Citations

Abstract Background We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of risankizumab (RZB) for Crohn’s disease (CD) in routine clinical practice. Methods We performed a retrospective review of a multicenter consortium of CD patients treated with RZB. Co-primary outcomes were week 12 clinical remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index [HBI] score of ≤4 or physician global assessment in those without HBI or with ileostomy) and 6-month endoscopic remission (Simplified Endoscopic Mucosal Assessment for Crohn’s Disease of 0-1 or absence of ulcers). Secondary outcomes included steroid-free clinical remission, clinical response, radiographic response, cumulative clinical and endoscopic remission rates at 6 and 12 months, and adverse events. Results A total of 309 patients were included (median disease duration 14 years [IQR, 6-24]; median follow-up 7.1 months [IQR, 4.1-10.3]). Most patients (85.8%) were advanced therapy (AT)-exposed, and 169 (54.7%) had prior ustekinumab (UST) exposure. Week 12 clinical remission rates were 49.7% (98/197) overall, and 44.2% (50/113) vs 57.1% (48/84) in UST-exposed vs naïve patients (P = .073). Among those with active disease on baseline endoscopy (n = 122) who had an available follow-up at 6 months, 52.4% (22/42) achieved endoscopic remission. Cumulative rates of clinical and endoscopic remission at 12 months were 65.0% and 49.5%, respectively. Cumulative 12-month endoscopic remission was 33.9% (19/56) in UST-exposed and 68.1% (32/47) in UST-naïve patients (P < .001). Risankizumab was well-tolerated with no new safety signals identified. Conclusions In this large multicenter cohort of patients with CD, RZB was well-tolerated and effective in achieving favorable clinical and endoscopic outcomes in both AT-exposed and naïve populations, including those with exposure to UST.

Abstract Background Pivotal trials have shown that ustekinumab is effective in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the population included in these trials do not represent the cohort of patients treated in the real world. In this study, we aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in a clinical cohort of patients with UC. Methods We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study and included patients with active UC starting ustekinumab. Variables collected included demographics, clinical data, and disease activity (measured using partial Mayo score [PMS] and endoscopic Mayo score) at follow-up. The primary outcomes were cumulative rates of steroid-free clinical and biochemical remission (SFCBR), defined as a PMS <2 while off steroids and a normal C-reactive protein and/or fecal calprotectin. Results A total of 245 patients met inclusion criteria. The median time of follow-up was 33 (interquartile range, 17-53) weeks, and 214 (87.3%) had previous exposure to a biologic and/or tofacitinib. Rates of SFCBR, clinical remission, and endoscopic remission at 6 and 12 months were 12.0% (n = 16 of 139), 29.0% (n = 71 of 175), and 18.0% (n = 7 of 39), and 23.8% (n = 15 of 63), 54.3% (n = 57 of 105), and 31.0% (n = 9 of 29), respectively. Non-Hispanic White race, higher baseline PMS, and the use of concomitant corticosteroids were independently associated with failure to achieve SFCBR. Of the 73 that were dose escalated, 28.4% did not respond, 49.3% experienced a benefit, and 21.6% achieved remission. Conclusions In a population enriched with refractory UC, ustekinumab was well tolerated and induced remission in a significant number of patients. Larger studies with a longer follow-up are warranted.

Abstract Background Combining biologics and small molecules could potentially overcome the plateau of drug efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and effectiveness of dual biologic therapy (DBT), or small molecule combined with a biologic therapy (SBT) in IBD patients. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Clinical trials.gov until November 3, 2020, including studies with 2 or more IBD patients on DBT or SBT. Main outcome was safety assessed as pooled rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) for each combination. Effectiveness was reported as pooled rates of clinical, endoscopic, and/or radiographic response and remission. The certainty of evidence was rated according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results Of the 3688 publications identified, 13 studies (1 clinical trial, 12 observational studies) involving 266 patients on 7 different combinations were included. Median number of prior biologics ranged from 0 to 4, and median duration of follow-up was 16–68 weeks. Most common DBT and SBT were vedolizumab (VDZ) with anti-tumor necrosis factor (aTNF, n = 56) or tofacitinib (Tofa, n = 57), respectively. Pooled rates of SAE for these were 9.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5–21.4) for VDZ-aTNF and 1.0% (95% CI, 0.0–7.6) for Tofa-VDZ. The overall certainty of evidence was very low due to the observational nature of the studies, and very serious imprecision and inconsistency. Conclusions DBT or SBT appears to be generally safe and may be effective in IBD patients, but the evidence is very uncertain.

AbstractIntroductionThe optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time is still a controversial topic. While several studies demonstrate that longer withdrawal time improves adenoma detection rate, others have contradicted these findings.MethodsThree independent reviewers performed a comprehensive review of all original articles published from inception to January 2021 and included studies reporting comparison of the two cohorts—(i) ≥ 6 but less than 9 min of colonoscopy withdrawal time (CWT) and (ii) ≥ 9 min of CWT. The outcome measures were the following: (i) adenoma detection rate (ADR), (ii) advanced ADR, and (iii) sessile serrated adenoma detection rate (SDR). The meta‐analysis was performed, and the statistics were two‐tailed.ResultsA total of seven studies met the inclusion criteria after a thorough search of the literature was completed. The analysis revealed that ≥ 9 min of CWT had significantly higher odds of adenoma detection as compared with 6–9 min of CWT (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30–1.82; I2 = 93.7). Additionally, a significantly higher odds of sessile serrated adenoma detection (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.28–2.22; I2 = 0) and a trend towards higher odds of advanced adenoma detection (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.98–1.95, I2 = 90) were seen with CWT of at least 9 min when compared with 6–9 min of CWT.ConclusionThis systematic review and meta‐analysis analysis provides further evidence that at least 9 min of CWT cohort had significantly higher ADR and SDR as compared with the at least 6 min but less than 9 min of cohort.

Background: Several professional society guidelines suggest holding antiplatelet agents before high-risk procedures. However, there is lack of high-grade evidence to support the recommendation as most of the studies have been single center with small sample sizes. We aimed to perform the first systematic review and meta-analysis comparing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus aspirin alone in terms of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) bleeding. Methods Three independent reviewers performed a comprehensive review of all original articles published from inception to May 2020, evaluating the post-ERCP bleeding rate in setting of DAPT. Primary outcomes were the overall post-ERCP bleeding rate with the use of dual antiplatelet therapy; comparison of post-ERCP bleeding rate in patients with DAPT versus aspirin alone. Secondary outcomes were comparison of immediate and delayed post-ERCP bleeding outcomes in the 2 cohorts. Results: Six studies were included after a thorough search was concluded using the key words. The pooled analysis of studies revealed an overall post-ERCP bleeding rate of 5.7% (95% confidence interval: 3-10.6) on sustained DAPT. Post-ERCP bleeding in DAPT Cohort was not significantly higher as compared with aspirin only Cohort (odds ratio: 1.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.46-2.81). The immediate bleeding and delayed bleeding rates cannot be generalized due to low number of studies. Conclusions: The first systematic review and meta-analysis showed that post-ERCP bleeding rates are not significantly higher in DAPT cohort as compared with aspirin alone. Therefore, the risk of bleeding is less likely related to the antiplatelet agents and more likely related to the procedure itself.

Abstract Background Colectomy is the curative management for ulcerative colitis (UC). Multiple studies have reported racial disparities for colectomy before the advent of anti-TNF alpha agents. The aim of this study was to describe racial and geographic differences in colectomy rates among hospitalized patients with UC after anti-TNF therapy was introduced. Methods We examined all patients discharged from the hospital between 2010 and 2014 with a primary diagnosis of UC or of complications of UC. The data were evaluated for race and colectomy rates among the hospitalized patients with UC. Results The unadjusted national colectomy rate among hospitalized patients with UC between 2010 and 2014 was 3.90 per 1000 hospitalization days (95% confidence interval, 3.72-4.08). The undajusted colectomy rates in African American (2.33 vs 4.35; P < 0.001) and Hispanic patients (3.99 vs 4.35; P ≤ 0.009) were considerably lower than those for White patients. After adjustment for confounders, the incidence rate ratio for African American as compared to White patients was 0.43 (95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.58; P < 0.001). Geographic region of the United States also showed significant variation in colectomy rates, with western regions having the highest rate (4.76 vs 3.20; P < 0.001). Conclusions Racial and geographical disparities persist for the rate of colectomy among hospitalized patients with UC. The national database analysis reveals that colectomy rates for hospitalized African American and Hispanic patients were lower than those for White patients. Further studies are important to determine the social and biologic foundations of these disparities.