Citations

8549 Background: Despite two decades of anti-angiogenic therapy in NSCLC, no predictive biomarker identifies which patients benefit. As VEGF-targeted combinations advance in clinical development, patient selection biomarkers remain a critical unmet need. QVT (Quantitative Vessel Tortuosity) Score is an automated imaging biomarker measuring chaotic tumor vasculature from baseline CT scans and has been shown to be associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) outcomes. We hypothesized that QVT Score could identify patients with chaotic angiogenesis tumors and greater sensitivity to anti-angiogenic therapy. Methods: We analyzed a subset of 334 patients from the SWOG S0819 (NCT00946712) trial with treatment-naïve stage IV non-squamous NSCLC receiving carboplatin/paclitaxel with (56%) or without (44%) bevacizumab. QVT Scores were derived from baseline CTs based on radiologist-defined tumor annotations and radiomic features of tumor vasculature (e.g. vessel twisting, curvature, and branching). Overall survival (OS) was evaluated as the primary endpoint using Cox proportional hazards models with QVT × bevacizumab interaction terms. Bevacizumab was non-randomized in S0819 (physician/patient discretion): to address this, we employed doubly robust estimation combining inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with multivariable covariate adjustment for age, performance status, histology, smoking history, and stage. Results: The QVT Score × bevacizumab interaction was significant (p=0.007, doubly robust estimation) and stayed consistent across sensitivity analyses (p=0.017 multivariable; p=0.047 IPTW), suggesting differential treatment benefit based on pre-treatment vascular phenotype. QVT Score was strongly OS-associated without bevacizumab (HR=3.03, p=0.003) but not with bevacizumab (HR=1.71, p=0.079), consistent with mitigation of high-risk biology. Bevacizumab benefit increased across QVT quartiles (Table 1): patients in the highest quartile had a 60% reduction in mortality (HR=0.40, p<0.001), while patients in the lowest quartile showed no OS benefit (HR=0.89, p=0.64). Conclusions: Despite unfavorable prognosis on standard-of-care therapies (chemotherapy, ICIs), we found that patients with elevated baseline QVT Score may benefit from the addition of anti-angiogenic agents. As VEGF-targeted combinations including bispecific antibodies enter development, radiomic biomarkers may play a crucial role in enriching trial populations and enabling mechanistic longitudinal monitoring. These findings warrant prospective validation in independent randomized clinical trials. Bevacizumab treatment effect by QVT score quartile. QVT Score Quartile N Bevacizumab effect (Hazard Ratio) P Q1 84 0.89 (0.56 -1.42) 0.64 Q2 83 0.70 (0.44-1.12) 0.14 Q3 83 0.54 (0.34-0.85) 0.01 Q4 84 0.40 (0.24-0.65) 0.0003

8534 Background: Immunotherapy (IO) has transformed treatment for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but not all patients (pts) benefit, underscoring the need for predictive biomarkers to guide IO versus chemotherapy (Ch). CheckMate 227 (CM227; NCT02477826) showed a survival benefit of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab (nivo+ipi) over Ch in stage IV NSCLC. CD8⁺ T cells are key mediators of antitumor immunity and are associated with IO benefit. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)–based pipeline (VIGOR-CD8) that predicts spatial CD8⁺ immune signatures from routine baseline H&E whole-slide images using histopathology foundation model embeddings (H-Optimus-0) and virtual gene expression modeling (HE2Gene), and evaluated its ability to identify pts who do and do not derive IO benefit over Ch in CM227. Methods: 1,598 pts with advanced NSCLC were analyzed, including multi-institutional retrospective cohorts (n = 487; 65 for patch-level CD8⁺ prediction and overall survival (OS), 422 for patient-level OS) and a blinded CM227 validation subset (n = 1,111). For orthogonal validation, 86,470 H&E patches were co-registered with quantitative CD8⁺ immunofluorescence. H-Optimus-0 and HE2Gene immune-related embeddings were used to train a random forest classifier to predict patch-level CD8⁺ probability. Patch-level probabilities were aggregated into a patient-level CD8⁺ signature and dichotomized into biomarker-positive (B⁺) and biomarker-negative (B⁻) groups by the training-set median. Cox models assessed the impact of VIGOR-CD8 on OS. In CM227, prognostic and predictive utility were evaluated using treatment-specific analyses; investigators were blinded to outcomes, and models were trained on independent, non-overlapping cohorts. Results: VIGOR-CD8 was associated with longer OS in the testing cohort (n = 422; HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53–0.87, p = 0.00163) and CM227 (n = 1,111; HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.67–0.96, p = 0.016), irrespective of treatment type and PD-L1 expression. Among pts with evaluable PD-L1, B⁺ pts treated with nivo+ipi had superior OS versus Ch (n = 617; HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58–0.90, p = 0.003), while in B⁻ pts there was no significant OS difference between treatment arms (n = 130; HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.79–1.75, p = 0.436), supporting a predictive rather than purely prognostic role for VIGOR-CD8. Conclusions: An AI-derived CD8⁺ immune signature from routine baseline H&E slides was associated with favorable OS in CM227 and predicted differential benefit from nivo+ipi versus Ch. VIGOR-CD8 may help identify advanced NSCLC pts most likely to benefit from first-line dual IO, but further validation in independent and prospective trials is warranted.

3118 Background: Improved risk stratification is critically needed across multiple cancers to guide treatment decisions. This includes reducing overtreatment in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS), addressing late recurrence risk in estrogen receptor-positive/lymph node-negative (ER+/LN-) breast cancer (BC), and refining prognosis in head & neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), and high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) reflect anti-tumor immunity, whereas tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) polarize toward anti-tumor M1-like (CD68+) or immunosuppressive M2-like (CD163+) phenotypes. Integrating TILs with TAM polarization markers may better capture inflammatory balance and improve outcome prediction. We developed a hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-only AI method (VAIP) to quantify TILs and virtual CD68/CD163 TAMs to develop multi-cancer based potential prognostic models. Methods: TILs were detected on H&E with HoVer-UNet, and virtual CD68 and CD163 macrophages were inferred with VISTA. In cancer regions, we computed cell densities and immune-balance ratios and trained cancer-specific Cox models with compact feature sets (DCIS 6; HGSOC 7; ER+ 4; HNSCC 4). Prognostic stratification used disease-free survival (DFS) for DCIS (N=273), HGSOC (training N=165, independent test N=220), and ER+ BC (training N=144, test N=622), and overall survival (OS) for HNSCC (N=77), reflecting clinical endpoints. Evaluation used cross-validation for cohorts without an external test set (DCIS, HNSCC) and independent training and testing when independent cohort was available (HGSOC, ER+). Results: Risk stratification performance across cancer types is in Table 1. The DCIS model used 6 features, largely TIL-macrophage contrast ratios (TIL/M2, TIL/M1). HGSOC used 7 features with a similar ratio-heavy immune-balance signature, plus macrophage-normalized density and polarization metrics (e.g., M1/N, M/N). In contrast, ER+ BC and HNSCC achieved best performance with 4 features dominated by macrophage measures, particularly M2 density and the M1/M2 ratio. Across sites, CD163-related macrophage metrics and immune-balance ratios were consistently informative. Conclusions: Integrating H&E-visible TILs with virtual CD68/CD163 TAMs enables fully automated, H&E-only prognostic biomarkers that stratify OS and DFS across multiple cancers, demonstrating consistent prognostic value in DCIS, ER+ BC, HGSOC, and HNSCC. These findings support further study of this histomorphometric risk classifier through broader external and prospective validation. Performance across cancer types. Cancer Type Cohort C-index HR [95% CI] p-value DCIS All 0.616 1.76 [1.20-2.59] <0.001 DCIS RT/No-treatment 0.624 1.94 [1.15-3.26] 0.003 HGSOC Test 0.553 1.38 [1.02-1.87] 0.030 ER+ BC Test 0.577 1.51 [1.00-2.28] 0.004 HNSCC All 0.603 1.92 [1.03-3.36] 0.012

Abstract Background: Tumor angiogenesis drives treatment resistance by fostering an immunosuppressive microenvironment. VEGF inhibitors (VEGFi) target the vasculature, while immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) do not address this mechanism directly. Quantitative Vessel Tortuosity (QVT) Score is a radiomic biomarker of vascularity previously shown to be associated with ICI response. Here, we introduce QVT Subscore, an interpretable panel that isolates distinct vascular attributes (e.g., branching, curvature, radius), enabling treatment-specific insight into vascularity MoA and vascular normalization. Methods: QVT Subscores are derived by grouping the 910 QVT features comprising QVT Score into six biological categories, summarized by principal component analysis. The panel was evaluated in 557 patients from the phase 3 SWOG S0819 trial and a real-world ICI monotherapy cohort (n=147). QVT score/subscore changes from baseline to first on-treatment CTs were assessed by paired t-test and substratified by objective response (OR). Results: While the mono-chemotherapy showed no vascularity changes, VEGFi regimens reduced QVT Score, with Branch and Curvature Subscores decreasing significantly but Vessel Volume unchanged. In contrast, ICI recipients exhibited significant increases in QVT Score and 5/6 Subscores, showing opposite changes to VEGFi in four subscores and differing effects on vessel Radius and Volume. VEGFi produced the greatest vascularity decrease in patients achieving OR, with milder decreases in non-OR. For ICI, OR showed negligible QVT change, while vascularity significantly increased in non-OR across all subscores except Radius. Conclusions: The QVT Subscore panel captures granular tumor vascular remodeling from different treatments, providing mechanistically grounded insights into clinical trial arm performance. Future work will assess the panel’s potential for identifying regimens that benefit from adding VEGFi. Citation Format: Haojia Li, Pushkar Mutha, Young Kwang Chae, Kai Zhang, Liam Il-Young Chung, Amogh Hiremath, Rhea Chitalia, Justin Yau, Omid Haji-Maghsoudi, Trishan Arul, Vamsidhar Velcheti, Anant Madabhushi, Nathaniel Braman. QVT Subscore: An interpretable radiomic panel of tumor vascularity reveals treatment-specific mechanisms-of-action (MoA) in NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3751.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet current biomarkers such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and response criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, RECIST, V.1.1) align poorly with long-term survival. Radiomics has been proposed as a source of novel biomarkers, but standard radiomic approaches suffer from limited biological interpretability and poor generalizability across treatment settings. We address these gaps by developing the Quantitative Vessel Tortuosity (QVT) score, a biologically interpretable imaging biomarker that quantifies tumor vascular complexity—a known mediator of immune evasion—from routine imaging. We hypothesized that QVT score would improve prognostication and enable treatment response monitoring in ICI-treated NSCLC, independent of current biomarkers. Methods This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed 1,301 CT scans from 682 patients with ICI-treated NSCLC. An automated pipeline segmented lesions and tumor-associated vasculature within each scan, extracting 910 QVT features measuring vascular shape and complexity. Unsupervised clustering of these features in a discovery cohort (N=375) was performed to identify fundamental vascular phenotypes. A continuous QVT score was then derived using regularized logistic regression to map patients along this phenotypic spectrum. QVT score was externally validated in ICI monotherapy (N=172) and chemoimmunotherapy (N=135) cohorts. In a longitudinal cohort (n=143), early on-treatment QVT score changes were evaluated for overall survival (OS) association. Results Two robust vascular phenotypes emerged in the discovery cohort: a highly vascularized, chaotic “QVT High” phenotype with poor post-ICI OS and a “QVT Low” phenotype with normalized vasculature and improved ICI outcomes. The continuous QVT score was prognostic for ICI monotherapy (HR=1.17 per 0.1 increase, p=0.0028) and chemoimmunotherapy (HR = 1.23 per 0.1 increase, p = 4.9×10⁻⁵). High QVT status remained prognostic for both treatments after adjustment for PD-L1 and clinical variables (adjusted HR range: 2.13–2.38, p≤0.002). Early decreases in QVT score during therapy, indicating vascular normalization, were associated with improved OS (HR=1.93, p=0.0022) independent of RECIST best overall response and tumor volume change. Conclusions QVT score is a novel, biologically interpretable imaging biomarker that quantifies vascular complexity. It enables automated, non-invasive prediction and monitoring of ICI outcomes by capturing treatment-induced vascular remodeling. Integrating QVT score into clinical decision-making and drug development can address critical gaps in precision oncology.

6073 Background: Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LaSCC) has varying outcomes based on the stage of cancer patients present with. Currently, a high proportion of patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage LaSCC complicating the treatment landscape and over-treating low risk patients. Risk stratification of LaSCC can help tailor treatment plans. Numerous studies have identified spatial architecture of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as a prognostic biomarker in oral cavity and oropharyngeal SCC. In this work, we evaluate the prognostic value of an artificial intelligence (AI)-leveraged approach that characterizes the spatial architecture of TILs on digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides from patients with LaSCC. Methods: H&E slides from 192 patients with LaSCC were collected from Baylor Medical Center. This dataset was randomly divided into two equal cohorts, A and B. The slides were digitized as whole slide images at 40x magnification. The nuclei of all cells were automatically segmented using a deep-learning model (Hover-Net). Each nucleus was then classified as TIL or non-TIL based on morphological features. TILs and non-TILs were clustered based on proximity, and features related to the density and spatial distribution were extracted. The top features, determined by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, were used to train a Cox Proportional Hazards regression model that assigned a risk score for recurrence of cancer to each patient in cohort A. For validation, the model was applied to patients in cohort B. The 25 th percentile training risk score was used as a cutoff for classifying patients as high or low risk. The performance of the model in prognosticating loco-regional recurrence (LRR) was evaluated using survival analysis. Results: Patients in Cohort B identified as “high risk” by the model based on spatial organization of TILs had a significantly shorter survival time. Univariate survival analysis showed this model was prognostic for DFS with a hazard ratio of 2.57 (95% Confidence Interval: 1.12-5.89, p-value=0.048), meaning that patients classified as “high risk” are approximately 2.5 times more likely to develop LLR. Conclusions: We used computational pathology to characterize the architecture of TILs and develop a model to predict risk of LLR in LaSCC. With additional validation, this approach can be used to assist clinicians with making clinical decisions. Multivariate analysis. Variable Reference vs Comparison Pr(>|z|) HR (95% CI) Race Black vs Caucasian 0.93 0.92 (0.40 - 2.31) N N0 vs N+ 0.67 1.80 (0.12 - 26.06) T 1-2 vs 3-4 0.83 1.28 (0.13 - 12.38) Chemo Yes vs No 0.38 3.49 (0.21 - 56.90) Tobacco Yes vs No 0.26 2.08 (0.58 - 7.47) Alcohol Yes vs No 0.43 1.53 (0.54 - 4.35) TIL Architecture Risk High vs Low 0.03 * 0.26 (0.08 - 0.89)

Abstract Recent advances in the field of immuno‐oncology have brought transformative changes in the management of cancer patients. The immune profile of tumours has been found to have key value in predicting disease prognosis and treatment response in various cancers. Multiplex immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence have emerged as potent tools for the simultaneous detection of multiple protein biomarkers in a single tissue section, thereby expanding opportunities for molecular and immune profiling while preserving tissue samples. By establishing the phenotype of individual tumour cells when distributed within a mixed cell population, the identification of clinically relevant biomarkers with high‐throughput multiplex immunophenotyping of tumour samples has great potential to guide appropriate treatment choices. Moreover, the emergence of novel multi‐marker imaging approaches can now provide unprecedented insights into the tumour microenvironment, including the potential interplay between various cell types. However, there are significant challenges to widespread integration of these technologies in daily research and clinical practice. This review addresses the challenges and potential solutions within a structured framework of action from a regulatory and clinical trial perspective. New developments within the field of immunophenotyping using multiplexed tissue imaging platforms and associated digital pathology are also described, with a specific focus on translational implications across different subtypes of cancer. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Abstract Modern histologic imaging platforms coupled with machine learning methods have provided new opportunities to map the spatial distribution of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. However, there exists no standardized method for describing or analyzing spatial immune cell data, and most reported spatial analyses are rudimentary. In this review, we provide an overview of two approaches for reporting and analyzing spatial data (raster versus vector‐based). We then provide a compendium of spatial immune cell metrics that have been reported in the literature, summarizing prognostic associations in the context of a variety of cancers. We conclude by discussing two well‐described clinical biomarkers, the breast cancer stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes score and the colon cancer Immunoscore, and describe investigative opportunities to improve clinical utility of these spatial biomarkers. © 2023 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

AbstractThe clinical significance of the tumor‐immune interaction in breast cancer is now established, and tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have emerged as predictive and prognostic biomarkers for patients with triple‐negative (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2‐negative) breast cancer and HER2‐positive breast cancer. How computational assessments of TILs might complement manual TIL assessment in trial and daily practices is currently debated. Recent efforts to use machine learning (ML) to automatically evaluate TILs have shown promising results. We review state‐of‐the‐art approaches and identify pitfalls and challenges of automated TIL evaluation by studying the root cause of ML discordances in comparison to manual TIL quantification. We categorize our findings into four main topics: (1) technical slide issues, (2) ML and image analysis aspects, (3) data challenges, and (4) validation issues. The main reason for discordant assessments is the inclusion of false‐positive areas or cells identified by performance on certain tissue patterns or design choices in the computational implementation. To aid the adoption of ML for TIL assessment, we provide an in‐depth discussion of ML and image analysis, including validation issues that need to be considered before reliable computational reporting of TILs can be incorporated into the trial and routine clinical management of patients with triple‐negative breast cancer. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Background The landmark study of durvalumab as consolidation therapy in NSCLC patients (PACIFIC trial) demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with locally advanced, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with durvalumab (immunotherapy, IO) therapy after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In clinical practice in the USA, durvalumab continues to be used in patients across all levels of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. While immune therapies have shown promise in several cancers, some patients either do not respond to the therapy or have cancer recurrence after an initial response. It is not clear so far who will benefit of this therapy or what the mechanisms behind treatment failure are. Methods A total of 133 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who underwent durvalumab after CRT or CRT alone were included. Patients treated with durvalumab IO after CRT were randomly split into training (D1=59) and test (D2=59) sets and the remaining 15 patients treated with CRT alone were grouped in D3. Radiomic textural patterns from within and around the target nodules were extracted. A radiomic risk score (RRS) was built and was used to predict PFS and overall survival (OS). Patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups based on median RRS. Results RRS was found to be significantly associated with PFS in D1 (HR=2.67, 95% CI 1.85 to 4.13, p<0.05, C-index=0.78) and D2 (HR=2.56, 95% CI 1.63 to 4, p<0.05, C-index=0.73). Similarly, RRS was associated with OS in D1 (HR=1.89, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.75, p<0.05, C-index=0.67) and D2 (HR=2.14, 95% CI 1.28 to 3.6, p<0.05, C-index=0.69), respectively. RRS was found to be significantly associated with PFS in high PD-L1 (HR=3.01, 95% CI 1.41 to 6.45, p=0.0044) and low PD-L1 (HR=2.74, 95% CI 1.8 to 4.14, p=1.77e-06) groups. Moreover, RRS was not significantly associated with OS in the high PD-L1 group (HR=2.08, 95% CI 0.98 to 4.4, p=0.054) but was significantly associated with OS in the low PD-L1 group (HR=1.61, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.28, p=0.0062). In addition, RRS was significantly associated with PFS (HR=2.77, 95% CI 1.17 to 6.52, p=0.019, C-index=0.77) and OS (HR=2.62, 95% CI 1.25 to 5.51, p=0.01, C-index=0.77) in D3, respectively. Conclusions Tumor radiomics of pretreatment CT images from patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC were prognostic of PFS and OS to CRT followed by durvalumab IO and CRT alone.