmatory skin biopsy. Months later, she developed systemic inflammatory lesions consistent with ENL, requiring hospitalization. She was treated with high-dose corticosteroids for ENL and methotrexate to treat type 1 reaction and continued multidrug therapy (MDT) with minocycline, rifampin, and clarithromycin for leprosy, which led to significant clinical improvement. Conclusion: This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of leprosy in the United States and the importance of recognizing ENL as a severe immunologic complication requiring prompt intervention. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for optimal patient outcomes.
Impact of Pretransplant Antimicrobial Sulfonamide Allergy Label in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Cuellar, Cesar Campos, Venugopal, A. , Pleqi, Vasili, Hochwald, Alex, Ma, Yaohua , Gonzales, Alexei, Powers, Harry Ross, Wadei, Hani M , Venugopal, Amogharvasha, Powers, Harry Ross, Wadei, Hani M. , Cuellar, Cesar Campos, Venugopal, Amogharvasha, Gonzales, Alexei

Mayo Clinic

Transplant Infectious Disease | June 5, 2025 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/tid.70063 | PMID 40468705 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Sulfa antibiotic allergy labels (SALs) are encountered frequently in kidney transplant recipients (KTs). This often results in patients receiving second‐line prophylaxis for both Pneumocystis jiroveci and urinary tract infections (UTIs). The effect of SAL on outcomes including UTIs after KT is unclear. Methods In our single‐center retrospective cohort study, we investigated the effect of SALs on bacteriuria after KT. We identified patients with pre‐KT SALs from 2011 to 2022. A matched cohort was then created using KT with no pretransplant SALs. The groups were compared using proportional analysis and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional regression models. The primary outcome of interest was the proportion of individuals experiencing one or more episodes of bacteriuria within 1 year posttransplant. Secondary outcomes included bacteremic UTIs, acute kidney injury, and opportunistic infections. Results We found that the proportion of individuals experiencing bacteriuria within the first‐year posttransplant was significantly greater in the SAL group versus the control group ( n = 21, 28% vs. n = 22, 14.7%, p = 0.012). This result was also seen in univariable and multivariable survival analysis. In addition, episodes of UTI with associated bacteremia ( n = 11, 14.7% vs. n = 5, 3.3%, p = 0.002) were statistically significantly higher in the SAL group. Conclusion There was a significantly greater number of episodes of bacteriuria in the first‐year posttransplant in subjects with pretransplant SAL. Based on our findings, we suggest that all KTs with pretransplant SALs undergo evaluation and intervention prior to transplantation. image
Severe Mpox Proctitis Complicated by Bowel Obstruction
Saleh, Hasan , Ho, Bao Tieu, Call, Justin T., Plante, Marie M. , Metcalfe, Allie M., Graham, Charles G., Lewis, Michele D. , Ho, Bao T, Zaver, Himesh B. , Powers, Harry R , Lewis, Michele D , Ho, Bao T., Call, Justin T. , Powers, Harry R.

Mayo Clinic

ACG Case Reports Journal | May 5, 2023 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 5 | Pages: e01048

10.14309/crj.0000000000001048 | PMID 37168504 Get It

ABSTRACT Mpox is a rare infection caused by the zoonotic orthopoxvirus. We present the case of a 44-year-old man with HIV and a history of kidney transplant who presented with mpox and developed proctitis-associated bowel obstruction, urinary retention, and eosinophilia. Our case highlights potential gastrointestinal manifestations of severe mpox infection.
Neurophenotypes of COVID-19: risk factors and recovery outcomes
Prabhakaran, Divya , Day, Gregory S. , Munipalli, Bala, Rush, Beth K., Pudalov, Lauren, Niazi, Shehzad K. , Brennan, Emily, Durvasula, Ravi, Athreya, Arjun, Blackmon, Karen , Powers, Harry R , Blackmon, Karen , Day, Gregory S , Powers, Harry R.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | February 20, 2023 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-2363210/v2 | PMID 36597538 Get It

Abstract Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is associated with risk of persistent neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric complications, termed “long COVID”. It is unclear whether the neuropsychological manifestations of COVID-19 present as a uniform syndrome or as distinct neurophenotypes with differing risk factors and recovery outcomes. We examined post-acute neuropsychological profiles following SARS-CoV-2 infection in 205 patients recruited from inpatient and outpatient populations, using an unsupervised machine learning cluster analysis, with objective and subjective measures as input features. This resulted in three distinct post-COVID clusters. In the largest cluster (69%), cognitive functions were within normal limits, although mild subjective attention and memory complaints were reported. Vaccination was associated with membership in this “normal cognition” phenotype. Cognitive impairment was present in the remaining 31% of the sample but clustered into two differentially impaired groups. In 16% of participants, memory deficits, slowed processing speed, and fatigue were predominant. Risk factors for membership in the “memory-speed impaired” neurophenotype included anosmia and more severe COVID-19 infection. In the remaining 15% of participants, executive dysfunction was predominant. Risk factors for membership in this milder “dysexecutive” neurophenotype included disease-nonspecific factors such as neighborhood deprivation and obesity. Recovery outcomes at 6-month follow-up differed across neurophenotypes, with the normal cognition group showing improvement in verbal memory and psychomotor speed, the dysexecutive group showing improvement in cognitive flexibility, and the memory-speed impaired group showing no objective improvement and relatively worse functional outcomes compared to the other two clusters. These results indicate that there are multiple post-acute neurophenotypes of long COVID, with different etiological pathways and recovery outcomes. This information may inform phenotype-specific approaches to treatment.
Neurophenotypes of COVID-19: risk factors and recovery trajectories
Prabhakaran, Divya , Day, Gregory S. , Munipalli, Bala, Rush, Beth K., Pudalov, Lauren, Niazi, Shehzad K. , Brennan, Emily, Durvasula, Ravi, Athreya, Arjun, Blackmon, Karen , Day, Gregory S , Powers, Harry

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | December 21, 2022 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-2363210/v1 Get It

Abstract Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is associated with risk of persistent neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric complications, termed “long COVID”. It is unclear whether the neuropsychological manifestations of COVID-19 present as a uniform syndrome or as distinct neurophenotypes with differing risk factors and recovery trajectories. We examined post-acute outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection in 205 patients recruited from inpatient and outpatient populations, using an unsupervised machine learning cluster analysis, with objective and subjective neuropsychological measures as input features. This resulted in three distinct post-COVID clusters. In the largest cluster (69%), cognitive functions were within normal limits (“normal cognition” neurophenotype), although mild subjective attention and memory complaints were reported. Cognitive impairment was present in the remaining 31% of the sample but clustered into two differentially impaired groups. In 16% of participants, memory deficits, slowed processed speed, and fatigue were predominant. Risk factors for membership in the “memory-speed impaired” neurophenotype included anosmia and more severe COVID-19 infection. In the remaining 15% of participants, executive dysfunction was predominant. Risk factors for membership in this milder “dysexecutive” neurophenotype included disease-nonspecific factors such as neighborhood deprivation and obesity. Recovery trajectories at 6-month follow-up differed across neurophenotypes, with the normal cognition group showing stability, the dysexecutive group showing improvement, and the memory-speed impaired group showing persistent processing speed deficits and fatigue, as well as worse functional outcomes. These results indicate that there are multiple post-acute neurophenotypes of long COVID, with different etiological pathways and recovery trajectories. This information may inform phenotype-specific approaches to treatment.
1752. Impact of a multifaceted, outpatient antimicrobial stewardship intervention bundle on unnecessary antimicrobial prescribing in upper respiratory tract infections (URI)
Christopherson, Darrin, Draper, Evan , Dinnes, Laura , Rajapakse, Nipunie , Epps, Kevin, Hannan, Kellie Arensman, Ausman, Sara , Prigge, Kimberly, Virk, Abinash , Stevens, Ryan W. , Vergidis, Paschalis , Christopherson, D, Anderson, Benjamin J, Powers, Harry R, Epps, Kevin, Hannan, Kellie N. Arensman , Ausman, Sara E , Rivera, Christina G. , Lessard, Sarah , Prigge, Kimberly , Jensen, Kelsey

Mayo Clinic

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | December 15, 2022 | Volume: 9 | Issue: Supplement_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1382 Get It

Abstract Background URIs are the most common indication for outpatient antibiotic prescribing. Given high rates of unnecessary prescribing, these indications have been identified as a high-priority target for outpatient antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP). Our primary objective was to evaluate the impact of a system-wide, multifaceted, outpatient ASP intervention bundle on unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for URI. Methods This quasi-experimental study was conducted from 2019 to 2021. ICD-10 codes for URIs were grouped into 3 tiers (i.e., tier I = antibiotics always indicated, tier II = sometimes, tier III = never). Encounters from 5 care specialties (i.e., family medicine, community internal medicine, express care, pediatrics, and emergency department) with a tier III URI primary ICD-10 code but without a secondary tier I or tier II code were included. COVID-19 ICD-10 codes were excluded. Interventions included construction of a prescribing data model, dissemination of clinician prescribing data and education, promotion of symptom management strategies, a patient-facing commitment poster, and a pre-populated URI order panel. Tools were designed at a system level and implemented by regional champions beginning in the 3rd quarter of 2020. The primary outcome was the rate of antibiotic prescribing, and the secondary outcome and counterbalance measure was the rate of repeat URI-related healthcare contact within 14 days. Outcomes were analyzed with chi-square with an α level of 0.05. Results A total of 147403 encounters were included. The overall antibiotic prescribing rate decreased from 24.1% to 12.3% between 2019 and 2021 (p< 0.01). Significant reductions in tier III antibiotic prescribing were demonstrated for each region, care specialty, and syndrome evaluated (Table 1). A reduction in repeat healthcare contact was seen across the total cohort (9.5% in 2019 vs. 8.3% in 2021, p< 0.01); decreases in repeat contact rates were observed in those not initially receiving an antibiotic (10.3% vs. 8.6%, p< 0.01), but not in those who initially received an antibiotic (6.8% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.94). Tier III URI encounter level antimicrobial prescribing rates by region, care specialty, and syndrome Conclusion A multifaceted, outpatient ASP intervention bundle decreased rates of unnecessary antimicrobial prescribing without increasing rates of 14-day repeat URI-related healthcare contact. Disclosures Paschalis Vergidis, MD, AbbVie: DSMB|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support Evan Draper, PharmD, Gilead Foundation: Grant/Research Support Sara Ausman, PharmD, Gilead: Honoraria Christina G. Rivera, PharmD, Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Honoraria|Insmed: Honoraria.
Neurocognitive Screening in Patients Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Tools for Triage
Blackmon, Karen , Day, Gregory S. , Bosch, Wendelyn , Prabhakaran, Divya , Woolston, Dixie J., Pedraza, Otto , Powers, Harry Ross, Woolston, Dixie, Day, Gregory S , Powers, Harry Ross

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | February 7, 2022 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-1127420/v1 | PMID 35169789 Get It

Abstract Background and purpose Cognitive complaints are common in patients recovering from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), yet their etiology is often unclear. We assess factors that contribute to cognitive impairment in ambulatory versus hospitalized patients during the sub-acute stage of recovery. Methods Participants were prospectively recruited from a hospital-wide registry. All patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection using a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerasechain-reaction assay. Patients ≤ 18 years-of-age and those with a pre-existing major neurocognitive disorder were excluded. Participants completed an extensive neuropsychological questionnaire and a computerized cognitive screen via remote telemedicine platform. Rates of subjective and objective neuropsychological impairment were compared between the ambulatory and hospitalized groups. Factors associated with impairment were explored separately within each group. Results A total of 102 patients (76 ambulatory, 26 hospitalized) completed the symptom inventory and neurocognitive tests 24 ± 22 days following laboratory confirmation of SARSCoV-2 infection. Hospitalized and ambulatory patients self-reported high rates of cognitive impairment (27-40%), without differences between the groups. However, hospitalized patients showed higher rates of objective impairment in visual memory (30% vs. 4%; p=0.001) and psychomotor speed (41% vs. 15%; p=0.008). Objective cognitive test performance was associated with anxiety, depression, fatigue, and pain in the ambulatory but not the hospitalized group. Conclusions Focal cognitive deficits are more common in hospitalized than ambulatory patients. Cognitive performance is associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms in ambulatory but not hospitalized patients. Objective neurocognitive measures can provide essential information to inform neurologic triage and should be included as endpoints in clinical trials.
Histologic acute graft pyelonephritis after kidney transplantation: Incidence, clinical characteristics, risk factors, and association with graft loss
Powers, H. R. , Hellinger, Walter C. , Cortese, Cherise , Elrefaei, Mohamed , Khouzam, Samir , Spiegel, Matthew R. , Li, Zhuo , Wadei, Hani M. , Powers, Harry R , Spiegel, Matthew, Wadei, Hani M

Mayo Clinic

Transplant Infectious Disease | January 26, 2022 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/tid.13801 | PMID 35080081 Get It

AbstractBackgroundHistologic acute graft pyelonephritis (HAGPN) after kidney transplantation (KT) has been assessed less frequently than urinary tract infections (UTIs) or clinical acute graft pyelonephritis. Risk factors for HAGPN, its association with graft loss, and measures that might prevent it are not known.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of HAGPN cases identified from KT occurring between January 2008 and December 2017 at our institution. We compared the HAGPN cases to a randomly selected control group of KTs to identify risk factors using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. The association between HAGPN and graft loss was also assessed, similarly.ResultsHAGPN was identified in 46 of 1391 patients (cumulative incidence, 5% [95% CI, 3%–7%]) undergoing KT at a single center from January 2008 through December 2017 (median time to diagnosis, 241 days after KT; interquartile range, 122–755 days). Indications for biopsy were follow‐up of treated rejection (n = 20 [43%]), KT protocol biopsy (n = 19 [41%]), and acute kidney injury (n = 7 [15%]). Histologic rejection, UTI, and asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) were present in 23 (50%), 9 (20%), and 16 (35%). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models comparing KT recipients with or without HAGPN (n = 46 and n = 138, respectively) showed that HAGPN was associated with urologic complication by day 30, delayed graft function, previous UTI or ASB, and a history of rejection. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, HAGPN was associated with an increased risk of graft loss.ConclusionHAGPN is an infrequent, unanticipated, and clinically significant complication of KT.
126. Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Utilizing a Decentralized Model
McMullan, Stephen, Anderson, Therese , Boeff, Deborah, Bonner, William F., Epps, Kevin , LaCouture, Jacqueline, Leak, Michelle A. , Leybeg, Angelica, Riffe, Izabela, Schnusenberg, Lynda, Mendez, Julio, Anderson, Therese F , Powers, Harry, Bonner, William, Harris, Dana M.

Mayo Clinic

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | December 5, 2021 | Volume: 8 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: S176-S176

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.328 Get It

Abstract Background The majority of human antimicrobial utilization occurs in the outpatient setting. Despite being mainly viral in etiology, upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) were the most common indication for outpatient antimicrobial prescriptions at our institution. Methods Through our electronic health record (EHR), we were able to determine our rate of antibiotic prescriptions for inappropriate URI diagnosis at our primary care practice sites. We selected staff volunteers from each our primary care practice sites to serve as stewardship champions. They were given training in stewardship best practices, and an URI stewardship toolkit which included viral URI prescription pad, EHR order panel, and patient education signage. They were tasked with providing education and feedback to their practice sites. We meet with them on a monthly basis to disseminate prescribing data and education. They also provided feedback from practice sites to the stewardship committee. Results Our decentralized model was put in place in November 2020. In the 6 months prior to the intervention, the average prescribing rate was 29.1%. In the 6 months after the intervention, the average prescribing rate decreased by 15% to 24.8%. During the intervention phase, there was an increase in number of non-COVID URIs diagnosed at our primary care sites. Temporal Trend in Inappropriate Antibiotics Prescribing Rates for Viral URIs Pre- and Post- Intervention Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing rate for viral upper respiratory tract infections from May 2020 until May 2021. Intervention started in December 2021 (arrow). Pre-intervention average was 29.1%. Post-intervention age was 24.8% which is a 15% decline in prescribing rate. Viral Upper Respiratory Infections Visits The total number of visits for presumed viral upper respiratory infections to primary care sites from May 2020 until May 2021. The majority of COVID-19 precautions in the area expired at the end of March 2021. Conclusion We have been able to lower our inappropriate prescriptions for URIs utilizing a decentralized model of stewardship champions. This result was especially notable as the intervention phase corresponded with the end of COVID-19 precautions and an increase in non-COVID URIs diagnosed. The advantage of this approach includes an advocate embedded at each practice site who is familiar with the opportunities and challenges of the site, and a two-way flow of information from practice sites to the stewardship committee. This model provided additional benefit during the COVID-19 pandemic as the ability of centralized staff to travel to off campus clinic sites was curtailed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures