Citations

Background: Major League Baseball (MLB) recently instituted a combine for their prospective players. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to report initial epidemiological findings for both physical examination and imaging findings for the MLB Combine. It was hypothesized that most players would have no significant abnormal physical examination findings, but most would have abnormal findings on their shoulder and elbow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: All players who attended the 2023 MLB Combine were included. History was taken and physical examination was performed by an MLB team physician, and MRI of the shoulder, elbow, cervical spine, and lumbar spine was performed on all players and read by 1 of 2 musculoskeletal radiologists. Physical examination notes and imaging reports were reviewed by the authors and recorded. Data were analyzed separately for pitchers and position players. Results: Overall, 219 players (112 pitchers [51%], 107 position players [49%]) were included. The mean age was 20.4 ± 1.5 years. The majority of players (95%) had no current pain or limitations; 54 players (25%) had a history of previous surgery. For pitchers, 18% underwent previous elbow surgery. With regard to MRI, >80% of pitchers had some abnormality within their ulnar collateral ligament (UCL), the majority of which was UCL scarring/remodeling. 70% of pitchers and 60% of position players had evidence of an olecranon osteophyte. Increased signal within the ulnar nerve was common in pitchers (40%) but rare in position players (4%). For the shoulder, 95% of pitchers and 93% of position players had some rotator cuff abnormality (often tendinosis within the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles). Also, 75% of pitchers had MRI evidence of a superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) tear, while 24% of position players demonstrated this. Lumbar spine MRI showed that 47% of position players had a disk protrusion and 46% had a previous pars fracture. Conclusion: Most baseball players who participated in the 2023 MLB Combine had MRI evidence of rotator cuff abnormalities, and many showed evidence of an olecranon osteophyte. Eighteen percent of pitchers had a previous history of elbow surgery. The majority of pitchers had some abnormality within their UCL and evidence of a SLAP tear on MRI scans.

Background: There remains room for improvement in surgical outcomes after medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (MUCLR) in professional pitchers. The role and influence of postoperative rehabilitation on the outcomes of MUCLR are unknown. There is a paucity of clinical data in the current literature comparing the success of various postsurgical rehabilitation protocols after MUCLR. Purpose: To summarize the current rehabilitation process for professional pitchers recovering from MUCLR, evaluates what player and surgical factors correlate with outcomes, and determines whether rehabilitation timing and milestones correlate with successful outcomes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: 717 professional baseball pitchers who underwent MUCLR between 2010 and 2016 were identified and included in the analysis. Player characteristics evaluated included age at the time of surgery, throwing side dominance, primary pitching role (starter vs reliever), and level of play (MLB, AAA, AA, A). Surgical factors studied included date of surgery, graft type (palmaris longus autograft vs gracilis autograft), and surgical technique (figure of 8 vs docking vs other). The rehabilitation and throwing progression details were as follows: initiation date; first throw date; dates to start throwing from various distances; longest distance thrown; first flat ground throw date; first mound throw date; and first live batting practice (BP) date. The primary outcomes of interest were the ability to return to play at any level (RTP), the ability to return to the same level (RSL), and the time to RTP/RSL. Results: On average, pitchers threw a baseball for the first time 4.9 months after surgery, with a broad range (2.8-14.9 months). For the 675 (94%) pitchers who were able to progress to mound throwing, the first throws off a mound occurred at a mean of 9.4 months after surgery. Before progressing to the mound, the mean longest long-toss distance reached was 137.5 feet, with a broad range (105-300 feet). A high variation in the time to RTP (7.6-53.9 months) and RSL (8.6-60.7 months) was noted. A total of 599 (84%) pitchers were able to RTP at a mean time of 14.9 ± 4.9 months after surgery (range, 7.6-53.9 months). Also, 528 (74%) pitchers were able to RSL after MUCLR at a mean of 17.4 ± 7 months (range, 8.6-60.7 months) postoperatively. Age was the most significant predictor of RTP (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05]; P = .01) and RSL (HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99]; P < .01). For every 1-year increase in age, there was a 3% increase in the chance of RTP. Conversely, for every 1-year decrease in age, there was a 4% increase in the chance of RSL. MLB players were more likely to RTP (HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.18-1.63]; P < .01) but not necessarily to RSL (HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.75-1.08]; P = .24). The time from surgery to any of the rehabilitation milestones of interest (first throw, first flat ground pitching, first mound throwing, and first live BP) did not correlate with RTP or RSL (all, P >.05). The same was true for the greatest long-toss distance thrown before transitioning to the mound. Conclusion: Significant variability in the postoperative rehabilitation protocols after MUCLR was observed in 717 professional baseball pitchers. The timing of achievement of throwing progression and rehabilitation milestones postoperatively varied widely but did not correlate with outcomes. Player characteristics—except for player age and professional pitching level—did not correlate with RTP and RSL outcomes. Older pitchers and MLB pitchers were more likely to RTP, but younger players were more likely to RSL. Surgical factors did not correlate with rehabilitation outcomes.

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is the gold standard treatment for ACL tears to allow baseball players to return to sport (RTS). The optimal graft type and femoral tunnel drilling technique are currently unknown. Hypothesis: There is a high rate of RTS in professional baseball players after ACLR, with no significant difference in RTS rates or performance between cases and controls or between graft types or femoral drilling techniques. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All professional baseball players who underwent ACLR between 2010 and 2015 were included. Demographic and performance data (pre- and postoperative) for each player were recorded. Performance metrics were then compared between cases and matched controls. Results: A total of 124 players (mean age, 23.7 ± 4.1 years; 83% minor league players) underwent ACLR. Of these, 80% returned to sport (73% to the same or higher level) at a mean 310 ± 109 days overall and 333 ± 126 days at the same or higher level. The most common graft type was an ipsilateral bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) autograft (n = 87; 70%). A total of 91 players underwent concomitant meniscal debridement or repair. No significant difference in any of the primary performance metrics existed from before to after ACLR. Compared with matched controls, no significant difference existed in RTS rates or any performance metrics after ACLR. No significant difference existed in RTS rates or primary performance outcome measures between graft types or femoral drilling techniques. Conclusion: The RTS rate for professional baseball players after ACLR was 80%. No significant difference in performance metrics existed between BTB and hamstring autografts or between femoral drilling techniques. Furthermore, no significant difference in performance or RTS rates existed between cases and matched controls. Femoral drilling technique and graft type did not affect performance and RTS rates in professional baseball players after ACLR.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric food residue (GFR) identified during gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is assumed to reflect delayed gastric emptying (GE [i.e., gastroparesis]). The aims of this study aims were to determine i) the prevalence of GFR during upper GI endoscopy (EGD) and, ii) the relationship between GFR and GE, structural abnormalities and diseases associated with gastroparesis. METHODS: Electronic health records were used to identify patients who had undergone both EGD and gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) between October 2013 and September 2018. The test meal included radiolabeled scrambled eggs (320 kcal, 30% fat). Data were collected via the Advanced Cohort Explorer (ACE) application available at Mayo Clinic. The presence of GFR, structural or physiological factors associated with delayed GE was determined. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the 5 year period, the prevalence of GFR during upper GI endoscopy was 3.2% per patient and 2.5% per procedure (37% or patients had undergone >1 procedure). Of 3169 patients who underwent both EGD and GES available for review, 230 (7.3%) had GFR. Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM, 22% vs 7%, P < 0.001) and type 2 DM (13% vs 7%, P < 0.05), but not systemic sclerosis ( P = 0.1), were associated with GFR. Relative to patients with no GFR, patients with GFR had reduced GE at 2 and 4 hours (35% vs 46%, P < 0.001 and 67% vs 81%, P < 0.001 respectively) and were more likely to have structural abnormalities in the stomach or small bowel (e.g., surgery/stenosis, 14% GFR vs. 5%, P < 0.001) or have predisposing medical conditions (e.g. DM, systemic sclerosis, 20% GFR vs. 8%, P < 0.001). GE rates for patients with these conditions are shown in Table 1. Among those with no structural abnormalities or medical conditions associated with delayed GE, GE at 2 hours and 4 hours was significantly reduced in patient with GFR compared to those without GFR (37% vs 46%, and 69% vs 81%, both P < 0.001 respectively). The proportion of patients with delayed GE at 2 and 4 hours was greater in patients with GFR than without (42% vs 22% and 35% vs. 54%, both P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: GFR is encountered in 3% of all EGDs. In a cohort undergoing endoscopy and GES, ∼20% of patients with type 1 DM demonstrated GFR. The presence of GFR during endoscopy is associated with retarded GE. However, almost 50% of patients with GFR will have normal GE; therefore the presence of GFR at EGD does not accurately reflect gastric retention of digestible solids.

INTRODUCTION: Rates of musculoskeletal (MSK) injury among gastroenterologists are estimated to be as high as 75%, exceeding rates of 35% among non-proceduralists. Specific ergonomic/procedural factors influencing these injuries have yet to be defined. We sought to characterize potential risk factors for MSK injury by analyzing the physical traits and technical procedural data of a cohort of endoscopists. METHODS: The QuickDASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) survey was sent to all gastroenterologists across a large tertiary care system. Added questions assessed injury characteristics, glove size, and other demographic data. Endpoints defining affected vs. unaffected groups include self-reported function-limiting upper extremity or back pain, injury necessitating limiting/stopping endoscopy, and trends toward higher QuickDash, Work Impairment, or Sport/Instrument Disability scores. A procedural database capturing all endoscopic activities of each respondent from 2011 to 2018 was queried to gather procedural types, volumes, durations, and insertion times; scope types; and polyp detection rates. RESULTS: 64 surveys were completed (28.1% female, mean age 44.4 ±10.8 yrs). The average time in practice was 18.9 (±10.8) years. 51% (n = 33) of respondents reported significant activity-limiting pain, including hand/wrist (n = 31), arm/elbow (n = 12), shoulder (n = 19), and back (n = 24) pain. Characteristics between affected and non-affected groups are detailed in Table 1 with further exploratory analyses found in Table 2. Those needing to limit/stop endoscopy due to pain more frequently used pediatric scopes (31% vs. 19%, P = 0.037), took longer to perform colonoscopy (25.3 vs. 22.1 minutes, P = 0.035) and had lower yearly procedural volumes (532 vs. 807, P = 0.009). Those with hand/wrist pain had longer colonoscopy insertion times (9.35 vs. 8.21 minutes, P = 0.03) and less colonoscopy hands-on scope hours per year (81.2 vs. 111.7 hours, P = 0.039). Females had more severe shoulder pain ( P = 0.04), but there were no other associations with sex or small glove size. CONCLUSION: Activity-limiting MSK injuries affect over 50% of endoscopists. MSK symptoms were associated with longer procedure times and higher EGD or push enteroscopy volumes. Symptomatic subjects were more likely to use pediatric colonoscopes. Hand/wrist pain is the most common and (presumably) the most limiting type of injury. Further prospective monitoring is warranted to better elucidate which variables are causative versus compensatory responses to injury.