Citations

This JAMA Clinical Guidelines Synopsis summarizes the American College of Gastroenterology’s (ACG) 2025 clinical guideline update on management of ulcerative colitis in adults.

Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often experience symptoms refractory to available treatments, prompting the use of alternative therapies like cannabis. Previous studies have shown cannabis users require higher levels of sedation for procedures. The anti-inflammatory effects of cannabis have been studied with mixed conclusions. We aimed to investigate if patients with IBD who reported cannabis use required more resources for endoscopic procedures and were more likely to have endoscopic inflammation. Methods This is a retrospective case–control study of adult patients with IBD between November 2018 and November 2022 at a tertiary academic medical center undergoing endoscopic evaluation of acute complaints related to IBD. Cases were matched for age, sex, and body mass index. Results There were 124 patients with IBD with 62 patients reporting cannabis use and 62 patients without reported cannabis use. There was a significant difference in endoscopy duration (P < .001) and endoscopic inflammation (P = .044) between groups. There was no significant difference in recovery room length of stay (P = .15), IBD treatment during time of endoscopy (P = .84), stricture (P = .53), propofol dose administered when adjusted for procedure duration (P = .082), or endoscopic duration between cannabis users with and without endoscopic inflammation (P = .194). Conclusions IBD cannabis users had longer endoscopic durations and were more likely to exhibit inflammation on endoscopic evaluation compared to cannabis non-users. Our study underscores the importance of medication reconciliation for more accurate resource allocation. Additionally, federal expansion of cannabis research is needed for randomized control trials to fulfill the presently unmet need for data on patient outcomes.

Abstract Objectives Oral extraintestinal manifestations (OEIMs) of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may impact IBD treatment. The aims of this study were to: (1) determine which OEIMs are most prevalent among patients with IBD, (2) investigate the presence of a temporal association between GI luminal disease activity and OEIMs, and (3) determine how often changes in therapeutic management of IBD are needed in the presence of OEIMs. Study Design A retrospective cohort study was performed for adult patients with IBD evaluated between January 2017 and November 2021 with at least 1 oral complaint. Demographic data were collected from the charts of these patients. Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous measures and Fisher’s Exact test for categorical measures were used. Results A total of 116 patients with IBD who had presented with at least 1 oral finding during the study time period were identified. Aphthous ulcers were the most common oral presentation in both Crohn’s disease (CD) (85.1%) and ulcerative colitis (UC) (75.0%). OEIMs were associated with CD activity in the small intestine (P = .004) and colon (P < .001). UC pancolitis was associated with OEIMs (P = .002). In 32.7% of patients, OEIMs led to either an increase in dose or frequency of IBD therapy. In an additional 16.4% of patients, new systemic agents were started because of the OEIMs. Conclusions This study provides evidence that patients with IBD may develop OEIMs synchronous with IBD flares and may require escalation of IBD therapy when OEIMs occur.