Citations

Abstract Introduction Patients with Parkinson’s disease commonly underreport sleep symptoms, but the extent to which such mismatch may be present in people with isolated RBD (iRBD) is unknown. We evaluated how the patient–bedpartner (PT–BP) mismatch in night-time and daytime sleep complaints relates to cognition, apathy, dopaminergic degeneration, and cortical structure in iRBD. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 425 iRBD participants (2018–2025) from the North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium with clinicodemographic data, dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging. Using Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease (SCOPA)-Sleep, PT–BP mismatch was classified into overestimator (PT>BP), concordant (PT=BP), and underestimator (PT< BP) groups, separately for complaints during night and day. Outcomes included cognition (CDR-Sum of Boxes [CDR-SB], CDR-global, and individual subdomain tests), pareidolia, apathy, subregional DAT uptake, and cortical thickness. Group differences were tested with analysis of covariance adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, education, clinician-rated OSA treatment inadequacy, and the corresponding patient-reported SCOPA-Sleep domain (night or day), and estimated total intracranial volume for cortical thickness; pairwise tests used Bonferroni correction. Results The PT–BP mismatch was common (night – overestimator 127/425, 29.9% and underestimator 116/425, 27.3%; day – overestimator 77/425, 18.1% and underestimator 134/425, 31.5%). For night-time mismatch, underestimators showed lower CDR-SB and lower CDR-global than overestimators. In addition, underestimators exhibited more illusory responses, fewer correct noise rejections, and fewer total correct responses than overestimator and concordant groups. For daytime mismatch, CDR-SB was lower in underestimators versus overestimators; CDR-global was lower in underestimators and concordant participants versus overestimators. No significant associations were found for apathy. Subregional DAT uptake did not differ by mismatch group. Cortical thickness analyses revealed thinner right transverse gyrus in underestimator and concordant groups compared to the overestimator group and thinner left superior temporal gyrus in underestimator group compared to overestimator group, for night-time mismatch only. Conclusion The PT–BP subjective sleep mismatch can be used as a clinical marker associated with overall cognitive decline and cortical thinning in auditory and language processing areas, which may underlie impairment in perceptual interpretation and hallucination proneness. Further research is warranted to seek longitudinal change and phenoconversion in mismatch groups. Support (if any) #U19-AG071754 (NAPS Consortium)

Abstract Isolated/idiopathic rapid-eye-movement (REM)-Sleep Behavior Disorder (iRBD) is characterized by dream enactment behaviors associated with loss of REM atonia. iRBD is in most cases a prodromal synucleinopathy, and emerging evidence suggests associations between RBD and other neurological and psychiatric conditions. In this study, we performed pathway-based polygenic risk score (PRS) and rare variant burden analyses to examine these potential associations. Pathway-specific PRS were constructed from genome-wide association study summary statistics of five neurodegenerative and seven psychiatric traits across 10 biologically relevant pathway categories, including a total of 279 pathways, in 1,573 iRBD cases and 16,022 controls from the International RBD Study Group and UK Biobank. Rare variant burden tests were performed in 1,264 iRBD cases and 2,581 controls. We identified multiple potential pathways indicating shared polygenic risk between RBD and both neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. Lewy body diseases and post-traumatic stress disorder had the most shared polygenic risk pathways in neurological and psychiatric disorders, respectively. Two pathways, the serotonin transport pathway and the chaperone-mediated autophagy pathway, showed the strongest association with iRBD, and gene-based rare variants analyses revealed five genes associated with iRBD: GBA1 , PLEKHM1 , LRP2 , P2RX1 , and HAP1. Subsequent analysis of these genes in Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies replicated several associations. Together, these findings provide novel insights into the shared genetic architecture underlying iRBD, neurodegenerative disorders, and psychiatric traits, with implications for early identification and mechanistic understanding.

Abstract Isolated/idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is a usually prodromal manifestation of neurodegenerative disorders with α-synuclein pathology: Parkinson’s disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and multiple system atrophy (MSA). Clinical trials in the iRBD population face substantial barriers: limited access to well-characterized cohorts, inconsistent assessment protocols across centers, and the absence of validated biomarkers of disease burden. The North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium was established to address these challenges and facilitate clinical trials for neuroprotective therapies targeting synucleinopathy at the earliest known stages. In this multi-site, longitudinal, observational study, nine academic centers across North America will enroll and follow over 500 individuals with iRBD from existing sleep centers. Sixty control participants, matched for age, sex, and race will also be recruited. A harmonized protocol—including a standardized clinical battery assessing motor, cognitive, autonomic, psychiatric, sensory, and sleep function; structured diagnostic adjudication; biospecimen collection; and centralized analysis of both polysomnography and neuroimaging data—is outlined herein and reflects NAPS Stage 2. Each participants completes these assessments annually, and are replaced in the event of phenoconversion. By unifying assessments and expanding geographic reach, NAPS lays the groundwork for efficient, well-powered clinical trials designed to delay or prevent progression of iRBD to overt PD, DLB, or MSA—ultimately enabling earlier, more effective therapeutic intervention for neurodegenerative disease. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05826457).

Abstract Background Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is a parasomnia that reflects an evolving α‐synucleinopathy disorder, providing an opportunity to study early pathological changes. While diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies have shown white matter changes in iRBD, Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) may offer better biological specificity in characterizing microstructural alterations through measures of Neurite Density Index (NDI), Orientation Dispersion Index (ODI), and Free Water Fraction (FWF). Method We included 77 participants with polysomnography‐confirmed iRBD from the North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium and 154 age‐ and sex‐matched cognitively unimpaired controls from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. White matter microstructure was evaluated using standardized multi‐shell diffusion on 3T MRI, quantifying DTI metrics (fractional anisotropy, FA; and mean diffusivity, MD) and NODDI parameters across bilateral white matter tracts defined by the JHU “Eve” WM atlas. Group differences were assessed using conditional logistic regression, with correlations to motor performance evaluated using the Purdue Pegboard and Alternating Finger Tapping tests. Result Compared to controls, iRBD participants demonstrated widespread and bidirectional white matter changes across major white matter pathways (see Figure 1 for glass brain visualizations). While predominantly showing decreases, FA exhibited some increases, particularly in the corticospinal tract. MD showed a largely opposite pattern with predominantly increased values across tracts. NODDI metrics revealed complex bidirectional patterns: ODI was broadly increased across multiple tracts with focal decreases, while NDI showed a pattern of predominantly decreased values alongside localized increases. FWF demonstrated a mixed pattern with predominant decreases across most tracts. In addition, both DTI and NODDI metrics showed extensive, moderate correlations with the Purdue Pegboard Test and Alternating Finger Tapping performance ( T = 2.0, p < 0.05, Figure 2). Conclusion Our study highlighted widespread and complex bidirectional white matter microstructural alterations in individuals with iRBD, demonstrating significant correlations with dexterity and motor performance even during the prodromal stage. These results suggest that extensive white matter abnormalities occur early in prodromal α‐synucleinopathies and highlight the value of advanced diffusion imaging techniques in characterizing iRBD and its potential prediction of phenoconversion to overt neurodegenerative disorders.

Abstract Two recent studies suggested that the APOE ε4 haplotype was associated with increased α-synuclein pathology in cell and mouse models. Genetic variants in the SNCA region have strong association with Parkinson’s disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder (iRBD), while APOE is a genetic risk determinant for only DLB. To determine if genetic-level interactions between SNCA and APOE exists that can explain the protein-level association, we investigated the genotypic interaction of APOE and SNCA in cohorts of PD, DLB and iRBD. We analysed genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from 5229 PD patients and 5480 controls, 2610 DLB patients and 1920 controls, and 1055 iRBD patients and 3667 controls. We used logistic regression interaction models across all three cohorts independently between the (i) top GWAS signals of SNCA single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and APOE haplotypes and (ii) SNP×SNP and three-way SNP interaction across the entire coding region plus 200 kb flanking each gene. No significant interactions were found to be associated with any of the synucleinopathies after correction for multiple testing. Our results do not support a role for genetic interactions between APOE and SNCA across PD, DLB and iRBD. Since the tested genetic variants affect the expression and function of these proteins, it is likely that any interactions between them do not affect the risk of PD, DLB and iRBD.