Citations

Importance Hypopigmented mycosis fungoides (HMF) is uncommon in adults, and data on clinicopathologic features and long-term outcomes remain sparse. Objective To investigate the clinicopathologic features and outcomes of adults with HMF in a large multicenter cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective multicenter cohort study conducted from January 2011 to October 2023 at 6 US tertiary referral centers and included adults (18 years or older at diagnosis) with biopsy-confirmed HMF and hypopigmentation documented at diagnosis, with a median (range) follow-up of 39 (1-347) months. Data were analyzed from February to December 2025. Exposures Clinical variant, immunophenotype predominance, and polymerase chain reaction–based T-cell receptor ( TCR ) gene rearrangement in peripheral blood and/or skin. Main Outcomes and Measures Best overall response, defined as complete response, partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease, and progression to a higher stage. Results The cohort included 224 adults with HMF (median [range] age, 44 [18-74] years), of whom 164 (73%) were women (60 men [27%]), 5 (2%) were Asian individuals, 1 (0.4%) was a Hispanic/Latino individual, 1 (0.4%) was a Middle Eastern individual, 19 (8%) were White individuals, and 186 (83%) were Black individuals; 219 (98%) presented with early-stage disease. Most had hypopigmented lesions only (159 [71%]), whereas 65 (29%) exhibited mixed-variant mycosis fungoides; outcomes were similar between groups. Among 141 patients with available immunophenotyping, 88 (63%) had CD8-positive predominance. Among 207 treated patients, most (179 [90%]) received skin-directed therapy alone. Among 198 evaluable patients, the best overall response was complete response for 52 (26%), partial response for 101 (51%), stable disease for 34 (17%), and progressive disease for 11 (6%). Over a median (range) follow-up of 39 (1-347) months, 14 of 224 patients (6%) experienced progression to a higher stage, including 5 of 219 patients (2%) with early-stage disease at baseline who experienced progression to advanced-stage disease. Peripheral blood TCR monoclonality was detected in 23 of 85 tested patients (27%) and was associated with poorer treatment response but not with disease progression. Conclusions and Relevance The finding of this cohort study suggest that adult HMF demonstrated a generally indolent course, with favorable response to skin-directed therapy, irrespective of immunophenotype or mixed-variant presentation. Peripheral blood TCR monoclonality was associated with lower treatment response but not disease progression.

ABSTRACT Background Chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), characterized by loss of sensation and impaired physical function, is a prevalent and debilitating side effect of chemotherapy, affecting 30%–50% of breast cancer survivors (BCS) with effects lasting years after treatment completion. Mindfulness‐based interventions are shown to be efficacious in reducing symptoms in neuropathies. This subgroup analysis examined the effect of Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction on Breast Cancer (MBSR(BC)) compared to Breast Cancer Education Support (BCES) or Usual Care (UC) on CIPN among BCS who received chemotherapy or chemotherapy and radiation. Methods BCS ( n = 114) were randomly assigned to the 6‐week MBSR(BC) ( n = 48), BCES ( n = 52), or UC ( n = 14) regimen. Demographic and clinical data were assessed at baseline, and CIPN was assessed using the Chemotherapy‐Induced Peripheral Neuropathy assessment tool (CIPNAT) at baseline, 6, 12, and 26 weeks. Between‐ and within‐group differences were evaluated and change over time was compared between groups. Results BCS (mean age = 52.7 years, range: 28–81 years) were primarily White and non‐Hispanic ( n = 78, 68%). The pattern of effect sizes was similar for CIPNAT symptoms and interference with improvements in CIPN for MBSR(BC) and BCES groups overtime. For both groups, the effects were larger compared to the UC. Differences tended to increase over time with significant effects observed between MBSR(BC) and UC, and between BCES and UC at weeks 12 and 26. Conclusions The findings indicate that MBSR(BC) and BCES may effectively reduce CIPN symptoms among BCS compared to UC. MBSR(BC) and BCES programs are effective non‐pharmacological interventions for CIPN that may translate into practice.

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo conduct an economic evaluation of a group mindfulness program compared to an education support program for breast cancer survivors (BCS).MethodsThe cost‐utility analysis (cost per quality‐adjusted life year [QALY]) was performed from a single‐center randomized controlled trial in the United States. Data from 181 BCS were included in the analysis (91 from the mindfulness‐based stress reduction for breast cancer, MBSR(BC) and 90 from the Breast Cancer Education Support, (BCES)). Analyses were conducted from two perspectives: societal and healthcare system. The EuroQol EQ‐5D‐5L was used to measure quality of life and the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) was used to measure health services utilization from baseline through 26 weeks. The impact of MBSR(BC) on health services utilization and costs was estimated with generalized linear models.ResultsIn the reference case analyses (societal perspective), the average total cost in the MBSR(BC) group was $5744 compared with $6140 in the BCES group. At the end of follow‐up, the MBSR(BC) group dominated BCES in terms of Incremental Cost Utility Ratio (ICUR), with MBSR(BC) providing an incremental cost of −$541 (95% CI: −$3400, $2318) and a 0.021 QALY (95% CI: −0.014, 0.055). Net monetary benefit (NMB) analysis showed that MBSR(BC) has a higher probability of achieving positive NMB across a range of possible societal willingness‐to‐pay for improving quality of life.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that MBSR(BC) is likely to be cost‐effective for breast cancer survivors over 6 months. Cost savings primarily resulted from reduced ER and hospital admissions and tests.

e23020 Background: Precision medicine studies must overcome the challenges of identifying patients with uncommon molecular targets and small cohort sizes for correlative studies. BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119) is a prescreening study that uses a single assay to address both problems by: 1) efficiently screening potentially eligible patients for subsequent clinical trials of Tmod logic-gated chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies; and 2) providing a large dataset available for translational studies. Methods: Initially, patients were identified for BASECAMP-1 by consenting and genotyping all potentially eligible patients for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02 heterozygosity. To improve screening efficiency, we co-developed a patient-matching program with Tempus AI, Inc (Tempus), in which Tempus informs the principal investigators of next-generation sequenced (NGS) patients with HLA-A*02 heterozygosity within their health system who may be eligible for BASECAMP-1. Patients are screened using the Tempus xT platform, which uses genomic and RNA sequencing (RNAseq) analyses to determine gene mutations and expression. Enrolled patients with colorectal (CRC), non-small cell lung, ovarian (OVCA), and pancreatic cancers (PANC) were analyzed for tumor purity, mutation distribution, HLA-A*02 loss of heterozygosity (LOH) status, and RNAseq to validate the data available for future clinical analyses. Results: As of January 3, 2025, 80 participants have been enrolled in BASECAMP-1. Through individual screening methods, 1684 patients were screened at 13 study sites, of which 30 patients had tumor-specific HLA-A*02 LOH and were enrolled (~1 eligible patient identified per 56 screened). The patient-matching program identified 282 patients with HLA-A*02 LOH at 12 sites; of these, 50 consented to the BASECAMP-1 study (~1 patient enrolled per 6 identified), demonstrating higher efficiency than the individual patient screening method. Correlative data from xT were available for 360 patients with germline HLA-A*02 and provided insights into mutational distribution and target expression. LOH status was not associated with tumor-specific differences in missense mutational distribution. RNAseq data demonstrated higher CEACAM5 expression in CRC and higher MSLN in PANC and OVCA vs other tumor types, while EGFR was consistently expressed with reduced variance across tumor types, confirming these as potential target antigens for Tmod CAR T interventional trials EVEREST-1, EVEREST-2, and DENALI-1. Conclusions: Identification and enrollment of HLA-A*02 LOH patients into BASECAMP-1 for logic-gated CAR T therapeutic studies were accelerated by the patient matching program. Concurrent xT analysis provides opportunities to augment analyses from robust propensity-matched comparisons, response correlation studies, and other translational discovery. Clinical trial information: NCT04981119 .

3040 Background: EVEREST-2 is a first-in-human, phase 1/2 trial to assess the safety and efficacy of A2B694, an autologous, logic-gated Tmod CAR T therapy targeted to MSLN, which is normally expressed in the mesothelium and can be upregulated in many solid tumors. A2B694 is designed to overcome challenges of on-target, off-tumor toxicity that have limited other MSLN-targeted approaches by combining a CAR-activating receptor targeting MSLN with a blocker CAR that recognizes HLA-A*02, to distinguish between normal and tumor cells (Tokatlian, et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2022). Methods: Adults with recurrent unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cancers with MSLN expression who have progressed after standard-of-care therapy are eligible for EVEREST-2. Enrollment to EVEREST-2 and collection of T-cells occurs through the ongoing prescreening study BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119). When clinically appropriate, A2B694 is manufactured from cryopreserved T cells, and patients undergo lymphodepletion before A2B694 infusion. The dose-escalation phase is evaluating the safety and tolerability of A2B694 to identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Dose escalation was started at 1x10 8 Tmod positive cells (dose level [DL] 1) and will increase up to 14x10 8 in combination with low-dose IL-2 (DL 5). The dose-expansion phase will confirm RP2D and collect biomarker data to further characterize A2B694. Results: As of January 15, 2025, 5 participants (median age: 60 years; range, 50-84) have enrolled on EVEREST-2 and received A2B694 at DLs 1-2; participants had ovarian cancer (n = 3), pancreatic cancer (n = 1), and non-small cell lung cancer (n = 1) and had received a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (range, 1-7). Lymphodepleting chemotherapy was well tolerated with no significant cytopenias observed. The most common adverse events were lymphopenia (7 [14.6%]) and decreased appetite (6 [12.5%]). There were no dose-limiting toxicities, cytokine release syndrome, nor related neurotoxicity. One participant was admitted to the hospital for decreased appetite. No long-term toxicities have been noted up to 7.5 months post-infusion. Of the participants who have received A2B694, 5 were efficacy evaluable at DLs 1-2. A2B694 was detected post-infusion in the peripheral blood in all patients. Additionally, A2B694 was detected in an abdominal tumor biopsy from a patient with pancreatic cancer 42 days post-infusion. Conclusions: The logic-gated approach was successful at reducing toxicity seen with prior MSLN-targeted CAR T therapies, and A2B694 showed successful CAR T expansion and tumor infiltration. The maximum tolerated dose has not been reached, and results from the dose-escalation phase continue to determine the RP2D. Clinical trial information: NCT06051695 .

TPS2677 Background: Despite the success in hematologic malignancies, CAR T therapies face significant challenges in solid tumors due to the lack of tumor-specific targets that distinguish cancer from normal cells. EGFR plays a critical role in oncogenesis across several cancers and is often upregulated (TCGA 2022). While monoclonal antibodies targeting EGFR have demonstrated efficacy, these approaches are often limited by on-target, off-tumor toxicities, such as skin rash, which constrains dose escalation and efficacy (Macdonald, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol . 2015). A2B395 is an allogeneic, logic-gated, EGFR-targeted Tmod CAR T therapy designed to address these limitations and provide a convenient and consistent off-the-shelf option. This therapy incorporates 2 CARs: an activator targeting EGFR, and a blocker targeting HLA-A*02. The activator recognizes EGFR on both tumor and normal cells, while the blocker inhibits CAR T activity against normal cells with preserved HLA expression and decreases the risk for graft-versus-host disease (Hamburger, et al. Mol Immunol . 2020). To address potential host-vs-graft response, an shRNA expression module targeting B2M is included in the Tmod construct, which significantly reduces major histocompatibility complex class I levels and subsequent host immune response (DiAndreth, et al. Clin Immunol. 2022). Importantly, the Tmod system is modular and adaptable to multiple targets. Initial data on autologous Tmod CAR T therapy suggest reduced off-tumor toxicity and encouraging clinical efficacy (Grierson, et al. SITC 2024. Abstract 588). A2B395 represents a novel approach for EGFR-expressing solid tumors with HLA-A*02 LOH. Methods: DENALI-1 (NCT06682793) is a phase 1/2, open-label, nonrandomized study evaluating the safety and efficacy of A2B395 in adults. Patients are enrolled through BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119), a master prescreening study that identifies patients with HLA LOH at any time in the course of their disease via next-generation sequencing (Tempus AI, Inc.). Key inclusion criteria include histologically confirmed recurrent unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cancers associated with EGFR expression, including colorectal, non-small cell lung, squamous cell head and neck, triple negative breast, and renal cell cancers. Patients must have received ≥1 line of prior therapy, such as a checkpoint inhibitor, molecular targeted therapy, or chemotherapy. The primary objective of phase 1 is to evaluate safety, tolerability, and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) using a Bayesian optimal interval design for dose escalation. The dose-expansion phase will confirm RP2D and collect biomarker data. Phase 2 will assess overall response rate per RECIST v1.1. Clinical trial information: NCT06682793 .

Abstract Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies have demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in hematologic malignancies, but have proven challenging in solid tumors, in part owing to a lack of tumor-specific targets and unmanageable toxicity. Mesothelin (MSLN) expression normally is limited to the mesothelium of major body cavities but can be upregulated in diverse solid tumor types (cancer.gov/tcga), making it a potential target for cancer therapy. MSLN-targeted cell therapy approaches, including CAR T and T-cell receptor fusion therapies, have shown promising clinical activity; however, on-target, off-tumor toxicity including fatal events have occurred (Beatty, et al. Gastroenterology. 2018.; Haas, et al. Mol Ther. 2023.; Hong, et al. ESMO 2021. Abstract 9590.). A2B694 is an autologous logic-gated, MSLN-targeted Tmod CAR T therapy that addresses the challenges of on-target, off-tumor toxicity by combining 2 CARs: an activating and blocking receptor. The activator recognizes MSLN present on the surface of both tumor and normal cells; the blocker inhibits the CAR T activator when it binds human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02, which is present in normal cells and often lost in tumor cells. Thus, in patients with tumor-associated HLA-A*02 loss of heterozygosity (LOH), the blocker prevents on-target, off-tumor toxicity on normal cells owing to retained HLA-A*02 expression (Hamburger, et al. Mol Immunol. 2020). Through this unique selective mechanism, A2B694 may provide a therapeutic window to treat patients with MSLN-expressing solid tumors exhibiting HLA-A*02 LOH. Methods: EVEREST-2 (NCT06051695) is a first-in-human, phase 1/2, open-label, nonrandomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A2B694 in adults with recurrent unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cancers with MSLN expression, including non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, or other solid tumors with MSLN expression. Eligible patients must have progressed following standard of care therapy. Enrollment to EVEREST-2 occurs through the prescreening study BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119), which identifies patients with tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH via next-generation sequencing (Tempus AI, Inc). Eligible patients enroll in the BASECAMP-1 study and undergo leukapheresis. A2B694 is manufactured from cryopreserved T cells when clinically appropriate for patients. The primary objective of phase 1 is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of A2B694 and identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The dose-expansion phase will confirm RP2D and collect biomarker data to further characterize A2B694. Phase 2 will assess overall response rate per RECIST v1.1. The first patient was enrolled on EVEREST-2 in April 2024. Dose escalation is ongoing. Citation Format: Julian R. Molina, Antonious Hazim, Oliver Dorigo, Salman R. Punekar, Monica Avila, Diane M. Simeone, Kedar Kirtane, Gottfried E. Konecny, Jeffrey Ward, Matthew Block, Jennifer Specht, Leslie Boyd, Yanyan Lou, Jong Chul Park, Jacqueline D. Xuan, Ramez N. Eskander, Gayanie Ong, Marco Davila, Wendy Langeberg, Marcela Maus, Armen Mardiros, Frederick L. Locke, Andrea Wise, David G. Maloney, John Welch, J. Randolph Hecht. EVEREST-2: A seamless phase 1/2 study of A2B694, a logic-gated Tmod CAR T-cell therapy, in patients with mesothelin-expressing solid tumors with human leukocyte antigen-A*02 loss of heterozygosity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT186.

766 Background: BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119) is a pre-screening study to identify patients with tumor-associated human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02 loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for interventional studies, such as EVEREST-2 (NCT06051695), a phase 1/2 study of logic-gated chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy for MSLN-expressing cancers. MSLN is a cell surface protein expressed in several cancer types, including mesothelioma (MESO), colorectal (CRC), non-small cell lung (NSCLC), ovarian (OVCA), and pancreatic (PANC) cancer, which can be associated with poor prognosis (1). Longitudinal clinical, genomic, and biomarker data were collected from patients enrolled in BASECAMP-1, providing a large dataset for translational discovery and propensity scoring. The aim of this analysis was to determine whether MSLN expression measured by RNAseq and IHC are correlated among patients with solid tumors. Methods: In BASECAMP-1, tumor tissue from patients with germline heterozygous HLA-A*02 is tested for HLA-A*02 LOH using an investigational next generation sequencing device codeveloped with Tempus Labs (Lozac'hmeur, et al. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024) that detects somatic alterations, including HLA LOH, and generates RNAseq data (eg, MSLN expression). Gene-level transcripts per million read (TPM) values were determined and the log2 TPM +1 was displayed in a scatter plot (the mean and standard deviation [SD] are provided in the Table). Patients with HLA-A*02 LOH also submit tissue for IHC testing for exploratory biomarkers (eg, MSLN expression using anti-MSLN clone 5B2). Statistical significance was determined with ANOVA or t-tests. Results: As of June 1, 2024, 314 patients had been screened for BASECAMP-1 and had RNAseq results; 34 patients also had MSLN IHC results. MSLN expression by RNAseq was consistently higher in patients with PANC or OVCA vs CRC or NSCLC ( P <0.001). MSLN expression by RNAseq and IHC were correlated overall ( P <0.001), particularly among patients with PANC and OVCA. Among the 8 patients with OVCA or PANC who were IHC+ for MSLN, only 1 had an RNAseq value below 6 log2 TPM+1; this patient had mesonephric-like ovarian adenocarcinoma, which may account for the low value. The one MESO sample with both RNAseq and IHC available was IHC+ and had a high RNAseq value. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrated high correlation between RNAseq and IHC MSLN expression in tumor tissue. 1. Faust, et al. Cancers. 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04981119 . MSLN expression by RNASeq by tumor type and IHC status. Tumor Overall (N=314) IHC data available (n=34) MSLN Positive MSLN Negative n Mean TPM a (SD) n Mean TPM a (SD) n Mean TPM a (SD) All 314 5.1 (2.3) 20 6.0 (2.1) 14 2.3 (1.7) adNSCLC 33 3.8 (2.4) 2 4.7 (1.7) 7 1.5 (1.3) sqNSCLC 4 3.1 (1.8) 0 0 MESO 4 4.5 (4.2) 1 5.7 0 CRC 148 4.4 (2.0) 8 5.1 (2.1) 7 3.1 (1.6) PANC 100 6.1 (1.8) 3 7.8 (0.6) 0 OVCA 25 7.2 (2.1) 5 6.6 (2.8) 0 a MSLN log2 transcripts per million+1. ad, adenocarcinoma; sq, squamous.

Introduction: The Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program for breast cancer survivors (MBSR [BCs]) is a stress-reducing program designed to increase cognitive functioning through four meditational practices. This randomized clinical trial aimed to determine if improvements in cognitive functioning and perceived cognitive abilities achieved from the MBSR(BC) were mediated through increased mindfulness, decreased rumination, and decreased perceived stress. Methods: Breast cancer survivors (BCSs) who met inclusion criteria of stage I, II, or III BC and received either chemotherapy (CT) or both CT and radiation were randomized to either the 6-week MBSR(BC), or Breast Cancer Education Support (BCES) program, or to a usual care (UC) regimen. Analysis of covariance was first implemented to identify potential mediators, followed by a formal mediational analysis to evaluate the effects of MBSR(BC) on 6-, 12-, and 26-week outcomes. Results: After consent, 212 BCS were randomized to MBSR(BC) ( n = 91), BCES ( n = 90), or UC ( n = 31). The mean age was 56.5 and the majority of the BCS, 73.1%, were White and non-Hispanic. Results showed increases in “observing” as part of mindfulness as a potential mediator of MBSR(BC) effects on impairments on quality of life and logical memory at 6 months relative to UC. No mediation effects were identified for outcomes measured at 6 or 12 weeks and also when MBSR(BC) was compared with the BCES program. Discussion: These results partially supported our hypothesis that improvement in cognitive functioning would occur through increased mindfulness. Although few mediating relationships were identified, results showed a relationship between mindfulness and cognitive functioning. Both mediating relationships occurred through increases in “observing,” a subconcept of “mindfulness,” when compared to the MBSR(BC) with UC at 6 months. This study shows that mediators may help “optimize” clinical therapeutic treatment effects, thus contributing to the advancement of science. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.ClinicalTrials.gov . Registration Number: NCT02786797.