Citations

ABSTRACT Background Long‐term health effects of thymectomy in adults remain uncertain. Previous reports suggested associations with increased mortality, cancer incidence, and autoimmune disease, although these findings may reflect differences in patient selection, surgical indication, or follow‐up duration. We aimed to examine long‐term outcomes following adult thymectomy. Methods We performed a propensity score‐matched retrospective study of patients who underwent thymectomy or comparator cardiothoracic procedures, with follow‐up extending to 10 years. Primary outcomes were all‐cause mortality, new‐onset malignancy, and autoimmune disease. Findings were compared with those reported in a recent study that has raised caution regarding thymic excision. Results We identified 425 patients who underwent thymectomy and 5401 controls who underwent coronary artery bypass or valve surgery. After matching, 398 patients remained in each group. Thymectomy was not associated with increased mortality at 5 years ( HR = 0.63; 95% CI , 0.38–1.04) or 10 years ( HR = 0.78; 95% CI , 0.54–1.13). Excluding reclassified thymic cancers, 5‐year extrathymic malignancy incidence was 2.3% versus 1.8% ( p = 0.54); no significant differences were observed in immune‐related disease. Mortality was higher among patients with thymic malignancy. Among MG patients, only one event occurred, precluding reliable estimation. Conclusions Thymectomy was not associated with excess mortality or malignancy at 10 years compared with matched cardiothoracic controls. Indication‐stratified analyses within the thymectomy cohort showed higher mortality for thymic malignancy, with insufficient events to assess outcomes in MG patients. These findings do not support a generalized survival penalty from thymectomy, though caution is warranted for incidental thymic removal.

Since its introduction into medical terminology by Lord Henry Cohen in 1941, the term “neurapraxia” has become established in the neurological and neurosurgical lexicon, although it is often misused or misspelled. It denotes a transient dysfunction of a peripheral nerve, as distinct from axonotmesis and neurotmesis, which describe more significant structural injuries to a peripheral nerve. To expand our understanding of neurapraxia, it is necessary to examine the phenomenon in both temporal and spatial contexts. This study examines neurapraxia in: (A) Time—(1) the origins of the term neurapraxia and (2) the time-course of a neurapraxic injury and its recovery, and (B) Space—(3) the microstructure of a neurapraxic injury and (4) the locations of neurapraxic injuries within the peripheral nervous system. We demonstrate that the term neurapraxia encompasses both a temporal and a spatial definition. In time, it applies to transient peripheral nerve palsy, from which recovery occurs before there is sufficient time for axonal regeneration, typically within a few weeks. In space, there is a histopathological change limited to localized demyelination in nerves lined by epineurium and myelinated by Schwann cells. Nerves distal to the spine qualify as nerves to which the term neurapraxia can apply; however, cranial nerves and spinal nerve roots (including cauda equina) are inconsistent with this owing to the variability in myelinating cells along their course (oligodendroglia proximally, i.e., central glial segment), the absence of an epineurial covering, and exposure to cerebrospinal fluid.