Citations

Background: Increased arterial stiffness, a marker of cardiovascular disease (CVD), is prevalent among African American (AA) adults and contributes to persistent CVD disparities. The Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) is a validated measure of arterial stiffness and predictor of adverse CVD outcomes. However, its relationship with the novel American Heart Association’s Life’s Essential 8 (LE8) cardiovascular health (CVH) construct has not been examined among AAs. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that increased arterial stiffness would be associated with lower CVH among AA adults. Methods: We analyzed baseline data from AA adults in the Techquity by FAITH! Trial, a 2-arm cluster randomized controlled trial conducted across 18 AA churches in Rochester and Minneapolis–St. Paul, Minnesota. Eligible participants (age ≥18 years with suboptimal diet or physical activity [PA]) completed validated electronic surveys (e.g., PA patterns) and clinical assessments (e.g., blood pressure [BP], lipids). CAVI was summarized as mean and categorized as normal (<8), borderline (8 to <9), or abnormal (≥9). CVH was assessed using the LE8 score (range 0-100 points) and categorized as low (<50), moderate (50-79), or high (≥80). Associations between CAVI and LE8 were assessed using multivariable linear regression adjusted for age, sex, and income (continuous) and Fisher’s exact test (categorical). LE8 components were compared across CAVI categories using Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results: Among 140 participants (mean age 53.0 years [SD 14.6]; 68% female), the mean LE8 score was 62.7 (SD 14.0). Nicotine exposure LE8 score was the highest (84.6 [SD 26.6]) and diet was the lowest (40.7 [SD 13.7]). Mean CAVI was 7.9 (SD 1.5), with 50% of participants classified as normal, 22% borderline, and 28% abnormal. No association between continuous CAVI and LE8 scores was observed after adjustment (unadjusted R 2 = 3.5%). All participants with high LE8 had normal CAVI, while abnormal CAVI was more prevalent among those with low (40%) and moderate (30%) LE8 scores (p<0.001). LE8 scores differed across CAVI categories for BP (median 50 in normal CAVI vs 30 in borderline/abnormal CAVI; p=0.003) and glucose LE8 scores (median 100 vs 60; p=0.014). Conclusions: Greater arterial stiffness was associated with lower CVH categories, with notable component-level differences in BP and glucose. Although not independently associated with overall LE8, integrating CAVI and LE8 categories may improve CVD risk stratification among AAs.

Abstract Objective To describe the development and implementation of an automated platform for genomic risk prediction that integrates multiple data types. Materials and methods Using the REDCap infrastructure, we constructed the R4 (Recruitment, Results, and Risk Reduction) platform to intake data from clinical sites, partner laboratories, participant surveys, and electronic health record (EHR) data across 13 institutions. Results The R4 Portal successfully integrated data to generate genome-informed risk assessments (GIRAs) across 11 conditions for a 23 840 person cohort. Testing phases and quality control led to network-wide protocols ensuring consistency and accuracy. Discussion As the science of estimating disease risk evolves, standardized and high-throughput methods of collecting and manipulating complex data are required. Platforms should be open-source, modular, and reusable, ensuring flexibility, security, and integration across healthcare environments. Conclusion The electronic MEdical Records and GEnomics (eMERGE) network successfully generated and returned comprehensive risk profiles using logic and data specific to 11 conditions in a secure and semi-automated fashion employing a customized REDCap database.

BACKGROUND: Performance and transferability of contemporary polygenic risk scores (PRS) for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease phenotypes may vary across PRS methods, training data, and trait ascertainment. METHODS: We aimed to investigate the performance and transferability of contemporary PRS for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease subtypes: coronary heart disease (CHD), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), ischemic stroke (IS), and peripheral artery disease (PAD), using the All of Us Workbench, which consists of a large, diverse cohort with whole-genome sequence data. We also developed and evaluated a multi-trait PRS for each subtype. Performance of PRS for 4 atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease subtypes was compared across genetic similarity groups in 245 388 All of Us participants. Groups genetically similar to European, African, admixed American, and remaining groups (combined as other) were used to assess PRS for CHD, IS, AAA, PAD, and multi-trait. RESULTS: PRS for CHD and AAA performed better than IS and PAD. For CHD, CHD PGS003725 performed the best (hazard ratio per SD increase [95% CI]), across genetic ancestry groups, European, and African (1.72 [1.67–1.78], 1.23 [1.17–1.29]), with CHD PGS004696 being best for admixed American (1.91 [1.70–2.15]), and CHD PGS003356 for other (1.75 [1.58–1.95]). The best performing PRS for AAA was AAA Multi for European, other, and admixed American (1.71 [1.52–1.92], 1.59 [1.07–2.37], 1.50 [0.90–2.52]) and AAA PGS003972 for African (1.39 [1.19–1.63]). For IS, IS Multi performed best for other and European (1.49 [1.17–1.89], 1.33 [1.25–1.42]), and IS PGS000039 performed best in admixed American and African (1.17 [1.07–1.27], 1.09 [1.04–1.15]). For PAD, PAD Multi performed best for all groups (other, 1.51 [1.19–1.92]; European, 1.32 [1.24–1.41]; admixed American, 1.23 [1.05–1.45]; and African, 1.18 [1.04–1.34]). CONCLUSIONS: Multi-trait and multi-ancestry PRS performed better than individual trait and/or single ancestry PRS for each atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease phenotype across ancestrally diverse and admixed individuals, with minimal change including adjustment for conventional risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder that increases risk for premature coronary artery disease and has accessible and effective interventions. The Dutch lipid clinic network is currently the most used diagnostic criterion; however, genetic sequencing provides a definitive diagnosis of FH. The goals of this study were to determine whether germline genetic screening using exome sequencing could be used to efficiently identify individuals who were genotype positive for FH. METHODS: Participants were recruited from 3 geographically and racially diverse sites in the United States (Rochester, MN; Phoenix, AZ; and Jacksonville, FL). Participants underwent Exome+ sequencing (dba Helix, San Mateo, CA) and return of results for specific genetic findings in APOB , LDLR , or PCSK9 . A chart review was performed to collect demographics, personal, and family cardiovascular history. RESULTS: At the time of the study, 84 413 participants were enrolled in the Tapestry study. Annotation and interpretation of all variants in genes for FH resulted in the identification of 419 likely pathogenic and pathogenic variants (prevalence, 0.50%), which included 116 APOB , 298 LDLR , and 5 PCSK9 . Sixty-six percent were female, the mean body mass index was 27.3, with 12.3% reporting a history of diabetes. Hypertriglyceridemia (≥150 mg/dL) was present in 39.5% and reduced HDL (<50 mg/dL) was present in 56.7% of patients. 27.5% of patients were not on cholesterol-lowering medications, and only 10% of FH carriers were at goal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. A history of coronary artery disease was reported in 22.4% of the cohort. Nearly 90% of these participants were newly diagnosed carriers of FH. Only 30.8% of confirmed genetic diagnoses of FH satisfied clinical (Dutch lipid clinic network) criteria for a diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the need for wider utilization of germline genetic sequencing for enhanced screening and detection of individuals who have familial hypercholesterolemia. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05212428.

Background Admixture mapping can be leveraged to identify genomic loci associated with disease traits in admixed individuals such as Hispanic Americans. Methods and Results We characterized fine‐scale population structure of participants (n=105 108) in the multiethnic eMERGE‐III (electronic Medical Records and Genomics) cohort, using reference panels from the 1000 Genomes Project and a Native American cohort. We defined “genetically admixed Hispanic Americans” as those having ≥10% Native American genetic ancestry (n=5025), in addition to European (specifically, Iberian) and African genetic ancestry. This population descriptor was subsequently applied to 3 other cohorts: the MESA (Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis; n=1176), WHI (Women’s Health Initiative; n=2873), and the HCHS/SOL (Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos; n=7804). We inferred local ancestry along the genome in genetically admixed Hispanic Americans in each cohort using RFMix2 with phased haplotypes from SHAPEIT2. Local ancestry proportions were used for admixture mapping of lipid traits (low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglycerides) using extended linear mixed models that incorporated multiple or single ancestries. After accounting for fixed‐effect covariates and random effects, ancestry proportions at the following loci were associated with lipid traits in the HCHS/SOL cohort: 11q12.2 ( P =6.8×10 −7 ) with low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, 2p23.3 ( P =5.2×10 −7 ) with total cholesterol, and 11q23.3 ( P =7.3×10 −12 ) with triglycerides. The LDL cholesterol and triglyceride loci replicated in at least one independent cohort, whereas the total cholesterol locus showed suggestive evidence for replication in the eMERGE cohort ( P =0.073). Native American (NAMR) ancestry appeared to drive the LDL‐C association, whereas both NAMR and Iberian population in Spain (IBS) ancestries contributed to the triglyceride signal. Conclusions Admixture mapping in genetically admixed Hispanic Americans identified genomic loci influencing lipid traits and the different ancestral origins driving these associations.

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been linked to elevated inflammatory biomarkers, yet few studies have evaluated these associations using iothalamate-based measures of kidney function, highlighting the need for further research. Research question: Is CKD associated with elevated inflammatory markers when defined by measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR)? Methods: Participants from the Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy (GENOA) cohort were included if they had data available for at least one inflammatory marker at visit 2. 17 inflammatory markers were assessed, including C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-18, tumor necrosis factor receptors 1 and 2 (TNFR1, TNFR2), serum amyloid A, intercellular and vascular adhesion molecules (ICAM, VCAM), E-selectin, P-selectin, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP), myeloperoxidase (MPO), receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 (MMP-2, MMP-9), and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases 1 and 2 (TIMP-1, TIMP-2). Kindey function was assessed using the urinary clearance of iothalamate. CKD was defined as mGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or UACR ≥ 30 mg/g. To further assess whether associations persisted without albuminuria, we also defined CKD solely by mGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to assess associations between CKD status and inflammatory markers, accounting for familial clustering. Exponentiated beta coefficients from GEE models were used to present geometric mean (GM) ratios of each biomarker by CKD status, adjusted for demographics, lifestyle factors, cardiovascular risk factors, and medication use. Results: Among 1,010 participants (mean age 61 ± 10 years; 67% women; 48% Black adults), 207 were classified as having CKD. After adjusting for potential confounders, individuals with CKD had significantly higher levels of hsCRP, VCAM, TNFR1, and TNFR2 compared to those without CKD (GM ratios > 1; p < 0.05), while the remaining inflammatory markers showed no significant differences ( Figure 1 ). Importantly, these elevations remained significant when CKD was defined by mGFR alone ( Figure 2 ). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that CKD, defined by mGFR, is associated with specific inflammatory biomarkers, underscoring the need for mechanistic studies to investigate these associations.

Background: Susceptibility to cardiometabolic diseases (CDs) is shaped by genetic, socio-environmental, and lifestyle factors. We evaluated the associations of disease-specific polysocial risk scores (PSSs)— derived from social determinants of health (SDOH) and lifestyle factors—and genetic risk factors with six CDs, across self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) groups in the eMERGE IV cohort. Methods: The six CDs included: atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. Disease-specific PSSs were developed using machine-learning models based on 65 SDOH and lifestyle factors. Participants were grouped based on their SIRE as Asian, Black, Hispanic/Latino, and White. We evaluated PSS distributions across SIRE groups. Genetic risk was assessed through disease-specific polygenic risk scores (PRSs), monogenic etiologies, and family history (FamHx). High PSS and high PRS were defined as the top 5th percentile. Associations were tested using multivariable logistic regression; model performance was assessed using the C-statistic. Results: Among 20178 participants (50±15 years, 68% female, 40% non-White), the most frequently associated PSS components were physical activity, sleep, self-perceived health, and income. PSS distributions varied across SIRE groups, with Whites having the lowest and Black and Hispanic/Latinos the highest scores for most CDs (Figure 1). All PSSs were significantly associated with their respective CDs, independent of confounders (OR per 1 SD increase: 1.19–2.68; Figure 2-A). No significant interactions were observed between PSSs and PRSs or monogenic etiologies. However, significant interactions were noted between PSSs and FamHx for CKD and obesity. PSS and PRS effects on the odds of CDs were independent (Figure 2-B) and additive (Figure 2-C). Incorporating PSSs into models that included clinical and genetic risk factors improved predictive performance of risk prediction models (Figure 3). Conclusion: PSSs, reflecting socio-environmental and lifestyle disadvantage, varied significantly across SIRE groups and were associated with risk of six CDs, independent of and additive to PRS. Given the substantial variation in socio-environmental and lifestyle risks across SIRE groups, integrating these factors into risk prediction models for CDs may help address health disparities and enhance preventive efforts, especially in marginalized populations.

Background: We investigated the impact of genetic risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) -polygenic risk score (PRS), familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), and family history (FamHx)- on CHD risk estimates, across the age spectrum, in two diverse cohorts of US adults -eMERGE IV (eIV) and All of Us (AoU). Methods: CHD was defined as myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and coronary revascularization. Self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) was used as a population descriptor. We calculated a PRS for CHD (PRS CHD , PGS004698), ascertained FH as the presence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in FH genes, and defined FamHx as early-onset CHD in first-degree relatives. We employed Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) to estimate the 10y risk of CHD for adults ≥40y and modeled the association of conventional risk factors with CHD in adults <40y. AoU served as the training set, and eIV as the testing set. We analyzed the impact of PRS CHD and FamHx on CHD risk estimates by a) using multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models, assessing discrimination and the extent of risk reclassification; and b) net benefit analysis and decision curves to assess the performance of prediction models across actionable thresholds. Results: We analyzed data for 19348 participants from eIV (age 50±15, 68% female, 41% non-White) and 239645 participants from AoU (age 55±17, 61% female, 48% non-White). Genetic risk factors were significantly associated with CHD. PRS CHD performance varied by SIRE groups, while FamHx was consistent. The effects of PRS CHD and FamHx on CHD were independent and additive (Figure 1). In adults ≥40y, incorporating PRS CHD and FamHx into PCE improved discrimination (C-statistic increased from 0.719 to 0.753; P -diff=9.1×10 -3 , Figure 2) and reclassified risk in 19% and 20% of participants at the 7.5% and 10% 10y CHD risk thresholds, respectively. Between the 7.5% and 10% 10y CHD risk thresholds, incorporating PRS CHD and FamHx into the PCE improved the net benefit of the risk prediction models across White, Black, and Hispanic/Latino groups (Figure 3). Conclusion: PRS CHD and FamHx were independently and additively associated with CHD in two large diverse cohorts in the US. Incorporating PRS CHD and FamHx into PCE improved risk discrimination, reclassified risk in a significant portion of participants, and improved net benefit of the PCE across all three major SIRE groups, motivating the addition of these factors to clinical risk calculators.

Introduction/Background: CHIP is a risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease, cancer, and all-cause mortality. Previous work has shown that CHIP, and particularly larger CHIP clones, are associated with adverse CV outcomes, yet the molecular pathways through which CHIP impacts CV risk are poorly defined. Hypothesis/Research Question: We hypothesize that the integration of whole blood transcriptomics and methylomics will provide novel insights into the pathophysiology of CHIP. Methods/Approach: Whole blood DNA methylation profiling, transcriptomics, and whole exome sequencing with CHIP calling for variant allele frequencies (VAF) of ≥2% (CHIP) and ≥10% (large CHIP) were performed for 507 ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD participants with moderate-severe ischemia. We identified transcriptomic and methylomic differences between participants with CHIP and large CHIP vs no CHIP using DESeq2 and limma, adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and probe set enrichment analysis (PSEA) were performed to identify pathway-level alterations in transcription and methylation, respectively. Results/Data: Clinical characteristics of study participants are described in Fig 1A . Compared to no CHIP (n=391), transcriptomics identified 6 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CHIP (n=116) and 27 DEGs in large CHIP (n=35) (p-adj<0.05; abs(logFC)>0.25) (Fig 1B) . Compared to no CHIP, methylation identified no differentially methylated probes in CHIP and 6 in large CHIP (padj<0.20, abs(logFC)>0.03). GSEA identified 137 pathways significantly different in both CHIP and large CHIP vs. no CHIP (padj<0.05), while PSEA identified 724 and 2356 pathways (padj<0.20), respectively. Given its stronger relationship with methylation and transcription, downstream analyses focused on large CHIP. Integrating these data, we found 58 pathways to be both hypomethylated and transcriptionally upregulated in large CHIP, including azurophil granule-related pathways implicated in neutrophil degranulation (Fig 1C) . Further investigation into the gene-probe pairs driving the azurophil granule pathway enrichment in large CHIP revealed hypomethylation and increased transcription of genes implicated in neutrophil extracellular trap formation, including ELANE, PTRN3, AZU1, and CTSG (Fig 1D) . Conclusions: Integration of the methylome and transcriptome suggests large CHIP is linked to neutrophil-mediated immune pathways in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Background: Hypertension and systemic inflammation are independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. While hypertension is a known risk factor for left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, the role of inflammation in LV structural changes remains unclear. It is also uncertain whether concomitant inflammation and hypertension ("inflammatory hypertension") exacerbate LV hypertrophy. Research Question: Is inflammatory hypertension associated with increased LV mass index (LVMI) compared to hypertension without inflammation? Methods: We analyzed baseline data from Black adults enrolled in the Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy (GENOA) cohort in Jackson, Mississippi. Inflammation was defined by high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) >3 mg/L, and hypertension as systolic blood pressure (SBP) >130 mmHg. Participants were classified into four groups: noninflammatory-normotensive (reference group), noninflammatory-hypertensive, inflammatory-normotensive, and inflammatory-hypertensive. The primary outcome was LVMI, assessed by echocardiography. Associations between groups and LVMI were evaluated using generalized estimating equations to account for familial clustering and adjusted for covariates including age, sex, education, smoking status, body mass index, number of antihypertensive medications, statin use, cholesterol, and diabetes. Results: Among 1,027 participants (mean age 64 ± 8.5 years; 71% women), baseline LVMI differed by inflammation-hypertension status. Compared with the LVMI in noninflammatory-normotensive cohort (n=108; 74.5 g/m 2 [70.4–78.6]), significantly higher LVMI was observed in noninflammatory-hypertensive (n=343; 83.6 g/m 2 [81.3–85.9], p<0.001) and inflammatory-hypertensive groups (n=497; 84.7 g/m 2 [82.8–86.7], p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between inflammatory-hypertensive and noninflammatory-hypertensive groups (84.7 vs 83.6 g/m 2 )(p=0.460). The inflammatory-normotensive cohort also did not differ from the reference group (74.9 g/m 2 [70.2–79.5], p=0.901). Secondary analyses using elevated IL-6 to define inflammation yielded similar findings ( Figure 1 ). Conclusion: In individuals with inflammatory hypertension, hypertension appears to be the primary driver of LV hypertrophy. Further studies in larger, diverse populations are needed to definitively evaluate the potential additive effect of inflammatory hypertension on LV remodeling.