Citations

Abstract Context Menstrual irregularities have been associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but underlying etiologies may confer distinct risk profiles. Functional hypothalamic amenorrhea (FHA) has not been evaluated as a separate risk phenotype. Objective To assess the association between FHA phenotype and incident CVD and cardiometabolic risk factors. Design Prospective cohort study with biennial follow-up from 1993 to 2019. Setting Nurses’ Health Study II cohort. Participants The sample included 52,655 premenopausal women free of CVD in 1993. FHA phenotype was defined as irregular or absent cycles without PCOS traits combined with low body mass index and/or high physical activity. Intervention None Main Outcome Measures Incident CVD (coronary heart disease [CHD; myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization] and stroke) and incident elevated cholesterol, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Results During up to 26 years of follow-up, 1,007 CVD events occurred. Among women who developed CVD, the median time to the first CVD event was 17.0 years (IQR, 11.3-21.0). FHA phenotype in mid-adulthood was associated with a 62% higher risk of CVD (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–2.59), driven by an almost two-fold higher risk of CHD (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.11–3.27), compared with women with regular cycles. FHA was also associated with T2DM (HR = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.41–2.47), but not hypertension or elevated cholesterol. Non-FHA menstrual irregularity was associated with elevated cholesterol, hypertension, and T2DM, but not CVD. FHA in early adulthood was not associated with outcomes. Conclusions FHA phenotype in mid-adulthood was associated with increased CHD risk independent of traditional risk factors. Menstrual history may serve as an early marker of cardiometabolic risk.

Most genetic variants associated with complex traits are hypothesized to regulate gene expression. To understand the genetics underlying gene expression variability, we characterized 14,324 RNA-sequencing samples from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine program and performed expression and splicing quantitative trait locus (e/sQTL) analyses in six tissues and cell types, including whole blood ( n = 6454) and lung ( n = 1291). We detected tens of thousands of secondary cis-e/sQTLs, showing that secondary cis-e/sQTL discovery remains unsaturated. We fine-mapped UK Biobank–derived genome-wide association study (GWAS) signals from 164 traits and identified e/sQTL colocalizations for 10,611 GWAS signals, including 7096 that colocalize with secondary e/sQTLs. Our results suggest that even larger e/sQTL analyses will uncover additional secondary e/sQTLs, further benefiting GWAS interpretation.

Background: Functional hypothalamic amenorrhea (FHA) is a common form of secondary amenorrhea caused partly by undernutrition relative to demand. Objective: To compare the dietary nutritional intake between women with FHA and eumenorrheic controls and evaluate micronutrient profiles. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 30 women with FHA and 29 eumenorrheic controls not on hormones. FHA was defined as ≥3 consecutive months of amenorrhea, estradiol of <50 pg/mL, and FSH and LH of <10 mIU/L, excluding other etiologies. A 3-day food diary was collected for dietary analysis, excluding dietary supplements using ESHA Research Food Processor. Results: The mean age of women with FHA and controls was 26.4 years ± 6.2 versus 30.3 years ± 3.7 ( p = 0.002), with no differences in BMI ( p = 0.16) or the waist-to-hip ratio ( p = 0.71). Women with FHA and controls consumed comparable median calorie intake (1784 kcal [1465, 2011] vs. 1732 kcal [1578, 1982], p = 0.62), with no differences in self-reported exercise patterns. Women with FHA consumed more dietary protein (84.2g [74, 112] vs. 74 g [59, 92], p = 0.001) and dietary fiber (30.1 g [22, 43] vs. 17.3 g [15, 23], p = 0.02) versus controls, respectively. When expressed as a percentage of estimated average requirements (% estimated average requirement), women with FHA had higher intakes of vitamin A (105% [45, 219] vs. 43% [21, 86], p = 0.005), vitamin C (201% [139, 351] vs. 107% [75, 190], p = 0.004), and iron (169% [146, 220] vs. 120% [99, 192], p = 0.027) compared with controls. Conclusions: Women with FHA had similar caloric intake to eumenorrheic controls but consumed more dietary protein, fiber, vitamin A, vitamin C, and iron. Future studies should examine the nutritional profiles of women with FHA in relation to long-term health consequences such as bone and vascular health.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Associations of short‐term use of menopausal hormone therapy (mHT) with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers were investigated 10 years after an mHT trial. METHODS Recently menopausal women with good cardiovascular health were randomized to oral conjugated equine estrogens (oCEE) or transdermal 17β‐estradiol (tE2) and micronized progesterone, or placebo for 4 years. Amyloid beta (Aβ) on positron emission tomography, hippocampal atrophy, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex thickness on MRI were assessed 10 years after completion of the mHT trial ( n = 266). RESULTS Aβ and structural MRI biomarkers were not different in the oCEE and tE2 groups compared to placebo. Apolipoprotein E ε4 status did not modify the findings. DISCUSSION There was no evidence of adverse effects or benefits associated with 4 years of use of oral or transdermal mHT on Aβ and structural MRI biomarkers in relatively healthy women, 10 years after mHT. Findings support the long‐term safety of short‐term use of mHT on brain health. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NCT00154180 Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS) Highlights There were no menopausal hormone therapy–related adverse effects or benefits on amyloid beta and magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers in the long term. Apolipoprotein E ε4 carrier status did not modify these findings. Findings align with neutral cognitive and cerebrovascular outcomes in this cohort.

Objective: To determine associations between central adiposity, cognitive function, and randomized menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in a reanalysis of the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study-Cognitive and Affective (KEEPS-Cog) sub-study participants. Methods: KEEPS randomized 727 women (ages 42-58) who were <36 months postnatural menopause to oral conjugated equine estrogens (o-CEE), transdermal 17-β-estradiol (t-E2), or placebo for 48 months. Participants with diabetes, body mass index >35 kg/m 2 , coronary artery calcium score >50 Agatston Units, and other cardiometabolic disease risk indicators were excluded from enrollment. In the ancillary KEEPS-Cog study, cognitive tests were completed at baseline, 18-, 36-, and 48-month post-randomization. In these analyses, cognitive variables were summarized as four cognitive domain-specific factor scores: verbal learning and memory, auditory attention and working memory, visual attention and executive function, and speeded language and mental flexibility. Waist-hip-ratio (WHR), an indicator of central adiposity, was measured at screening (baseline) and modeled as a covariate in linear latent growth models assessing associations of MHT with cognitive functions at baseline and over time. Results: Higher baseline WHR was associated with poorer performance on all domain-specific cognitive outcomes at baseline and with changes in visual attention and executive function across time. Models including interaction effects were not significant for either o-CEE x WHR or t-E2 x WHR. Conclusion: Central adiposity is a risk factor for domain-specific cognitive decline, and thus, cognitive health effects should be investigated in early postmenopausal women, even in women with low cardiovascular risk statuses.

Objective: To evaluate whether effects of oral hormone therapy (HT) on risks of venous and arterial vascular events differ by baseline statin or aspirin use. Methods: We performed time-to-event analysis using data from the Women’s Health Initiative menopausal HT randomized trials to assess risk of thrombotic events. Women were randomized to oral conjugated equine estrogens (CEEs) alone or placebo among women with prior hysterectomy (n = 10,739), and CEE with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) or placebo among women with an intact uterus (n = 16,608), stratified by baseline personal use of statins and aspirin. We evaluated risk of prespecified, adjudicated thrombotic events, including coronary heart disease, stroke, venous thromboembolism, and/or composite major adverse cardiovascular events, at 2 and 5 years. Results: Baseline statin use (n = 827 in CEE-alone trial; n = 1,115 in CEE+MPA trial) or aspirin use (n = 2,212; n = 3,431) was limited. At 5-year follow-up, coronary heart disease risk for CEE-alone versus placebo was hazard ratio (HR) = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.44-1.49) in statin users, similar to nonusers, HR = 1.07 (95% CI: 0.82-1.40). For CEE+MPA, there was also no difference by statin use, HR = 1.02 (95% CI: 0.55-1.89) and HR = 1.47 (95% CI: 1.13-1.90), respectively. Neither statin nor aspirin exposure significantly modified effects of HT on any arterial or venous thrombotic outcome at 2 or 5 years. Conclusions: In this secondary randomized clinical trial analysis, neither statins nor aspirin significantly modified effects of oral HT on key arterial or venous thrombotic outcomes at 2 or 5 years. Results, however, may be underpowered given low baseline exposure prevalence for both statins and aspirin.

Objective: To examine prospective associations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test positivity, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019) symptom severity, and COVID-2019 hospitalization with incident clinical diabetes among aging women. Methods: A cohort study was conducted using data from 34,405 eligible Women’s Health Initiative participants who completed ≥1 COVID-2019 surveys (Survey 1: June–December 2020; Survey 2: June 2021–February 2022) and were followed up for an average of 1.86 (±0.49) years, yielding 399 incident diabetes cases. Results: SARS-CoV-2 test positivity was associated with diabetes risk in the age-adjusted Cox regression model (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10, 2.82), but not when fully adjusted (HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 0.88, 2.31). Diabetes risk was higher among those with 1–2 COVID-19 symptoms (HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.77) and those with 3± COVID-2019 symptoms (HR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.06, 2.22) compared with those without COVID-2019 symptoms in fully-adjusted models, irrespective of self-reported SARS-CoV-2 testing. COVID-2019 hospitalization was associated with 2–3 times the risk of clinical diabetes in age-adjusted (HR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.52, 5.72) and fully-adjusted (HR = 1.90, 95% CI: 0.97, 3.72) models. Conclusions: Age-adjusted self-reported SARS-CoV-2 test positivity was associated with a higher incidence of diabetes. Reporting of COVID-2019 symptoms and being hospitalized for COVID-2019 were each associated with higher incidence of diabetes in aging women, after controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, and health characteristics.

Objectives: To assess the long-term effects of 4 years of menopausal hormone therapy (mHT) on the brain’s white matter architecture in women who initiated mHT within 3 years of menopause onset. Methods: The Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS) was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 4-year mHT trial with treatment arms of oral conjugated equine estrogens (oCEE), transdermal 17β-estradiol (tE2), and placebo in recently postmenopausal women. KEEPS Continuation was an observational follow-up of KEEPS participants. White matter integrity was evaluated in KEEPS Continuation participants 10 years after KEEPS completion using white matter hyperintensity volume, diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) techniques, and cerebral infarcts. Linear regression models were fitted for each brain region to evaluate if there were differences in white matter between KEEPS treatment arms. Results: There was no evidence to suggest the long-term effects of 4 years of mHT on brain white matter in KEEPS Continuation participants [n=266, mean age 67 (58-73)]. No differences in dMRI metrics were found in each of the treatment arms (oCEE n=70; tE2 n=79) when compared to placebo (n=94), following a false discovery rate adjustment for multiple comparisons. There were no statistically significant differences in white matter hyperintensity volume or infarct occurrence when comparing each of the treatment arms to placebo. Conclusions: We found no evidence of the long-term effect of 4-year mHT on white matter integrity when compared to placebo, consistent with emerging evidence of the safety of short-term use of mHT in recently postmenopausal women.