Citations

631 Background: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) women with breast cancer who have not completed their desired childbearing pre-diagnosis may be more likely to decline adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) and/or to temporarily or permanently stop ET to pursue pregnancy. Fertility counseling and use of fertility preservation strategies (e.g., oocyte/embryo cryopreservation) might impact these decisions. Methods: In the Valuing Opinions and Insights from Cancer Experiences (VOICE) Study, we investigated whether use of fertility preservation strategies were associated with ET initiation and early discontinuation amongst AYAs with fertility concerns. Eligible females were diagnosed with stage 1–3 estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer at age 15-39 during 2013-2022 and responded to a survey in 2023-2024. Those who reported that they had not completed their desired family size or had been unsure about having completed their desired family size at the time of their cancer diagnosis were categorized as having had fertility concerns. ET initiation was defined as 2+ ET prescription fills within 18 months after diagnosis. Among ET initiators, we assessed early discontinuation (defined as lack of ET prescription fill over any 180 day period until 5 years after their first ET fill date). Due to inadequate power, we did not model the relationship between oocyte/embryo cryopreservation and ET initiation. However, we did have power to assess the association between oocyte/embryo cryopreservation and ET discontinuation using multivariable Cox regression to calculate Hazard Ratios (HR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). HRs for discontinuation were adjusted for age at diagnosis, stage, study site, diagnosis year, income, and children before diagnosis (yes/no). Results: Among 518 AYA breast cancer survivors, 56% (N = 290) had fertility concerns at diagnosis. Of these 290, 41% had 1+ child before diagnosis, 90% received fertility counseling, 27% froze eggs or embryos, and 10% had 1+ child after diagnosis. The majority (89%) initiated ET. Among the 32 who did not initiate ET, 7 (22%) reported that fertility concerns impacted that decision. Oocyte/embryo cryopreservation was used by 26% of ET initiators and 34% of ET non-initiators. Among the 258 ET initiators, 89 (35%) discontinued ET early. Compared to those who did not use fertility preservation strategies, patients who froze oocytes/embryos were more likely to discontinue ET (HR 1.89; 95% CI 1.18–3.05). Among those who discontinued ET, 19% had 1+ child after diagnosis (compared to 2% among those who did not discontinue ET). Conclusions: This study confirmed prior studies showing that many AYAs with breast cancer have fertility concerns, and these concerns may impact decisions about ET. In our analysis, those who cryopreserved oocytes/embryos were more likely to discontinue ET early, and a higher proportion who discontinued ET had 1+ live birth after breast cancer.

1564 Background: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) females with early-stage ER-negative and/or HER2-positive breast cancer commonly receive chemotherapy to reduce risk of recurrence. Fertility concerns, counseling, and preservation may influence chemotherapy decisions and time to chemotherapy (TTC) initiation. Methods: We surveyed AYA survivors of stage I–III premenopausal ER-negative and/or HER2-positive breast cancer treated at Kaiser Permanente Northern and Southern California (2013-2022). Fertility concerns were defined as not having completed desired family size or being unsure about having completed desired family size at diagnosis. We summarized receipt of fertility counseling, receipt of chemotherapy, and use of oocyte/embryo cryopreservation for fertility preservation (FP). Among fertility-concerned patients who received chemotherapy, TTC (days from diagnosis) was assessed separately for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) vs for adjuvant chemotherapy (AdjC). Time to NAC was natural log–transformed and modeled with multivariable log-linear regression to estimate relative differences in TTC, adjusting for stage, study site, ER, HER2, age, and diagnosis year. Results: Of 363 respondents, 197 (54%) had fertility concerns at diagnosis; 183/197 (93%) received chemotherapy, similar to 153/166 (92%) among those without concerns (p=0.7). Of the concerned chemotherapy recipients, 45 (25%) saw a fertility specialist but did not pursue FP while 55 (30%) underwent FP. For the 112 fertility-concerned NAC recipients, FP was associated with longer TTC than no fertility specialist counseling (mean=41 vs. 30 days; adjusted ratio=1.39; 95% CI 1.15–1.69), whereas fertility specialist counseling without FP was not (mean= 31 vs. 30 days, adjusted ratio=1.04; 95% CI 0.86–1.25). For the 71 fertility-concerned AdjC recipients, TTC was similar for patients who did not see a fertility specialist (mean=63 days), those who froze oocytes/embryos (mean=65 days), and those who saw a fertility specialist but did not pursue FP (mean=69 days). Conclusions: In this AYA breast cancer cohort, there was no evidence that fertility concerns led patients to decline chemotherapy. FP was associated with a modest delay in NAC initiation (<2 weeks on average). Time to chemotherapy (TTC) among 183 AYA patients with ER− and/or HER2+ breast cancer and fertility concerns. Fertility-focused care N (n=183) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n=112) Mean TTC, days Relative difference in TTC, adjusted ratio (95%CI) Adjuvant chemotherapy (n=71) Mean TTC, days No fertility counseling from a specialist 83 (45%) 55 (49%) 29.6 Reference 28 (39%) 62.6 Received fertility counseling from a specialist No fertility preservation 45 (25%) 28 (25%) 30.7 1.04 (0.86,1.25) 17 (24%) 68.6 Fertility preservation 55 (30%) 29 (26%) 41.2 1.39 (1.15,1.69) 26 (37%) 64.6

Abstract Rationale Low-sodium oxybate (LXB; Xywav®) is FDA approved for treatment of cataplexy and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in people ≥7 years of age with narcolepsy, and for idiopathic hypersomnia in adults. LXB Prescribing Information includes a Warning and Precaution for respiratory depression and sleep-disordered breathing; therefore, data on safety of LXB in people with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA; a common comorbidity among people with narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia) are needed. This post hoc analysis of DUET (Develop hypersomnia Understanding by Evaluating low-sodium oxybate Treatment; NCT05875974), a prospective, open-label phase 4 study, evaluated respiratory parameters in participants taking LXB with or without comorbid OSA, in 3 cohorts: narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia (LXB ≤9 g/night), or narcolepsy (LXB &gt;9 g/night). Methods Participants underwent the following study periods: screening, 8-day baseline (BL; off-LXB for narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia cohorts; on-LXB 9 g/night for &gt;9 g cohort), 2-8-week dose titration, 2-week stable-dose, 8-day end-of-treatment (EOT; on optimized total nightly dosage; ≤12 g for the &gt;9 g cohort), and 2-week safety follow-up. Participants with BL apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) &gt;10 (treated/untreated OSA) were excluded from the study. Overnight polysomnography assessments conducted at BL and EOT included respiratory parameters: AHI, central apnea index (CAI), and percentage of total sleep time spent with oxygen saturation (SpO2) &lt;90% (T90). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed by OSA group. Least squares mean changes were adjusted for BL values. Results Fifty-five participants enrolled in the narcolepsy cohort, 9% (5/55) had comorbid OSA; 22% (10/46) and 31% (15/48) had comorbid OSA in the idiopathic hypersomnia and narcolepsy &gt;9 g cohorts, respectively (3, 9, and 12 were on OSA treatment throughout the study). Most participants (narcolepsy, idiopathic hypersomnia, narcolepsy &gt;9 g) were female (72.7%, 80.4%, 62.5%) and White (80.0%, 84.8%, 77.1%). No worsening of sleep-disordered breathing was observed during LXB treatment, as evidenced by respiratory parameters AHI, CAI, and T90 assessed at BL and EOT in either participants with or without OSA (Table 1). Percentages of participants with/without OSA reporting ≥1 TEAE were 60.0%/62.0% (narcolepsy), 80.0%/72.2% (idiopathic hypersomnia), and 66.7%/78.8% (narcolepsy &gt;9 g). Most TEAEs were mild or moderate; 1 serious TEAE each occurred in the idiopathic hypersomnia cohort (with OSA) and the narcolepsy &gt;9 g cohort (without OSA). Conclusions No worsening respiratory signals were observed with LXB treatment in participants with or without comorbid (mild or treated) OSA in the narcolepsy, idiopathic hypersomnia, or narcolepsy taking &gt;9 g LXB dosage cohorts. This abstract is funded by: Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Abstract Introduction Low-sodium oxybate (LXB; Xywav®), the only FDA-approved treatment for idiopathic hypersomnia in adults, was evaluated in the phase 4, open-label DUET study (NCT05875974). This post-hoc analysis evaluated subgroups of participants with idiopathic hypersomnia stratified by patient-reported ideal nighttime sleep duration (with [&gt;9 hours] and without [≤9 hours] long sleep need [LSN]), based on Idiopathic Hypersomnia Severity Scale (IHSS) Item 1. Methods DUET included screening, 8-day baseline (BL), 2−8-week LXB dose titration/optimization, 2-week stable-dose, 8-day end-of-treatment (EOT), and 2-week safety follow-up periods. Outcomes were Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), IHSS, polysomnographic total sleep time (TST), and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) and Change (PGI-C). Least squares mean (LSM) changes (BL-to-EOT) were BL-adjusted; P values are nominal. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed by subgroup. Results Of 46 enrolled participants with idiopathic hypersomnia, 45 had BL IHSS data; 24 reported LSN (&gt;9 hours) and 21 reported no LSN (≤9 hours). Most (LSN/without LSN) were female (100%/61.9%) and White (91.7%/76.2%), with mean±SD age 36.8±11.1/38.6±12.1 years; 20/24 and 19/21 completed the study. BL mean±SE (LSN/without LSN) ESS scores were 16.8±0.5/16.1±0.7; LSM changes (95% CI): LSN −9.5 (−11.5, −7.6; P&lt; 0.0001; n=20), without LSN −7.4 (−9.4, −5.4; P&lt; 0.0001; n=19). BL mean±SE (LSN/without LSN) IHSS total scores were 35.7±1.3/30.5±1.8; LSM changes (95% CI): LSN −18.3 (−22.4, −14.1; P&lt; 0.0001; n=19), without LSN −12.5 (−16.9, −8.0; P&lt; 0.0001; n=17). BL mean±SE (LSN/without LSN) IHSS long sleep/sleep inertia component scores were 12.5±0.6/9.2±0.6; LSM changes (95% CI): LSN −5.5 (−6.8, −4.1; P&lt; 0.0001; n=19), without LSN −4.0 (−5.4, −2.5; P&lt; 0.0001; n=17). BL mean±SE (LSN/without LSN) polysomnographic TSTs were 490.0±26.0/442.7± 24.7 minutes; LSM changes (95% CI): LSN −53.1 (−92.5, −13.7; P=0.0097; n=20), without LSN −59.4 (−99.8, −18.9; P=0.0052; n=19). On the PGI-C, most participants (LSN/without LSN) endorsed improved overall disease (100%/88.2%; n=19/n=17) at EOT. TEAEs were reported in 79.2% (LSN) and 66.7% (without LSN); most (LSN/without LSN) were mild (45.8%/42.9%) or moderate (33.3%/23.8%) in severity; 1 (without LSN) was serious (unrelated to study drug). Conclusion Participants with or without LSN (&gt;9 hours or ≤9 hours, respectively) taking LXB showed improvements in multiple idiopathic hypersomnia symptoms and reduced TST. Support (if any) Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Abstract Introduction Jazz DUET (Develop hypersomnia Understanding by Evaluating low-sodium oxybate Treatment; NCT05875974) was the first study to evaluate effectiveness/safety of low-sodium oxybate (LXB; Xywav®) &gt;9 g/night (outside the recommended range: 6–9 g/night). This analysis evaluated changes in patient-reported hypersomnolence measures in participants with narcolepsy taking LXB &gt;9 g/night compared with LXB 9 g/night. Methods DUET was a phase 4, prospective, open-label study with screening, 8-day LXB 9 g/night (9g-baseline), titration/optimization, stable-dose, and 8-day end-of-treatment (EOT) optimized LXB &gt;9 g/night (up to 12g; &gt;9g-EOT) periods. Patient-reported measures included Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), electronic sleep diaries (completed daily during 9g-baseline and &gt;9g-EOT; subjective total sleep time [TST], number of awakenings, sleep efficiency [TST divided by time in bed], sleep quality [5-point scale; “very good” to “very poor”], and how rested/refreshed the participant felt upon awakening [5-point scale; “very well” to “not at all”]), Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS; administered 90 minutes post-polysomnography awakening at 9g-baseline and &gt;9g-EOT), and Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire-10 (FOSQ-10). LSM differences (95% CI) from 9g-baseline to &gt;9g-EOT (nominal P-values) were 9g-baseline-adjusted. Results Forty-eight participants took LXB &gt;9g (mean±SD age: 39.2±10.9 years; 62.5% female). Total stable-dose LXB (mean±SD) was 11.1±1.0 g/night (n=45). From 9g-baseline to &gt;9g-EOT, ESS scores improved (LSM [95% CI]: –3.1 [–4.2, –1.9]; P&lt; 0.0001; n=44), nocturnal TST increased (0.3h [0.1, 0.4]; P=0.0163; n=26), sleep efficiency increased (3.8% [1.7, 5.9]; P=0.0011; n=26), and number of awakenings remained stable (–0.2 [–0.7, 0.3]; P=0.3959; n=26). Percentage of participants rating sleep quality as “very good”/”good” increased from 26.9% (9g-baseline) to 61.5% (&gt;9g-EOT), as did rested sleep (“very well”/”well”/”somewhat” rested) from 57.7% to 69.2%, respectively. From 9g-baseline to &gt;9g-EOT, KSS scores decreased (–0.9 [–1.4, –0.4]; P=0.0004; n=39); FOSQ-10 scores also increased (1.3 [0.5, 2.0]; P=0.0014; n=40). Of 48 participants, 36 (75.0%) experienced ≥1 TEAE (mostly mild/moderate and 1 serious [syncope, unrelated to treatment]). No changes in respiratory polysomnography measures were observed. Conclusion Participants with narcolepsy who optimized to LXB &gt;9 g/night, relative to 9 g/night, reported increased sleep quality and restfulness that paralleled improvements in daytime sleepiness and daytime functioning. TEAEs were consistent with those at lower dosages. Support (if any) Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Abstract Introduction People with idiopathic hypersomnia often experience sleep inertia, characterized by profound difficulty waking up with grogginess, disorientation, and cognitive impairment immediately after awakening. This post-hoc analysis of the DUET study (NCT05875974) evaluated objective and subjective sleep inertia in participants with idiopathic hypersomnia taking low-sodium oxybate (LXB; Xywav®) stratified by patient-reported ideal nighttime sleep duration (with [&gt;9h] and without [≤9h] long sleep need [LSN]), based on Idiopathic Hypersomnia Severity Scale (IHSS) item 1. Methods DUET was a phase 4, prospective, open-label study of LXB with baseline (BL), titration/optimization, stable-dose, and end-of-treatment (EOT) periods. Exploratory outcomes included Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT; objective performance impairment) and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS; subjective sleepiness), administered BL and EOT, in the morning after overnight polysomnogram. The 10-minute PVT was completed at 10, 40, and 90 minutes after awakening. The KSS, a single-item, 9-point scale, was completed upon awakening and immediately before/after PVT assessments. Separate nonlinear, mixed-effects regression models were applied to PVT lapses and KSS ratings to estimate objective and subjective sleep inertia magnitudes, respectively, in LSN subgroups, along with sleep inertia dissipation time constants for the overall cohort. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. Results Of 46 enrolled participants with idiopathic hypersomnia, 45 had BL IHSS data; 24 reported LSN and 21 reported no LSN. Most (with/without LSN) were female (100.0%/61.9%) and White (91.7%/76.2%); 20/24 and 19/21 completed the study. Based on PVT lapses, objective sleep inertia ±SE (with/without LSN) at BL was 17.0±4.2/4.2±2.8, and at EOT was 0.0±na/2.0±0.9 (BL-to-EOT changes [95% CI]: −17.0 [−25.5, −8.5] and −2.2 [−6.9, 2.5]). Based on KSS, subjective sleep inertia ±SE (with/without LSN) at BL was 6.5±0.3/5.1±0.5, and at EOT was 0.81±0.5/1.5±0.6 (BL-to-EOT changes [95% CI]: −5.7 [−6.7, −4.7] and −3.5 [−4.5, −2.6]). Sleep inertia dissipation time constants ±SE were 2.7±1.1h (PVT) and 13.9±3.8h (KSS). TEAEs were consistent with the known LXB safety profile. Conclusion Participants with idiopathic hypersomnia experienced subjective and objective sleep inertia at BL, with prolonged dissipation after awakening. Objective BL sleep inertia was particularly severe in participants with LSN (&gt;9h). After LXB treatment, notable improvements in objective and subjective sleep inertia were observed for both subgroups. Support (if any) Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Abstract Introduction Sleep inertia (characterized by profound difficulty waking up with grogginess, disorientation, and cognitive impairment immediately after awakening) is a core idiopathic hypersomnia symptom and may also be experienced by individuals with narcolepsy. Sleep inertia in individuals with narcolepsy is not well studied. This post-hoc analysis of the DUET study (NCT05875974) evaluated sleep inertia in narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and narcolepsy type 2 (NT2) subgroups of the DUET narcolepsy cohort. Methods DUET was a phase 4, prospective, open-label study with baseline (BL), titration/optimization, stable-dose, and end-of-treatment (EOT) periods. Exploratory outcomes included Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT; objective performance impairment) and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS; subjective sleepiness); both administered at BL and EOT, in the morning after overnight polysomnogram. The 10-minute PVT was completed at 10, 40, and 90 minutes after awakening. The KSS, a single-item, 9-point scale, was completed upon awakening and immediately before and after the PVT assessments. Separate nonlinear, mixed-effects regression models were applied to PVT lapses and KSS ratings to estimate objective and subjective sleep inertia magnitudes, respectively, for NT1 and NT2, along with sleep inertia dissipation time constants for the overall cohort. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. Results Of 55 enrolled participants with narcolepsy, 26 and 29 had NT1 and NT2, respectively. Most (NT1/NT2) were female (73.1%/72.4%) and White (73.1%/86.2%); 16/26 and 18/29 completed the study. Based on PVT lapses, objective sleep inertia ±SE (NT1/NT2) at BL was 33.1±6.2/14.9±3.2, and at EOT was 8.3±1.7/3.2±1.1 (BL-to-EOT changes [95% CI]: −24.8 [−35.5, −14.1] and −11.8 [−17.4, −6.1]). Based on KSS ratings, subjective sleep inertia ±SE (NT1/NT2) at BL was 1.1±0.6/1.1±0.5, and at EOT was 0.8±0.5/1.3±0.5 (BL-to-EOT changes [95% CI]: −0.3 [−1.9, 1.2] and 0.2 [−1.3, 1.6]). Sleep inertia dissipation time constants ±SE were 1.6±0.3h (PVT) and 0.4±0.1h (KSS) for the overall cohort. TEAEs were consistent with the known LXB safety profile. Conclusion Participants with narcolepsy, especially NT1, demonstrated objective sleep inertia at BL. Participants with NT1 or NT2 showed substantial improvements in objective sleep inertia with LXB treatment. Support (if any) Jazz Pharmaceuticals