Citations

Abstract Context. Thyroid nodule ultrasound findings are crucial in guiding management decisions for patients with thyroid nodules. However, the frequency with which ultrasound images are discussed and reviewed with patients during clinical visits is not well understood. Objective. To assess how often thyroid ultrasound images are shown and discussed with patients during consultations, and to identify predictors of image review during clinical visits. Design and setting. Secondary analysis of a multicenter pilot randomized clinical trial conducted at two academic medical centers in the United States. Participants. Adults undergoing evaluation for thyroid nodules. Intervention. Participants were randomized to receive either usual care or care enhanced with a conversation aid. Main Outcome Measures. The primary outcome was the frequency of thyroid nodule imaging review evaluated as a binary outcome. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of predictors of image discussion. Results. Eighty-five patients were evaluated. Most participants were women (80%), mean age (60 years, SD 16), and White (86%), undergoing new patient visits (84%). Thyroid nodule ultrasound images were reviewed with patients in 53% of visits (45/85), and in all cases, clinicians initiated the imaging discussion. Predictors of image review included type of consultation (new patient visit) (OR 10.6, 95% CI: 1.79, 62.3). Age, sex, study arm, thyroid nodule size or cancer risk and plan of care (e.g., completing a biopsy) were not statistically associated with review of clinical images. Conclusions. Review of thyroid ultrasound images during clinical visits is relatively common, with consultation type serving as significant predictor.

Introduction: Young-onset esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) often presents at advanced stages and is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to examine the epidemiology of young-onset Barrett’s esophagus (BE) using the TriNetX database. Methods: Young-onset BE patients (age 18 to younger than 50 y) with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) within 1 year before index BE diagnosis between 2014 and 2023 were included. Negative binomial regression was used to evaluate incident-time trends, and logistic regression to assess for independent predictors of young-onset BE. Results: BE diagnosis was present in 76,691 (3.3%) of 2,337,786 patients that underwent EGD, of which 14,120 (18%) had prevalent young-onset BE. BE dysplasia/EAC was present in 6% of young-onset patients at initial diagnosis. Conventional BE risk factors also predicted young-onset BE: GERD (OR=2.4), White race (OR=2.4), male sex (OR=2.2), smoking (OR=1.2), and obesity (OR=1.1). Each additional risk factor increased the probability of BE prevalence by 74% in young patients versus 54% in older patients. The prevalence of young-onset BE was 4.5% with GERD and ≥3 additional risk factors, and 2.3% when ≥3 risk factors were present. Discussion: Young-onset BE accounts for 18% of all BE cases, demonstrates a striking 6% rate of dysplasia/neoplasia at initial diagnosis, and has a prevalence of 4.5% in those with GERD and ≥3 risk factors. These findings suggest that young-onset BE is an important patient population that merits further study. Additional studies are necessary to study the cost-effectiveness of BE screening in younger patients with multiple risk factors.

Abstract Objectives Diagnostic reconciliation is the collaborative process between patients and clinicians to create and reconcile evidence-based, feasible, and desirable care plans. However, the specific components of this process remain unclear. The objective of this study was to develop the first comprehensive framework to elucidate the diagnostic reconciliation process. Methods We followed a multi-step and iterative approach to develop the framework, including a focused systematic review of diagnostic conversations, quantitative evaluation of recordings of real-life clinical visits recordings, and stakeholder engagement (e.g., patients, clinicians, researchers). Results We identified 17 potential components to the process of diagnostic reconciliation through literature review and stakeholder engagement. After review of 56 clinical visits and further stakeholder engagement, we developed a final framework including four categories: 1) understanding the need for a test/referral, 2) logistics of test/referral scheduling, 3) test/referral information, and 4) test/referral results. Conclusions The proposed framework lays the foundation for evaluation and improvement of diagnostic conversations in practice. Clinicians can enhance patient-centered diagnosis by co-creating diagnostic plans of care in practice and using the components described in the novel diagnostic reconciliation framework.

Metastatic CUP is complex, especially NCUP. Precision oncology is crucial for rare, aggressive cancers. A 54-year-old had HER2+ neuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown origin. T-DXd treatment, response, re-challenge show importance of genomics and caution.

e18807 Background: CUP represents both a diagnostic and a management challenge. Despite improvements through sophisticated imaging modalities, specific and sensitive testing using immunohistochemistry, a concrete determination of the site of origin of the primary tumor can still be a diagnostic challenge Hereby, we described the genomic landscape of patients with CUP treated at our institution. Methods: Retrospective study of patients with CUP treated at Mayo Clinic Rochester MN from 2010 to 2021. Next generation sequencing (NGS) information was abstracted, and alterations were ranked into different levels of actionability following the Onco KB framework. All data were analyzed by the SPSS version 22.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, United States). Results: From a total of 214 patients, we identified 67 (32%) patients in whom NGS was performed. Among patients with available NGS the median age was 64 years (range: 35-86) and 51% were female. the most prevalent histology included adenocarcinoma (39%), carcinoma NOS (31%), and neuroendocrine tumors (12%). NGS on tumor (t-NGS) was available in 56 (84 %) patients, circulating tumor NGS (b-NGS) was available in 12 (18%) patients, and only 1 patient had both testing available. Among the 56 patients with available t-NGS, MSI-high was detected in 9 patients, whereas among the 12 patients with available b-NGS, MSI-high was detected in 8 patients; yielding an MSI-high detection rate of 16% and 67% for t-NGS and b-NGS. In this cohort, there were a total of 474 genomic alterations detected from which 103 (22 %) were able to be ranked into one therapeutic level following the OncoKB framework. Genomic alterations were most observed among patients with carcinoma (n = 50, 48.53%) adenocarcinoma (n = 33, 32.03 %), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 3, 2.91 %) and neuroendocrine tumor (n = 2, 1.94%). Following the OncoKB framework, 39-level 1 genomic alterations were detected in a total of 14 genes. The most common level 1 genomic alterations comprised the BRCA2 (20.51%), NF1 ATM (17.95%) and HER2/NEU (ERBB2) (15.38%) genes. Therapeutic level 2 included 51 genomic alterations in 13 genes of which KRAS (17.65%), BRAF (15.69%), and BRCA2 (15.69%) were the most prevalent mutated genes. Additionally, level R comprised 13 genomic alterations in the following genes: KRAS (69.23) NRAS (23.08%) and PDGFRA (7.69%). Conclusions: CUP are malignancies rich in potentially actionable alterations, and NGS of tissue and blood samples can inform systemic therapy decisions. Alteration-specific targeted therapy may be an option for a substantial proportion of patients. NGS of tumor tissue or blood should be considered for all patients with CUP.

e18803 Background: CUPs are a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers for which a standardized diagnostic work-up fails to identify the site of origin at the time of diagnosis. CUP accounts for 3%-5% of all cancer diagnoses worldwide, and the natural history of patient with CUP differs from that of patients (pts) with cancer with known primary tumor. Here we report and summarize the clinical features of patients with CUP treated at Mayo Clinic. Methods: Retrospective study of patients treated at Mayo Clinic Rochester MN from 2010 to 2021. Patient demographics, tumor-related variables, treatment-related variables, and clinical data were extracted. Descriptive statistics were used, and all data were analyzed by the SPSS version 22.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, United States). Results: From a total of 214 pts, 207 pts were included, as primary tumor site was identified in 7 patients after initial evaluation. The pts in this study were predominantly white (87%) of female (50.2%) gender with a mean age of 63 (SD: 13) without history of smoking (51%) and either private or public insurance (82.6%). The predominant histology was adenocarcinoma (30%), followed by neuroendocrine neoplasms (27%), and carcinoma NOS (not otherwise specified) (25%). The most prevalent grade in this cohort was grade III with poorly differentiated tumor cells. All pts had diagnostic imaging and the most used imaging modalities included CT (81.2%), and PET-CT (43.5%). In our cohort, the 3 most common sites of metastases included lymph nodes (57.5%), liver (37.8%), lung (34.3%), and bone (23.7%); and in 64% of pts, there was a specific presentation pattern including liver-predominant (24.6%), lymph node-predominant (24.6%), bone-predominant (7.7%), and peritoneal carcinomatosis (7.7%). The majority of pts received systemic therapy (69%) as first line of therapy and the most frequent first line regimens included platinum-doublet (26.5%), gemcitabine-based regimen (20.7%), 5FU-based regimens (18%) and somatostatin analogs (16.7%); whereas salvage radiation and ablation were offered to 11% of pts and surgery to 17%. The median follow-up time was 22 months (IQR: 45) with a median survival time of 23 months and the 3-year cumulative survival rate was 30%. Conclusions: The heterogenous nature of CUPs and lack of specific immunohistochemical signature prevents primary tissue of origin diagnoses in CUP pts. Without the identification of a primary origin site, treatment is restricted to generic chemotherapy with limited benefit as demonstrated in this cohort.

e18802 Background: CUP is a rare cancer with an incidence of 7–12 cases per 100,000/year. CUP is defined as metastatic cancer with no identifiable primary tumor despite comprehensive evaluation. Despite its heterogeneous clinicopathological presentation, the treatment of CUP has primarily been with platinum-based combination chemotherapies but results are poor and survival is short. Here, we describe survival outcomes in real-world dataset of patients with CUP seen at a tertiary referral center. Methods: Retrospective study of patients treated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, from 2010 to 2021. Survival probabilities were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. We used Cox proportional hazard regression with forward modeling to explore the association between each variable and death. Overall survival (OS) analysis was conducted in the entire cohort, and it was stratified by histological subtype. For the hypothesis test, we considered p < 0.05 to be statistically significant; all tests were two-sided. All data were analyzed by the SPSS version 22.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, United States). Results: From a total of 214 patients, 198 patients were included in the survival analysis. The patients were predominantly white (87%), female (50.2%), with a mean age of 63 (SD: 13) without history of smoking (51%). The predominant histology was adenocarcinoma (30%), followed by neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) (27%), carcinoma NOS (25%), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (10%) and non-classifiable tumors (7%). The median follow-up time was 23 months, and medial OS was 23 months in the entire cohort. OS by histology was as follows: 51 months for NEN, 34 months for SCC, 18 months for carcinomas NOS and 11 months for adenocarcinomas (p < 0.001) (fig.1). Similar OS trends were observed when we restricted the analysis to poorly differentiated tumors. The 3- and 5-year cumulative survival by histology were as follows: 7% and 0% for adenocarcinoma, 25% and 8% for carcinoma NOS, 39% and 17% for SCC, and 56% and 22% for NEN. In Cox regression models we did not identify any prognostic factors among patients with adenocarcinoma. Conclusions: Patients with adenocarcinoma of unknown primary possess a considerable challenge and the OS is short. CUP of other histologies have higher OS. This study highlights the need of accurate tumor identification and better treatment, perhaps as a multiomics therapeutic approach.