Citations

Abstract Introduction Mucosal immunization and respiratory IgA offer significant promise in protecting against airborne pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2. However, the conditions and mechanisms that lead to the robust induction of respiratory IgA responses following mucosal vaccination remain poorly understood. Methods In this project, we established SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection and mucosal adenovirus-based booster vaccination models. Using genetic mouse models and various in vivo and in vitro blockade or depletion approaches, we further investigated the mechanisms regulating respiratory IgA responses. Results Here we found that a mucosal adenovirus-based booster vaccination in mouse models revealed that respiratory booster immunization elicited markedly stronger and more durable respiratory IgA, T cell response, and protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2, supporting the promise of respiratory mucosal vaccination. Mechanistically, we identified that local CD4+ T cells support respiratory IgA production by promoting IgA+ B cell class switching, proliferation, and survival in situ. This T cell help depended on interactions between local Blimp-1+ T-bet+ Th1 cells and B cells, mediated through ICOS/CD40L/MHC-II engagement and IL-21 signaling. Furthermore, lung macrophages contributed to the mucosal IgA response via TGF-β production. Consequently, mucosal administration of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-encoding mRNA encapsulated in pulmonary surfactant (PS)- incorporated lipid nanoparticles designed to target lung macrophages elicited a stronger mucosal IgA response. Conclusion Our results uncover a local cellular network supporting enhanced mucosal IgA responses, with implications for the development of optimal mucosal immunization strategies against SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens such as H5N1 influenza. Funding Source AI147394, AG069264, AI112844, HL170961, AI154598, AI176171 to J.S., AI67986, AI177467 to Hui.H; U54CA260582 to S.L.L; R01AI168684 to G. Z.; S.L.L was also supported by a fund provided by an anonymous private donor to The Ohio State University. Topic Categories Mucosal and Regional Immunology (MUC)

ABSTRACT Background Fall risk screening and prevention interventions initiated from the Emergency Department (ED) are endorsed by current national guidelines. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ED‐based multi‐factorial and multi‐component interventions to prevent falls. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of interventions for fall prevention initiated in the ED for older patients (age ≥ 60 years). Multi‐component and multi‐factorial interventions were included. We excluded studies without a control or comparison group. The published literature was searched from 2019 to May 2024. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle Ottawa tool for observation studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias v2 for randomized trials. A meta‐analysis was completed for the outcomes with multiple studies. Results The search resulted in 6312 abstracts with 2571 duplicates, for 3741 unique citations. A total of 18 studies were included in the systematic review; 5 were rated as high risk of bias/low quality. The articles were heterogenous in the intervention type (8 multi‐factorial and 8 multi‐component), setting (ED focused vs. outpatient), intervention components (i.e., nurses, physicians, therapists), and size (103–1435 participants). The interventions did not decrease risk of falls at 3 months (risk difference 0.05 95% CI [0.00; 0.09]), 6 months (0.07 [−0.04; 0.18]) or 12 months (−0.02 [−0.11; 0.07]). ED revisits at 1 month (−0.01 [−0.03; 0.00]), 3 months (−0.04 [−0.14; 0.06]), and 12 months (0.02 [−0.05; 0.25]) were also unchanged. Mortality and hospitalization rates were also unaffected. Improvement in functional status was noted in 4 of 5 studies reporting this outcome. Conclusions Multi‐factorial and multi‐component fall prevention interventions initiated from the ED did not decrease falls or recurrent healthcare use. These interventions may improve functional status in older adults at fall risk. Comparisons are limited by the heterogeneity in types of interventions, intervention compliance, and timing of outcomes.

ABSTRACT Background One in five emergency department (ED) visits is by older adults aged 65+ years. Clinical practice guidelines are needed to optimize patient care by translating the best available evidence into actionable recommendations to guide person‐centered management for this medically complex and growing patient population. Our objective was to understand contributors' experiences and share best practices to inform other guideline working groups. Methods We conducted a qualitative study based on thematic analysis with an interpretivist paradigm in June–July 2025, using semi‐structured interviews of Geriatric Emergency Department (GED) Guidelines 2.0 contributors to understand their experiences. Interviews were transcribed, independently reviewed by team members, and reflexively coded to identify themes. Results We interviewed 18 participants. Four main themes emerged: (1) motivations for participation, (2) varying opportunities to be involved, (3) personal benefits, and (4) challenges for improvement. Participants contrasted the strengths of shared learning and development with the burdens of organization and coordination. Conclusion Contributors to the GED Guidelines 2.0 reported a positive experience. They joined because they wanted to contribute to better care of older patients and to achieve personal and professional goals. Many cited that their roles aligned with their strengths and expertise. They also gained skills and knowledge on systematic reviews and benefited from networking. Future groups planning a similar process should consider having multiple levels of leadership, experts in systematic reviews, regular reminders, and creative incentives to improve the process and foster improved networking opportunities within their disciplines.

ABSTRACT Background Older adults are at high risk for severe injuries and death from falls. Physical therapist (PT) and occupational therapist (OT) evaluations have been introduced into Emergency Department (ED) care to assist with fall risk evaluation and fall prevention care. An evaluation of current evidence was undertaken to inform the Geriatric ED Guidelines 2.0. Methods Systematic review of physical and/or occupational therapy evaluation for fall prevention in the ED. The intervention was evaluation by a rehabilitation therapist (PT, OT, or both) for fall prevention, fall assessment, or mitigation of fall risk factors. Studies that did not perform the evaluation during the ED or ED Observation Unit visit were excluded, such as referrals for home consultation. The published literature was searched using strategies created by a medical librarian and was implemented in Embase and PubMed in March 2025. Covidence was used for article collation and review. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias v2 and the Ottawa–Newcastle scale. Results The search resulted in 387 articles with 52 duplicates, for 335 unique citations. Ten articles on 6 datasets were included (4 abstracts and 6 published manuscripts). One article was at high risk of bias as very few intervention patients received therapist evaluation. The remaining 5 datasets had varied co‐interventions in addition to PT and/or OT evaluations. PT or OT evaluation in the ED was associated with reduced ED revisits at 1, 2, and 6 months. Evaluations in the ED were not associated with increased hospital admission rates or ED length of stay. A meta‐analysis was infeasible due to varied outcome timeframes. Conclusions PT and/or OT evaluations for fall prevention were associated with reduced subsequent ED revisits for older adults. However, the impact of co‐interventions and heterogeneity limits strong conclusions.

Abstract Background: CD19-directed CART cell (CART19) therapy has transformed the treatment of B-cell malignancies but is limited by life-threatening toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), as well as low durable remission rates. Our understanding of the pathogenesis of CART-associated toxicities is limited, and although current treatments are effective, refractory cases remain challenging. Methods and Results: To investigate CRS/ICANS pathogenesis and identify new therapeutic targets, we analyzed plasma cytokine kinetics within the first month of CART19 cell therapy in 25 relapsed/refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and 14 r/r follicular lymphoma (FL) patients (NCT02030834). In this cohort, 22 (88%) patients developed any-grade CRS (73% LBCL, 27% FL) and 4 (16%) developed any-grade ICANS (50% LBCL, 50% FL). Across 30 analyzed cytokines, IL-5 emerged as the second most enriched cytokine based on the median peak-to-baseline (Day 0) ratio in patients who experienced CRS vs. those who did not. The IL-5 ratio was 6.6-fold higher (p<0.05) and 11.9-fold higher (p=0.093) in patients who experienced CRS or ICANS, respectively. Moreover, IL-5 was elevated in patients experiencing CRS on Days 1 and 2 (p<0.05). Prompted by our results, we evaluated the effect of IL-5 neutralization with a monoclonal antibody (mAb) on CART-associated toxicity in a patient-derived B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) xenograft model. After engraftment (average of 110 human CD19+ cells/µL peripheral blood), NSG mice were randomized based on tumor burden and treated with 3.5×10⁶ CART19 plus either IL-5 mAb or IgG control (10 mg/kg, weekly), or no treatment. Mice receiving IL-5 mAb showed reduced weight loss (p<0.005, Days 13–16) and neuroscore (p<0.05, Day 15), as assessed by a daily, blinded 18-point assessment, vs. the IgG group. Additionally, while CRS-associated cytokines (GM-CSF, IFN-γ, MIP-1β) were significantly elevated in the IgG group (p<0.05) vs. the untreated group, they were not in the IL-5 mAb group. In this model, all mice treated with CART19 cells were able to clear the tumor burden. However, in a follow-up challenge model generated by engrafting NSG mice with 1x106 luciferase+ JeKo-1 cells, mice treated with a combination of 1x106CART19 cells + IL-5 mAb showed reduced weight loss (p<0.0001) and enhanced overall survival (p<0.01) vs. mice treated with CART19 + IgG. Next, we evaluated IL-5 neutralization in an immunocompetent toxicity model. BALB/c mice were treated with 10×10⁶ murine untransduced T cells, CART19 + IL-5 mAb, or CART19 + IgG (10 mg/kg, weekly). Mice receiving IL-5 mAb exhibited significantly reduced weight loss (p<0.05, Day 1) and lower neuroscore (p<0.05, Days 1, 6, and 8) vs. those receiving IgG control, with a consistent trend observed on other days, supporting a protective role for IL-5 blockade in mitigating CART-associated toxicities. To explore the direct effects of IL-5 on CART19 cells, we disrupted either IL-5 (IL-5KO-CART19) or its receptor (IL-5RαKO-CART19) using CRISPR-Cas9. In NSG mice engrafted with 1×10⁶ luciferase+NALM6 cells, mice receiving 1×10⁶ IL-5KO-CART19 vs. IL-5WT-CART19 showed a trend toward reduced weight loss (p=0.08), significantly increased antitumor activity by Day 20 (p<0.05), and improved overall survival (p<0.05), indicating that IL-5 production can significantly impair CART19 cell efficacy. We next evaluated changes in IL-5Rα gRNA representation in a published genome-wide CRISPR screen (PMID: 39266501). CART19 cells with IL-5Rα-targeting gRNAs were enriched following chronic stimulation, indicating a protective effect for IL-5 pathway interruption. In subsequent studies, IL-5RαKO-CART19 cells showed enhanced killing of JeKo-1 cells following 48 hours of co-culture (p<0.05) and reduced co-expression of multiple inhibitory markers (p<0.01) following chronic stimulation with JeKo-1 cells for one week vs. IL-5RαWT-CART19 cells, suggesting an improvement in CART19 cell activity and phenotype following disruption of IL-5Rα. Conclusion: Our data identify IL-5 as a previously unrecognized mediator of CART–associated toxicities and show significant improvement of CART19 activity with disruption of IL-5 signaling either indirectly with an IL-5 neutralizing antibody or directly with CRISPR gene editing. Thus, IL-5 could serve as a dual-purpose target to improve both safety and efficacy of CART cell therapy.

ABSTRACT Objectives This portion of the Geriatric Emergency Department (GED) Guidelines 2.0 focuses on delirium in the emergency department (ED). Methods A multidisciplinary group applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and develop recommendations related to older ED patients with possible delirium. Results The GED Guidelines 2.0 Delirium Work Group derived six evidence‐based recommendations for risk stratification, diagnosis, and brain imaging. To reduce universal screening, the Delirium Risk Score may be used to identify older adults at low risk for delirium, though the evidence certainty is very low. In adults over 65 admitted to ED observation units, Zucchelli's risk assessment tool (threshold ≥ 4) may stratify delirium risk, also with very low certainty. For adults over 75, the REDEEM Score may be used to identify low‐ or high‐risk individuals, again with very low certainty. For diagnosis, 4AT, bCAM, CAM‐ICU, mCAM, AMT‐4, or RASS may be used to rule delirium in or out, based on very low certainty. The Delirium Triage Screen (DTS) may be used to rule out, but not to rule in, delirium, also with very low certainty. For diagnostic imaging, there is very low certainty of evidence to recommend for or against obtaining a head CT as part of the evaluation for older ED patients with delirium. All recommendations are conditional, reflecting very low certainty of evidence due to the lack of high‐quality ED‐based studies and comparative effectiveness research. Conclusion Rigorous ED‐based research is needed to strengthen evidence and guide delirium care for older adults in geriatric emergency medicine.

Introduction The rapidly growing population of older adults (individuals aged 65 years and older) presents a new set of challenges for healthcare providers in the emergency department (ED), given the prevalence of severe and life-threatening conditions among this group, such as chronic cancer, Alzheimer’s disease/dementia and congestive heart failure. ED encounters often represent a critical point in an older patient’s trajectory of care and can thus be an important opportunity for various interventions such as palliative care consultation. Therefore, identifying those who will benefit most from palliative care is of high importance, especially in determining the course of future treatment. Thus, we aim to conduct a systematic review assessing the efficacy of palliative care screening in the ED by assessing inpatient length of stay as the primary outcome and quality of life, percentage of hospitalisation and cost of care as secondary outcomes. Methods This study will use Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane as databases. The study population comprises adults aged 60 years and older, with no focus on any specific clinical specialty or disease. Patients who have not received palliative care screening will serve as the comparator. Only studies with an applicable comparator will be considered. Studies published from 1 January 2000 to 1 July 2025 will be included. All articles will be reviewed independently and in duplicate, and every author will participate in the review, data abstraction and conflict resolution process. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required as it is a protocol for a systematic review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024562389.

Background Delirium is a state of acute brain failure causing confusion, reduced focus, and changes in alertness. It is common in older patients, occurring in 6-38% of older emergency department (ED) patients. Evidence suggests that systematic screening improves detection rates and early detection, management and reporting are critical. However, examples of operationalizing this in clinical non-research care are scarce. Objective To describe and disseminate examples of best practices for delirium screening, management, and monitoring within the ED. Methods A group of emergency physicians interested in geriatric emergency medicine (GEM) and evidence-based medicine gathered monthly to discuss ways of implementing delirium care. Members were asked to submit any electronic health record (EHR)-based interventions for delirium in current use at their institutions. One group member categorized the EHR tools by their use for screening, prevention, management, and monitoring of delirium. As a group, categorizations were reviewed and agreed upon and similarities, differences and themes were identified. Results Current EHR interventions from 5 EDs were included. We found that: 1) Screening for delirium in EDs is challenging due to the nature of the environment and the variety of tools available. 2) Prevention tools included order sets. 3) Management was accomplished with best practice alerts and order sets to help screen, prevent, address underlying causes, and manage agitation. Delirium prevention order sets emphasize optimizing patient mobility, comfort, and communication. Assessment order sets include routine labs and consultations, while management order sets for agitation provide safe medication options considering older adults’ unique physiology. 4) Utilizing dashboards for compliance monitoring offers real-time feedback, and provides an overview of adherence to clinical guidelines, regulatory standards, and patient safety protocols. Conclusion These real-world examples can be used in EDs implementing delirium programs. Further studies on how EHR interventions impact screening, diagnosis, and treatment of delirium in the ED are needed.

Abstract Background The increasing prevalence of dementia poses significant challenges for emergency department (ED) care, as persons living with dementia (PLWD) more frequently experience adverse outcomes such as delirium, prolonged stays, and higher mortality rates. Despite advancements in care strategies, a critical gap remains in understanding how ED interventions impact outcomes in this vulnerable population. This systematic review aims to identify evidence‐based ED care interventions tailored to PLWD to improve outcomes. Methods A systematic review was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library (Wiley), Scopus (Elsevier), and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global through September 2024. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024586555). Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and quality improvement initiatives focused on ED interventions for PLWD. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Outcomes included patient satisfaction, ED revisits, functional decline, and mortality. Results From 3305 screened studies, six met the inclusion criteria. Interventions included nonpharmacologic therapies (e.g., music and light therapy), specialized geriatric ED units, and assessment tools, such as for pain. Tailored interventions including geriatric emergency units and community paramedic care transitions were effective in reducing 30‐day ED revisits and hospitalizations. However, heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes precluded meta‐analysis. Risk of bias ranged from low to moderate. Conclusion This review underscores the urgent need for standardized and evidence‐based interventions in ED settings for PLWD. Approaches including multidisciplinary care models and nonpharmacologic therapies demonstrated potential for improving outcomes. Future research should prioritize consistent outcome measures, interdisciplinary collaboration, and person‐centered care strategies to enhance the quality and equity of ED services for PLWD.

AbstractIntroductionOlder adults are at high risk of adverse health outcomes in the post–emergency department (ED) discharge period. Prior work has shown that discharged older adults have variable understanding of their discharge instructions which may contribute to these outcomes. To identify discharge comprehension gaps amenable to future interventions, we utilize meta‐analysis to determine patient comprehension across five domains of discharge instructions: diagnosis, medications, self‐care, routine follow‐up, and return precautions.MethodsUsing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines, two reviewers sourced evidence from databases including Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar (for gray literature). Publications or preprints appearing before April 2024 were included if they focused on geriatric ED discharge instructions and reported a proportion of patients with comprehension of at least one of five predefined discharge components. Meta‐analysis of eligible studies for each component was executed using random‐effects modeling to describe the proportion of geriatric ED cases understanding the discharge instructions; where appropriate we calculated pooled estimates, reported as percentages with 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsOf initial records returned (N = 2898), exclusions based on title or abstract assessment left 51 studies for full‐text review; of these, seven constituted the study set. Acceptable heterogeneity and absence of indication of publication bias supported pooled estimates for proportions comprehending instructions on medications (41%, 95% CI 31%–50%, I2 = 43%), self‐care (81%, 95% CI 76%–85%, I2 = 43%), and routine follow‐up (76%, 95% CI 72%–79%, I2 = 25%). Key findings included marked heterogeneity with respect to comprehending two discharge parameters: diagnosis (I2 = 73%) and return precautions (I2 = 95%).ConclusionsOlder patients discharged from the ED had greater comprehension of self‐care and follow‐up instructions than about their medications. These findings suggest that medication instructions may be a priority domain for future interventions.