Citations

Abstract Rationale Pulmonary hypertension (PH) in interstitial lung disease (ILD) lacks approved therapies. Objectives The Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute GoDeep metaregistry collects real-world data of patients with PH from international PH referral centers. Methods Patients with ILD-PH and relevant subgroups (idiopathic interstitial pneumonia [IIP], idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [IPF]) were stratified by pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were employed, additionally accounting for immortal time bias, sensitivity analyses, Heller explained relative risk statistics, and target trial emulation framework analysis. Measurements and Main Results Among 34,482 patients, 940 with hemodynamically fully characterized incident ILD-PH (median age, 67 [IQR, 59–74] yr) were identified. A total of 62% had severe ILD-PH with PVR >5 Wood units (WU) and poor survival rates (29% and 18% at 3 and 5 yr), significantly worse than patients with ILD-PH with PVR ≤5 WU and patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Survival was poorest in severe IPF-PH. A total of 59% of all patients ILD-PH received PH-targeted therapy, predominantly phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5is). PDE5i treatment was consistently associated with significantly improved survival in patients with severe PH (hazard ratios of 0.537 [0.370–0.781], 0.461 [0.233–0.913], and 0.435 [0.215–0.8] for IIP-PH, IPF-PH, and IIP-PH with nintedanib/pirfenidone background therapy), but not in patients with less severe hemodynamic impairment, supported by sensitivity analyses, Heller statistics, and target trial emulation framework analysis. The survival statistics of patients with PDE5i-treated IIP-PH or IPF-PH were validated in the independent COMPERA registry. Combination therapy with PDE5is and inhaled prostacyclin analogues was superior to monotherapy using PDE5is (hazard ratio, 0.341; 0.205–0.566). Conclusions Prognosis in ILD-PH was generally very poor and was related to PH severity. PDE5i treatment in severe IIP-PH and IPF-PH was associated with improved survival, which is to be further verified in controlled trials.

ABSTRACTPortopulmonary hypertension (PoPH), a type of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in patients with liver disease, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The relationship between cardiopulmonary hemodynamics, PAH therapy, and survival in PoPH remains unclear. We performed a retrospective cohort study of PoPH patients from the international pulmonary hypertension (PH) meta‐registry, PVRI GoDeep. PAH was defined by a mean pulmonary arterial pressure > 20 mmHg, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ≤ 15 mmHg, and a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) > 2 Wood Units. PoPH diagnoses were assigned by each center's PH specialist based on international guidelines at the time of enrollment. 246 incident PoPH patients met eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis, equally split between males (51%) and females (49%), with a median age of 54 years. When compared to both patients with IPAH and those with other subtypes of PAH (not classified as PoPH or IPAH), those with PoPH had significantly lower 5‐year survival rates (46% vs. 68% vs. 65%, log‐rank p < 0.001). Amongst the PoPH patients, however, there was no significant difference in 5‐year survival when dichotomized by disease severity, either by a PVR of 5 Wood Units or a CI of 2.5 L/min/m2. Treatment of the PoPH patients with PAH‐targeted therapies was associated with significantly higher 5‐year survival rates compared to those not receiving such treatments, as shown by Kaplan–Meier analysis. This survival benefit was observed for PDE5i (50% vs. 34%, log‐rank p = 0.029), ERA (58% vs. 34%, log‐rank p < 0.001), and the combination of PDE5i and/or ERA (51% vs. 22%, log‐rank p < 0.001), as well as any PAH‐targeting treatment (50% vs. 26%, log‐rank p = 0.007). Corresponding survival advantage was noted when including only PoPH patients with MELD Score ≥ 13. PoPH is a disease with significantly worse long‐term survival than other PAH subtypes, but targeted PAH therapy is associated with a robust survival benefit. Survival did not differ across high‐risk PVR and cardiac index thresholds, suggesting the factors that influence prognosis and survival in PoPH may be unique as compared to other PAH subtypes, and warrant further investigation.

Abstract Introduction Sex-based differences in morbidity and mortality for pulmonary hypertension (PH) are insufficiently addressed in current research. However, recognizing these differences is crucial for optimal clinical management and improving outcomes. This study assesses the effect of sex on survival among PH patients, while accounting for disease severity, comorbidities, treatment, and race. Methods We analyzed data from the PVRI GoDeep meta-registry, including all incident patients with complete hemodynamic profiles. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for various confounders. Analyses included both PAH and non-PAH groups and risk assessment by the ESC/ERS 2022, REVEAL lite 2, and COMPERA 4-strata scores. All analyses were performed using R (The R Foundation). Results A total of 19,663 incident PH patients were included in the analysis, with 5,581 patients (28%) diagnosed with Group 1 PH and a median age of 64 years [IQR: 52-73]. Among these, male patients (8,704, 44%) had a significantly higher mortality risk than female patients across the entire cohort and within all PH subtypes. The adjusted hazard ratio for mortality in male versus female patients was 1.391 [95% CI: 1.260-1.536] in the overall population and 1.404 [95% CI: 1.264-1.561] for those with PAH. This survival difference was consistent across various severity levels, age groups, and in the presence of comorbidities such as obesity and cardiovascular diseases, as well as among those receiving PAH-specific therapies as well as patients who remained without treatment during the observation period. Notably, male disadvantage in survival was observed in low, intermediate, and high-risk categories for ESC/ERS 2022, REVEAL lite 2, and COMPERA scores but not within REVEAL 2.0, which includes male sex as a non-modifiable risk factor. Racial analysis revealed a greater mortality risk for males among White patients, with no significant differences noted in Black or Asian populations. Conclusion Our PVRI GoDeep meta-registry analysis demonstrates that male PH patients face higher mortality risk across both PAH and non-PAH groups, independent of disease etiology, age, severity, comorbidities, and treatment factors, with this risk amplified in White patients. These findings suggest that male sex should be further considered as a risk factor to refine predictive models for survival in PH.

Abstract The diagnosis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) includes several advances, such as a broader recognition of extrapulmonary vascular organ system involvement, validated point-of-care clinical assessment tools, and focus on the early initiation of multiple pharmacotherapeutics in appropriate patients. Indeed, a principal goal in PAH today is an early diagnosis for prompt initiation of treatment to achieve a minimal symptom burden; optimize the patient’s biochemical, hemodynamic, and functional profile; and limit adverse events. To accomplish this end, clinicians must be familiar with novel risk factors and the revised hemodynamic definition for PAH. Fresh insights into the role of developmental biology (i.e., perinatal health) may also be useful for predicting incident PAH in early adulthood. Emergent or underused approaches to PAH management include a novel TGF-β ligand trap pharmacotherapy, remote pulmonary arterial pressure monitoring, next-generation imaging using inert gas–based magnetic resonance and other technologies, right atrial pacing, and pulmonary arterial denervation. These and other PAH state of the art advances are summarized here for the wider pulmonary medicine community.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is highly heterogeneous and despite treatment advances it remains a life‐shortening condition. There have been significant advances in imaging technologies, but despite evidence of their potential clinical utility, practice remains variable, dependent in part on imaging availability and expertise. This statement summarizes current and emerging imaging modalities and their potential role in the diagnosis and assessment of suspected PH. It also includes a review of commonly encountered clinical and radiological scenarios, and imaging and modeling‐based biomarkers. An expert panel was formed including clinicians, radiologists, imaging scientists, and computational modelers. Section editors generated a series of summary statements based on a review of the literature and professional experience and, following consensus review, a diagnostic algorithm and 55 statements were agreed. The diagnostic algorithm and summary statements emphasize the key role and added value of imaging in the diagnosis and assessment of PH and highlight areas requiring further research.

Background— Ambrisentan is a propanoic acid–based, A-selective endothelin receptor antagonist for the once-daily treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Methods and Results— Ambrisentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Efficacy Study 1 and 2 (ARIES-1 and ARIES-2) were concurrent, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that randomized 202 and 192 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, respectively, to placebo or ambrisentan (ARIES-1, 5 or 10 mg; ARIES-2, 2.5 or 5 mg) orally once daily for 12 weeks. The primary end point for each study was change in 6-minute walk distance from baseline to week 12. Clinical worsening, World Health Organization functional class, Short Form-36 Health Survey score, Borg dyspnea score, and B-type natriuretic peptide plasma concentrations also were assessed. In addition, a long-term extension study was performed. The 6-minute walk distance increased in all ambrisentan groups; mean placebo-corrected treatment effects were 31 m ( P =0.008) and 51 m ( P <0.001) in ARIES-1 for 5 and 10 mg ambrisentan, respectively, and 32 m ( P =0.022) and 59 m ( P <0.001) in ARIES-2 for 2.5 and 5 mg ambrisentan, respectively. Improvements in time to clinical worsening (ARIES-2), World Health Organization functional class (ARIES-1), Short Form-36 score (ARIES-2), Borg dyspnea score (both studies), and B-type natriuretic peptide (both studies) were observed. No patient treated with ambrisentan developed aminotransferase concentrations >3 times the upper limit of normal. In 280 patients completing 48 weeks of treatment with ambrisentan monotherapy, the improvement from baseline in 6-minute walk at 48 weeks was 39 m. Conclusions— Ambrisentan improves exercise capacity in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Improvements were observed for several secondary end points in each of the studies, although statistical significance was more variable. Ambrisentan is well tolerated and is associated with a low risk of aminotransferase abnormalities.