Citations

Clear

37 citation(s) found for "Patel, Sanjay V".

Locally Invasive Conjunctival Squamous Cell Carcinoma Refractory to Plaque Radiotherapy
Dalvin, Lauren A., Trejo‐Lopez, Jorge , Smith, Wendy M. , Patel, Sanjay V , Dalvin, Lauren A. , Wagner, Lilly H. , Patel, Sanjay V.

Mayo Clinic

Cornea | August 24, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/ico.0000000000004259 | PMID 42634946 Get It

Purpose: To describe a case of locally invasive conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) refractory to plaque radiotherapy. Case Description: A 69-year-old man presented with a recurrent conjunctival tumor after 6 previous cycles of topical 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy and excisional biopsy showing invasive SCC with positive margins. There was a mild anterior chamber reaction. By the time of repeat excisional biopsy, the conjunctiva had ulcerated with underlying scleralysis associated with histopathologic evidence of scleral involvement by SCC. After subsequent tectonic scleral patch grafting, plaque radiotherapy was applied after which the disease appeared to be controlled for 9 months. The eye then developed progressive conjunctival ulceration and scleralysis with progressive ectropion. Exenteration was performed, revealing locally invasive SCC into palpebral conjunctiva, ciliary body, and choroid. Conclusions: Conjunctival SCC can be locally invasive with destruction of the globe, despite plaque radiotherapy. Clinicians should be suspicious of invasive diseases in cases of ocular surface squamous neoplasia that are poorly responsive to topical chemotherapy. Associated anterior chamber cell and progressive scleralysis should also raise concern for invasive malignancy.
0589 Concomitant Aroxybutynin and Atomoxetine (AD109) with GLP-1 Agonists: An Analysis of the SynAIRgy and LunAIRo Trials in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Strollo, Patrick, Pho, Huy, Shah, Neomi, Schwab, R J, Somers, Virend, Gell, L., Farkas, Ron, Cronin, John, Patel, Sanjay, Somers, Virend K. , Taranto‐Montemurro, Luigi

Mayo Clinic

SLEEPJ | May 9, 2026 | Volume: 49 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: A261-A262

10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0588 Get It

Abstract Introduction AD109, an investigational oral anti-apneic neuromuscular modulator, combines in one tablet the novel antimuscarinic, aroxybutynin (2.5 mg), with the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, atomoxetine (75 mg). AD109 significantly improved the apnea-hypopnea index and oxygenation vs placebo (PBO) in two phase 3 clinical trials in OSA. This exploratory analysis evaluated concomitant administration of AD109 with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) on weight change in OSA. Methods SynAIRgy (NCT05813275; N=646) and LunAIRo (NCT05811247; N=660) were randomized, double-blinded, PBO-controlled, parallel-arm phase 3 trials of AD109 vs PBO in adults with mild-to-severe OSA (AHI >5) who failed or refused positive airway pressure therapy. Participants must have had a body mass index (BMI) 18.5–40 kg/m2 for males / 18.5–42 kg/m2 for females. Participants receiving GLP-1 RA for diabetes were permitted. Body weight was assessed throughout the trials. Results One-hundred and six participants were enrolled in the phase 3 trials taking a GLP-1 RA for diabetes (PBO+GLP-1 RA: n=48; AD109+GLP-1 RA: n=58). In participants receiving a GLP-1 RA with baseline BMI < 30, AD109 reduced weight by 2.7% (vs PBO: -1.4%, P=0.08) and 0.5% (vs PBO: 2.3%, P=0.60) at Week 26 and Week 51, respectively. In participants receiving a GLP-1 RA with baseline BMI 30 to 34.9, AD109 reduced weight by 0.9% (vs PBO: 1.2%, P=0.84) and 2.5% (vs PBO: 3.3%, P=0.85) at Week 26 and Week 51, respectively. In participants receiving a GLP-1 RA with baseline BMI ≥35, AD109 reduced weight by 5.5% (vs PBO: 0.9%, P=0.02) and 11.5% (vs PBO: 3.8%, P=0.04) at Week 26 and Week 51, respectively. Participants not receiving GLP-1 RA (n=979) showed smaller weight reductions across BMI classes; in participants with BMI ≥35, AD109 reduced weight by 1.4% (vs PBO: 0.2%, P=0.002) and 2.8% (vs PBO: 1.4%, P=0.19) at Week 26 and Week 51, respectively. Conclusion In this exploratory analysis using pooled data from SynAIRgy and LunAIRo, results indicate that participants with a baseline BMI ≥35 receiving AD109+GLP-1 RA experienced progressively greater weight loss over time relative to GLP-1 RA alone. Future studies are needed to further evaluate concomitant administration of AD109+GLP-1 RA in OSA. Support (if any) These studies were supported by Apnimed, Inc.
Twelve-Month Results From the CISTO Study Comparing Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Recurrent High-Grade Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Gore, John L. , Wolff, Erika M. , Nash, Michael G. , Comstock, Bryan A. , Gilbert, Scott M. , Chang, Sam S., Chisolm, Stephanie , MacLean, Douglas B., Wright, Jonathan L. , Kates, Max , Pohar, Kamal S. , Guzzo, Thomas J., Bivalacqua, Trinity J, Nepple, Kenneth G. , Montgomery, Jeffrey S., Scarpato, Kristen R., Master, Viraj A. , Chen, David YT , Mossanen, Matthew , O’Neil, Brock , Tyson, Mark D. , Mansour, Ahmed M. , Chamie, Karim, Riggs, Stephen B. , Kukreja, Janet Baack , Peyton, Cheri L. , Nix, Jeffrey W. , Dickstein, Rian, Sankin, Alex , Lane, Brian R. , Bassett, Jeffrey C. , Patel, Sanjay , Lee, Eugene K. , Ritch, Chad R. , Follmer, Kristin , Kim, Sung Min , Kessler, Larry G. , group, on behalf of the CISTO Collaborative, Gore, John L., Smith, Angela B., Wolff, Erika M., Comstock, Bryan A., Nash, Michael G., Follmer, Kristin M., Lee, Jenney R., Kim, Sung Min, Kessler, Larry G., Gilbert, Scott M., Chang, Sam S., Wright, Jonathan L., Kates, Max R., Pohar, Kamal S., Guzzo, Thomas J., Bivalacqua, Trinity J., Nepple, Kenneth G., Montgomery, Jeffrey S., Scarpato, Kristen R., Woldu, Solomon L., Master, Viraj A., Chen, David Y.T., Mossanen, Matthew, Daneshmand, Siamak, O'Neil, Brock B., Tyson, Mark D., Westerman, Mary E., Kamat, Ashish M., Mansour, Ahmed M., Chamie, Karim, Riggs, Stephen B., Kukreja, Janet B., Modi, Parth K., Garg, Tullika, Peyton, Charles C., Nix, Jeffrey W., Dickstein, Rian, Gadzinski, Adam J., Sankin, Alex, Shore, Neal D., Lane, Brian R., Bassett, Jeffrey C., Patel, Sanjay, Morris, David S., Macleod, Liam C., Lee, Eugene K., Ritch, Chad R., Chisolm, Stephanie, MacLean, Douglas B., Almeida, Fred, Murray, Mary Beth Ballard, Lindsey, Nancy, Lipman, Robert, Oliver, Richard M., Roscoe, Lori A., Sachse, Karen, Lotan, Yair, Porten, Sima P., Taylor, Jennifer M., Steinberg, Gary D., Catto, James W.F., Downs, Tracy M., Malin, Jennifer L., Davicioni, Elai, Rios, Patricia, Yano, Marielle, Jun, Grace, Li, Casey, Nefcy, Christopher, Basu, Anirban, Heagerty, Patrick J., Catto, James W.F. , Sankin, Alexander , Woldu, Solomon L , Master, Viraj A , Chen, David Y T , Daneshmand, Siamak , O'Neil, Brock B , Westerman, Mary E , Kamat, Ashish M. , Modi, Parth K , Peyton, Charles C , Gadzinski, Adam J , Shore, Neal , Patel, Sanjay , Ritch, Chad R , Follmer, Kristin M , Kim, Sung Min , Kessler, Larry G , Bivalacqua, Trinity J. , Daneshmand, Siamak , Westerman, Mary E. , Garg, Tullika K. , Shore, Neal D. , Morris, David S. , Macleod, Liam Connor , Lee, Jenney R. , Smith, Angela B. , group, on behalf of the CISTO Collaborative, Gore, John L., Smith, Angela B., Wolff, Erika M., Comstock, Bryan A., Nash, Michael G., Follmer, Kristin M., Lee, Jenney R., Kim, Sung Min, Kessler, Larry G., Gilbert, Scott M., Chang, Sam S., Wright, Jonathan L., Kates, Max R., Pohar, Kamal S., Guzzo, Thomas J., Bivalacqua, Trinity J., Nepple, Kenneth G., Montgomery, Jeffrey S., Scarpato, Kristen R., Woldu, Solomon L., Master, Viraj A., Chen, David Y.T., Mossanen, Matthew, Daneshmand, Siamak, O'Neil, Brock B., Tyson, Mark D., Westerman, Mary E., Kamat, Ashish M., Mansour, Ahmed M., Chamie, Karim, Riggs, Stephen B., Kukreja, Janet B., Modi, Parth K., Garg, Tullika, Peyton, Charles C., Nix, Jeffrey W., Dickstein, Rian, Gadzinski, Adam J., Sankin, Alex, Shore, Neal D., Lane, Brian R., Bassett, Jeffrey C., Patel, Sanjay, Morris, David S., Macleod, Liam C., Lee, Eugene K., Ritch, Chad R., Chisolm, Stephanie, MacLean, Douglas B., Almeida, Fred, Murray, Mary Beth Ballard, Lindsey, Nancy, Lipman, Robert, Oliver, Richard M., Roscoe, Lori A., Sachse, Karen, Lotan, Yair, Porten, Sima P., Taylor, Jennifer M., Steinberg, Gary D., Catto, James W.F., Downs, Tracy M., Malin, Jennifer L., Davicioni, Elai, Rios, Patricia, Yano, Marielle, Jun, Grace, Li, Casey, Nefcy, Christopher, Basu, Anirban, Heagerty, Patrick J.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | December 15, 2025 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 274-285

10.1200/jco-25-01324 | PMID 41397208 Get It

PURPOSE To compare patient-reported and clinical outcomes between radical cystectomy (RC) and bladder-sparing therapy (BST) in patients with recurrent high-grade non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS This pragmatic, prospective observational cohort study was designed with patients, who selected and prioritized outcomes. Eligible adults were candidates for both RC or BST, had previous induction Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), and received their last treatment within 12 months. The primary outcome was the EORTC-QLQ-C30 physical function scale at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included other EORTC-QLQ-C30 scales, depression, anxiety, bladder cancer–specific quality of life (QOL), financial burden, and cancer-specific outcomes. Targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) was used to calculate average treatment effect (ATE) estimates between arms. Inverse probability weighted risk ratios (wRR) were calculated using quasi-Poisson regression. RESULTS Of 570 participants (mean age 71.4 years; 21% female), 371 selected BST and 199 selected RC. Physical function was significantly worse in the RC arm at 3 months; by 9 months, there was no difference between arms, and at 12 months, physical function did not differ (ATE, 0.9; 95% CI, –0.6 to 2.4; P = .22). RC was associated with better emotional function, generic health-related QOL, and financial burden, and lower depression and anxiety, while BST was associated with better bowel and sexual health. Cancer-specific survival was 99% for BST versus 96% for RC (wRR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.01). RC was associated with a higher risk of adverse events and serious adverse events, including a 90-day mortality rate of 2.5%. CONCLUSION Most patient-prioritized outcomes were similar or better among participants who chose RC compared with BST. These findings support the continued role of RC in managing recurrent high-grade NMIBC.
Endothelial Cell Loss 1 Year After Successful DMEK in the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study
Lass, Jonathan H. , Lass, Jonathan H., Benetz, Beth Ann, Verdier, David D., Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta B., Bauza, Colleen E., Reed, Zachariah W., Greiner, Mark A., Mian, Shahzad I., Patel, Sanjay V., Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis W., Soper, Mark C., Terry, Mark A., Titus, Michael S., Kollman, Craig, Beck, Roy W., Price, Marianne O., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Gang, Anjulie, Hall, Taylor, Lucas, Katelyn, Lynn, Ashlyn, Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Baratz, Keith H. , Hardtke, Elainey, Treichel, Emily J., Hood, Christopher , Nallasamy, Nambi , Verkade, Angela , Jones, Kristin, Shapiro, Jeremy N. , Leavy, Lisa, Sinkey, Chris, Tenkman, Lawrence R., Gordon, DJ, Ketcherside, Christopher, Fox, Jenni, Coonfield, Kristy, Vislisel, Jesse M., Sharma, Yogi, Young, Angela M. , Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James, Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Phillips, Paul, Maloney, Charlene, Jun, Albert S. , Maria, Christina, Boyce, Michelle, Kam, Yong, Crosser, Vicki, Chen, Jessica , Straiko, Michael D., Bauer, Alex, Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Veldman, Peter B., Evans, Que, Majmudar, Parag A., Epstein, Rachel , Vaidya, Neal, Rosselson, Marie, Nykaza, Jim, Jurkunas, Ula V., Venkateswaran, Nandini, Cheung, Michael K., Ayres, Brandon D. , Haught, Drew Monteleone, Prasad, Elizabeth, Toti, G, Wier, Jim, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Hansen, Mark, Hardten, David R., Reeves, Sherman, Dreyer, Allison, Mack, Megan, Hamill, M. Bowes , Nguyen, Jessica, Koo, Ellen, Stanfield, Ryan, Greenwood, Michael, Ernst, L, Messer, Brooke, Risbrudt, Nick, Stofferahn, Seth, Saville, Alyson, Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Potts, Luke B. , Alexander, Jamie, Rinn, Jennifer, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Sica, Chris, Buckman, Natalie, Ansin, Amy, Clover, Jameson , Pivoney, Charles, Vizzerra, Anthony, Elbanhawy, Lindsey, Mullins, Monica, Statz, Brianne, Fout, Elizabeth, Drury, Donna, Tavolazzi, Trisha, Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta, Richards, Leslie, Raghupathy, Sangeetha, Spruill, Rashad, Bauza, Colleen, Kollman, Craig, Garrett, Kaitlyn, Reed, Zachariah, Benetz, Beth Ann, Lê, Jimmy T. , Redford, Maryann , Arafah, Baha M. , Greiner, Mark, Johnson, Paula C, Keeler, D. K., Monnier, Vincent M. , Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Soper, Mark, Velhuisen, Paul Van, Hawkins, Barbara S., Macsai, Marian S., Patel, Sanjay, Mian, Shahzad, Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Gabrielson, Deanna, Barton, Glenn, Bear, Andrew, Das, Pravamaya, Dawson, Lauren, Dingess, Ryan, Madere, Mark, Sengupta, Pratim , Wadleigh, Garth, Greiner, Mark A. , Lass, Jonathan H., Benetz, Beth Ann, Verdier, David D., Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta B., Bauza, Colleen E., Reed, Zachariah W., Greiner, Mark A., Mian, Shahzad I., Patel, Sanjay V., Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis W., Soper, Mark C., Terry, Mark A., Titus, Michael S., Kollman, Craig, Price, Marianne O., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Gang, Anjulie, Hall, Taylor, Lucas, Katelyn, Lynn, Ashlyn, Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Hood, Christopher, Sáles, Christopher S. , Sinkey, Chris, Gordon, DJ, Ketcherside, Christopher, Fox, Jenni, Young, Angela, Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James, Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Srikumaran, Divya S. , Daoud, Yassine J. , Eghrari, Allen Omid , Ali, Muhammad , Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Epstein, Rachel H. , Vaidya, Neal, Jurkunas, Ula V. , Cheung, Michael, Prasad, Elizabeth, Toti, Gwen, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Hansen, Mark, Reeves, Sherman, Dreyer, Allison, Mack, Megan, Nguyen, Jessica, Greenwood, Michael, Messer, Brooke, Saville, Alyson, Omar, Ahmed F. , Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Rinn, Jennifer, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Sica, Chris, Schmidt, Gregory A. , Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Price, Marianne O. , Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta, Richards, Leslie, Bauza, Colleen, Beck, Roy W. , Kollman, Craig, McCarthy, Chris, Garrett, Kaitlyn, Reed, Zachariah, Benetz, Beth Ann, Greiner, Mark, Johnson, Paula, Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Soper, Mark, Aleppo, Grazia , Bateman-House, Alison , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Patel, Sanjay, Mian, Shahzad, Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Gabrielson, Deanna, Barton, Glenn, Bear, Andrew, Das, Pravamaya, Dingess, Ryan, Sengupta, Paromita

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Ophthalmology | October 17, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1053

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.4261 | PMID 41105099 Get It

Importance The effect of cornea donor diabetes on endothelial cell density (ECD) and morphometry after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is not known. Objective To determine whether endothelial cell loss (ECL) and morphometric changes 1 year after successful DMEK are related to cornea donor’s diabetes status. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2022 to July 2024 at 28 US clinical sites (46 surgeons) and 13 eye banks. Included in the trial were the eyes of recipients (some of whom received tissue from donors without diabetes and others who received tissue from donors with diabetes) who underwent successful DMEK, primarily for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, and had at least 1 analyzable postoperative endothelial image. Intervention DMEK performed with a cornea from a donor without or with diabetes, assigned using a minimization procedure to achieve an approximate 2:1 distribution. Main Outcomes and Measures ECD, ECL, coefficient of variation in cell area (CV), and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX) at 1 year from eye bank and postoperative specular central endothelial images. Results A total 1274 eyes of 982 recipients (mean [SD] age, 70 [8] years; 569 female [57.9%]; 816 [64.1%] with tissue from donors without diabetes and 458 [35.9%] with tissue from donors with diabetes) were included in the study. Preoperatively, mean (SD) central ECD in tissue from donors without diabetes and with diabetes were 2676 (290) cells/mm 2 and 2671 (286) cells/mm 2 , respectively. At 1 year, mean (SD) ECL was 28.3% (16.1%) and 28.0% (17.0%), in the donor groups without and with diabetes, respectively (adjusted mean difference = −0.4%; 95% CI, −2.3% to 1.4%), resulting in a mean (SD) 1-year ECD of 1927 (498) cells/mm 2 and 1920 (496) cells/mm 2 , respectively (adjusted mean difference = 10 cells/mm 2 ; 95% CI, −36 to 56; P = .95). No difference in ECD at 1 year associated with diabetes severity was noted ( P = .97). Mean (SD) CV did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (31.5% [4.1%] vs 31.4% [4.1%]; adjusted mean difference = −0.4%; 95% CI, −0.9% to 0.1%; P = .51), and mean (SD) HEX did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (57.7% [5.8%] vs 57.2% [5.8%]; adjusted mean difference = 0.1%, 95% CI, −0.8% to 0.9%; P = .33). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found that ECL and morphometry 1 year after DMEK were not affected by cornea donor diabetes status. With comparable 1-year graft success with tissue from donors with and without diabetes demonstrated in this trial, these findings support the use of corneas from donors with diabetes for endothelial keratoplasty procedures. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05134480
Donor Diabetes and 1-Year Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Success Rate
Price, Francis W. , Szczotka‐Flynn, Loretta , Bauza, Colleen , Reed, Zachariah W., Arafah, Baha M. , Greiner, Mark A. , Johnson, Paula, Keeler, Devon B., Pramanik, Sudeep, Soper, Mark, Terry, Mark A., Titus, Michael S. , Verdier, David D. , Kollman, Craig, Lass, Jonathan H. , Lass, Jonathan H., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Gang, Anjulie, Hall, Taylor, Lynn, A. G., Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Baratz, Keith H. , Hardtke, Elainey, Treichel, Emily J., Hood, Christopher , Nallasamy, Nambi , Verkade, Angela , Jones, Kristin, Shapiro, Jeremy, Leavy, Lisa, Sinkey, Chris, Tenkman, Lawrence R., Gordon, DJ, Ketcherside, Christopher, Fox, Jenni, Coonfield, Kristy, Vislisel, Jesse M., Sharma, Yogi, Young, Angela M. , Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James L. , Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Phillips, Paul, Maloney, Charlene, Jun, Albert S. , Maria, Christina, Boyce, Michelle, Kam, Yong, Crosser, Vicki, Chen, Jessica , Straiko, Michael D., Bauer, Alex, Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Veldman, Peter B., Evans, Que, Majmudar, Parag A., Epstein, Rachel , Vaidya, N. N., Nykaza, Jim, Venkateswaran, Nandini, Ayres, Brandon D. , Haught, Drew Monteleone, Prasad, Elizabeth, Toti, Gwen, Wier, Jim, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Hansen, Mark D., Hardten, David R., Reeves, Sherman W., Dreyer, Allison, Mack, Megan, Hamill, Mark, Nguyen, Jessica , Stanfield, Ryan, Greenwood, Michael , Ernst, Lindsay, Risbrudt, Nick, Saville, Alyson, Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Potts, Luke B. , Alexander, Jamie, Rinn, Jennifer, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Sica, Chris, Buckman, Natalie, Ansin, Amy, Clover, Jameson , Pivoney, Charles, Vizzerra, Anthony, Elbanhawy, Lindsey, Mullins, Monica, Statz, Brianne, Fout, Elizabeth, Drury, Donna, Tavolazzi, Trisha, Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Richards, Leslie, Raghupathy, Sangeetha, Spruill, Rashad, Bauza, Colleen, Beck, Roy, Garrett, Kaitlyn, Reed, Zachariah, Benetz, Beth Ann , Lê, Jimmy T. , Redford, Maryann , Arafah, Baha, Greiner, Mark, Keeler, Devon, Monnier, Vincent M. , Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Velhuisen, Paul Van, Hawkins, Barbara S., Macsai, Marian S., Patel, Sanjay, Mian, Shahzad I. , Pramanik, Sudeep , Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Gabrielson, Deanna, Barton, Glenn, Bear, Andrew, Das, Pravamaya, Dawson, Lauren, Dingess, Ryan, Madere, Mark, Wadleigh, Garth, Price, Marianne O. , Mian, Shahzad I. , Patel, Sanjay V. , Pramanik, Sudeep, Titus, Michael S., Beck, Roy W. , Lass, Jonathan H., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Lynn, Ashlyn, Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Hardtke, Elainey, Hood, Christopher, Shapiro, Jeremy, Sáles, Christopher S. , Leavy, Lisa, Gordon, DJ, Fox, Jenni, Coonfield, Kristy, Young, Angela, Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James, Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Srikumaran, Divya S. , Daoud, Yassine J. , Eghrari, Allen Omid , Ali, Muhammad , Crosser, Vicki, Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Evans, Que, Epstein, Rachel H. , Nykaza, Jim, Jurkunas, Ula V. , Cheung, Michael, Wier, Jim, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Mack, Megan, Hamill, M. Bowes, Nguyen, Jessica, Koo, Ellen H. , Stanfield, Ryan, Risbrudt, Nick, Saville, Alyson, Omar, Ahmed F. , Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Schmidt, Gregory A. , Elbanhawy, Lindsey, Statz, Brianne, Tavolazzi, Trisha, Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Richards, Leslie, Spruill, Rashad, Bauza, Colleen, Beck, Roy, McCarthy, Chris, Reed, Zachariah, Arafah, Baha, Greiner, Mark, Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Velhuisen, Paul Van, Aleppo, Grazia , Bateman-House, Alison , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Patel, Sanjay, Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Barton, Glenn, Das, Pravamaya, Dingess, Ryan, Madere, Mark, Sengupta, Partha Pratim , Wadleigh, Garth

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Ophthalmology | October 17, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1043

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.4253 | PMID 41105094 Get It

Importance If the success of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is not affected by whether the donor has diabetes, then the donor pool should expand. Objective To determine whether the 1-year DMEK success rate is affected by the presence of diabetes in the donor. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2022 to July 2025 at 28 clinical sites (46 surgeons), with donor corneas provided by 13 eye banks in the US. Included in the study were individuals undergoing low to moderate risk DMEK (95% for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy). Study data were analyzed from April to September 2025. Intervention DMEK performed with a cornea from a donor without or with diabetes, assigned using a minimization procedure (comparable with randomization) to achieve an approximate 2:1 distribution, respectively. Main Outcomes and Measures Graft success at 1 year Results A total of 1097 individuals (1421 study eyes; median [IQR] age, 71 [66-76] years; 631 female [57.5%]) were included in the study. The 1-year cumulative probability of graft success was 96.3% (95% CI, 95.0%-97.5%) among 912 study eyes (64.2%) receiving tissue from donors without diabetes and 97.1% (95% CI, 95.5%-98.4%) among 509 study eyes (35.8%) receiving tissue from donors with diabetes (difference between groups = 0.7 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.2 to 2.6; P = .63). The 1-year cumulative probability of graft success was 96.5% (95% CI, 93.6%-98.9%) in the mild donor diabetes severity subgroup (n = 173) and 97.3% (95% CI, 95.4%-98.8%) in the moderate to severe donor diabetes severity subgroup (n = 336), using a diabetes severity rating scale based on medical history. The rates of primary donor failure, early failure related to surgical complications, and subsequent failure were as follows: 2.5% (23 of 912), 0.7% (6 of 912), and 0.3% (3 of 912), respectively, in recipients of tissue from a donor without diabetes, and 2.6% (13 of 509), 0.4% (2 of 509), and 0%, respectively, among recipients of tissue from a donor with diabetes. There were no failures due to graft rejection. Conclusions and Relevance The 1-year success rate in eyes undergoing DMEK with successfully prepared tissue was very high regardless of donor diabetes status. These results, supported by the separately reported finding that endothelial cell loss and cornea morphometry after 1 year were not affected by donor diabetes status, provide strong support for having no restrictions on the use of tissue from donors with diabetes for DMEK. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05134480
Validation of the Italian Version of the Visual Function and Corneal Health Status (V-FUCHS) Questionnaire: A Patient-Reported Visual Disability Instrument for Fuchs’ Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy
Buzzi, Matilde , Carnicci, Alberto , Maccari, M , Magherini, Silvia, Virgili, Gianni , Giansanti, Fabrizio , Mencucci, Rita , Maccari, Martina , Patel, Sanjay V , Virgili, Gianni , Giansanti, Fabrizio , Mencucci, Rita , Patel, Sanjay V.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Medicine | June 5, 2025 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 3996

10.3390/jcm14113996 | PMID 40507755 Get It

Background/Objectives: The Visual Function and Corneal Health Status (V-FUCHS) questionnaire assesses vision-related quality of life in patients affected by Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) through 15 items, which are divided into the “visual acuity (VA) Factor” and “glare Factor” domains. The purpose of this study was to translate and validate the Italian version of the V-FUCHS instrument. Methods: The original V-FUCHS questionnaire was translated into Italian using certified forward and backward translation methods and administered to patients with FECD undergoing a unilateral or bilateral Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for FECD and healthy controls. Its test–retest reliability was assessed by administering the questionnaire twice, four weeks apart. Modified Krachmer grade, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central corneal thickness (CCT) were also measured. Results: A total of 74 participants, aged 45 to 83 years, were prospectively enrolled and divided into five subgroups: mild-to-moderate FECD (n = 18), advanced FECD (n = 15), unilateral DMEK (n = 9), bilateral DMEK (n = 12), and healthy controls (n = 20). Retest reliability confirmed the consistency and agreement of their responses (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.90 for both factors). The Italian V-FUCHS effectively discriminated between different stages of FECD severity, with significant differences in VA and glare factor scores across all subgroups (p < 0.001). While both BCVA and CCT showed correlations with V-FUCHS scores, only the association between the VA factor and BCVA was statistically significant (p < 0.05), indicating that the VA factor meaningfully reflects patients’ measured VA. Conclusions: The proposed Italian version of the V-FUCHS questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for assessing visual disability in patients with FECD before and after DMEK. This instrument may aid in optimizing endothelial keratoplasty timings and evaluating postoperative symptomatic improvements in FECD patients.
Ocular toxicity and tolerability of BCMA directed antibody drug conjugate (ADC) therapy in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM).
Xu, Timothy T. , Gertz, Morie A., Kourelis, Taxiarchis , Kapoor, Prashant , Abeykoon, Jithma P. , Patel, Sanjay , Kumar, Shaji , Rees, Matthew J. , Atallah‐Yunes, Suheil Albert , Lim, Kenneth J C , Dispenzieri, Angela , Gertz, Morie A. , Muchtar, Eli , Fonseca, Rafaël , Parrondo, Ricardo D , Ailawadhi, Sikander , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Gonsalves, Wilson I. , Dingli, David , Buadi, Francis K. , Rajkumar, S. Vincent

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 28, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: No page available

10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e19503 Get It

e19503 Background: The uptake of BCMA directed ADCs in MM has been hindered by ocular toxicity. Belantamab mafodotin (BM) and MEDI2228 (MEDI) are BCMA directed monoclonal antibodies conjugated to the microtubule inhibitor, monomethyl auristatin F and the alkylator, pyrrolobenzodiazepine, respectively. Differences in the ADCs payload, antibody specificity and linker stability influence ocular toxicity. We investigated the patterns of ocular toxicity and tolerability of BCMA directed ADC therapy. Methods: Retrospective study of MM patients who commenced treatment with a commercial or investigational BCMA directed ADC at the Mayo Clinic between 2019-22. Results: 111 patients were included, the median age was 69 and median follow up 40 months. The median number of prior treatments was 6, 87% of patients were triple class refractory, 50% penta class refractory, 14% had prior BCMA directed therapy and 24% had extraosseous disease. Treatments included BM (n=56, 50%), BM in combination with other MM therapy (n=12, 11%) and MEDI (n=43, 39%). The overall response rate was 30% for BM and 44% for MEDI. The median OS and PFS for BM was 8 and 2 months, the median OS and PFS for MEDI was 11 and 5 months. The median number of ADC cycles was 2.5. Ocular toxicity is summarized in the table 1. Keratopathy was more common with BM (p=0.004). Only 4 MEDI patients developed keratopathy, all grade 1 and associated with dry eyes and/or photophobia. In contrast, 60% of BM patients developed keratopathy (13% grade 3-4 keratopathy). The median time to keratopathy onset was 1 month with BM, and 2.8 with MEDI. The median time until keratopathy was 4.6 months for BM. Loss of best-corrected visual acuity (VA) was significantly more common with BM (p<0.001). The median time to any decline in VA was 1.5 months for BM and 2.3 for MEDI. The median time until VA returned to baseline was 2.4 months for BM and 2.3 for MEDI. The frequency of dose delays for ocular toxicity was comparable between ADCs, as was the number of dose reductions (16% BM vs. 12% MEDI, p=0.5). The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were progression or death (BM=69%, MEDI=44%) and ocular toxicity (BM=18%, MEDI=30%). Conclusions: Treatment interruptions, dose reductions and drug discontinuation are common with BCMA directed ADC therapy. Further research to optimize the administration schedule of these agents is warranted. BM and MEDI produce distinct patterns of ocular side effects, namely keratopathy and reduced VA with the former, and photophobia and dry eyes with the latter. BM N = 68 MEDI N = 43 p-value 2 Prophylactic steroid eye drops 4 (6%) 28 (68%) <0.001 Prophylactic lubricant eye drops 42 (63%) 33 (80%) 0.051 Max grade keratopathy 0.004 1-2 29 (47%) 4 (19%) 3-4 8 (13%) 0 (0%) VA equal or worse than 20/40 26 (68%) 6 (20%) <0.001 Days of ADC treatment 59 (33, 167) 68 (41, 105) 0.9 Dose delay for ocular toxicity 19 (28%) 8 (19%) 0.2 n (%); Median (IQR); 2 Chisq test; Wilcoxon rank sum.
Low-Dose Valacyclovir in Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus
Cohen, Elisabeth J. , Liu, Mengling , Baratz, Keith H. , Mian, Shahzad I., Choulakian, Mazen Y., Warner, David B., Lu, Ying , Twi-Yeboah, Alberta , Kim, Jiyu , Lopez-Jimenez, Carlos, Laury, Sarah, Jeng, Bennie H., Weissbart, Sarah B. , Abazari, Azin, Chou, Timothy , Chang, Eileen , Amescua, Guillermo , Koo, Ellen, Galor, Anat , Berestka, John S., Nanji, Afshan, Stutzman, Richard D., Clements, John, Davies, Emma , Saeed, Hajirah N. , Ciralsky, Jessica, Fernández, A. Gómez-Bastero , Sippel, Kimberly C. , Perez-Quinones, Victor L, Daluvoy, Melissa B. , Liu, Katy C., Ewald, M., Groos, Erich B, Chang, Bernard, Shivitz, Ira A., Hill, Jordan , Fowler, Priscilla G., Read, Russell W. , Geggel, Harry S. , Rony, Sayegh, Rapuano, Christopher J. , Meghpara, Beeran, Holland, Gary N. , Irvine, John, Aldave, Anthony J. , Edmund, Tsui, Chen, Judy , Honig, Marc A, Snyder, Lee A, Lubniewski, Anthony J., Katz, Douglas, Capoor, Seema, Gonzales, John, Keenan, Jeremy, Morkin, Melina I., Kenyon, Kenneth R., Lee, William B., Christenbury, Joseph, LaMattina, Kara C. , Negahban, Kambiz, Rao, Ronihi, Ament, Christine S, Lopatynsky, Marta O., Barbato, John D, Sarkar, Jayati S, Macsai, Marian S., Herz, Joshua B, Al-Mohtaseb, Zaina , Matoba, Alice Y., Cooney, Theresa, Sugar, Alan , Shtein, Roni M., Nehls, Sarah, Warner, Evan J. , Nettune, Greg, Bowman, Brad, Gelender, Henry, Alexander, Jamie K. , McCall, Tyrone, Zaffos, Joshua, Beebe, Walter E., Potts, Luke B. , Lustbader, Jay M., Oboh-Weilke, Aruoriwo, Hammersmith, K.M., Orlin, Stephen E., Nagra, Parveen K., Sulewski, Michael E., Bunya, Vatinee Y. , Shafer, Brian M. , Viriya, Elizabeth T., Qureshi, Anam, Lazzaro, Douglas R., Palazzolo, Laura , Goyal, Himani , Schrack, Katie E, Raber, Irving M. , Ayres, Brandon D. , Finklea, Brenton, Reeves, Sherman W., Awad, Omar E, Hardten, David R., Reilly, Charles, Flynn, William J., Rashid, Edward D, Wen, Angie E, Harris, David J. , Shaik, Neha, Seedor, John A., Rosenfeld, Steven I., Winnick, Marc , Amir, Ahmad Fitri , Sherman, Mark D., Chaon, Benjamin, Soukiasian, Sarkis H., Rao, Naveen K. , Steiner, Anne, Winokur, Jules , Udell, Ira J., Shih, Carolyn, Gorski, Matthew , Schrier, Amilia, Lobo-Chan, Ann-Marie , Sugar, Joel, Munir, Wuqaas W, Sunshine, Sarah B. , Miller, Donald M. , Gensheimer, William G. , Zegans, Michael E. , Weiss, Jayne S. , Bernal, María José , Barron, Bruce J., Hindman, Holly B. , Wise, R., Gelston, Christopher D. , Taravella, Michael J. , Davidson, Richard S. , Tran, Uyen, Bartley, Jeremy, McCulley, James P., Verity, Steven M., Bowman, Wayne, Blomquist, Preston H. , Mootha, V. Vinod , Thorne, George, Renucci, Ann M, Verdier, David D. , Sivaraman, K. R., Nordlund, Michael L., Hwang, Frank S. , Affeldt, John E., Ingraham, Herbert J., Guibord, Nathalie M., Dobbins, Kendall, Thareja, Tarika , Zaugg, Brian , Mifflin, Mark D., FORSTOT, S. LANCE, Fish, Robert A, Repine, Karen, Wildes, Michael, Estopinal, Christopher B., Brown, Donna, Koreishi, Aaleya, Ple-plakon, Patricia, Clemons, Carol S., Ashe, S, Bonaffini, Sarah G. , Houser, Kourtney, Wallace, M. Christopher , Wesberry, Jesse M, Yeung, Sonia N. , Noordeh, Nima, Faucher, Anne, Robert, Marie‐Claude , Rullo, Jacob, Johnson, Davin , Mah, Dean, Chew, Hall F., Hassonlou, Mojgan, Liu, Shaohui , Eikenberry, Jennifer , Yung, Chi-Wah, Shen, Joanne F , Yu, Charles, Ta, Christopher N. , Goins, Kenneth M., Sutphin, John E., Svanda, Kerri, Keppol, Stacy, Rostov, Audrey Talley, Vyas, Neil , Hsu, Kimberly , Goodman, Gerri, McHam, Lisa, Oates, Dale, Rizkalla, Ramy, Shukla, Anita N. , Veena, Mathew , See, Craig W. , Feder, Robert S., Baqai, Jeanine, Basti, Surendra, Haddadin, Ramez I., You, Jae Young , Dixit, Lena, Patel, Ravi H, Golde, Kimberly T, Zaidman, Gerald W., Mahesh, Sankara, Wesolosky, Jason D., Jeffrey, Helen, Mannis, Mark J., Meyer, Jay J. , Niederer, Rachael L. , Colby, Kathryn , McLeod, Stephen D. , Melia, Michele , Sugar, Elizabeth A. , Taylor, Carol R., Nagel, Maria A. , Lass, Jonathan H. , Lu, Ying , Jeng, Bennie H. , Troxel, Andrea B. , Hochman, Judith S. , Mian, Shahzad I. , Warner, David B., Lu, Ying, Lee, Ting‐Fang , Tonk, Rahul Singh , Martinez, Jaime D. , Patel, Sanjay V. , Chamberlain, Winston , Chodosh, James , Fernandez, Ana G Alzaga, Hill, Jordan, Omar, Ahmed F. , Syed, Zeba A. , Lee, Olivia, Irvine, John, Deng, Sophie X. , Huang, Andrew , Margolis, Todd P. , Seitzman, Gerami D. , Hamrah, Pedram , Lee, Hyunjoo, Weikert, Mitchell P. , Hood, Christopher T. , Woodward, Maria A. , Shtein, Roni Mintz , Zaffos, Joshua, Prescott, Christina R. , Haberman, Ilyse D. , Ritterband, David C. , Harris, David J, Ahmad, Sumayya , Amir, Ahmad, Srikumaran, Divya S. , Akpek, Esen K. , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Miller, Donald M, Bernal, Maria, Barron, Bruce, Wise, Ronald, Shieh, Christine , Thorne, George, Renucci, A., Sivaraman, Kavitha, Affeldt, John, Guibord, Nathalie M, Lin, Amy , Patel, Ravi, Asbell, Penny A. , Wallace, Michael, Iovieno, Alfonso , Teichman, Joshua C. , Robert, Marie-Claude , Harissi‐Dagher, Mona , Baxter, Stephanie A. , Benson, Matthew, Tone, Stephan Ong , Yung, C.–W., Lin, Charles C. , Vyas, Neil M, Oates, Dale, Veena, Mathew, Goshe, Jeffrey M. , Sharma, Vikas , Miller, Darby D. , Ma, Jeffrey H, Dupps, William Joseph

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Ophthalmology | March 6, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 269

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.6114 | PMID 40048183 Get It

Importance High-quality evidence regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment in herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) is necessary to guide care. Objective To determine whether suppressive valacyclovir compared with placebo delays the occurrence of new or worsening stromal keratitis (SK), endothelial keratitis (EK), iritis, or dendriform epithelial keratitis (DEK) during 12 months of treatment and if treatment benefit persisted at 18 months (secondary end point). Design, Setting, and Participants The Zoster Eye Disease Study (ZEDS) was a randomized clinical trial conducted in 95 sites from November 2017 to June 2024. Immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with a history of an HZO rash, documented active keratitis or iritis within 1 year, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or greater were eligible. After determined to be eligible, participants were randomized in 4 strata: age at onset (&amp;lt;60 years vs ≥60 years) and disease duration (&amp;lt;6 months vs ≥6 months). Interventions A total of 12 months of double-masked daily valacyclovir, 1000 mg, or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was time to first occurrence within 12 months of new or worsening SK, EK, iritis, or DEK. Results A total of 527 participants (median [IQR] age, 60 [50-68] years; 266 female [50.5%]; 266 in the valacyclovir group; 261 in the placebo group) were randomized in 4 strata; 481 completed 12 months, and 460 completed 18 months. Data were analyzed by intention to treat. At 12 months, primary end points occurred in 86 participants (33%) assigned to placebo and 74 (28%) assigned to valacyclovir, and at 18 months in 104 participants (40%) assigned to placebo and 86 (32%) assigned to valacyclovir. The hazard ratio (HR) of the primary end point at 12 months was 0.77 for participants taking valacyclovir vs placebo (HR, 0.77; adjusted 95% CI, 0.56-1.05; P = .09) and 0.73 at the secondary end point at 18 months (HR, 0.73; adjusted 95% CI, 0.55-0.97; P = .03). There was a reduction of multiple other secondary end points at 12 months (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.95; P = .02) and 18 months (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.95; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance Although the primary outcome did not show a benefit of suppressive valacyclovir treatment, secondary study outcomes showed treatment superiority at the 18-month end point and reduced number of multiple episodes of keratitis or iritis at both 12 and 18 months. These results support consideration of 1 year of suppressive valacyclovir treatment for HZO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134196
Low-Dose Valacyclovir for Postherpetic Neuralgia in the Zoster Eye Disease Study
Warner, David, Jeng, Bennie H., Kim, Jiyu , Liu, Mengling , Baratz, Keith H. , Mian, Shahzad I., Choulakian, Mazen Y., Meyer, Jay J. , Lu, Ying , Twi-Yeboah, Alberta , Lopez-Jimenez, Carlos, Laury, Sarah, Cohen, Elisabeth J. , Weissbart, Sarah B. , Abazari, Azin, Chou, Timothy , Chang, Eileen , Amescua, Guillermo , Koo, Ellen, Galor, Anat , Berestka, John S., Nanji, Afshan, Stutzman, Richard D., Clements, John, Davies, Emma , Saeed, Hajirah N. , Ciralsky, Jessica, Fernández, A. Gómez-Bastero , Sippel, Kimberly C. , Perez-Quinones, Victor L, Daluvoy, Melissa B. , Liu, Katy C., Ewald, M., Groos, Erich B, Chang, Bernard, Shivitz, Ira A., Hill, Jordan , Fowler, Priscilla G., Read, Russell W. , Geggel, Harry S. , Rony, Sayegh, Rapuano, Christopher J. , Meghpara, Beeran, Holland, Gary N. , Irvine, John, Aldave, Anthony J. , Edmund, Tsui, Chen, Judy , Honig, Marc A, Snyder, Lee A, Lubniewski, Anthony J., Katz, Douglas, Capoor, Seema, Gonzales, John, Morkin, Melina I., Kenyon, Kenneth R., Lee, William B., Christenbury, Joseph, LaMattina, Kara C. , Negahban, Kambiz, Rao, Ronihi, Ament, Christine S, Lopatynsky, Marta O., Barbato, John D, Sarkar, Jayati S, Macsai, Marian S., Herz, Joshua B, Al-Mohtaseb, Zaina , Matoba, Alice Y., Cooney, Theresa, Hood, Christopher , Sugar, Alan M., Shtein, Roni M., Nehls, Sarah, Warner, Evan J. , Nettune, Greg, Bowman, Brad, Gelender, Henry, Alexander, Jamie K. , McCall, Tyrone, Zaffos, Joshua, Beebe, Walter E., Potts, Luke B. , Lustbader, Jay M., Oboh-Weilke, Aruoriwo, Hammersmith, K.M., Orlin, Stephen E., Nagra, Parveen K., Sulewski, Michael E., Bunya, Vatinee Y. , Shafer, Brian M. , Viriya, Elizabeth T., Qureshi, Anam, Lazzaro, Douglas R., Palazzolo, Laura , Goyal, Himani , Schrack, Katie E, Raber, Irving M. , Ayres, Brandon D. , Finklea, Brenton, Reeves, Sherman W., Awad, Omar E, Hardten, David R., Reilly, Charles, Flynn, William J., Rashid, Edward D, Wen, Angie E, Shaik, Neha, Seedor, John A., Rosenfeld, Steven I., Winnick, Marc , Amir, Ahmad, Sherman, Mark D., Chaon, Benjamin, Soukiasian, Sarkis H., Rao, Naveen K. , Steiner, Anne, Winokur, Jules , Udell, Ira J., Shih, Carolyn, Gorski, Matthew , Schrier, Amilia, Lobo-Chan, Ann-Marie , Sugar, Joel, Munir, Wuqaas W, Sunshine, Sarah B. , Miller, Donald M. , Gensheimer, William G. , Zegans, Michael E. , Weiss, Jayne S. , Bernal, M.L. , Barron, Bruce, Hindman, Holly B. , Wise, Ronald E. , Gelston, Christopher D. , Taravella, Michael J. , Davidson, Richard S. , Tran, Uyen, Bartley, Jeremy, McCulley, James P., Verity, Steven M., Bowman, Wayne, Blomquist, Preston H. , Mootha, V. Vinod , Thorne, George, Renucci, A., Verdier, David D. , Sivaraman, K. R., Nordlund, Michael L., Hwang, Frank S. , Affeldt, John, Ingraham, Herbert J., Guibord, Nathalie M, Dobbins, Kendall, Thareja, Tarika , Zaugg, Brian , Mifflin, Mark D., Forstot, S. Lance, Fish, Robert A, Repine, Karen, Wildes, Michael, Estopinal, Christopher B., Brown, Donna, Koreishi, Aaleya, Ple-plakon, Patricia, Clemons, Carol S., Patel, Ravi , Ashe, Sanda, Bonaffini, Sarah G. , Houser, Kourtney, Wallace, Michael A., Wesberry, Jesse M, Yeung, Sonia N. , Noordeh, Nima, Faucher, Anne, Rullo, Jacob, Johnson, Davin , Mah, Dean, Benson, Matthew , Chew, Hall F., Hassonlou, Mojgan, Liu, Shaohui , Eikenberry, Jennifer , Yung, Chi-Wah, Shen, Joanne F , Lin, Charles C. , Yu, Charles, Ta, Christopher N. , Goins, Kenneth M., Sutphin, John E., Svanda, Kerri, Keppol, Stacy, Rostov, Audrey Talley, Vyas, Neil , Hsu, Kimberly, Goodman, Gerri, McHam, Lisa, Oates, Dale, Rizkalla, Ramy, Shukla, Anita N. , Veena, Mathew , See, Craig W. , Feder, Robert S., Baqai, Jeanine, Basti, Surendra, Haddadin, Ramez I., You, Jae Young , Dixit, Lena, Patel, Ravi H, Golde, Kimberly T, Zaidman, Gerald W., Mahesh, Sankara, Sharma, Vikas, Wesolosky, Jason D., Jeffrey, Helen, Mannis, Mark J., Niederer, Rachael L. , Lu, Ying , Jeng, Bennie H. , Troxel, Andrea B. , Hochman, Judith S. , Mian, Shahzad I. , Lee, Ting‐Fang , Tonk, Rahul Singh , Martinez, Jaime D. , Patel, Sanjay V. , Chamberlain, Winston , Chodosh, James , Fernandez, Ana G Alzaga, Perez-Quinones, Victor L, Hill, Jordan, Omar, Ahmed F. , Syed, Zeba A. , Lee, Olivia, Irvine, John, Deng, Sophie X. , Edmund, Tsui, Huang, Andrew , Margolis, Todd P. , Seitzman, Gerami D. , Keenan, Jeremy David , Hamrah, Pedram , Lee, Hyunjoo, Barbato, John D, Weikert, Mitchell P. , Hood, Christopher, Woodward, Maria A. , Sugar, Alan, Shtein, Roni Mintz , Prescott, Christina R. , Haberman, Ilyse D. , Schrack, Katie E, Ritterband, David C. , Harris, David J, Ahmad, Sumayya , Srikumaran, Divya S. , Akpek, Esen K. , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Miller, Donald M, Bernal, Maria, Shieh, Christine , Thorne, George, Sivaraman, Kavitha, Lin, Amy , Repine, Karen, Asbell, Penny A. , Ashe, S, Wallace, Michael, Iovieno, Alfonso , Teichman, Joshua C. , Robert, Marie-Claude , Harissi‐Dagher, Mona , Baxter, Stephanie A. , Benson, Matthew, Tone, Stephan Ong , Hassonlou, Mojgan, Yung, C.–W., Svanda, Kerri, Keppol, Stacy, Vyas, Neil M, McHam, Lisa, Veena, Mathew, Goshe, Jeffrey M. , Miller, Darby D. , Ma, Jeffrey H

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Ophthalmology | March 6, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 277

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.6113 | PMID 40048191 Get It

Importance Evidence regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment on postherpetic neuralgia is necessary to guide care. Objective To test the hypothesis that suppressive treatment with 1000 mg/d of oral valacyclovir for 12 months reduces the prevalence, severity, and duration of postherpetic neuralgia compared with placebo at 12 and 18 months in participants with herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial including 527 immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with history of HZO rash, documented keratitis, or iritis within 1 year and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or greater. The study was conducted at 95 participating sites (in Canada, New Zealand, and the US) from November 2017 to June 2024 and participant visits occurred every 3 months. Intervention Treatment with 1000 mg/d of valacyclovir or placebo for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia, severity as determined by pain score (a score of ≥3 on a scale of 1-10), pain duration (≥3 months after HZO onset), and total daily dose of pain medication. Results Of the 527 participants (490 completed 12 months of treatment and 460 completed 18 months), 73 (14%) had postherpetic neuralgia and were analyzed by age at HZO onset (&amp;lt;60 years or ≥60 years) and disease duration (recent [&amp;lt;6 months] or chronic [≥6 months]). Of the 73 participants with postherpetic neuralgia (34 in the valacyclovir group and 39 in the placebo group), the mean age was 62.4 years (SD, 13.6 years), 59% were female, 5% were Black or African American, and 10% were Hispanic. The prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia at 12 months was not reduced by valacyclovir (12/32 [38%]) compared with placebo (14/35 [40%]) (between-group difference, 2.5% [95% CI, −20.8% to 25.8%]; P &amp;gt;.99). The participants who were younger than 60 years at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration had lower pain scores in the valacyclovir group (mean score, 0.3 [SD, 0.9]) vs the placebo group (mean score, 0.8 [SD, 1.9]) at 12 months ( P = .045) and at 18 months (mean score, 0.2 [SD, 0.9] vs 1.0 [SD, 2.3], respectively; P = .02). There was a decrease in pain duration in the valacyclovir group at 18 months (mean, 13.6 [SD, 11.4] months) vs the placebo group (mean, 18.7 [SD, 29.5] months) (linear mixed-effects model between-group difference, −3.39 months [95% CI, −6.73 to −0.04 months]; P = .046). The total daily dose of neuropathic pain medication was lower in the valacyclovir group (mean, 271.4 [SD, 593.8] mg/d) vs the placebo group (mean, 363.4 [SD, 592.2] mg/d) at 12 months (linear mixed-effects model P = .006) and at 18 months (mean, 209.0 [SD, 412.8] mg/d vs 286.2 [SD, 577.9] mg/d, respectively; linear mixed-effects model P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance One year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir was associated with a lower dosage of neuropathic pain medication. Participants in the valacyclovir group, who were younger at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration, had lower pain scores. These secondary outcomes support consideration of 1 year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir to reduce dosage of pain medications and pain due to HZO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134196
Delphi-Based Global Consensus on Adopting Endothelial Keratoplasty: An Endothelial Keratoplasty Learners Group Initiative
Bhogal, Maninder, Gupta, Nidhi , Giobellina, Ticiano, Kobayashi, Akira , Males, John , Mehta, Jodhbir S., Romano, Vito , Allan, Bruce, Fogla, Rajesh , Gorovoy, Mark , McKee, Yuri, Koo, Ellen H. , Kocaba, Viridiana , Mejia, Luis Fernando, Moriyama, Aline Silveira , Pereira, Nicolas Cesário , Price, Francis W. , Rapuano, Christopher J. , Rostov, Audrey Talley, Slomovic, Allan R. , Terry, Mark A., Veldman, Peter B., Mehta, Jodhbir Singh , Busin, Massimo , Cursiefen, Claus , Patel, Sanjay V. , Saad, Alain , Sharma, Namrata , Sutton, Gerard L , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Pineda, Roberto , Vaddavalli, Pravin Krishna

Mayo Clinic

Cornea | December 17, 2024 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1010-1021

10.1097/ico.0000000000003758 | PMID 39688243 Get It

Purpose: To identify areas of consensus among experts on the performance of endothelial keratoplasty by using a modified Delphi approach, to help create a framework for novice surgeons to adopt these procedures. Methods: Thirty-one international experts in endothelial keratoplasty participated. Two rounds of electronic survey were followed by a hybrid, virtual meeting. Consensus was set at 75%, and results with agreement between 70% and 75% were deemed as achieving near consensus. Results: A consensus was reached for 98 statements covering the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative aspects of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty/Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Four statements achieved near consensus, and consensus could not be achieved for 11 statements. For DMEK, the panel supported a peel technique to prepare tissue for endothelium out DMEK, implanted via an injector and supported by a near full air/gas fill as a baseline procedure onto which more advanced techniques can be built. DMEK tissue should be marked to ensure correct orientation. An inferior peripheral iridotomy should be used to prevent pupil block when a near full air/gas fill in used in endothelial keratoplasty (EK). Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty was considered preferable to Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty where access to microkeratome preparation was available. Conclusions: The Delphi process allowed areas of consensus on the performance of EK to be established by a group of international experts. The statements generated are a helpful framework for novice surgeons learning EK. Further research is needed to help determine what specific tomographic features indicate EK, when guttae are considered visually significant and how to approach combined aphakia and endothelial dysfunction.