Citations

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Opioids prescribed for acute pain frequently remain unused, creating opportunities for unintended use, accidental ingestion, or diversion. Little is known about counseling patients receive from prescribers or pharmacists on storage and disposal of opioids. OBJECTIVE To characterize clinician counseling on opioid disposal and patient-reported storage, use, and disposal practices among opioid-naïve patients prescribed opioids for acute pain. DESIGN Multicenter prospective cohort study with participant recruitment between September 2020 and March 2023. PARTICIPANTS Opioid-naïve patients prescribed opioids for acute pain in emergency departments, primary care or urgent care clinics, inpatient settings, and dental practices. MAIN MEASURES Patient-reported receipt of counseling on the importance of opioid disposal and appropriate disposal methods; opioid storage practices; use and disposition of prescribed opioids; disposal methods; and reasons for keeping or disposing of leftover opioids. KEY RESULTS Among 1708 participants, the median age was 38 years (IQR, 28-52); most were recruited from emergency departments (n=915; 53.6%) and primary care or urgent care clinics (n=307; 18.0%). Among 1233 participants who answered the question on counseling about the importance of opioid disposal, 811 (65.8%) reported receiving no counseling. Among 1220 participants who answered the question on counseling about appropriate disposal methods, 832 (68.2%) reported receiving no counseling. Among 812 participants who answered the question about storing opioids in a locked location, 610 (75.1%) reported never doing so. Among 929 participants providing information on opioid leftovers and disposition, 618 (66.5%) did not use all prescribed opioids. Among these 618 participants, 258 (42.8%) kept leftover opioids and 345 (57.2%) disposed of them. Among 256 participants who reported reasons for keeping leftover opioids, 159 (62.1%) wanted medication available for the same condition, 70 (27.3%) wanted medication available for a different condition, and 36 (14.1%) did not know how to properly dispose of the medication. CONCLUSIONS Among opioid-naïve patients prescribed opioids for acute pain, counseling about opioid disposal was uncommon, secure storage was infrequent, and leftover opioids were frequent, with many patients keeping leftover opioids for possible future use. These findings suggest opportunities to improve counseling on opioid storage and disposal and encourage safe disposal of unused opioids after acute pain treatment.

Introduction No study to date has examined the association between organism profile and ideal interstage duration in patients undergoing two-stage exchange arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the type of infecting organism on the optimal timing of reimplantation in this patient population. Methods This retrospective study identified 576 patients with chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee that underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty with a minimum 1-year follow-up. PJI was defined using the 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Patients with a time to reimplantation >180 days from resection arthroplasty (n=76) and those that underwent spacer exchange were excluded (n=49). Treatment failure was defined as any reoperation for infection or PJI-related mortality. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to identify whether the optimal interstage duration differed by infecting organism. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for failure. Results 451 patients with a mean follow-up time of 5.8 ± 3.6 years were included. Of these, 71 (15.7%) patients experienced failure and 380 (84.3%) experienced success. ROC curve analyses demonstrated that the optimal interstage duration was longest for patients infected with “high-virulence” pathogens (129 days), followed by those with MSSA (117 days), culture negative PJI (98 days), and coagulase-negative Staphylococci (86 days). After controlling for co-variates, regression analyses showed that an interstage duration above the identified cutoff for each pathogen group was a predictor of treatment failure (all p<0.05). Conclusion We found that the ideal interstage duration varied considerably by the type of infecting organism in patients undergoing two-stage exchange. Greater awareness of this data may help guide the optimal timing of reimplantation in this patient population.

Introduction The alpha-defensin test has witnessed a surge in popularity following reports of its superior diagnostic capabilities, when compared to more conventional synovial markers. Despite this, no study to date has evaluated the utility of alpha-defensin for the diagnosis of acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this multicenter study was to determine whether the alpha-defensin test provided additional clinical benefit, when compared to synovial white blood cell (WBC) count and polymorphonuclear leukocyte percentage (PMN%), in the diagnosis of acute postoperative PJI. Methods This retrospective study identified all patients who underwent arthrocentesis within 90 days of their primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) at three institutions. PJI was defined as revision TJA for infection within 2-weeks of joint aspiration with >=1 positive intraoperative culture. Patients were considered aseptic if they had no reoperation for >=1-year after arthrocentesis. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the utility of alpha-defensin, WBC count, and PMN% in the diagnosis of acute PJI. Pairwise comparison was performed to compare whether the area under the curve (AUC) was significantly different between the three markers. Results A total of 143 patients were included. Of these, 85 (59.4%) were infected and 58 (40.6%) were aseptic. After plotting ROC curves, WBC count was found to have the highest diagnostic utility (AUC 0.912, sensitivity 80.0%, specificity 91.2%), followed by PMN% (AUC 0.869, sensitivity 70.5%, specificity 93.0%), and alpha-defensin (AUC 0.812, sensitivity 62.4%, specificity 100%). Using pairwise comparison, the AUC for WBC count was found to be significantly higher than that of alpha-defensin (p=0.005). However, there was no difference in the AUC between alpha defensin and PMN% (p=0.154). Conclusion Based on our findings, it appears that alpha-defensin provides little to no additional clinical benefit in the diagnosis of acute PJI, when compared to synovial WBC count and PMN%.

Purpose To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with increased posterior tibial slope (PTS ≥12°) undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with concomitant lateral extra‐articular tenodesis (LET) and to determine whether the addition of LET mitigates the elevated risk of graft failure associated with increased tibial slope. Methods This single‐center retrospective cohort study included patients ≥16 years who underwent primary ACLR with LET between 2013 and 2022 with a minimum 2‐year follow‐up. Patients were stratified by PTS ≥12° versus <12° and required preoperative lateral radiographs for slope measurement and high‐risk features (pivot shift ≥2, Beighton ≥4, or return to pivoting sports). Outcomes included graft failure, residual pivot shift, complications, and patient‐reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm). Achievement of minimal clinically important difference was assessed. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analysis were performed to identify independent predictors of graft failure. Results A total of 289 patients (mean follow‐up, 38 months) were included: 45 with PTS ≥12° (13.0° ± 1.2°) and 244 with PTS <12° (8.1° ± 1.5°). Graft failure occurred in 24% versus 18%, respectively ( P = .411). On multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, no independent predictor of graft failure was identified, including PTS (hazard ratio, 1.07 per degree; 95% confidence interval, 0.95‐1.19; P = .260). Complications and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament injury rates were similar between groups. On sex‐disaggregated analysis, similar patterns were observed in both male and female cohorts, with no significant between‐group differences in graft failure, retear, or complication rates by tibial slope. Patient‐reported outcomes were comparable at all time points. At final follow‐up, minimal clinically important difference achievement for International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm was 98% and 100%, respectively, with no between‐group differences. Conclusions In high‐risk patients with a PTS of ≥12°, primary ACLR with LET led to similar clinical results as patients with a PTS of 12 or less. A PTS of ≥12° may be considered an indication for the addition of an LET during primary ACLR. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Objective: Patients with limited English proficiency often face barriers to accessing timely care. We evaluated whether Spanish-language Fast Pass messaging, combined with two-way Short Message Service (SMS) functionality, increased appointment acceptance rates among Spanish-preferring patients while maintaining equitable outcomes for English-preferring patients. Methods: A pre/post-quality improvement project was conducted at Mayo Clinic from November 2023 to June 2025. Epic’s Fast Pass, an automated appointment waitlist system, was enhanced with Spanish-language templates and bidirectional SMS in lieu of patient portal utilization. The primary outcome was the Fast Pass acceptance rate for Spanish-preferring patients. Balancing measures included acceptance among English-preferring patients. Secondary outcomes included scheduler efficiency and cost savings. Results: Prior to implementation, Spanish-preferring patients accepted 4.69% of Fast Pass offers compared with 7.57% for English-preferring patients. Post-implementation, acceptance rates for Spanish-preferring patients increased from 4.69% to 8.05%, a 71.6% improvement in the acceptance rate, exceeding the initial target of a 7.57% acceptance rate. Acceptance rates for English-preferring patients also improved, rising from 7.57% to 9.5%, or a 25.5% improvement in the acceptance rate. The intervention resulted in 344 additional Spanish-language accepted appointments and 29,883 additional English-language accepted appointments, both measured by unique patient appointments. The intervention also improved operational efficiency, saving more than 4,000 hours of scheduler time and reducing scheduling-related costs. Conclusions: Spanish-language concordant and SMS-enabled Fast Pass messages improved patient equity in appointment access while increasing scheduling efficiency and reducing operational costs. Health systems should adopt language-concordant digital communication strategies. Future research should expand to include additional languages and explore artifical intelligence–based scheduling support.

Abstract Objective Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of pain and disability worldwide. Recent studies demonstrate a vertebrogenic model involving the basivertebral nerve (BVN) as a cause of chronic LBP. Vertebral endplates are highly innervated by the BVN, and literature shows type 1 and 2 Modic changes at vertebral endplates are a source of vertebrogenic low back pain (VBP). As a result, intraosseous radiofrequency ablation of the BVN is a minimally invasive outpatient procedure used to treat VBP. We conducted a retrospective review of 1,145 patients that have undergone BVN ablation to assess for safety and complication management. Methods Chart reviews were conducted to obtain demographic and pre-procedural information regarding patient gender, age at the time of BVN ablation, duration of LBP, and BMI. Post-procedure information derived from chart notes included vertebral levels ablated and post-BVN ablation complications, which were categorized as increased LBP &gt; 7 days, increased radicular pain &gt; 7 days, lower extremity weakness, infection, vertebral compression fracture, superficial bleeding, spinal or epidural hematoma, serious neurological injury, visit to the ER, and deep vein thrombosis/clot. Results 1,145 patient charts were reviewed showing an overall complication rate of 3.2% (37 complications). Increased radicular pain was the most common complication at 2.2% (25 complications) and resolved completely in all but one patient. The overall complication rate fell to 1.1% (13 complications) when the 24 cases of transient radicular pain were not counted as adverse events. Conclusions In this multicenter retrospective review, the overall rate of complications related to BVN ablation was low (3.2%). The most common complication was temporary radicular pain that resolved with conservative care. These findings suggest that BVN ablation is a safe treatment for VBP in real-world clinical settings.

Background: Tobacco use is a known risk factor for poor healing after rotator cuff repair (RCR), but the effects of nontobacco nicotine products remain unclear. Purpose: To compare postoperative complications among nontobacco nicotine users, tobacco users, and nonusers undergoing RCR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Using the PearlDiver database, the authors identified patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR with ≥2 years of follow-up. Three 1:1 propensity-matched comparisons were conducted: nontobacco nicotine users versus nonusers (n = 4844), tobacco users versus nonusers (n = 19,182), and nontobacco nicotine users vs tobacco users (n = 4882). Outcomes included 90-day complications and 2-year revision surgeries. Results: Nontobacco nicotine users had mildly higher rates of lysis of adhesions than controls (0.7% vs 0.4%; OR, 1.95; P = .033) but no other significant differences. Tobacco users showed increased rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), pneumonia, infections, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and revision surgery compared to controls. Compared to tobacco users, nontobacco nicotine users had moderately strong lower risks of pneumonia (0.6% vs 1.2%; OR, 0.46), ED visits (8.8% vs 13.6%; OR, 0.62), and readmissions (0.8% vs 1.5%; OR, 0.54) (all P < .01). Conclusion: While nontobacco nicotine use was associated with a modestly increased risk of lysis of adhesions after RCR, it did not significantly elevate the risk of major medical complications, infections, or revision surgery when compared to nonnicotine users. In contrast, tobacco users demonstrated consistently worse postoperative outcomes across multiple domains, including higher rates of AKI, pneumonia, surgical site infection, ED visits, readmissions, and revision procedures. Notably, when compared directly to tobacco users, nontobacco nicotine users had significantly lower rates of pneumonia, ED utilization, and readmissions. These findings suggest that although nontobacco nicotine products may not be entirely benign, their perioperative risk profile appears to be less severe than that of traditional tobacco use.

Abstract T-cell immune tolerance is established in part through the activity of the autoimmune regulator (AIRE) transcription factor in medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTEC) of the thymus. AIRE induces expression of peripheral tissue–specific self-antigens for presentation to naïve T cells to promote activation/deletion of autoreactive T cells. This traditional role of AIRE in mTECs is to prevent autoimmunity. Herein, we demonstrate that tumors mimic the role of AIRE in mTECs to evade immune rejection. We found that AIRE induced a profile of “selfness” at the RNA and protein levels which, when presented on major histocompatibility complexes (MHC), shielded the tumor from inherently self-tolerized T cells. Moreover, we describe an in vivo immunotherapy in which engineered changes in AIRE expression in tumor cells altered their profile of selfness, exposing both AIRE-modified and parental unmodified tumor cells to T-cell attack. Therefore, by resetting the immunologic selfness of cancer cells, this AIRE-mediated immunotherapy (i) converted a highly tolerized T-cell compartment into a tumor-reactive T-cell population; (ii) conferred upon nonimmunogenic tumors de novo sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade; (iii) removed the need to identify potentially immunogenic tumor-associated antigens as targets for generation of T-cell responses; and (iv) lead to potent T cell–mediated rejection of aggressive, immunologically cold, nonimmunogenic tumors. Patient RNA sequencing data showed that the expression of AIRE predicted response to immune therapies with a strong correlation between AIRE expression and markers of T-cell receptor signaling, suggesting that our studies have therapeutic translational value.

Abstract Distal radius fracture (DRF) open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a common procedure performed across inpatient and outpatient settings. This study compared postoperative complications and healthcare utilization between these settings using a large national claims database. Patients aged 18 years and older who underwent DRF ORIF were identified in the PearlDiver Mariner database using International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Service location determined surgical setting. Patients with pathological fractures, malignancy, or polytrauma were excluded. Cohorts were propensity matched 1:1 based on age, sex, Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices, and relevant comorbidities. The matched cohort included 9,697 inpatient and 9,697 outpatient DRF ORIF cases. Serious postoperative complications occurred in 16.8% of inpatient procedures versus 5.0% of outpatient procedures. Inpatient surgery was associated with higher odds of surgical site infection (OR 2.23, 95% CI: 1.78–2.79), wound dehiscence (OR 2.57, 95% CI: 1.07–6.17), and deep vein thrombosis (OR 7.75, 95% CI: 3.53–17.04). Inpatients also had greater odds of emergency department visits (OR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.05–1.31), readmissions (OR 3.64, 95% CI: 2.91–4.54), reoperations (OR 2.15, 95% CI: 1.70–2.73), and higher 90-day reimbursements. Inpatient DRF ORIF was associated with significantly higher complication rates and increased postoperative healthcare utilization compared with outpatient procedures, with the largest absolute differences seen in readmissions, reoperations, and 90-day reimbursements. These associations are unlikely to be causal, as inpatient admission typically reflects greater medical necessity and clinical complexity not fully captured by administrative data. Nonetheless, because admission status is readily available at the point of care, it may serve as a practical flag to identify patients who warrant closer post-discharge surveillance and individualized follow-up planning. III.