Citations

Abstract Objective The goal of this study was to synthesize the evidence on how “status migrainosus” is defined in research studies in comparison to established International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) criteria. Background Current ICHD‐3 criteria define status migrainosus as a headache attack occurring in a patient with a history of migraine with or without aura that is typical of previous attacks except for its duration (>72 h) and severity (debilitating). Despite the ICHD criteria, there are varying inclusion criteria noted in studies enrolling patients with status migrainosus. With this diagnostic uncertainty, there remains difficulty in studying this patient population. Methods This systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, All Evidence‐Based Medicine Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov , and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched with the end search date of August 29, 2025. We included studies that were original research focused on status migrainosus, published in English after January 1, 1988, and also included diagnostic criteria to define this condition. The abstracts and full texts were screened by independent reviewers, with a third independent reviewer remaining available to settle disputes. There were 45 studies that underwent full text review, with 19 of these studies included. Data extraction was conducted recording the criteria used to define status migrainosus, headache characteristics, and goals of each study. Results We identified four common domains among studies of status migrainosus, including use of ICHD criteria, headache duration, symptom severity, and treatment response. Reference to ICHD criteria was variable, with only 68% (13/19) of studies specifying an edition of ICHD criteria applied in recruiting or studying patients with status migrainosus. The majority of studies (16/19; 84%) used a headache duration greater than 72 h to define status migrainosus. The use of symptom severity with “debilitating” or “severe” was present in 63% (12/19) of studies and depended on the edition of ICHD criteria that was referenced. Treatment response was rarely used as a condition in defining status migrainosus, with only 15% (3/19) of studies utilizing this stipulation in diagnostic criteria. Conclusion The results of this systematic review show inconsistent application of ICHD criteria in research studies focusing on status migrainosus. These inconsistencies lead to ambiguity in how status migrainosus is defined in the research setting and limit the ability to replicate or compare studies. Guidelines outlining best practices for research of status migrainosus are necessary. For prospective studies, consistent utilization of ICHD criteria is necessary, with potential need to revise these criteria to better reflect the clinical realities of this entity. For retrospective studies, implementation of a standardized International Classification of Diseases code for status migrainosus would be of benefit to improve diagnostic clarity because the current codes are lengthy, cumbersome, and unclear.

Background: Radiologically Isolated Syndrome (RIS) is defined as incidentally found MRI abnormalities that are radiographically indistinguishable from multiple sclerosis (MS) and is considered a presymptomatic disease state of MS. Age <37 years, infratentorial or spinal cord lesions, gadolinium-enhancing lesions on index imaging, and positive cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal bands have been identified as risk factors for conversion to MS. There are no existing guidelines regarding the role of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in RIS patients. Objective: The objective of this study was to critically assess the current evidence regarding the impact of initiating DMT for patients with RIS on the time to first clinical attack of MS. Methods: The objective was addressed through the development of a structured critically appraised topic. This included a clinical scenario with a clinical question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom-line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, medical librarian, and content experts in the field of neuroimmunology. Results: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was chosen for critical appraisal. This trial examined the impact of treatment with dimethyl fumarate (DMF) versus placebo on the risk of conversion from RIS to MS over a 96-week study period. Patients in the DMF arm were found to have an 82% reduction in risk of clinical attack. DMF patients also had a smaller number of new/newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions compared with placebo. No subgroup analyses were performed to elucidate risk factors for conversion. Conclusions: While initiation of DMT in RIS does appear to reduce the time to first clinical attack of MS, the risk factors that should prompt initiation of DMT in this patient population require further study.

Background/Objectives: Although endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) has been widely accepted as the procedure of choice for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) management due to most etiologies, concerns regarding the reactivation of disease and involvement of surrounding structures add to hesitation in its utilization for granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) patients. No study has directly compared outcomes of external vs. endoscopic DCR in GPA patients. This information can be helpful for patient counselling and choosing a personalized surgical approach for the best results. Methods: A scoping review of the literature was performed in January 2024. The following databases were searched using a combination of MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) and keywords: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. This scoping review is not registered. Medical records of two GPA patients who underwent endoscopic DCR at our center were reviewed. Results: The search yielded 96 articles; 15 articles met the inclusion criteria for a full review. Six studies with 22 procedures reported 100% success with endoscopic DCR. Nine studies with 122 procedures reported success in 88.5% of cases with external DCRs. Additional perioperative immunosuppression was recommended in patients with severe mucosal inflammation. The case series presents the disease course, details of surgery, and perioperative management in two GPA patients with NLDO who underwent endoscopic DCR successfully. Conclusions: Endoscopic DCR was associated with equivalent or better success rates and lower complications compared to external DCR in GPA patients. Ensuring disease remission state and appropriate immunomodulatory therapy can help prevent the proposed risk of endonasal disease reactivation with endoscopic DCR.

ABSTRACTObjectivesTo achieve consensus among expert laser surgeons on standards for the prevention and management of adverse events from fully ablative laser resurfacing of the face.Materials and MethodsDelphi study with two rounds of ratings and revisions until consensus was achieved. The draft set of statements was developed by a steering committee based on expert clinical experience. This was followed by two rounds of rating and revisions completed by an expert panel, then a virtual consensus meeting. In both rounds, respondents rated the draft statements on a 9‐point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 9 = strongly agree) and optionally provided comments. The consensus meeting was supplemented by the results of a systematic review of the literature (from 2000 to 2023).ResultsTwo rounds of Delphi survey were completed by 34 participants across four countries. Represented specialties were dermatology, facial plastic surgery, plastic surgery, and oculoplastic surgery. The initial 105 statements from round 1 expanded to 112 in round 2, with 96 statements achieving consensus. These included possible adverse events (11 statements); absolute and relative contraindications to treatment (5 statements); preoperative care and antimicrobial prophylaxis precautions (16 statements); intraoperative precautions (17 statements); postoperative care (21 statements); monitoring for and management of infection (16 statements); management of pigmentation changes (6 statements); and management of scarring and incipient scarring (4 statements).ConclusionAn international consensus statement was developed for the prevention and management of complications associated with fully ablative laser resurfacing of the face. While expert practices vary, key factors for optimizing outcomes include careful patient selection, counseling, and meticulous pre‐ and postoperative care. Further research will improve our understanding of this treatment technique.

Abstract Reconstruction of clival defects may be challenging in expanded endonasal skull base surgery. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the outcomes of vascularized flaps used for clival reconstruction. The following databases were searched using a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keywords related to clival reconstruction in July 2024: Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies reporting outcomes of clival reconstruction with vascularized free and pedicled flaps in patients were selected for complete review. Twenty-three studies were included for detailed study. Clival reconstruction with free flaps was done in 18 patients; 17 had a successful repair, outcome was not reported for 1. Facial vessels were preferred for microvascular anastomosis. Radial artery forearm flap and anterolateral thigh flap were most utilized. Pedicled flaps were used in 68 patients, with reported success in 85.3%. Nasoseptal flap was the most common intranasal flap, used in 34 patients with successful reconstruction in 85.3%. Temporoparietal fascia flap was the most common extranasal flap, successfully used in 13 patients. Intranasal pedicled flaps, wherever available, were preferably used for primary reconstruction; extranasal flaps were the next choice. Free flaps were reserved for salvage reconstruction due to prior failed or unavailable local pedicled flaps. Satisfactory reconstructive outcomes are reported using pedicled and free flaps. The flap of choice is determined by the previous surgical history, radiotherapy, wound vascularity, defect size, overall health of the surrounding nasal mucosa, simultaneous clival surgery, and the preferred pedicle transposition route (free flaps).

Introduction: Trust and rapport between patients and physicians form the cornerstone of effective medical practice. A key factor influencing this trust is the patient’s perception of the physician’s appearance. Women physicians often face more rigorous expectations concerning their physical appearance compared to men physicians, creating a need to balance traditional professional attire with maintaining femininity and individuality. This review explores the unique challenges women physicians encounter in presenting a professional image. Methods: A narrative review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify studies addressing both patient and physician perceptions of physician appearance. The search was limited to studies conducted in the United States and published between 2004 and 2024. Seven articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. Results: The findings suggest that professional attire, particularly when combined with a white coat, is associated with higher perceptions of competence and professionalism. However, women physicians face ambiguity in meeting these expectations compared with men. In addition, women are more frequently mistaken for nurses, phlebotomists, or support staff based on their attire and appearance. Discussion: Overall, patients tend to prefer professional attire to physicians, but these preferences are influenced by cultural, demographic, and age-related factors. Women physicians, in particular, experience heightened scrutiny regarding their appearance and are subject to stricter norms than men physicians. This challenge is further amplified for young women trainees, who may struggle to convey professionalism due to their youthful appearance.

Background Inadvertent intra-arterial injection of sclerosants is an uncommon adverse event of both ultrasound-guided and direct vision sclerotherapy. This complication can result in significant tissue or limb loss and significant long-term morbidity. Objectives To provide recommendations for diagnosis and immediate management of an unintentional intra-arterial injection of sclerosing agents. Methods An international and multidisciplinary expert panel representing the endorsing societies and relevant specialities reviewed the published biomedical, scientific and legal literature and developed the consensus-based recommendations. Results Actual and suspected cases of an intra-arterial sclerosant injection should be immediately transferred to a facility with a vascular/interventional unit. Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) is the key investigation to confirm the diagnosis and help select the appropriate intra-arterial therapy for tissue ischaemia. Emergency endovascular intervention will be required to manage the risk of major limb ischaemia. This includes intra-arterial administration of vasodilators to reduce vasospasm, and anticoagulants and thrombolytic agents to mitigate thrombosis. Mechanical thrombectomy, other endovascular interventions and even open surgery may be required. Lumbar sympathetic block may be considered but has a high risk of bleeding. Systemic anti-inflammatory agents, anticoagulants, and platelet inhibitors and modifiers would complement the intra-arterial endovascular procedures. For risk of minor ischaemia, systemic oral anti-inflammatory agents, anticoagulants, vasodilators and antiplatelet treatments are recommended. Conclusion Inadvertent intra-arterial injection is an adverse event of both ultrasound-guided and direct vision sclerotherapy. Medical practitioners performing sclerotherapy must ensure completion of a course of formal training (specialty or subspecialty training, or equivalent recognition) in the management of venous and lymphatic disorders (phlebology), and be personally proficient in the use of duplex ultrasound in vascular (both arterial and venous) applications, to diagnose and provide image guidance to venous procedure. Expertise in diagnosis and immediate management of an intra-arterial injection is essential for all practitioners performing sclerotherapy.