Citations

Abstract Background The functional significance of the left ventricular (LV) hypercontractile phenotype (HP) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains unclear. Purpose To assess the systemic and coronary hemodynamic correlates of HP in HCM. Methods We enrolled 1533 HCM patients (age 51 ± 15 years, 965 males, 63%) with ejection fraction (EF) ≥50%, referred for rest transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in 27 laboratories from 13 countries. Two-dimensional volumetric TTE assessment included LV outflow tract gradient (LVOTG), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), EF, and LV force (systolic blood pressure + LVOTG/ESV, mmHg/mL). Coronary flow velocity in the mid-distal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery was assessed in 325 patients. HP was defined as the highest quartile of the force (> 7.32 mmHg/ml). Results Force was moderately related to EF (r = 0.48, p < 0.0001) and weakly to LVOTG (r = 0.36, p < 0.0001). Compared to non-HP patients, HP showed higher heart rate (72 ± 14 vs 67 ± 14 beats per minute, p <0.0001), lower stroke volume (50 ± 22 vs 67 ± 22 ml, p < 0.0001), larger left atrial volume index (44 ± 16 vs 40 ± 16 ml/m2, p = 0.011) and higher coronary flow velocity in the LAD (n = 325, 41 ± 12 vs 37 ± 14 cm/s, p = 0.021), see Figure. Abnormal B-lines (≥ 2) were present in 11 of the 39 HP compared to 39 of the 271 non-HP patients (28% vs 14 %, p = 0.05). E/e’ ratio was higher in HP (n = 59) vs. non-HP (n = 571) patients (11 ± 5.4 vs 9.6 ± 4.2, p = 0.018). Conclusion In patients with HCM, preserved EF, and no history of coronary artery disease, HP identified by resting TTE with supernormal LV force was associated with an unfavorable systemic hemodynamic and coronary flow profile. Compared to non-HP HCM patients, the HP was characterized by reduced stroke volume, impaired diastolic function, and increased resting coronary flow velocity. HP may reflect inefficient myocardial mechanics, with disproportionate energy expenditure mirrored by higher resting coronary flow despite reduced stroke volume generation, ultimately contributing to adverse remodeling and worse prognosisNon-HP vs HP LAVI and coronary LAD flow

Abstract Background The presence of the significant left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) changes clinical symptoms, prognosis and treatment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy enabling the classification into its obstructive (HOCM) and non-obstructive form (non-HOCM). However, the more detailed functional characteristics and comparison of these forms remains poorly known. Purpose To compare the demographic, clinical and echocardiographic features between non-HOCM (defined as LVOTG < 30 mmHg) and HOCM patients enrolled into multi-centred study in years 1996-2024 as well as to analyse their long –term prognosis in relation to registered LVOTG. Methods We enrolled 1533 HCM patients (age 51 ± 15 years, 965 males, 63%) with ejection fraction (EF) ≥50%, referred for rest transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in 27 centers, nevertheless quantitative assessment of LVOTG was available in 1252 patients. Survival analysis was performed in a subset of 1200 patients with follow-up information. Beyond standard TTE, the number of B-lines, the maximal diastolic velocity of coronary flow in left anterior descending artery (LAD) as well as left ventricular force defined as the ratio of systolic blood pressure plus LVOTG divided by left ventricular end-systolic volume was assessed with specification of hypercontractile phenotype (HP) as the highest force quartile. Additionally age and sex matched control group was included. Results Compared to non-HOCM patients, HOCM showed a bit higher body mass index (27 ± 4 vs 26 ± 4 kg/m2, p = 0.001), were often burdened with diabetes and hypertension, presented more advanced NYHA class and higher risk of SCD, see Table. In the echocardiographic assessment HOCM presented lower end-systolic left ventricular volume (LV ESV: 27 ± 14 vs 29 ± 13 ml, p = 0.014) although maintained equal stroke volume and even higher ejection fraction (EF: 69 ± 8% vs 67 ± 7%, p < 0.001), cardiac output (CO: 4.3 ± 1.7 vs 4.0 ± 1.4 l/min, p < 0.001) and force in comparison to counterparts without LVOTG. This high-contractility performance was however sustained at the cost of larger left atrium volume index (LAVI: 49 ± 19 vs 40 ± 15 ml/m2, p < 0.001), higher coronary flow velocity (43 ± 12 vs 27 ± 13 cm/s, p < 0.001) as well as more frequent B-lines in the lung assessment. During a median follow-up of 87 months (interquartile range 45 – 143 months), 131 all-cause deaths occurred and not only patients with HOCM but also those with HP showed the worse long-term survival, see Figure. Conclusion HOCM remains the form of HCM burdened with more overt clinical symptoms, signs and prognosis. On the other hand LVOTG seems to be important but not always necessary element of this presentation, which seems to be related even more tightly to general hypercontractility phenotype reflected by higher force and resting coronary flow.Table.Non-HOCM vs HOCM comparison Figure.Force and LVOTG prognostic value

Abstract Aims Our aim was to assess the clinical and prognostic significance of the left ventricular (LV) hypercontractile phenotype (HP) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), which until now remains unclear. Methods and results We enrolled 1533 HCM patients (age 51 ± 15 years, 965 males, 63%) with ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50%, referred for rest transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in 27 laboratories from 13 countries. Two-dimensional volumetric TTE assessment included LV outflow tract gradient (LVOTG), LV EF, and LV force (systolic blood pressure + LVOTG/ESV, mmHg/mL). HP was defined as the highest quartile of the force (> 7.32 mmHg/mL). Survival analysis was performed in a subset of 1200 patients with follow-up information. Compared with non-HP patients, HP showed higher heart rate (72 ± 14 vs. 67 ± 14 beats per minute, P < 0.001), lower stroke volume (50 ± 22 vs. 67 ± 22 mL, P < 0.001), larger left atrial volume index (44 ± 16 vs. 40 ± 16 mL/m2, P = 0.011) and higher coronary flow velocity in the mid-distal left anterior descending artery (n = 325, 41 ± 12 vs. 37 ± 14 cm/s, P = 0.021). Force was moderately related to LV EF (r = 0.48, P < 0.001) and weakly to LVOTG (r = 0.36, P < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 87 months (interquartile range 45–143 months), 131 all-cause deaths occurred. At multivariable Cox analysis, a force > 7.32 mmHg (the fourth quartile for analyzed patients) was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.44 (95% Confidence intervals 1.00–2.07) for all-cause death, independently of LVOTG and LV EF. Conclusion HP in HCM is associated with a disadvantageous systemic, cardiac and coronary hemodynamic profile as well as lower survival in the long-term.

Over the past decade, stress echocardiography has evolved from a test for assessing epicardial artery stenosis to a comprehensive functional test, targeting multiple cardiovascular parameters. The new approach includes several structured steps: (a) evaluating regional wall motion abnormalities to detect epicardial artery stenosis or vasospasm; (b) assessing pulmonary congestion and diastolic function via B-lines with lung ultrasound; (c) gauging preload and contractile reserve with volumetric echocardiography; (d) measuring coronary microvascular reserve using Doppler-based coronary flow velocity in the middistal left anterior descending artery; and (e) determining cardiac sympathetic reserve by tracking heart rate reserve on an ECG. This evolution was supported extensively by the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI), which played a key role in five areas: (1) developing the initial, curiosity-driven project; (2) disseminating protocols and results at national and international conferences, supporting logistic infrastructure and publication expenses; (3) establishing a digital platform (customized Redcap) for data entry and storage; (4) facilitating patient recruitment across 19 Italian centers; and (5) offering formal endorsement through six presidencies, adding credibility and reach beyond any single institution. The protocol quickly advanced from concept to high-impact publications, earning inclusion in 2024 specialty guidelines. Initially Italian-led, the study now includes 50 centers across 20 countries (e.g. USA and China). Beyond the 50 peer-reviewed papers published in 2016–2024, this study offers a novel, sustainable approach to cardiac stress testing, providing more information at lower costs, with zero radiation and minimal environmental impact. SIECVI’s endorsement was instrumental in amplifying the study’s rigor and outreach.

Abstract Background The left ventricular (LV) hypercontractile phenotype (HP) plays a critical role in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and is usually identified with the left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG). Purpose To assess the systemic and coronary hemodynamic profile associated with HP identified with increased LV elastance (also known as force) at rest in patients with HCM. Methods We enrolled 1248 HCM patients (age 50 ± 15 years, 798 males, 64%) with ejection fraction (EF) ≥50%, referred for rest transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in 14 quality-controlled sites from 7 countries TTE assessment included LVOTG, EF, and LV force (systolic blood pressure + LVOTG/LV end-systolic volume, mmHg/mL). Volumetric echocardiography with Simpson’s method was used to measure EF from end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), arterial elastance (AE) and ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC). We also assessed resting peak diastolic coronary flow velocity (D-CFV) in the mid-distal left anterior descending artery in a subset of 275 patients. Results EF equaled 68 ± 7%, force = 6.8 ± 5.3 mmHg/ml and LVOTG = 22 ± 28 mmHg. HP was identified as the highest quartile of force (> 7.85 mmHg/ml, mean value= 13.3 ± 7.0). HP showed the lowest SV (46 ± 18 ml) and EDV (61 ± 20 ml), with the highest AE (3.19 ± 1.35 mmHg/ml) and VAC (3.46 ± 1.59) compared to other quartiles (p<0.001) ( see Picture) . D-CFV was not higher in patients with HP (n = 65) compared to those (n = 210) without HP (41± 11 vs 38 ± 14 cm/s, p=ns, but higher in comparison to joint first and second Force quartile (n=122) vs 37 ±14 p =0.0472). Table displays the demografic, clinical and TTE parameters related to HP (Table). In multivariate logistic analysis 4 independent predictors of HP were identified: SBP >130 mmHg with OR 2.5, female sex with OR 5.4, LV EF >70% with OR 6.1 and LVOTG >30 mmHg with the highest OR = 6.3. Conclusion: HCM patients with HP exhibit a distinctive systemic hemodynamic and coronary physiology profile, characterized by low SV, high VAC, and supranormal baseline D-CFV compared to non-HP patients. These findings suggest reduced cardiovascular efficiency and increased myocardial oxygen demand, possibly detrimental over time.

Abstract Background Guidelines recognize the role of exercise stress testing in evaluating functional capacity in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS). The study aimed to identify the prognostic role of exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) in asymptomatic severe AS. Methods We enrolled 153 asymptomatic patients (70±13 years; 88 male, 57%) with severe AS, aortic valve area (AVA) <1.0 cm2, mean aortic gradient ≥ 40 mmHg, ejection fraction (EF) ≥55%. All were referred for ESE in 7 quality-controlled centers from 5 countries. Rest and ESE assessment also included global longitudinal strain (GLS) and left atrial volume index (LAVI). B-lines were assessed by LUS with the 4-site simplified scan of the third intercostal space. A 4-point ESE score was based on 4 parameters (0 for normal, 1 for abnormal), with the following pre-determined cutoffs of abnormality: ∆-maximal aortic gradient (MAG) ≥20 mmHg; GLS at peak ≤ 19%, according to receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, stress B-lines ≥2; stress LAVI ≥ 34 mL/m2. Follow-up was completed in 142/153 patients (92%). Results At rest, AVA was 0.85±0.14 cm2, maximal aortic gradient: 79±14 mmHg, and peak aortic velocity: 4.42 ± 0.41 m/s. Mean EF at rest: 63.4±5.3% During a median follow-up of 1802 days (IQ range 651-2302), 41 events occurred in 39 patients: 15 all-cause deaths, 17 acute HF, 1 stroke, 1 myocardial infarction, and 7 coronary revascularization. Patients experiencing events displayed a greater increase in MAG during peak ESE, more B-lines with exercise, greater degree of LAVI dilation with exercise and slightly lower GLS compared to those without events (Table). Increase in ESE score was associated with a significant rise (p=0.001) in event incidence from score 0 (n=0/13, 0%) to score 1 (n=2/21, 9.5%), score 2 (n=10/42, 23.8%), and ≥3 (n=27/66, 40.9%), see figure. Conclusions In asymptomatic severe AS cases with preserved LV EF, comprehensive ESE provides early marker of potential cardiac decompensation at follow-up. The composite ESE index, including MAG, GLS, LAVI, and B-lines, holds promise as a prognostic predictor.TableFigure

Abstract Background Guidelines recognize the role of exercise stress testing in evaluating functional capacity in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS). Exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) allows the detection of pulmonary congestion with B-lines by lung ultrasound (LUS). Aim To identify the prevalence, determinants, and functional correlates of B-lines during ESE in asymptomatic severe AS. Methods We enrolled 35 asymptomatic patients (age= 69±16 years, 69% male) with severe AS, aortic valve area (AVA) <0.6 cm2/m2, mean aortic gradient (MAG) ≥ 40 mmHg, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥55%. All patients were referred for ESE (treadmill in 1, bicycle in 34 patients) in 7 experienced centers from 4 countries between 2021-2022. ESE assessment at rest and peak stress included global longitudinal strain (GLS), left atrial volume index (LAVI) and cardiac output (CO). B-lines were assessed by simplified LUS from 4 lung zones across the third intercostal space (2 on each side). Heart rate reserve (HRR) was measured as the peak/rest heart rate. CO reserve was calculated as the difference between peak stress CO and rest CO. Results B-lines (≥2) were present in 2 patients at rest and in 15 patients during ESE (6% vs 43%, p<0.001). When compared to patients without B-lines during ESE (Group 1, n=20), patients with B-lines during ESE (Group 2, n=15) were older (Group 1= 64±18 vs Group 2=75±8 years, p=0.030) had larger LAVI, higher logNT-pro-BNP and a trend to higher systolic pulmonary artery pressures (SPAP), see Table. The 2 groups showed similar values of resting AVA (Group 1= 0.52±0.11 vs Group 2=0.47±0.15 cm2/m2, p=0.311), stress AVA (Group 1= 0.45±0.09 vs Group 2=0.49±0.13 cm2/m2, p=0.663), resting MAG (Group 1= 45±15 vs Group 2=46±10 mm Hg, p=0.491), and stress MAG (Group 1= 59±19 vs Group 2=58±11 mm Hg, p=0.665). Patients with B-lines during ESE showed lower HRR and CO reserve, with a trend towards lower peak GLS, see Table. Conclusions Exercise-induced pulmonary congestion as evidenced by development of sonographic B- lines on LUS were present commonly (43%) among patients with "asymptomatic" severe AS undergoing ESE. Patients with exercise-induced B-lines have larger resting LAVI, higher NT-pro-BNP levels, lower CO reserve, and blunted HRR. Exercise-induced B-lines might provide an early sign of cardiac decompensation in "asymptomatic" patients with severe AS, which is an important factor to consider in the decision to intervene.TableFigure

Background: Left atrial (LA) myopathy with paroxysmal and permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequent in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) but sometimes occult at rest and elicited by stress. Aim: This study sought to assess LA volume and function at rest and during stress across the spectrum of AF. Methods: In a prospective, multicenter, observational study design, we enrolled 3042 patients [age = 64 ± 12; 63.8% male] with known or suspected CCS: 2749 were in sinus rhythm (SR, Group 1); 191 in SR with a history of paroxysmal AF (Group 2); and 102 were in permanent AF (Group 3). All patients underwent stress echocardiography (SE). We measured left atrial volume index (LAVI) in all patients and LA Strain reservoir phase (LASr) in a subset of 486 patients. Results: LAVI increased from Group 1 to 3, both at rest (Group 1 = 27.6 ± 12.2, Group 2 = 31.6 ± 12.9, Group 3 = 43.3 ± 19.7 mL/m2, p < 0.001) and at peak stress (Group 1 = 26.2 ± 12.0, Group 2 = 31.2 ± 12.2, Group 3 = 43.9 ± 19.4 mL/m2, p < 0.001). LASr progressively decreased from Group 1 to 3, both at rest (Group 1 = 26.0 ± 8.5%, Group 2 = 23.2 ± 11.2%, Group 3 = 8.5 ± 6.5%, p < 0.001) and at peak stress (Group 1 = 26.9 ± 10.1, Group 2 = 23.8 ± 11.0 Group 3 = 10.7 ± 8.1%, p < 0.001). Stress B-lines (≥2) were more frequent in AF (Group 1 = 29.7% vs. Group 2 = 35.5% vs. Group 3 = 57.4%, p < 0.001). Inducible ischemia was less frequent in SR (Group 1 = 16.1% vs. Group 2 = 24.7% vs. Group 3 = 24.5%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: In CCS, rest and stress LA dilation and reservoir dysfunction are often present in paroxysmal and, more so, in permanent AF and are associated with more frequent inducible ischemia and pulmonary congestion during stress.

With stress echo (SE) 2020 study, a new standard of practice in stress imaging was developed and disseminated: the ABCDE protocol for functional testing within and beyond CAD. ABCDE protocol was the fruit of SE 2020, and is the seed of SE 2030, which is articulated in 12 projects: 1-SE in coronary artery disease (SECAD); 2-SE in diastolic heart failure (SEDIA); 3-SE in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (SEHCA); 4-SE post-chest radiotherapy and chemotherapy (SERA); 5-Artificial intelligence SE evaluation (AI-SEE); 6-Environmental stress echocardiography and air pollution (ESTER); 7-SE in repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (SETOF); 8-SE in post-COVID-19 (SECOV); 9: Recovery by stress echo of conventionally unfit donor good hearts (RESURGE); 10-SE for mitral ischemic regurgitation (SEMIR); 11-SE in valvular heart disease (SEVA); 12-SE for coronary vasospasm (SESPASM). The study aims to recruit in the next 5 years (2021–2025) ≥10,000 patients followed for ≥5 years (up to 2030) from ≥20 quality-controlled laboratories from ≥10 countries. In this COVID-19 era of sustainable health care delivery, SE2030 will provide the evidence to finally recommend SE as the optimal and versatile imaging modality for functional testing anywhere, any time, and in any patient.