Citations

Objective To assess the effect of Moses™ 2.0 (Lumenis Be Ltd., Yokneam Illit, Israel; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) for lithotripsy of renal stones of 8–20 mm in diameter on operative time, surgeon workload, and retropulsion. Subjects/Patients and Methods In our multicentre, randomised, double‐blind clinical trial, patients were randomised 1:1 to standard or Moses 2.0 laser lithotripsy and stratified by stone size. Patients and surgeons were blinded to laser modality. Primary outcomes were total operative time as well as surgeon workload assessed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration‐Task Load Index (NASA‐TLX). Secondary outcomes were stone retropulsion evaluated by blinded video review and postoperative clinical outcomes. Linear regression modelling was used for analysis. Results A total of 153 patients (79 Standard, 74 Moses 2.0) with similar clinical, stone, and operative characteristics were evaluated. There was no significant difference in operative times between the Standard and Moses 2.0 groups ( P = 0.73). Moses 2.0 was associated with lower effort, frustration, mental, physical, and temporal workload, as well as higher rated overall performance compared to the standard laser. Video review demonstrated no difference in rates of retropulsion ( P = 0.13). Complication rates (Standard: 13%; Moses 2.0: 10%) and stone‐free rates (Standard: 51%; Moses: 2.0 55%) were comparable. Conclusion Our study evaluated the impact of Moses 2.0 technology on high‐powered renal stone dusting, constituting the largest double‐blind trial of its kind to date. There was insufficient evidence to suggest any difference in operative times or clinical outcomes when using Moses 2.0 compared to standard laser lithotripsy. Moses 2.0 was associated with reduced surgeon workload, which has implicit impact on surgeon wellness.

ABSTRACT Importance Despite the current enthusiasm for anti‐obesity medications, there is a critical need for effective lifestyle interventions that can be broadly implemented. Objective To assess the effectiveness of REWIND, an obesity and diabetes treatment program. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Virtual, community‐based weight management program. Participants Two‐hundred and nineteen participants, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 , with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D). Intervention Three phases: “induction” with meal replacement diet to promote ≥ 15% weight loss; “transition” to everyday foods; and “maintenance” to prevent weight regain. REWIND leveraged teams including community leaders, media personalities, nationally recognized athletes and participants, to disseminate information, and foster belonging, commitment, and resilience. Main Outcomes The co‐primary outcomes were the change in weight at 6‐, 12‐, and 18 months. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% weight loss at 6, 12, and 18 months, and remission rates in T2D at 6‐, 12‐, and 18‐month, respectively. Results Two hundred and nineteen participants (mean age 49.1 [SD 10.5] years), 37% men, 12% Black, 26% with T2D. Weight decreased from: 114.4 (20.8) kg to 96.1 (18.4) kg at 6 months, to 98.5 (18.1) kg at 12 months, and to 101.1 (20.5) kg at 18 months. Weight loss percentages at 6, 12, and 18 months were ≥ 5%: 95%, 91%, 84%; ≥ 10%: 79%, 72%, 67%; ≥ 15%: 58%, 46%, 47%; and ≥ 20%: 24%, 25%, 22%. Diabetes remission was achieved by 52% and 43% of participants with T2D at 12‐ and 18‐month, respectively. Limitations Single geographic region. Weight was self‐reported. Conclusion A virtual community‐based program for individuals with obesity and T2D facilitated substantial weight loss and T2D remission. This model has the potential for wide‐scale implementation in diverse settings.

Background: Residual fragments (RFs) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) have a significant impact on patients' quality of life and clinical course. There is a paucity of studies that evaluate the natural history of RFs after PCNL. The objective of this study is to compare rates of reintervention, complications, stone growth, and passage in patients with RFs >4, ≤4, and ≤2 mm after PCNL. Methods: Sites from the Endourologic Disease Group for Excellence (EDGE) research consortium examined data of PCNL patients from 2015 to 2019 with at least 1-year follow-up. RF passage, regrowth, reintervention, and complications were recorded and RFs were stratified into >4 and ≤4 mm groups, as well as >2 and ≤2 mm groups. Potential predictors for stone-related events after PCNL were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. It was hypothesized that larger RF thresholds would result in lower passage rates, faster regrowth, and greater clinically significant events (complications and reinterventions) than smaller RF thresholds. Results: A total of 439 patients with RFs >1 mm on CT postoperative day 1 were included in this study. For RFs >4 mm, rates of reintervention were found to be significantly higher and Kaplan–Meier curve analysis showed significantly higher rates of stone-related events. Passage and RF regrowth were not found to be significantly different compared with RFs ≤4 mm. However, RFs ≤2 mm had significantly higher rates of passage, and significantly lower rates of fragment regrowth (>1 mm), complications, and reintervention compared with RFs >2 mm. On multivariable analysis, older age, body mass index, and RF size were found to be predictive of stone-related events. Conclusions: With the largest cohort to date, this study by the EDGE research consortium further confirms that clinically insignificant residual fragment is problematic for patients after PCNL, particularly in older more obese patients with larger RFs. Our study underscores the importance of complete stone clearance post-PCNL and challenges the use of Clinically insignificant residual fragment (CIFR).