Citations

ABSTRACT Background Intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG) is a live attenuated vaccine for tuberculosis. Intravesical BCG (iBCG) administration is a highly effective immunotherapy for non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Although live attenuated vaccines are generally contraindicated in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), iBCG has been utilized for NMIBC in SOTR. We describe the clinical manifestations, management, and outcomes of disseminated Mycobacterium bovis ‐BCG infection (Mb‐BCGi) following iBCG therapy in SOTR for NMIBC. Methods All adult patients (> 18 years of age) diagnosed with NMIBC who received iBCG across three tertiary referral and transplant centers between 2000 and 2025 were identified. The study cohort consisted of SOTR who had received iBCG for NMIBC and subsequently developed disseminated Mb‐BCGi. English language literature review was performed to identify additional cases. Results A total of 4207 patients received iBCG during the study period. Thirty (0.71%) were SOTR, of whom two (6.7%) developed disseminated Mb‐BCGi, including bloodstream infection and prostate abscesses. Literature review identified two additional disseminated Mb‐BCGi cases in SOTR with lungs, bloodstream, and native kidney involvement, and one fatality. All cases required extended antimycobacterial therapy. Median times from SOT to Mb‐BCGi and from iBCG to Mb‐BCGi were 104 and 8 months, respectively. Conclusion SOTR appear to be at a higher risk of disseminated Mb‐BCGi following iBCG. Administration of iBCG in SOTR with NMIBC warrants careful risk‐benefit assessment and subsequent close monitoring. image

Key Points Health care utilization rates in elderly kidney transplant were no different between the high kidney donor profile index and low kidney donor profile index group. Number of readmissions and surgical interventions in elderly kidney transplant was no different between the high kidney donor profile index and low kidney donor profile index group. Death censored graft loss was higher in the high kidney donor profile index group, whereas the patient survival was no different between the high kidney donor profile index and low kidney donor profile index groups. Background High kidney donor profile index (KDPI) kidneys (KDPI >85%) are often associated with increased risks of post-kidney transplant (KT) complications and greater health care utilization (HCU), particularly in elderly recipients with multiple comorbidities. These concerns frequently lead to underutilization of high KDPI kidneys in older transplant candidates, thereby limiting their access to transplantation despite potential clinical benefits. The aim of this study was to compare post-KT HCU between elderly recipients of high versus low KDPI deceased donor kidneys. The primary outcome included differences in hospital readmissions, surgical interventions, and outpatient service use at multiple post-transplant time points. Secondary outcome included graft function, graft survival, and patient survival. Methods A retrospective analysis of elderly solitary KT recipients (age ≥65 years) between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020. Patients were stratified into high KDPI (>85%, n =160) and low KDPI (≤85%, n =453) groups. We assessed inpatient and outpatient HCU, including readmissions at 30, 90, and 365 days post-transplant, surgical interventions, and outpatient visits (emergency department, transplant clinic, endocrine clinic, and ambulatory infusion units). Results There were no statistically significant differences between high and low KDPI groups in rates of hospital readmissions, surgical interventions, or outpatient visits (all P > 0.05). Delayed graft function rates were also similar ( P = 0.61). The low KDPI group had significantly higher eGFR at 4 months, 1, 2, and 3 years post-transplant (all P < 0.001). However, days alive and out of the hospital within 90 and 365 days post-transplant were comparable between the groups (all P > 0.05). Overall patient survival was similar ( P = 0.08), although death-censored graft loss was significantly higher in the high KDPI group ( P = 0.001). Conclusions Among elderly KT recipients, high KDPI kidney recipients had comparable post-transplant HCU and overall survival with those receiving low KDPI kidneys, despite lower long-term graft function. These findings suggest that high KDPI kidneys remain a viable option for older patients, offering timely access to transplantation.

Despite improvements in kidney transplantation rates, the shortage of donor kidneys remains a critical issue, exacerbated by non-utilization of recovered kidneys due to quality concerns, necessitating advancements in perfusion methods to enhance graft outcomes and usage. Although static cold storage remains the default standard for kidney preservation, newer methods like hypothermic machine perfusion have shown improved outcomes, including reduced delayed graft function and better survival rates. Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion and normothermic machine perfusion offer some potential clinical benefits but studies to date have demonstrated mixed results. In the United States, LifePort and the XVIVO’s Kidney Assist Transport are the most popular hypothermic perfusion devices, with NMP devices mostly in trials. Combining perfusion with biomarkers such as mitochondrial flavin mononucleotide, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and osteopontin shows promise in assessing kidney viability and predicting post-transplant outcomes, though further research is also needed. Emphasis on repair biomarkers, such as uromodulin and osteopontin, aims to better predict graft outcomes and develop new therapies. While notable advancements have been made in the use of machine perfusion and viability testing for liver transplantation, additional research with larger sample sizes is essential to substantiate these results and enhance kidney transplantation outcomes.

The indications for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use in cancer treatment continue to expand. This is attributable to their proven anticancer activity in addition to their tolerability and favorable toxicity profile as compared to conventional chemotherapeutic agents. ICIs work by blocking the inhibitory signals between tumor cells and T-cells, thereby enhancing the T-cell cytotoxic activity to inhibit tumor growth. Because of their immune-stimulating effect, ICIs are linked to adverse renal outcomes in both native and transplanted kidneys. The risk of kidney allograft rejection in the setting of ICI use has been reported to be around 40%, leading to an increased risk of graft loss. In this report, we review the literature examining outcomes in kidney transplant recipients receiving ICIs for various oncologic indications.

ABSTRACT Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) prophylaxis can prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) and other opportunistic infections (OI). We sought to assess the frequency, causative factors, and impact of early TMP/SMX discontinuation in abdominal solid organ transplant (SOT). This is a single‐center, retrospective cohort study of abdominal SOT recipients at Mayo Clinic Arizona (MCA) between January 2021 and June 2023. Primary study goals were to determine the rate and reasons behind early TMP/SMX discontinuation and whether TMP/SMX prophylaxis was reinitiated. Secondary outcomes included mean duration of therapy, alternative prophylactic agent utilized, and incidence of TMP/SMX‐preventable OI. A total of 930 abdominal SOT recipients were included (592 kidney, 253 liver, 85 multiorgan transplants). TMP/SMX was discontinued early in 184 (20%) patients: 77 kidney, 84 liver, 23 multiorgan. Predominant reasons for discontinuation were hyperkalemia (39%) and cytopenias (35%). Median duration of TMP/SMX prophylaxis before discontinuation was 54.5 (18.0, 93.2) days. TMP/SMX was not resumed in 62% of cases (36% kidney, 89% liver, 52% multi‐organ). The predominant reason for non‐resumption was alternative prophylaxis with no clear intent to rechallenge TMP/SMX (70%). Alternative prophylaxis included pentamidine (43%), none (30%), dapsone (22%), and atovaquone (5%). Of patients reinitiated, 86% (59/69) successfully remained on TMP/SMX through the prophylaxis period. One TMP‐SMX‐preventable OI (nocardiosis) was observed in the TMP/SMX discontinuation group. TMP/SMX is often discontinued prematurely in SOT recipients without resumption despite resolution of the offending cause. TMP/SMX prophylaxis should be maintained where possible, as alternative therapy may not offer the same broad spectrum of protection against OI.

Abstract Background Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TS) prophylaxis can prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii (PCP) and other opportunistic infections (OIs), such as intestinal protozoa, Toxoplasma, Listeria, and Nocardia. We sought to assess the frequency, causative factors, and impact of early TS discontinuation in abdominal SOT recipients. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult abdominal SOT recipients at Mayo Clinic Arizona between 1/1/2021 and 6/30/2023. Objectives included the rate and reasons behind early TS discontinuation and whether TS prophylaxis was reinitiated. Early discontinuation was defined as cessation of TS prophylaxis within 6 months post-transplant for ≥7 days. Secondary outcomes included median duration of therapy, alternative prophylactic agent utilized, and incidence of TS preventable OI. Patients were excluded if they had no TS ordered, died &lt;180 days from transplant, or received a thoracic organ transplant. Results 942 abdominal SOT recipients were identified. Thus far 171 liver, 11 Kidney, and 29 liver/kidney have been reviewed and included in the current analysis. TS was discontinued early in 60 (28%) patients. Predominant reasons for discontinuation were hyperkalemia (45%), cytopenias (17%), and acute kidney injury (15%). Allergy was the indication for discontinuation in 1 patient. Median duration of TS before discontinuation was 39 days (IQR 66). TS was not resumed in 78% of cases. The predominant reason for non-resumption was alternative prophylaxis with no clear intent to rechallenge TS (70%). The main discontinuation reason had resolved in 70% that stopped due to cytopenias, 67% that stopped due to liver injury, and 96% that stopped due to hyperkalemia. Alternative prophylaxis included pentamidine (50%), dapsone (32%), atovaquone (5%), none (13%). No patients developed PCP or other TS preventable OI during 9-month follow-up post-SOT. Conclusion TS is discontinued prematurely in a significant number of SOT recipients and is often not resumed despite resolution of the offending cause. Given its proven track record in preventing several OIs in SOT recipients, providers should document reason(s) for TS discontinuation and consider resumption of TS after reasons for discontinuation resolve. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background Recipients of solid organ transplant (SOT) have higher risk for infections, and the prevalence of mycobacterium tuberculosis liver abscess (MTB-LA) without pulmonary/disseminated MTB is 0.34%. However, there is little research on MTB-LA in SOT recipients. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Liver Abscess Cases Upon extensive literature review, this chart details all published, English-language cases of mycobacterium tuberculosis liver abscess in solid organ transplant recipients. Methods We conducted an extensive literature review of MTB-LA in adult SOT recipients. Results Our review showed 4 cases of MTB-LA in SOT recipients (table below). We detail 1 additional case. A 58-year-old male with ESRD due to type 2 diabetes mellitus, and latent MTB underwent kidney transplantation in March 2023. He completed a 6-month course of isoniazid and vitamin B6 for latent MTB 1 month before transplant. His post-operative course was uncomplicated; he was discharged to follow up with his nephrologist. He later developed norovirus illness with fever, which was conservatively managed. He developed new fevers 3 months post-transplant and CT of the abdomen/pelvis revealed a liver abscess, which was treated with empiric broad spectrum antibiotics, and was not amenable to aspiration. At his 4-month post-transplantation, he complained of fatigue, night sweats, poor appetite, and weight loss requiring hospitalization, wherein an MRI of the abdomen/pelvis identified a 3.6 x 3.2 x 6.2 cm liver abscess. The liver abscess aspirate was positive on acid fast bacilli smear and MTB polymerase chain reaction. He was initiated on antituberculosis therapy with isoniazid, rifabutin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. Susceptibilities identified pyrazinamide resistance, and led to substitution with levofloxacin. Labs, imaging and microbiology testing were negative for evidence of pulmonary/disseminated MTB. His donor’s information was reviewed; no obvious risk factors for active MTB were found. The recipient of the mate kidney is doing well without evidence of MTB infection. After 2 months of 4-drug antituberculosis therapy, ethambutol was discontinued. CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis at 4 months post anti-tuberculosus therapy revealed a 3 cm area of residual inflammation at the site of prior MTB-LA, in the setting of resolution of prior symptoms. Conclusion Early imaging and diagnostic aspiration of liver abscess with specific stains, culture and PCR testing can facilitate rapid diagnosis and initiation of antituberculosis therapy. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Background. Solid organ transplant recipients are at risk of severe coccidioidomycosis and are given prophylaxis to mitigate the risk. Patients with seropositive testing typically receive lifelong prophylaxis; currently, this prophylaxis strategy includes patients who are positive only for IgM by enzyme immunoassay (EIA-IgM-only), although this result may be falsely positive. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study at a large-volume transplant center in an endemic coccidioidomycosis region to compare outcomes of non–lung transplant recipients who were seropositive for Coccidioides but discontinued prophylaxis (case patients) to outcomes of patients who continued prophylaxis (controls). Results. No case or control patients developed active coccidioidomycosis during the follow-up period. Before transplant, 62 of 77 case patients (80.5%) had a single positive serologic test, of whom 27 of 62 were EIA-IgM-only positive (43.5%). In contrast, 57 of 77 controls (74.0%) had a single seropositive result (16/57 [28.1%] were EIA-IgM-only). The single EIA-IgM-only result was classified as falsely positive by infectious disease consultants in 20 of 43 patients (46.5%) compared with all other Coccidioides serologic results (13/111 [11.7%], P < 0.001). Lifetime antifungal prophylaxis was felt to be unnecessary for 28 of 43 patients (65.1%) who were EIA-IgM-only versus 31 of 111 patients (27.9%) with other serologic results (P < 0.001). Conclusions. For patients repeatedly positive for EIA-IgM-only and no evidence of seroconversion, compatible clinical illness, or radiographic findings, discontinuing antifungal prophylaxis may be reasonable after the first posttransplant year.

ABSTRACTBackgroundAdenovirus (ADV) infection can lead to significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, particularly in those with hematopoietic stem cells or solid organ transplants. The incidence of ADV infection in kidney transplant (KT) is not well‐defined as ADV is often asymptomatic and not routinely checked.MethodsThis retrospective case‐series study included KT and simultaneous pancreas‐KT (SPKT) recipients from January 1, 2008, to January 31, 2024, across three Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota) with symptomatic adenovirus polymerase chain reaction cases. The primary outcomes were allograft function at various intervals post‐ADV infection, allograft, and patient survival.ResultsWe report one of the largest multi‐site case series regarding outcomes of ADV in KT with 17 patients. The median time to ADV infection was 30 weeks (5–74). Five patients (29%) developed disseminated infection. Nine patients (53%) of the entire cohort experienced graft loss within a median of 35 (4–168) weeks, with four (44%) of graft loss attributed to ADV. Nine patients (53%) developed rejections post‐ADV infection with a median of 4 (2–8) weeks after resolution. One patient died from acute hypoxic respiratory failure from ADV infection.ConclusionADV should be considered in KT/SPKT patients with renal dysfunction, hematuria, and with or without fever. Despite the low mortality rate, there is a significant risk of graft loss and rejection after ADV infection. It is crucial to screen for ADV and develop intervention strategies for treatment. Further multicenter studies are needed to better define, stage, and manage ADV infection. image

Introduction. The impact of renal allograft rejection treatment on infection development has not been formally defined in the literature. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 185 rejection (case) and 185 nonrejection (control) kidney transplant patients treated at our institution from 2014 to 2020 to understand the impact of rejection on infection development. Propensity scoring was used to match cohorts. We collected data for infections within 6 months of rejection for the cases and 18 months posttransplant for controls. Results. In 370 patients, we identified 466 infections, 297 in the controls, and 169 in the cases. Urinary tract infections (38.9%) and cytomegalovirus viremia (13.7%) were most common. Cumulative incidence of infection between the case and controls was 2.17 (CI 1.54–3.05); p<0.001. There was no difference in overall survival (HR 0.90, CI 0.49–1.66) or graft survival (HR 1.27, CI 0.74–2.20) between the groups. There was a significant difference in overall survival (HR 2.28, CI 1.14–4.55; p=0.019) and graft survival (HR 1.98, CI 1.10–3.56; p=0.023) when patients with infection were compared to those without. Conclusions. As previously understood, rejection treatment is a risk factor for subsequent infection development. Our data have defined this relationship more clearly. This study is unique, however, in that we found that infections, but not rejection, negatively impacted both overall patient survival and allograft survival, likely due to our institution’s robust post-rejection protocols. Clinicians should monitor patients closely for infections in the post-rejection period and have a low threshold to treat these infections while also restarting appropriate prophylaxis.