Citations

Abstract Purpose Modeling relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is central to carbon ion radiotherapy treatment planning. The modified Microdosimetric Kinetic Model (mMKM) is a clinically established RBE framework that has guided treatment protocols at many existing carbon centers, while the Mayo Clinic Florida Microdosimetric Kinetic Model (MCF MKM) is a recently developed alternative. This work aims to implement the MCF MKM in the open‐source treatment planning system matRad and to quantitatively compare its RBE‐weighted dose predictions with those of the clinically established mMKM using identical physical dose distributions across multiple disease sites. These findings will help assess their dosimetric equivalence and inform protocol development for carbon ion radiotherapy at MCF. Methods Monte Carlo simulations of the MCF carbon beamline were performed to generate physical (IDD, LET, lateral spread) and biological base data for integration of each RBE model into matRad . Treatment plans were generated for six patients, each corresponding to a different disease site, using clinical beam configurations with carbon‐reference dose prescriptions, and plans were optimized using the MCF MKM. To isolate differences attributable solely to the RBE model, the resulting physical dose distributions were held fixed and RBE‐weighted doses were recalculated using the mMKM. Dose volume histogram (DVH) metrics and spatial dose‐difference maps were used to compare target coverage and organ‐at‐risk doses between the two models. Results Across patient cases, RBE‐weighted dose distributions from MCF MKM and mMKM showed strong agreement. Differences in target coverage were small, with CTV D95% differing by less than 1.6% across all disease sites and maximum target dose differences not exceeding 0.88%. Organ‐at‐risk dose deviations were limited, with differences of 3.0% or less across evaluated DVH metrics. Spatial dose‐difference maps showed that the largest discrepancies occurred in regions of steep dose gradients near target to organ‐at‐risk interfaces, while overall dose conformity and plan quality remained comparable between the two models. Conclusions: This study served as the first systematic model comparison of the MCF MKM and mMKM within a treatment planning environment. These findings suggest that the MCF MKM and mMKM produce dosimetrically consistent RBE‐weighted dose predictions under realistic planning conditions using carbon‐reference parameters. Accordingly, the fractionation schemes developed from years of clinical experience with mMKM implementations may serve as a practical foundation for protocol development at MCF.

Abstract Purpose This study investigates a novel optimization framework that integrates the newly developed MCF MKM relative biological effectiveness (RBE) model into intensity modulated particle therapy (IMPT) planning for carbon ion therapy. Unlike conventional RBE models such as MKM or LEM, the MCF MKM provides detailed microdosimetric information, which improves predictive accuracy of cell survival but elevates both memory and time requirement in the optimization process. Furthermore, to the implicit nature of the MCF MKM, the gradient information, which is essential in inverse planning, is hardly accessible. In response, a randomized gradient‐free optimization method (RGFM) was developed to mitigate the computational challenge and achieve improved RBE dose distributions. Materials and Methods An RBE dose optimization problem was formulated based on the discretized MCF MKM, known as the Abridged Microdosimetry Distribution Model (AMDM). The RGFM was derived to find feasible and high‐quality settings of monitor unit for IMPT plans without the need for explicit gradient calculations. To verify the clinical plausibility of the proposed method, it was tested on two clinical scenarios—prostate and brain cases in comparison with benchmark plans derived solely from physical dose optimization. Computational times and dose‐volume histograms (DVHs) for both physical and RBE doses were evaluated. Results The RGFM algorithm successfully optimized the MCF MKM‐based IMPT plans. Compared to the benchmark, the RBE dose distributions showed improved coverage of the target and reduced hot spots. Such improvements were observed to coincide with trade‐offs in physical dose distributions. The complexity of the MCF MKM extended the computational time, yet high‐quality solutions were attainable in a clinically reasonable timeframe. Multi‐field optimization (MFO) further enhanced target coverage and critical organ sparing over single‐field optimization (SFO). Conclusions This proof‐of‐principle study confirmed the feasibility of using a randomized gradient‐free method to optimize RBE dose based on the MCF MKM in IMPT planning for carbon ion therapy. The approach provides a pathway for clinical adoption of advanced RBE models, potentially leading to more biologically informed and effective carbon ion therapy treatments. Future work involves refining algorithms, incorporating parallel computing, and performing additional case studies to improve computational efficiency and generalizability.

Abstract Background Dose‐driven continuous scanning (DDCS) enhances the efficiency and precision of proton pencil beam delivery by reducing beam pauses inherent in discrete spot scanning (DSS). However, current DDCS optimization studies using traveling salesman problem (TSP) formulations often rely on fixed beam intensity and computationally expensive interpolation for move spot generation, limiting efficiency and methodological robustness. Purpose This study introduces a Break Spot‐Guided (BSG) method, combined with two acceleration strategies—dose rate skipping and bounding—to optimize beam intensity while minimizing beam delivery time (BDT). In addition, a ‐method is proposed for efficient move spot generation, aiming to balance computational efficiency and dose calculation accuracy. Methods The BSG framework simplifies the original mixed‐integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem by transforming it into a series of TSP evaluations using break‐spot dose rates. The two acceleration strategies are integrated to reduce computational complexity. The ‐method is introduced to efficiently generate move spots without compromising dose fidelity. The performance of the BSG method, with and without the acceleration strategies, and the ‐method, was evaluated across multiple clinical cases. Results By jointly optimizing the scan path and dose rate, the proposed BSG‐S‐B method offered the most efficient delivery, achieving a 64% reduction in BDT compared to DSS and a 57% reduction compared to Liu's method in the prostate case. These gains were consistently observed across all cases. Utilizing acceleration strategies, BSG‐S‐B significantly reduced computation time from hours to minutes (e.g., from 10 525.7 to 108.5 s in the prostate case, and from 6202.4 to 129.8 s in the head‐and‐neck case). When combined with the ‐method, it reduced the number of move spots by more than 50%, while still ensuring dosimetric quality. Conclusions The proposed framework significantly improves computational efficiency, making scan path optimization with dose rate selection feasible for clinical DDCS delivery. The ‐method effectively reduces computational complexity while maintaining dose calculation accuracy, demonstrating strong potential for clinical adoption in proton therapy treatment planning.

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) workflows are increasingly adopted to achieve dose escalation and tissue sparing under dynamic anatomical conditions. However, recontouring and time constraints hinder the implementation of real-time ART workflows. Various auto-segmentation methods, including deformable image registration, atlas-based segmentation, and deep learning-based segmentation (DLS), have been developed to address these challenges. Despite the potential of DLS methods, clinical implementation remains difficult due to the need for large, high-quality datasets to ensure model generalizability. This study introduces an InterVision framework for segmentation. The InterVision framework can interpolate or create intermediate visuals between existing images to generate specific patient characteristics. The InterVision model is trained in two steps: (1) generating a general model using the dataset, and (2) tuning the general model using the dataset generated from the InterVision framework. The InterVision framework generates intermediate images between existing patient image slides using deformable vectors, effectively capturing unique patient characteristics. By creating a more comprehensive dataset that reflects these individual characteristics, the InterVision model demonstrates the ability to produce more accurate contours compared to general models. Models are evaluated using the volumetric dice similarity coefficient (VDSC) and the Hausdorff distance 95% (HD95%) for 18 structures in 20 test patients. As a result, the Dice score was 0.81 ± 0.05 for the general model, 0.82 ± 0.04 for the general fine-tuning model, and 0.85 ± 0.03 for the InterVision model. The Hausdorff distance was 3.06 ± 1.13 for the general model, 2.81 ± 0.77 for the general fine-tuning model, and 2.52 ± 0.50 for the InterVision model. The InterVision model showed the best performance compared to the general model. The InterVision framework presents a versatile approach adaptable to various tasks where prior information is accessible, such as in ART settings. This capability is particularly valuable for accurately predicting complex organs and targets that pose challenges for traditional deep learning algorithms.

AbstractBackgroundIntensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) is a sophisticated radiation treatment allowing for precise dose distributions. However, conventional spot selection strategies in IMPT face challenges, particularly with minimum monitor unit (MU) constraints, affecting planning quality and efficiency.PurposeThis study introduces an innovative Two‐Stage Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) method to optimize spot intensity in IMPT with Lower Bound (LB) constraints. This method seeks to improve treatment planning efficiency and precision, overcoming limitations of existing strategies.MethodsOur approach evaluates prevalent IMPT spot selection strategies, identifying their limitations, especially concerning MU constraints. We integrated LB constraints into a MILP framework, using a novel three‐phase strategy for spot pool selection, to enhance performance over traditional heuristic methods and L1 + L∞ strategies. The method's efficacy was tested in eight study cases, using Dose‐Volume Histograms (DVHs), spot selection efficiency, and computation time analysis for benchmarking against established methods.ResultsThe proposed method showed superior performance in DVH quality, adhering to LB constraints while maintaining high‐quality treatment plans. It outperformed existing techniques in spot selection, reducing unnecessary spots and balancing precision with efficiency. Cases studies confirmed the method's effectiveness in producing clinically feasible plans with enhanced dose distributions and reduced hotspots, especially in cases with elevated LB constraints.ConclusionsOur Two‐Stage MILP strategy signifies a significant advancement in IMPT treatment planning. By incorporating LB constraints directly into the optimization process, it achieves superior plan quality and deliverability compared to current methods. This approach is particularly advantageous in clinical settings requiring minimum spot number and high MU LB constraints, offering the potential for improved patient outcomes through more precise and efficient radiation therapy plans.

Abstract Objective . To investigate the impact of scan path optimization on the dose accuracy and beam delivery time (BDT) of proton pencil beam scanning in the dose-driven continuous scanning (DDCS). Approach . A diverse set of six clinical plans, representing various spot patterns and treatment sites, was used to evaluate the effectiveness of scan time optimization and scan length optimization. The DDCS dose discrepancy and BDT with optimized scan paths was compared to the default serpentine scan path. Main results . Both scan time optimization and scan path optimization were able to reduce the DDCS dose discrepancy compared to the default serpentine scan path. All plans, except for the layer repainting lung plan, achieved a 2%/2 mm gamma pass rate of over 99% and less than 1% PTV DVH root mean square error (RMSE) through scan path optimization. In the case of the layer repainting lung plan, when compared to the default serpentine scan path, the 2%/2 mm gamma pass rate showed improvements from 91.3% to 93.1% and 95.8%, while the PTV DVH RMSE decreased from 2.1% to 1.7% and 1.1% for scan time optimization and scan length optimization, respectively. Although scan time optimization resulted in shorter total scan times for all plans compared to the default scan path and scan length optimization tended to have longer total scan times. However, due to the short total scan times and their minimal contribution to the total BDT, the impact of scan path optimization on the total BDT was practically negligible. Significance . Both scan time optimization and scan length optimization proved to be effective in minimizing DDCS dose discrepancy. No definitive winner can be determined between these two optimization approaches. Both scan time and scan length optimization had minimal effect on the total BDT.

Pencil beam scanning delivered with continuous scanning has several advantages over conventional discrete spot scanning. Such advantages include improved beam delivery efficiency and reduced beam delivery time. However, a move dose is delivered between consecutive spots with continuous scanning, and current treatment planning systems do not take this into account. Therefore, continuous scanning and discrete spot plans have an inherent dose discrepancy. Using the operating parameters of the state-of-the-art particle therapy system, we conducted a proof-of-concept study in which we systematically generated 28 plans for cubic targets with different combinations of plan parameters and simulated the dose discrepancies between continuous scanning and a planned one. A nomograph to guide the selection of plan parameters was developed to reduce the dose discrepancy. The effectiveness of the nomograph was evaluated with two clinical cases (one prostate and one liver). Plans with parameters guided by the nomograph decreased dose discrepancy than those used standard plan parameters. Specifically, the 2%/2 mm gamma passing rate increased from 96.3% to 100% for the prostate case and from 97.8% to 99.7% for the liver case. The CTV DVH root mean square error decreased from 2.2% to 0.2% for the prostate case and from 1.8% to 0.9% for the liver case. The decreased dose discrepancy may allow the relaxing of the delivery constraint for some cases, leading to greater benefits in continuous scanning. Further investigation is warranted.