Citations

Clear

25 citation(s) found for "Kumar, Mahesh".

Snare‐Assisted Retrieval of a Mechanically Locked‐Open TEER Device: A Novel Bailout Technique
Kaliyamoorthy, Dhamodaran , Murugesan, Kannan , Mahesh Kumar, Aishwarya

Mayo Clinic

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | October 28, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ccd.70957 | PMID 42949126 Get It

ABSTRACT Transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) is an established intervention for patients having severe mitral regurgitation (MR) with prohibitive surgical risk. Complications during deployment related to device malfunction are uncommon but necessitate prompt decision‐making and management. A 54‐year‐old gentleman with dilated cardiomyopathy, severe left ventricular dysfunction, and severe MR underwent TEER using the MyClip system (Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Vapi, Gujarat, India). Initial deployment across the A2−P2 scallops of mitral leaflets achieved partial MR reduction. Significant residual MR required a second clip for optimal leaflet coaptation. While deploying the second clip, it failed to close because of a mechanical locking failure. So, we everted the clip, pulled back to LA, and it stayed in open position and failed to close. We report a novel bailout snare technique that enabled safe retrieval without the need for a second transseptal puncture. The ability to close the clip arms prior to withdrawal minimized the risk of tearing the atrial septum and facilitated the successful completion of the TEER procedure. Another clip was deployed successfully, resulting in significant MR reduction. This case demonstrates a rare complication during deployment, a malfunction of the device, and a novel strategy for safely bailing out a challenging intra‐procedural complication.
Advances in the Management of Pediatric Heart Failure: From Medical Therapy to Mechanical Support and Transplantation
Ahmad, Rimsha , Kumar, Mahesh, Khan, Saifullah, Niaz, Mahnoor, Frangaj, Kristjana , Arslan, Fatima Safi , Hussain, Syed Sadam, Maheta, Darshilkumar, Frishman, William H., Aronow, Wilbert S., Khan, Saifullah , Niaz, Mahnoor, Maheta, Darshilkumar, Frishman, William H. , Aronow, Wilbert S.

Mayo Clinic

Cardiology in Review | February 4, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/crd.0000000000001186 | PMID 41634903 Get It

Pediatric heart failure is a heterogeneous, high-risk clinical syndrome that differs fundamentally from adult heart failure in its etiologies, pathophysiology, and therapeutic responses. Although its absolute prevalence is lower, children experience disproportionate morbidity and mortality, with up to 40% of patients with symptomatic cardiomyopathy progressing to death or transplantation within 2 years of diagnosis. Congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathies, and genetic or metabolic disorders dominate the etiologic spectrum, while developmental differences in myocardial signaling, neurohormonal activation, and ventricular remodeling limit direct extrapolation of adult guideline-directed medical therapy. Evidence supporting pharmacologic treatment remains limited, and most therapies are symptom-modifying rather than outcome-modifying, particularly in single-ventricle physiology. Advances in mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation have substantially improved survival, yet pose unique anatomic, physiological, and ethical challenges in children. This review synthesizes contemporary evidence across medical, device-based, and transplant therapies, highlights lesion- and age-specific considerations, and identifies critical research gaps needed to advance outcomes in pediatric heart failure.
Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban in Cancer-Associated Thromboembolism: A Narrative Review
Aperna, Fnu, Kumar, Mahesh, Ahmad, Rimsha, Niaz, Mahnoor, Khan, Saifullah, Vakhshoori, Mehrbod, Arslan, Fatima Safi , Frishman, William H., Aronow, Wilbert S., Ahmad, Rimsha , Niaz, Mahnoor, Khan, Saifullah , Vakhshoori, Mehrbod , Frishman, William H. , Aronow, Wilbert S.

Mayo Clinic

Cardiology in Review | February 2, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/crd.0000000000001195 | PMID 41622537 Get It

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE) is a leading, severe, and potentially life-threatening complication in patients with malignancy. Low–molecular-weight heparin has historically been the standard of care; however, direct oral anticoagulants, particularly direct factor Xa inhibitors, have emerged as effective alternatives. These agents offer the convenience of oral administration, predictable pharmacokinetics, elimination of routine laboratory monitoring, and improved adherence. Despite the expanding role of direct oral anticoagulants in CA-VTE management, concerns regarding bleeding risk—particularly in patients with gastrointestinal and genitourinary malignancies—remain central to clinical decision-making. In this narrative review, we evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinical applicability of apixaban for the treatment and prophylaxis of CA-VTE. Current evidence from randomized controlled trials, including CARAVAGGIO and AMPLIFY, demonstrates that apixaban has noninferior efficacy compared with low–molecular-weight heparin and conventional anticoagulation strategies, with comparable or lower rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism. In addition, apixaban appears to have a favorable safety profile, with no statistically significant increase in major bleeding in selected cancer populations, including those without active gastrointestinal lesions. Apixaban’s pharmacokinetic properties, including limited renal clearance and stable drug exposure, further enhance its clinical utility in oncologic populations. However, evidence supporting apixaban use across all cancer subtypes remains limited and heterogeneous, highlighting the need for additional comparative and real-world studies.
Widaplik: A Fixed-Dose Triple Combination for Initial Hypertension Therapy
Niaz, Mahnoor, Ahmad, Rimsha , Khan, Saifullah , Kumar, Mahesh, Arslan, Fatima Safi , Hussain, Syed Sadam, Frishman, William H., Aronow, Wilbert S., Frishman, William H. , Aronow, Wilbert S.

Mayo Clinic

Cardiology in Review | January 28, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/crd.0000000000001190 | PMID 41593840 Get It

Hypertension remains the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide, yet blood pressure control rates remain suboptimal despite the availability of effective therapies. Contemporary guidelines increasingly recommend early use of combination therapy, recognizing that most patients require multiple agents to achieve target blood pressure. Widaplik, a recently Food and Drug Administration-approved fixed-dose, single-pill triple combination of telmisartan, amlodipine, and indapamide, represents the first triple therapy approved for initial treatment of hypertension in adults likely to need multidrug therapy. This review summarizes the pharmacologic rationale for low-dose triple therapy, highlighting complementary mechanisms targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, vascular resistance, and sodium retention. We examine evidence from pivotal phase 3 trials demonstrating rapid, sustained blood pressure reductions, higher control rates compared with dual therapy, and favorable tolerability. We also discuss safety considerations, practical limitations, and gaps in evidence, including long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Widaplik represents a paradigm shift toward simplified, early combination therapy aimed at improving hypertension control and reducing cardiovascular risk.
Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Cardiovascular Disease: Diagnosis and Management
Ahmad, Rimsha , Niaz, Mahnoor, Khan, Saifullah , Frangaj, Kristjana , Kumar, Mahesh, Basha, Nabel Rajab , Hussain, Syed Sadam, Chettri, Sunit, Maheta, Darshilkumar, Frishman, William, Aronow, Wilbert S., Kumar, Mahesh, Maheta, Darshilkumar, Frishman, William, Aronow, Wilbert S.

Mayo Clinic

Cardiology in Review | January 26, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/crd.0000000000001188 | PMID 41582311 Get It

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is increasingly recognized as a central mechanism underlying myocardial ischemia, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with and without obstructive coronary artery disease. The coronary microcirculation plays a critical role in regulating myocardial perfusion through tightly coordinated myogenic, metabolic, and endothelial pathways. Disruption of these mechanisms results in impaired vasodilatory capacity, abnormal coronary flow reserve, and microvascular ischemia. This review summarizes the anatomy and physiology of coronary microcirculation and examines the pathophysiologic mechanisms driving CMD, including endothelial dysfunction, structural remodeling, inflammation, and neurohormonal dysregulation. Contemporary diagnostic strategies are reviewed, with emphasis on invasive coronary function testing and advanced noninvasive imaging modalities such as positron emission tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The clinical implications of CMD across diverse disease states, including ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries, heart failure, and cardiomyopathies, are discussed. Finally, current therapeutic approaches, prognostic considerations, and emerging research directions aimed at improving diagnosis and targeted treatment of CMD are highlighted.
Coronary Artery Spasm: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Implications
Ahmad, Rimsha , Khan, Saifullah , Kumar, Mahesh, Niaz, Mahnoor, Basha, Nabel Rajab , Hussain, Syed Sadam, Frangaj, Kristjana , Chettri, Sunit, Maheta, Darshilkumar, Frishman, William, Aronow, Wilbert S., Maheta, Darshilkumar, Aronow, Wilbert S.

Mayo Clinic

Cardiology in Review | January 21, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/crd.0000000000001187 | PMID 41563117 Get It

Coronary artery spasm (CAS) is a dynamic vasomotor disorder characterized by transient, intense constriction of epicardial coronary arteries, leading to myocardial ischemia in patients with and without obstructive coronary artery disease. CAS plays a central role in vasospastic angina, ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries and myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries, malignant arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. Its pathophysiology is multifactorial, involving endothelial dysfunction, vascular smooth muscle hyperreactivity, inflammation, oxidative stress, autonomic imbalance, and genetic susceptibility, with notable ethnic and sex-related differences. Diagnosis relies on integration of clinical features, electrocardiographic changes, and invasive coronary provocation testing using acetylcholine or ergonovine, supported by advanced imaging and functional assessment when microvascular involvement is suspected. Management is centered on calcium channel blockers and nitrates, aggressive risk factor modification, particularly smoking cessation, and individualized strategies for refractory or high-risk patients. Improved recognition and standardized diagnostic pathways are essential to optimize outcomes and reduce life-threatening complications associated with CAS.
Shock: Pathophysiology, Classification, and the Role of Lactate in Diagnosis and Prognosis
Ahmad, Rimsha , Basha, Nabel Rajab , Kumar, Mahesh, Niaz, Mahnoor, Khan, Saifullah , Chettri, Sunit, Frangaj, Kristjana , Hussain, Syed Sadam, Arslan, Fatima Safi , Frishman, William H., Aronow, Wilbert S., Frishman, William H. , Aronow, Wilbert S.

Mayo Clinic

Cardiology in Review | January 21, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/crd.0000000000001189 | PMID 41563115 Get It

Shock is a life-threatening state of circulatory failure characterized by inadequate tissue oxygen delivery and cellular hypoxia. Lactate has emerged as a central biomarker in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of shock, yet its interpretation is complex and context dependent. Although traditionally viewed as a marker of anaerobic metabolism and tissue hypoperfusion, hyperlactatemia in distributive shock, particularly sepsis, frequently reflects multifactorial mechanisms, including increased aerobic glycolysis, adrenergic stimulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and impaired hepatic clearance. This review examines the pathophysiology and classification of shock, the biochemical basis of lactate production and clearance, and the prognostic significance of both static lactate levels and lactate kinetics. We synthesize evidence supporting lactate as a robust prognostic marker while highlighting limitations of lactate-targeted resuscitation strategies. Emerging data favor multimodal approaches integrating lactate trends with complementary perfusion markers such as capillary refill time and central venous oxygen saturation. Lactate should be interpreted as one component of a comprehensive physiological assessment rather than an isolated therapeutic target.
MAPS-R: International consensus classification-guided revision of the mayo alliance prognostic system for systemic mastocytosis
Tefferi, Ayalew , Aperna, Fnu, Kumar, Mahesh, Abdelmagid, Maymona, Butterfield, Joseph H. , Pongdee, Thanai , Reichard, Kaaren K. , Gangat, Naseema , Pardanani, Animesh , Yi, Cecilia Arana , Arber, Daniel A. , Orazi, Attilio , Chen, Dong

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 5, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 2017-2017

10.1182/blood-2025-2017 Get It

Abstract Background: The International Consensus Classification (ICC) for systemic mastocytosis (SM) recognizes mast cell leukemia (MCL) and SM with associated myeloid neoplasm (SM-AMN) as distinct categories of advanced SM (SM-Adv; Arber et al. Blood 2022;140:1200). Contemporary risk models in SM, including the Mayo Alliance Prognostic System (MAPS), do not account for the prognostic heterogeneity among ICC-defined SM-Adv subcategories. Methods: Mayo Clinic databases were utilized to access patient information. Diagnoses of SM and its morphological subcategories were confirmed through clinical evaluations and review of BM pathology. Diagnostic criteria were retrospectively fitted to be consistent with those of the ICC (Arber et al. Blood 2022;140:1200); diagnosis of MCL required the presence of immature cytomorphology of mast cells and only myeloid neoplasms were listed under the category of SM-AMN.Next-generation sequencing and cytogenetic studies was performed in a subset of the study patients according to previously described methodologies. Statistical analyses were conducted on clinical and laboratory data collected at the time of initial diagnosis while survival analysis was censored at the time of allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT). Results: A total of 910 Mayo Clinic patients with SM (median age 56 years, range 12-89; males 50%) were accessed in order to conduct a series of multivariable analyses (MVA) in search of independent risk factors for transplant-censored overall survival (OS). All patients were evaluable for assignment to specific ICC categories of SM: indolent (ISM; N=553), aggressive (ASM; N=114), SM-AMN (N=235), and MCL (N=8); the AMN components in SM-AMN included acute myeloid leukemia (N=18), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (N=70), myelodysplastic syndromes (N=32), MDS/myeloproliferative overlap (N=81), myelofibrosis (N=7), polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia (PV/ET; N=19), and others (N=8). In addition, subsets of patients were evaluable for hemoglobin level (N= 865), white blood cell count (WBC; N=858), platelet count (N= 859), serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP; N=761), serum tryptase level (N=706), karyotype (N=574), and mutations (N=240). Median follow-up for living patients was 70 months (range, 0-520); during this time 346 (38%) deaths, 16 leukemic transformations, and 20 ASCTs were documented. ROC analysis-determined optimal cutoff levels for predicting OS included age at ≥60 years, platelet count <150 x 109/L, tryptase level ≥100 ng/mL, WBC ≥10 x 109/L, hemoglobin below sex-adjusted lower limit of normal (anemia), and ALP >210 U/L in women or >170 U/L in men (increased). All except WBC ≥10 x 109/L retained significance during MVA that included ICC-specified SM categories: MCL (HR 74.8, 26.0-215.3; p<0.01); SM-AMN (HR 3.9, 2.5-6.0; p<0.01); ASM (HR 2.2, 1.4-3.5; p<0.01); age ≥60 years (HR 3.3, 2.2-4.7; p<0.01); platelets <150 x 109/L (HR 2.8, 2.0-3.9; p<0.01); tryptase ≥100 ng/mL (HR 2.1, 1.5-2.9; p<0.01); anemia (HR 1.7, 1.1-2.4; p<0.01); and increased ALP (HR1.5, 1.1-2.0; p=0.01). A subsequent HR-weighted risk model effectively delineated 5 risk levels ranging in median survivals from 11 months to 372 months (Figure 1). Figure 2 outlines complementary subtype-specific risk models; to that end, risk factors for ISM included age ≥60 years (HR 4.5, 2.5-7.9), tryptase ≥100 ng/mL (HR 3.5, 2.1-6.0); platelets <150 x 109/L (HR 3.4, 1.5-7.9), and anemia (HR 2.4, 1.2-4.8); for ASM age ≥60 years (HR 2.3, 1.3-4.3), platelets <150 x 109/L (HR 2.4, 1.4-4.0), and anemia (HR 2.0, 1.2-3.4); and for SM-AMN age ≥60 years (HR 2.9, 1.6-5.2), platelets <150 x 109/L (HR 2.5, 1.6-3.9), and tryptase ≥100 ng/mL (HR 2.5, 1.6-3.9) [Figure 2]. In SM-AMN, additional prognostic relevance from subcategorization into PV/ET vs. all other types of AMN was appreciated (Figure 3; HR 4.0, 1.6-3.9) and incorporated into the risk model for SM-AMN (Figure 2). Abnormal karyotype (AK) and high risk mutations(HRM; ASXL1, SRSF2, RUNX1, NRAS)clustered withSM-AMN with AK and ASXL1MUT displaying independent prognostic relevance that was most apparent in SM-AMN. Conclusions : MAPS-R relies on the prognostic eminence of ICC-defined morphologic subcategories and allows for additional SM subtype-specific risk stratification. SM associated with ET or PV is a prognostically unique subcategory of SM-AMN and should be recognized as such in future classification schemes. SM-AMN must be thoroughly ruled out in the presence of AK or HRM.
Real-world practice patterns of IDH inhibitors and outcomes of on-label IDH inhibitor use for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the United States
Leone, Sami, Dworkin, Emily , Kahla, Justin A. , Ali, Moiez , Raptis, Nepheli, Lokhandwala, Alifya, Taborda, Cristian , Ritchie, Jordan, Coltoff, Alexander , Ormond, Sean, Dulak, Dominika, Im, Annie , Song, Amy , Scobie, Micaela R. , Lewis-Gonzalez, Jessica, Foucar, Charles , LeBlanc, Thomas W. , Pulte, Dianne , Wynne, Joseph , Leblanc, Thomas , Lin, Chenyu , Woods, Ashley C. , Li, Zhiguo , Leone, Sami, Abaza, Yasmin , Filho, Cilomar Martins de Oliveira , Lee, Michelle Hyunju , Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp , Burkart, Madelyn , Kumar, Mahesh , Song, Amy, Iyer, Sunil Girish , Murthy, Guru Subramanian Guru , Zhou, Katherine Ismei , Atallah, Ehab , Winer, Eric P. , Erba, Harry Paul , Patel, Anand , Badar, Talha , Norsworthy, Kelly J.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 5, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 1614-1614

10.1182/blood-2025-1614 Get It

Abstract Introduction: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are observed in ~20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In the U.S., ivosidenib (ivo) is approved with or without azacitidine (aza) in the frontline (FL) and as monotherapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) IDH1-mutated (mut) AML. Olutasidenib (oluta) is approved as monotherapy for R/R IDH1-mut AML. Enasidenib (ena) is approved as monotherapy for R/R IDH2-mut AML. This study describes real-world IDH inhibitor (IDHi) administration patterns and evaluates their outcomes in on-label settings. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with IDH1/2-mut AML who received ivosidenib, olutasidenib, or enasidenib was conducted at 12 academic institutions in the U.S. Best response at any time during treatment, including complete response (CR) and complete response with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), were graded using European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 criteria. Results: A total of 387 patients with IDH1- and IDH2-mut AML were treated with an IDHi in the FL or R/R setting. Median follow-up was 9.6 months (range, 0.03-90.7). Demographics include 79% White, 14% Black, 3% Asian, and 4% other/unknown race; 5% were Hispanic ethnicity; 46% were female; the median age was 70 years (range, 28-95). 70% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, 26% had secondary AML, and 10% had therapy-related AML. Per the ELN 2024 less-Intensive risk classification, 58% were favorable risk, 29% intermediate, 7% adverse, and 6% unknown. Overall, 209 of 387 patients (54%) received IDHi regimens on-label. In FL IDH1-mut AML (n=45), 11 received ivo monotherapy, 25 aza/ivo, and 9 used off-label combinations: 3 hypomethylating agent (HMA) + venetoclax (ven) + ivo, 5 decitabine/ivo, 1 intensive chemotherapy (IC)/ivo. Among R/R IDH1-mut AML (n=109), 47 received ivo monotherapy, 7 oluta monotherapy, and 55 off-label (31 HMA/ivo, 16 HMA/ven/ivo, 3 IC/ivo, and 5 other). 44 received off-label ena for FL treatment of IDH2-mut AML (25 ena monotherapy, 9 HMA/ena, 8 HMA/ven/ena, and 2 IC/ena). In R/R IDH2-mut AML (n=189), 119 patients received ena monotherapy and 70 received off-label combinations (25 HMA/ena, 30 HMA/ven/ena, 7 IC/ena, 6 ena/gilteritinib, and 2 other). In on-label treatment of FL IDH1-mut AML, one of four patients with response assessment of FL ivo monotherapy had a CR/CRh. Of 19 patients with response assessment on FL aza/ivo, 13 patients (68.4%) had a CR as best response (95% CI, 46.0-84.6%). Median OS was 14.9 mo (95% CI, 4.17-NR) for ivo monotherapy (n=11) and 31.9 mo (95% CI, 9.1-NR) for aza/ivo (n=25), with 0 and 2 patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT), respectively. In R/R IDH1-mut AML, the rate of CR/CRh was 35.5% (95% CI, 21.1-53.1) for on-label ivo monotherapy. All 4 patients with response assessment for on-label oluta monotherapy had a CR. Median OS was 14.0 mo (95% CI, 10.1-22.4) for ivo monotherapy and NR for oluta monotherapy (95% CI, 10.1-NR), with 10 and 0 receiving allo-SCT, respectively. The CR/CRh rate for ivo was 38.1% (8 of 21 assessed; 95% CI, 20.8-59.1) in age < 70, and 30.0% (3 of 10 assessed; 95% CI, 10.8-60.3) in age ≥ 70. Median OS was 15.2 mo (95% CI 9.3-NR) in age < 70 (n=27) and 10.4 mo (95% CI 8.0-18) in age ≥ 70 (n=20). In R/R IDH2-mut AML, the rate of CR/CRh for on-label ena monotherapy was 38.2% (95% CI, 27.6-50.1). Median OS was 12.1 mo (95% CI, 8.2-16.6), with 5 having received allo-SCT. In demographic subgroups for ena monotherapy, 52 non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients with response assessment had a CR/CRh rate of 42.3% (95% CI, 0.30-0.56). Only 1 of 13 non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients with response assessment had a CRh (7.7%; 95% CI, 1.4-33.0) as best response, with none attaining CR. Median OS was 13.7 mo (95% CI 10.3-26.3) in NHW (n=82), 11.2 mo (95% CI, 6.1-NR) in NHB (n=18), and 69.1 mo (95% CI, 52.6-NR) in Hispanic patients (n=8). The CR/CRh rate was 48.6% (17 of 35 assessed; 95% CI, 33.0-64.4) for age < 70, and 27.3% (9 of 33 assessed; 95% CI, 15.1-44.2) for age ≥ 70. Median OS was 12.0 mo (95% CI, 9.9-22.1) in age < 70 (n=48) and 5.8 mo (95% CI, 4.1-8.7) in age ≥ 70 (n=69). Conclusion: Practice patterns for IDH inhibitors in AML vary considerably, with high amounts of off-label use. Response rates for ivosidenib and enasidenib in the real-world setting are comparable to those of clinical trials. Descriptive analyses of demographic subgroups highlight areas in need of further research.
Decoding DDX41: Clinical impact of germline and somatic mutations in 77 high-risk myeloid neoplasm patients
Kumar, Mahesh, Kusne, Yael , Lasho, Terra, Foran, James M. , Kharfan‐Dabaja, Mohamed A. , Gangat, Naseema , Mangaonkar, Abhishek A. , He, Rong , Viswanatha, David S., Jiang, Jennifer , Fan, Yao‐Shan, Litzow, Mark R. , Al‐Kali, Aref , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Badar, Talha , Lasho, Terra, Murthy, Hemant S. , Chlon, Timothy M. , Alkhateeb, Hassan B. , Ferrer, Alejandro , Litzow, Mark R.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 5, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 1442-1442

10.1182/blood-2025-1442 Get It

Abstract Introduction: DDX41 (DEAD-box helicase 41) mutations (mt) represent the most prevalent germline predisposition syndrome (GPS) in adult patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This molecular subtype is typically associated with late-onset disease, runs an indolent clinical course, with a relative absence of high-risk co-mutations. While several retrospective studies have reported favorable responses to venetoclax (VEN)-based therapies, anecdotal observations suggest variable outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with DDX41-mt MDS/AML treated at the Mayo Clinic. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of pts diagnosed with DDX41-mt germline predisposition syndrome with concurrent myeloid neoplasms at our institution. Germline testing was conducted under an IRB approved protocol (Mayo Clinic IRB# 16-004173; clinical-trials gov. Identifier: NCT02958462). Of 198 pts with DDX41-mt myeloid neoplasms, 77 had high-risk disease—43 with MDS with increased blasts (MDS-IB1, n = 11; IB2, n = 32) and 34 with AML (WHO 2022). We assessed how clinical, and disease features influenced outcomes in this subgroup. Among these pts, 69 (90%) pts had likely pathogenic/pathogenic variant (DDX41path) variants and 8 (10%) pts had variant of undetermined significance (DDX41VUS) according to variant classification criteria from the American College of Medical Genetics/ the Association of Medical Genetics/ the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines. Results: The median age was 68 years (yrs) (range [R],34-92), 70% were male and the median bone marrow blast % was 15 (R,5-60). The most common DDX41 germlinevariants (> 5% cases) included p.D140fs (26%), p.M1I (22%), and p.P258L (6.5%). 74% had DDX41 truncating variants. Thirty-one (40%) acquired a somatic DDX41-mt (R525H [81%]) and 43 (56%) had other somatic mutations. Among these, the most frequent were ASXL1 (n= 9, 21%), TP53 (n= 8, 10%), splicing factor (n= 7, 9%), and DNMT3A (n= 5, 6%). Twenty-six, (34%), 26 (34%), 15 (19%) and 9 (12%) pts were treated with hypomethylating agents (HMA), HMA+VEN, intensive chemotherapy (IC) and active surveillance/supportive care, respectively. Overall, the composite complete remission rate (cCR) in high-risk MDS and AML was 56%. The cCR rates (41%, 59% and 68.7%, p= 0.10) and median duration of response (DOR; 43.7, 44.9 and 28.9 months [mo], p= 0.46) were not significantly different with HMA, HMA+VEN, and IC induction. Thirty-one (40%) pts received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT); 4 (36%), 15 (47%) and 12 (35%) in MDS-IB1, MDS-IB2 and AML groups, respectively (p= 0.56). With a median follow up of 34.7 mo (R, 0.7-136.7), the median overall survival (OS) from the time of diagnosis was 56.9 mo (95% CI, 50.7-63.0) and was not significantly (NS) different between MDS-IB1 (not reached, 70% at 3 yrs), MDS-IB2 (56.9 mo, 86% at 3 yrs) and AML (55.7 mo, 60% at 3 yrs) groups, p= 0.16). The median OS was NS different between DDX41path and DDX41VUS (58.6 vs 55.7 mo, p= 0.50), respectively. We conducted a multivariable analysis for OS using variables that showed significance or trend towards significance in univariable analysis. Concurrent splicing factor mutations (HR; 5.29, 95% CI: 1.29-21.6, p= 0.02) remained negatively prognostic, while there was a trend towards better survival outcomes with allo-HCT (HR; 0.48, 95% CI: 0.21-1.07, p= 0.07). Bone marrow blast ≥ 20% (HR; 1.87, p= 0.12) and TP53-mt (HR; 2.14, p= 0.12) did not retain significance. Conclusion: In our cohort of patients with germline DDX41-mt high-risk MDS and AML, VEN-based regimens were not superior to HMA alone or IC, in terms of response rates and outcomes. On multivariable analysis, the presence of concurrent splicing factor mutations independently and negatively impacted survival with a trend towards better outcomes with allo-HCT. These findings highlight the heterogeneity within DDX41-mt myeloid neoplasms and underscore the need for future studies in larger cohorts to better define predictors of response and survival.