Citations

Importance Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women. Therapies for breast cancer are evolving rapidly, and several are associated with cardiovascular adverse effects, can exacerbate cardiovascular risk factors, or can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. Observations Advances in screening and treatment have led to earlier diagnosis and improved disease-free survival. For long-term survivors of breast cancer, cardiovascular adverse effects can pose a greater threat to overall long-term health than the cancer itself. Additionally, the increasing incidence of breast cancer in younger, premenopausal women has created a distinct demographic with unique medical needs. Conclusions and Relevance Cardiology practitioners need to remain updated on rapidly evolving breast cancer therapies to care for this growing, unique patient population. The field of cardio-oncology has evolved to address the cardiovascular needs of patients and survivors.

Importance The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has improved cancer outcomes but at the cost of adverse events, mainly related to the immune system. Cardiovascular (CV) toxic effects, and especially myocarditis, are of particular concern and are the subject of this position statement by the International Cardio-Oncology Society with representation of experts from oncology, hematology, and cardiology. Observations CV toxic effects of ICI therapies include inflammation-associated diseases, such as myocarditis, pericarditis, and vasculitis, as well as the aggravation of chronic inflammatory conditions, such as atherosclerosis with acute ischemic complications (myocardial infarction and stroke). Patients taking ICI therapies can also develop cardiac dysfunction, stress-induced cardiomyopathy (Takotsubo or apical ballooning syndrome), and heart failure without inflammatory cell infiltration of the myocardium. Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias can emerge in the setting of a systemic inflammatory milieu, myocarditis, or ischemia. Of all potential CV adverse effects, myocarditis remains of highest concern, although fatality rates have declined over time with a broadening spectrum of presentations ranging from troponin elevation of uncertain significance to smoldering, nonsevere, and severe or fulminant myocarditis. Conclusions and Relevance Concerns for myocarditis continue to dominate the spectrum of CV toxic effects in patients receiving ICI therapy. Recommendations for management vary according to severity. Multidisciplinary collaborations remain key for managing acute toxic effects and future cancer treatment decisions, including ICI rechallenge. Ischemic heart disease constitutes the main differential diagnosis in these patients, while pericarditis can be concomitantly present, and atrial and ventricular arrhythmias can also complicate the clinical picture. Several gaps in knowledge are identified and require further research.

Importance Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are associated with increased risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). The risk of sight-threatening complications associated with GLP-1 RAs is underexamined. Objective To investigate whether the use of GLP-1 RAs in patients with T2D is associated with the development of DR, NAION, or DR complications. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study of adults (aged ≥18 years) with T2D and a recent hemoglobin A 1c level of 6.5% or higher was conducted between January 1, 2015, and September 30, 2022, using the TriNetX database. The cohort was divided into 2 groups, adjusted for baseline characteristics through propensity score matching (PSM), based on whether the individuals received prescriptions for a GLP-1 RA. The statistical analysis was conducted on October 10, 2024. Exposures At least 2 prescriptions of a GLP-1 RA given 6 months apart. Main Outcomes and Measures Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the primary outcome: association between GLP-1 RAs and the risk of incident DR, NAION, or sight-threatening complications over a 2-year follow-up period. Results After PSM, 185 066 individuals (mean [SD] age, 59.0 [12.5] years; 93 389 females [50.5%]) were prescribed GLP-1 receptor agonists. Use of GLP-1 RAs was associated with an increased incidence of DR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11), while no statistically significant difference was observed in the risk of NAION (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.94-1.70). In a subgroup analysis of 32 695 patients with preexisting DR, GLP-1 RAs were not associated with progression to proliferative DR (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.97-1.15) or diabetic macular edema (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.95-1.01) but were associated with a lower occurrence of vitreous hemorrhages (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.68-0.80), neovascular glaucoma (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.88), or blindness (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.82). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of individuals with T2D, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a modestly increased risk of incident DR; however, fewer patients experienced sight-threatening DR complications, including blindness, even among those with preexisting DR. These findings suggest that all patients with T2D treated with GLP-1 RAs, regardless of preexisting DR, should be regularly screened and monitored for potential complications of T2D.

ImportanceAcute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer in the US and worldwide.ObjectivesTo assess the trends in PE-related mortality from 2011 to 2020 among US patients with cancer across age, sex, ethnic and racial groups, urbanicity, and regionality.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research data system to determine national trends in age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) due to acute PE among US patients with cancer aged 15 years or older from January 2011 to December 2020. Concomitant trends in cancer mortality and incidence that may have contributed to PE-related mortality were obtained from US Cancer Statistics. Data were analyzed from September to November 2024.ExposurePE-related mortality.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was PE-related deaths among individuals with cancer. AAMRs and cancer incidence were assessed using joinpoint regression modeling, expressed as an average annual percentage change (AAPC) with relative 95% CIs.ResultsFrom 2011 to 2020, a total of 27 280 194 individuals aged 15 years or older (13 897 519 male [50.9%]; 13 382 675 female [49.1%]) died in the US. The AAMR for PE-related mortality in patients with cancer increased during this time period (AAPC, 2.5%; 95% CI, 1.4% to 3.6%; P = .001), without differences between sexes (P for parallelism = .38). The AAMR increased among those aged 15 to 64 years (AAPC, 3.2%; 95% CI, 1.9% to 4.6%; P = .001), non-Hispanic and non-Latinx White individuals (AAPC, 2.7%; 95% CI, 1.52% to 3.94%; P = .001), non-Hispanic and non-Latinx Black or African American individuals (AAPC, 2.2%; 95% CI, 0.7% to 3.7%; P = .001), Hispanic and Latinx individuals (AAPC, 2.6%; 95% CI, 0.7% to 4.5%; P = .006), and among individuals residing in the Southern US (AAPC, 3.7%; 95% CI, 1.3% to 6.2%; P = .003). During the same period, age-adjusted cancer incidence and cancer-related mortality decreased while the absolute number of new cancer diagnoses and cancer-related deaths increased.Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study found that despite decreases in cancer-related mortality rates, age-adjusted PE-related mortality in US patients with cancer increased over the last decade; concerning trends included rising PE-related mortality in younger individuals aged 15 to 64 years, particular ethnic and racial groups, and the Southern region of the US. Recognition of such patterns may inform further research into thromboprophylaxis and treatment of PE as a complication of cancer and cancer-directed therapy.

ImportanceSystematic data on the association between anticancer therapies and thromboembolic events (TEEs) in patients with COVID-19 are lacking.ObjectiveTo assess the association between anticancer therapy exposure within 3 months prior to COVID-19 and TEEs following COVID-19 diagnosis in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients who were hospitalized and had active cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data were accrued from March 2020 to December 2021 and analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022.ExposureTreatments of interest (TOIs) (endocrine therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors/tyrosine kinase inhibitors [VEGFis/TKIs], immunomodulators [IMiDs], immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs], chemotherapy) vs reference (no systemic therapy) in 3 months prior to COVID-19.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMain outcomes were (1) venous thromboembolism (VTE) and (2) arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Secondary outcome was severity of COVID-19 (rates of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, 30-day all-cause mortality following TEEs in TOI vs reference group) at 30-day follow-up.ResultsOf 4988 hospitalized patients with cancer (median [IQR] age, 69 [59-78] years; 2608 [52%] male), 1869 had received 1 or more TOIs. Incidence of VTE was higher in all TOI groups: endocrine therapy, 7%; VEGFis/TKIs, 10%; IMiDs, 8%; ICIs, 12%; and chemotherapy, 10%, compared with patients not receiving systemic therapies (6%). In multivariable log-binomial regression analyses, relative risk of VTE (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69) but not ATE (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.16) was significantly higher in those exposed to all TOIs pooled together vs those with no exposure. Among individual drugs, ICIs were significantly associated with VTE (aRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01-2.07). Also noted were significant associations between VTE and active and progressing cancer (aRR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03), history of VTE (aRR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.38-4.04), and high-risk site of cancer (aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.75). Black patients had a higher risk of TEEs (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50) than White patients. Patients with TEEs had high intensive care unit admission (46%) and mechanical ventilation (31%) rates. Relative risk of death in patients with TEEs was higher in those exposed to TOIs vs not (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91-1.38) and was significantly associated with poor performance status (aRR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.30-2.40) and active/progressing cancer (aRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.13-2.13).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, relative risk of developing VTE was high among patients receiving TOIs and varied by the type of therapy, underlying risk factors, and demographics, such as race and ethnicity. These findings highlight the need for close monitoring and perhaps personalized thromboprophylaxis to prevent morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19–related thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

ImportanceCytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation.ObjectiveTo determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings.ExposuresImmunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm.ResultsThe median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79).Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701

Abstract The discipline of Cardio-Oncology has seen tremendous growth over the past decade. It is devoted to the cardiovascular (CV) care of the cancer patient, especially to the mitigation and management of CV complications or toxicities of cancer therapies, which can have profound implications on prognosis. To that effect, many studies have assessed CV toxicities in patients undergoing various types of cancer therapies; however, direct comparisons have proven difficult due to lack of uniformity in CV toxicity endpoints. Similarly, in clinical practice, there can be substantial differences in the understanding of what constitutes CV toxicity, which can lead to significant variation in patient management and outcomes. This document addresses these issues and provides consensus definitions for the most commonly reported CV toxicities, including cardiomyopathy/heart failure and myocarditis, vascular toxicity, and hypertension, as well as arrhythmias and QTc prolongation. The current document reflects a harmonizing review of the current landscape in CV toxicities and the definitions used to define these. This consensus effort aims to provide a structure for definitions of CV toxicity in the clinic and for future research. It will be important to link the definitions outlined herein to outcomes in clinical practice and CV endpoints in clinical trials. It should facilitate communication across various disciplines to improve clinical outcomes for cancer patients with CV diseases.

12081 Background: Young women with breast cancer may be at increased risk for premature development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in part due to their cancer treatment. Limited data are available on CVD risk among young breast cancer survivors. Methods: Women aged 30-40 years at diagnosis with stage 0-III breast cancer enrolled in a prospective cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer at ≤40 were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. Data were obtained from serial surveys and electronic medical records at breast cancer diagnosis and 5-year follow-up. We calculated “excess heart age,” which incorporates a CVD risk-based score (calculated using age, systolic blood pressure, blood pressure medication, diabetes, smoking, body mass index) to estimate the difference in years between an individual’s chronological age and their CVD-risk adjusted age. Multivariable logistic regression models (adjusting for age at diagnosis, stage, and race) were fitted to evaluate associations between treatment (radiation, endocrine therapy, anthracyclines, and trastuzumab) and having a change in excess heart age ≥2 years from baseline to 5 years. Results: Among 372 young breast cancer survivors, mean age at diagnosis was 36.6 (SD 2.89), 93% were white, and 79% were diagnosed with stage I or II breast cancer. Mean excess heart age was.32 (SD: 6.16) years at baseline, which declined to -.07 (SD 6.64) at 5-year follow-up (p=.17). At 5 years, 31% (n=114) of women experienced an increase of at least 2 years in their excess heart age since diagnosis, and their mean excess heart age was 4.34 years (range -9 to 30). In multivariable analyses, receipt of trastuzumab was associated with higher odds (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.02-2.77) of experiencing an increase of ≥2 years in excess heart age between diagnosis and 5 years of follow-up. Endocrine therapy, anthracyclines, and radiation were not significantly associated with a change in excess heart age of ≥2 years at 5 years post-diagnosis. Conclusions: At 5 years post-diagnosis, approximately 1/3 of young breast cancer survivors experienced a change from baseline in their excess heart age of ≥2 years. Further research is warranted to confirm findings regarding trastuzumab and excess heart age, and potential effects on longer-term cardiac outcomes in this population. Extended follow-up of this cohort may further quantify CVD risk over time.[Table: see text]