Citations

Background: Regorafenib (R) and Trifluridine/Tipiracil ± bevacizumab (T) are approved for treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but their optimal sequence is unclear. This study describes the characteristics/clinical outcomes of patients with mCRC in U.S. clinical practice treated sequentially with R-T or T-R. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 818 patients treated with R-T or T-R between January 2015 and November 2022 was conducted using an electronic health record-derived database. The primary objective was to describe the demographic/clinical characteristics and biomarker status of patients treated with R-T or T-R, stratified by treatment line/age. Secondary objectives were to evaluate/estimate the frequency of neutropenia and myelosuppression-related treatments, the number/type of subsequent therapies, time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and overall survival (OS). Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among patients who received R-T (n = 393) or T-R (n = 425). Lower rates of moderate/severe neutropenia (26%/12% vs. 32%/16%) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor/erythropoietin use (22% vs. 24%) were observed with R-T versus T-R. The median TTD was 8.7 months and 8.5 months with R-T versus 8.1 months and 7.9 months with T-R as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively. The median OS was 13.1 months and 11.6 months with R-T versus 11.5 months and 10.3 months with T-R as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively. Conclusions: This study did not show a statistically significant difference in OS with R-T versus T-R. Although limited by its retrospective nature, the study suggested R-T may be preferable to T-R given the observed reduction in neutropenia/myelosuppression-related treatments.

ABSTRACTBackgroundContrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance neurography (ceMRN) can enhance brachial plexus visualization and quality of imaging. However, the interval between contrast injection and scanning that provides the highest‐quality images is not known.MethodsFifteen patients underwent brachial plexus imaging using the 3D T2‐NerveView sequence with a scanning duration of 5 min. A consecutive six‐phase scan was initiated immediately at the start of contrast agent injection. Subsequently, all patients' images were classified into six groups according to the phases: group A (phase 1, delay 0 min), group B (phase 2, delay 5 min), group C (phase 3, delay 10 min), group D (phase 4, delay 15 min), group E (phase 5, delay 20 min), and group F (phase 6, delay 25 min). The image quality in each group was assessed based on nerve signal (signalnerve), muscle signal (signalmuscle), lymph node signal (signallymph node), background noise (BN), signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), and subjective score.ResultsSignalnerve, signalmuscle, BN, and SNR did not significantly differ among the six groups (p > 0.05). However, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed in signallymph node (F = 16.067), CNR (F = 9.495), and subjective score (χ2 = 23.586). As the scanning delay increased, signallymph node intensity gradually increased whereas the CNR gradually decreased. The subjective score was significantly higher in groups B (4.83 ± 0.24), C (4.90 ± 0.21), D (4.87 ± 0.30), E (4.83 ± 0.31), and F (4.83 ± 0.31) than in group A (4.47 ± 0.30).ConclusionWe recommend performing brachial plexus ceMRN 5 min after contrast injection. With this delay, the brachial plexus can be visualized optimally with minimal interference from background signals.

9009 Background: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) is an inhibitory T-cell co-receptor that may lead to suppression of antitumor immunity. Lambrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal IgG4 antibody against PD-1. This study explored the safety and clinical activity of lambrolizumab in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (MEL). Methods: In this ongoing phase 1b expansion study of MEL pts with or without previous ipilimumab (IPI) treatment, lambrolizumab was administered IV every 2 or 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor response was assessed every 12 weeks by independent, central, blinded radiographic review per immune-related response criteria and RECIST 1.1. Results: As of December 1, 2012, 294 pts with MEL were enrolled, including 179 IPI-naive and 115 IPI-pretreated. Pts received lambrolizumab 10 mg/kg (n = 183) or 2 mg/kg (n = 111). Preliminary data from the first 85 consecutive pts dosed before April 25, 2012, who had independent radiologic review available as of December 3, 2012, indicate a confirmed overall response rate per RECIST 1.1 of greater than 35%, pooled across all doses and schedules and including both IPI-naive and IPI-pretreated patients. The median duration of response has not been reached as only 2 pts who had initial response discontinued due to disease progression, but the duration of confirmed responses range from 28+ to 240+ days (up to 8+ months). Among 133 pts who were dosed with lambrolizumab before July 31, 2012, and evaluable for adverse events (AEs) as of September 28, 2012, fatigue (22%), rash (18%), and pruritus (14%) were the most common drug-related AEs (mostly grade 1/2). The incidence of drug-related grade 3/4 AEs was 10% (24% regardless of attribution). Four drug-related cases of pneumonitis were reported, all of grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 drug-related hypothyroidism (n = 1) and hyperthyroidism (n = 1) were noted. Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that lambrolizumab has significant antitumor activity and is well tolerated with manageable side effects in both IPI-naive and IPI-pretreated MEL pts. These data have led to an ongoing, international, randomized study of lambrolizumab versus chemotherapy in IPI-pretreated MEL. Clinical trial information: NCT01295827.

Pharmacologic stimulation of a G protein–coupled receptor preferentially expressed on fibroblasts reverses experimental lung and liver fibrosis.