Citations

e19008 Background: Bispecific antibodies (BsAb) have emerged as a new treatment modality for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphomas (R/R NHL). They exert their effect by binding to CD3 on T-cells and CD19 or CD20 on lymphoma cells, activating the T-cell to exert cytotoxic effects against the tumor and normal B-cells. Treatment related adverse events (TRAE) include infections, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity (ICANS). This meta-analysis was conducted to assess prevalence of TRAEs from prospective clinical trials that evaluated BsAb in R/R NHL. Methods: A systematic review was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane to identify BsAb clinical trials in NHL through October 2023. Eligible studies included phase I-III trials evaluating BsAb in any type of NHL, either as monotherapy or combination therapy irrespective of prior lines of treatment. Primary outcomes of interest include infection, neutropenia, CRS, and ICANS. All studies were weighted equally. Pooled prevalence estimates of TRAE were calculated using common and random effects models. Heterogeneity tests were performed using Cochran’s Q test. Subgroup analysis examined infection rates in monotherapy versus combination therapy cohorts. Results: After screening 1039 studies, 36 clinical trials with 2162 patients were included. The lymphoma subtypes were diffuse-large B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma. The BsAbs included mosunetuzumab (13 studies), epcoritamab (10 studies), blinatumomab (5 studies), glofitamab (5 studies), odronextamab (2 studies), and AFM11 (1 study). The median age of patients was 66 years, and patients had received a median of two prior lines of therapy. Median follow-up duration was 9.1 months. The prevalence of all-grade infections was 35% (95% CI: 0.33-0.38; I2 = 79%). For grade ≥3 infections, the prevalence was 16% (95% CI: 0.14-0.18, (I2 = 77%). There were higher rates of all-grade infections in the combination therapy cohort (41%, 95% CI: 0.36-0.47) compared with the monotherapy cohort (33%, 95% CI: 0.30-0.36). All-grade and grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 31% (95% CI: 0.29-0.34; I2 = 80%) and 22% (95% CI: 0.20-0.24, I2 = 61%) of patients. CRS was observed in 45% of patients (95% CI: 0.43-0.48, I2 = 85%). Grade ≥3 CRS occurred in only 2% of patients (95% CI: 0.02-0.03, I2 = 0%, p = 0.99). ICANS occurred in 12% (95% CI: 0.10-0.14, I2 = 90%) while grade ≥3 ICANS was rare, at 3% (95% CI: 0.02-0.03, I2 = 0%, p = 0.99). Conclusions: BsAb is associated with nontrivial rates of infections and neutropenia. The rates of high grade CRS and ICANS are low. The heterogeneity of the findings could be attributed by an underreporting of TRAE and small sample sizes from various studies. These results highlight the need for vigilant practices to diagnose and treat infections early and consideration for antibacterial prophylaxis in this immunocompromised population.

3590 Background: Co-occurring alterations (COAs) in the HER2 and MAPK pathway are rare in mCRC. RAS, HER2 and BRAF alterations have been associated with resistance to EGFR inhibitor therapy (EGFR-mab). Typical co-occurring mutually exclusive gene mutations such as in KRAS and BRAF have been reported. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of co-occurring alterations in the MAPK pathway or across MAPK/ HER2 and correlate to outcomes in patients with mCRC treated with EGFR-mab. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients with mCRC within the Mayo Clinic database who have available blood-based NGS Guardant 360 data (September 2017-November 2021) and contained co-alterations in the MAPK pathway or across MAPK/ HER2. MSI-high cases were excluded. Typical-RAS was defined as alterations in codons 12, 13, 59, 61, 117, and 146 of KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS. Atypical-RAS alterations were considered mutations at other codons of these genes. Patient characteristics, specific mutations, and outcome data were assessed. Results: 692 patients (pts) with mCRC were identified and 66 (9.5%) of those had COAs detected. 59/66 pts had clinical data available. Median age was 52 years, 55.9% were male, and 61.0% had left-sided tumors. The frequency of detected alterations was: BRAF-V600E (7.3%), BRAF-non-V600E (7%), BRAF-amplification (3.04%), RAS-typical (39.5%), RAS-atypical (2.1%), HER2 amp (0.5%), HER2-mutation (1.2%) and PIK3CA (13%). COAs are described in the table. Twenty-three pts received EGFR-mab; COAs developed in 19 of them after progression on EGFR-mab. Four pts received EGFR-mab with documented COAs at baseline with none of them responding to treatment. Conclusions: COAs in MAPK and MAPK/ HER2 pathway are not uncommon in pts with mCRC emphasizing on the importance and feasibility of blood based NGS vs. selected gene testing. In pts with prior EGFR-mab treatment, COAs were detected after progression on treatment in the majority of pts, suggesting a mechanism of secondary treatment resistance. Further data including prospective validation is warranted. [Table: see text]

512 Background: The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-NEC) has yet to be established. While objective responses have been observed, it is still unknown which patients are likely to derive benefit. We investigated the genomic profiles of patients who did and did not benefit from ICIs. Methods: Previously we reported the objective responses to ICI in a retrospective series of patients with EP-NEC. RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to categorize patients as achieving disease control (DC = CR, PR, or SD) vs progressive disease (PD). The EMR was reviewed to identify patients who had genomic panels performed, and results were extracted for analysis. Results: Of 31 patients eligible for RECIST assessment, 19 had genomic panels available (9 with DC: 4 SD, 5 PR vs 10 with PD). Of those with NEC histology specified, 9 were small cell, 1 combined large and small cell, 3 were large cell. All tumors were microsatellite-stable. All but one (with TMB = 25) of 16 tumors with TMB status available were < 10 m/MB. Of those with disease control, 67% had both TP53 and RB1 alterations, compared with only 10% in those with progressive disease; this was statistically significant ( p = 0.0198, Fisher exact). Of 7 tumors with TP53 + RB1 alterations, 4 were specified as small cell carcinoma. Half of those with PD showed alterations in β-catenin pathway genes CTNNB1 or APC, compared to only one of the DC group, but this did not reach significance ( p = 0.1409, Fisher exact). In an analysis of all Mayo patients (not just those treated with ICI) with NGS data available (Tempus and FoundationOne), concurrent TP53 + RB1 alteration was significantly more common in SCLC than in EP-NEC (Table). Conclusions: In this small series of patients with EP-NEC treated with ICIs, the SCLC-like genomic signature of concurrent TP53 + RB1 alterations was significantly more common in those with disease control than in those with progressive disease. An analysis of all patients with NGS data (not just on ICI) showed that the dual alteration was more common in SCLC, and SCLC also had more TMB-high tumors. This may explain why ICIs are more effective in SCLC than in EP-NEC. Further study is warranted to determine whether TP53 + RB1 mutations predict response to ICI in NEC.[Table: see text]

92 Background: Since the publication of the MOSAIC trial, stage III CC has been treated with a six-month (mo) regimen of FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) or CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin). Recently, the IDEA collaboration challenged this practice by demonstrating that the 3-year rate of disease-free survival (DFS) was non-inferior to 6mo of treatment (Rx) when given for low risk CC (83.1 vs. 83.3%) and resulted in significantly lower rates of grade 2 and higher neuropathy. In high risk (T4, N2) patients (pts) the DFS of 3mo of CAPOX was equivocal to 6mo (64.1 vs. 64.0%), while 3mo of FOLFOX was inferior to 6mo (61.5 vs. 64.7%). We hypothesized that trends in prescribing would favor shorter courses of Rx with a preference towards CAPOX given its efficacy across both high and low risk CC. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of stage III CC pts from 4 institutions. We evaluated prescribing patterns of 3mo or 6mo of Rx and CAPOX vs. FOLFOX over a period of 5 years from Jan 2016 to Jan 2021, a time period that traverses before and after the release of IDEA. Logistic and multinomial logistic regression models, with a linear time trend, were used to estimate the percentage of pts receiving CAPOX vs. FOLFOX and the combination of Rx and duration, respectively, while adjusting for baseline characteristics. The prescribing patterns in important subgroups were examined by incorporating the interaction term in the models. Results: A total of 366 pts met inclusion criteria. From 2016-2021, there was a significant increase per quarter in patients treated with CAPOX when compared to FOLFOX (OR 1.16 95% CI 1.11 – 1.21, p <.001). Prior to IDEA, 78.3% of pts received 6mo FOLFOX and 7.4% received 3mo CAPOX. Two years after IDEA, only 17.3% of pts were on 6mo FOLFOX compared to 67.5% of pts on 3mo CAPOX (Table). At present, high risk pts are more likely to receive 6mo FOLFOX (47.8%) than 3mo of FOLFOX (3.9%), 3mo CAPOX (25.8%), or 6mo CAPOX (22.4%). Low risk pts are more likely to receive 3mo of CAPOX (67.9%) than other Rx. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that since IDEA, physician practice has significantly changed in favor of CAPOX and shorter courses of Rx. The use of CAPOX has significantly increased overall, presumably due to its efficacy across all risk groups and relatively reduced toxicity.[Table: see text]

e17587 Background: Radium (Ra)-223 has become the cornerstone treatment in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with bone metastases. Ra-223 has been shown to suppress abnormal bone formation by inducing DNA double-strand breaks in tumor cells. This can reduce skeletal-related events, as well as improve survival and quality of life. Studies have indicated mutations that regulate DNA damage response in prostate cancer as susceptible to PARP inhibitors and platinum-based therapies. This study aims to evaluate mCRPC response to Ra-223 stratified by tumor genomics. Methods: This is a retrospective study of mCRPC patients who received Ra-223 and genetic testing within the Mayo Clinic database (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota). Patient demographics, genetic mutations, treatment responses in terms of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and survival were assessed. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from time of first radium treatment. Results: 239 mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223 were identified. Germline and/or somatic genetic sequencing was available in 50 patients, who had a median age of 61 years at time of diagnosis and 68 years at time of Ra-223 treatment. Median Gleason score at time of diagnosis was 8.0. 100% of patients received prior androgen deprivation therapy. 72% received prior docetaxel, and 18% received prior cabazitaxel. Notable mutations included TP53 (45.2%), TMPRSS2-ERG (28.6%), PTEN (26.2%), BRCA1/2 (14.3%), ATM (9.3%), CDK12 (7.1%), and Rb (4.9%). TMPRSS2-ERG was the second most commonly found mutation, with median OS 12.7 mo versus 15.4 mo in patients without TMPRSS2-ERG mutations (p = 0.099). In patients with CDK12 mutations (2 of 28 tested positive), PFS was 10.4 mo versus 5.6 mo in patients without CDK12 mutations (p = 0.157). The assessment of ALP and PSA response to radium treatment stratified by genetic mutation did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Among mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223 at Mayo Clinic, TMPRSS2-ERG was the second most commonly found genetic mutation and had observed worse survival outcomes that approached statistical significance. Prospective studies and increased sample sizes are needed to determine the impact of genetic mutations in response to Ra-223.

e16752 Background: Undifferentiated osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of the pancreas is an aggressive malignancy only described by a few case reports in the literature. In this study, we sought to better characterize this entity by examining patients seen at Mayo Clinic. Methods: This study identified patients with osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of the pancreas using Mayo Clinic databases (MN, AZ, FL) from the year 2000 to present. Patient demographics, genetic data, and treatment modalities were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate median overall survival (mOS) for the cohort as well as mOS and mPFS for treatment subgroups. Results: 15 patients were identified (9 female, 6 male). Median age at diagnosis was 59 years and mOS for all patients was 11.0 mos (95% CI 6.2-15.7 mos). 3 patients (20%) had metastatic disease at diagnosis with the liver being the most common site (n = 3). Metastatic disease was associated with significantly shorter OS (3.5 vs. 14.1 mos, p = 0.005; HR 7.98 [95% CI 1.43-44.4]) compared to locoregional disease (LRD). 4 patients underwent genetic testing. The most common mutation was CDKN2A (n = 3), followed by TP53 (n = 2) and KRAS (n = 2). 13/15 patients had detailed follow-up information. 6/7 patients undergoing chemotherapy received a gemcitabine-based regimen as first line: with capecitabine (n = 2), with nab-paclitaxel (n = 2), or as monotherapy (n = 2). 1 patient received FOLFIRINOX. In patients with LRD and adequate follow-up (n = 11), 8/11 underwent surgical resection and had longer OS compared to those without resection (17.0 vs. 8.4 mos, p = 0.09). No surgical patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 5/8 received adjuvant chemotherapy, 2 did not undergo chemotherapy, and 1 was lost to follow-up after surgery. PFS from time of surgery was 15.3mos (95% CI 5.0-25.6mos). 6 patients (40%) were alive at time of analysis; all 6 underwent surgical resection. Conclusions: Osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of the pancreas is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis, even when diagnosed at an early stage. OS for patients of all stages in this study was less than 1 year suggesting prognosis may be even worse than that of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The optimal therapy remains unknown but most patients received similar chemotherapy as in adenocarcinoma. Patients with LRD amenable to surgical resection experienced a PFS over 1 year from surgery, possibly associated with OS benefit, however overall prognosis is poor. Further study is warranted on a larger scale to better understand disease course and treatment options.

e16702 Background: There are only a few reports examining the treatment patterns for poorly differentiated rectal/anal NEC. In this study, we sought to report treatment and survival outcomes for patients with NEC of the anus and rectum seen at Mayo Clinic. Methods: We identified patients with a primary NEC of the anus or rectum using Mayo Clinic databases (Minnesota, Arizona, Florida) from the year 2000 to present. NEC identified within polyps on colonoscopy was excluded from this study. Patients’ demographics were compiled. Kaplan Meier analyses were performed to evaluate overall survival (OS) for all patients, as well as subgroups with locoregional disease (LRD) and metastatic disease at diagnosis. Progression free survival (PFS) was also evaluated for patients with LRD treated with chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Results: 38 patients with NEC of the anus/rectum were identified with a median age of 55.5 years. 23 patients (61%) had metastatic disease at diagnosis and 15 (39%) had LRD. The most common site of metastasis was the liver (n = 20). Patients with metastatic disease at presentation had significantly shorter OS compared to patients with LRD (median OS 10.4 vs. 18.9 months, p = 0.039; HR 2.46, 95% CI [1.001-6.050]). 34 total patients received chemotherapy (ORR 11.8%), with platinum + etoposide (EP) being the most common first-line chemotherapy (n = 26). 10 of 15 patients with LRD received CRT (9 with EP and 1 with 5-FU) with median PFS of 6.3 months (95% CI 2.3-16.5 months), a 1-year PFS rate of 20%, and median OS of 18.6 months (95% CI 13.5-23.7 months). 2/10 received induction chemotherapy prior to CRT with 6/10 undergoing primary tumor resection (1 prior to CRT and 5 after CRT). Only 3 CRT patients were living at time of analysis (all underwent surgical resection), 2 without any active disease, 1 who achieved complete response with CRT then suffered recurrence and is still undergoing treatment. Conclusions: NEC of the anus and rectum is an aggressive malignancy with most patients experiencing metastatic disease at presentation and poor response to chemotherapy at all stages. Even those with LRD experience a very poor prognosis with OS of 18.9 months from diagnosis. For LRD, most patients underwent CRT with only a short-lived response (median PFS 6.3 months). Those achieving sustained response also underwent surgical resection. Overall, prognosis is poor for all stages and further study on a large scale is warranted to better characterize this rare, aggressive malignancy.

e16691 Background: Recent WHO classification of NET has defined high-grade well-differentiated NET (NET G3) as a distinct entity that is clinically different from neuroendocrine carcinoma. The optimal treatment for NET G3 has not been well-described. This study aims to evaluate NET G3 response to different treatment regimens. Methods: This is a retrospective study of NET G3 patients within the Mayo Clinic database (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota). Patient demographics along with treatment responses and survival were assessed. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Results: 71 patients with NET G3 were identified. Systemic treatment data was available in 30 patients who had a median age of 59.5 years at time of diagnosis. The primary tumor was most commonly pancreatic (73.3%). Ki 67 index was ≥55% in 26.7% of cases. 56.7% of cases had > 1 metastatic site. Treatment regimens included: capecitabine+temozolomide (CAPTEM) (n = 20), somatostatin analog (SSA) (n = 14), carboplatin/cisplatin+etoposide (EP) (n = 7), everolimus (n = 2), FOLFOX (n = 7), and lutetium Lu 177 DOTATATE (PRRT) (n = 10). CAPTEM was the most commonly used regimen (10 first-line, and 10 second-line) with ORR of 35%, disease control rate (DCR) of 65%, and median PFS of 9.4 months. The table summarizes the treatment data and responses rates for the various therapies used. Conclusions: Among NET G3 patients treated at Mayo Clinic, CAPTEM was found to be the most commonly used treatment with reasonable efficacy and disease control. Other treatment options include SSA, PRRT, FOLFOX, and EP. Prospective studies evaluating different treatments effects in NET G3 patients are needed to determine an optimal treatment strategy. [Table: see text]

4541 Background: Anti-VEGFR2 therapy (ramucirumab/paclitaxel [RAM/TAX]) and ICI are approved as 2nd- and 3rd-line therapy (Tx), respectively, for pts with mGEA. We unexpectedly saw durable responses in 2 pts on RAM/TAX after progression on an ICI trial (KN-059; PMID 29674442). We performed a pilot to examine the clinical activity of ICI followed by RAM/TAX. Then we retrospectively compared the outcomes of pts who received this serial Tx to pts who received RAM/TAX without prior ICI. Methods: All pts with mGEA at Mayo Clinic who received RAM/TAX (2014-19) were included (N = 87). Outcomes were best objective response rate (ORR: complete [CR] or partial response) per RECIST1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS). Chi square and multivariate (MV) logistic and Cox regression were used. Results: 15 consecutive pts with measurable mGEA received ICI immediately followed by RAM/TAX after irRECIST progression. Most pts (95%) did not respond to ICI. Yet on RAM/TAX, 100% (15/15) had tumor reduction (range -8% to -100%) with an ORR of 73% (11/15), including 3 CRs. In these pts (who received ICI followed by RAMTAX), PFS on RAMTAX was longer than on last chemotherapy before ICI (12.3 vs 3.0 m, P < .001). Outcomes on RAM/TAX in these pts were significantly better than in pts who received RAM/TAX alone (see Table). Associations were strengthened after adjusting for total lines of Tx, line of Tx of RAM/TAX, age, and ECOG PS. Exploratory analysis of paired tumor biopsies collected pre-ICI and on RAM/TAX in a small subset revealed that the frequency of intratumoral immunosuppressive FOXP3+ Tregs decreased on RAM/TAX, whereas the frequency of antitumor CD8+ T cells was preserved. Conclusions: RAM/TAX immediately preceded by ICI was associated with significantly higher OS, ORR, and DOR than RAM/TAX alone, suggesting ICI may enhance efficacy of subsequent anti-VEGFR/taxane therapy. This novel sequence of therapy will be tested prospectively in a new randomized phase 2 trial (NCT04069273). [Table: see text]