Citations

Our knowledge regarding baroreflex regulation of subpopulations of differently sized sympathetic action potentials (APs) remains incomplete. This study tested the hypothesis that baroreflex sigmoid morphology varies across AP subpopulations. In 12 healthy individuals (6 females; 32 ± 5 years), we measured diastolic blood pressure (DBP; brachial artery catheter) and muscle sympathetic APs (peroneal microneurography; continuous wavelet transform) during a modified Oxford protocol (100 μg nitroprusside bolus, 150 μg phenylephrine bolus). Baroreflex sigmoids (four-parameter logistic functions) modelled the relationship between DBP and sympathetic AP discharge probability for 10 normalized AP clusters. For each AP cluster, baroreflex sigmoid morphology was quantified by max gain, threshold, centering, and saturation pressures, and operating and response ranges. One-way analyses of variance and Dunnett post-hoc tests were performed. Data are mean ± SD. At the centering pressure of the baroreflex sigmoid, max gain was greater for medium APs (e.g., Cluster 3: -5.6 ± 2.9%/mmHg) compared to small (e.g., Cluster 1: -1.4 ± 1.1%/mmHg; P < 0.01) and large APs (e.g., Cluster 9: -0.6 ± 0.4%/mmHg; P < 0.01). Discharge probability at the centering pressure was also greater for medium APs (e.g., Cluster 3: 61 ± 22%) compared to small (e.g., Cluster 1: 12 ± 10%; P < 0.01) and large APs (e.g., Cluster 9: 3 ± 3%; P < 0.01). There were no differences in the saturation pressure (i.e., DBP where any further reduction does not elicit an increase in AP discharge probability) between AP clusters (main effect P = 0.22). The threshold pressure (i.e., DBP where any further reductions elicit an increase in AP discharge probability) was greater for medium (e.g., Cluster 3: 78 ± 8mmHg) compared to large APs (e.g., Cluster 9: 74 ± 11mmHg; P = 0.03). The operating range (i.e., Threshold – Saturation DBP) was greater for medium (e.g., Cluster 3: 14 ± 3mmHg) compared to large APs (e.g., Cluster 9: 8 ± 5mmHg; P < 0.01). There were no differences in the threshold pressure or operating range of medium compared to small APs (both P ≥ 0.82). The response range (i.e., Saturation – Threshold discharge probability) was greater for medium (e.g., Cluster 3: 26 ± 13%) compared to small (e.g., Cluster 1: 5 ± 4%; P < 0.01) and large APs (e.g., Cluster 9: 1 ± 1%; P < 0.01). These data confirm prior work using linear modeling and spontaneous approaches to quantify sympathetic AP baroreflex gain and extend to demonstrate variation in the morphology of the baroreflex sigmoid. During large changes in blood pressures, we identify differences in broader features of baroreflex control (e.g., threshold pressure, operating range, and response range) between AP subpopulations that support strong baroreflex regulation over medium-sized APs. This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2026 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion (selective α 2 -adrenergic receptor agonist) 1) reduced the firing probability and strength of baroreflex control over medium-sized sympathetic action potentials in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and 2) attenuated the transduction of MSNA bursts to changes in blood pressure (BP) by reducing the magnitude of BP responses and increasing the time to peak BP. These data suggest that neural and vascular α 2 -adrenergic mechanisms contribute to sympathetic baroreflex regulation of human BP.

Sympathetic control of human blood pressure is mechanistically regulated by α 2 -adrenergic receptors distributed throughout the nervous system and cardiovascular end-targets. Recently, we discovered the sympathoinhibitory effects of central α 2 -adrenergic mechanisms on human sympathetic neuronal emission patterns. However, our knowledge remains incomplete regarding the impact of α 2 -adrenergic mechanisms on beat-by-beat transduction of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) bursts to changes in blood pressure and heart rate (HR). Based on evidence of α 2 -adrenergic receptors within central and peripheral sympathetic neural sites and on the vasculature, this study tested the hypothesis that activation of α 2 -adrenergic receptors with dexmedetomidine (DEX) would reduce sympathetic transduction to blood pressure. In eight healthy participants (5 females; 28 ± 7 years), diastolic blood pressure (DBP; brachial arterial catheter), HR (ECG), and MSNA (peroneal microneurography) were recorded during a 5-minute supine baseline (BSL) and an intravenous DEX infusion consisting of a loading dose (10 minutes at 0.225 μg/kg/hr) and a maintenance dose (~0.15 μg/kg/hr). Signal averaging quantified sympathetic transduction to DBP and HR for 12 cardiac cycles following integrated MSNA bursts. We also quantified sympathetic transduction to DBP using a transduction gain estimate derived from the slope of the linear relationship between the peak DBP response and the number of cardiac cycles until peak DBP response. Data (mean ± SD) are reported for the 5-minute BSL and the last 5-minute period during the DEX infusion. Mixed-effects modeling and t -tests were performed. Non-parametric tests were performed for non-normally distributed data. DEX reduced resting MAP (BSL: 92 ± 7, DEX: 82 ± 6 mmHg: p < 0.001) but did not affect resting HR (BSL: 62 ± 14, DEX: 61 ± 14 bpm; p = 0.853). DEX reduced resting integrated MSNA burst frequency (BSL: 14 ± 6, DEX: 4 ± 3 bursts/min; p = 0.001) and total integrated MSNA (BSL: 663 ± 252, DEX: 188 ± 142 AU/min; p < 0.001). DEX attenuated the DBP transduction response, particularly for the cardiac cycle associated with peak DBP during BSL (cardiac cycle 6: BSL: 4.3 ± 3.2, DEX: 3.3 ± 2.0 mmHg; p = 0.025) and prolonged the time to peak DBP transduction (BSL: 6 ±1, DEX: 10 ± 3 cardiac cycles; p = 0.014). Also, DEX reduced DBP transduction gain (BSL: 1.6 ± 2.4, DEX: 0.9 ± 1.3 mmHg/cardiac cycle; p = 0.029). By contrast, DEX did not affect the mean transduction of MSNA bursts to changes in HR (BSL: 3.2 ± 3.1, DEX: 3.9 ± 4.6 mmHg; p = 0.668). These data suggest that α 2 -adrenergic mechanisms distributed among central and peripheral sympathetic neural regions and the cardiovascular system influence moment-to-moment sympathetic regulation of blood pressure homeostasis, but not HR, in humans. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Biological sex impacts baroreflex control of integrated muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), yet our knowledge remains incomplete regarding sex differences in baroreflex regulation of the differently sized APs contributing to variations in MSNA burst frequency and size. We hypothesized that sex differences in baroreflex control of sympathetic action potential (AP) discharge contribute to higher resting AP activity in males compared to females. We measured diastolic blood pressure (DBP; Finometer or brachial arterial catheter) and MSNA (peroneal microneurography and continuous wavelet transform, APs normalized to 10 clusters) in 24 healthy individuals (aged 18-30, 12 females) during a 5-minute supine baseline. Sympathetic AP baroreflex threshold gain was measured as the slope of the linear relationship between AP discharge probability and DBP. Sympathetic AP baroreflex sensitivity gain was measured as the slope of the linear relationship between AP clusters per burst and DBP. Analyses were performed during DBP rises and falls to explore baroreflex hysteresis. Mixed-effects analyses and t-tests were performed. Data are reported as mean ± SD. In the aggregate cohort, baroreflex control of medium-sized APs exhibited hysteresis. Compared to rises in DBP, DBP falls were associated with greater AP firing probabilities (cluster 3; DBP rise: 20 ± 11, DBP fall: 26 ± 12%; p < 0.01) and greater AP baroreflex gains (cluster 3; DBP rise: -4.36 ± 2.43, DBP fall: -5.32 ± 3.09 %/mmHg; p < 0.01). In the aggregate cohort, baroreflex hysteresis was not detected for small- or large-sized AP clusters (both p ≥ 0.56). Similar observations were detected for medium-sized APs in male (M) and female (F) cohorts when analyses were stratified by sex. Compared to females, males exhibited greater medium-sized AP firing probabilities during DBP rises (cluster 3; M: 23 ± 12, F: 16 ± 8%; p < 0.01) and falls (cluster 3; M: 32 ± 13, F: 20 ± 8%; p < 0.01). However, AP baroreflex gains were not different between sexes during DBP rises (cluster 3; M: -4.87 ± 2.05, F: -3.84 ± 2.75%/mmHg; p = 0.13) and falls (cluster 3; M: -5.87 ± 2.25, F: -4.76 ± 3.77 %/mmHg; p = 0.15). In the aggregate cohort, the number of AP clusters per burst and the AP baroreflex sensitivity gain were not different between rises and falls in DBP. However, compared to females, males demonstrated a greater number of AP clusters per burst during DBP rises (M: 4 ± 0.9, F: 3 ± 0.6 clusters/burst; p < 0.01) and falls (M: 4 ± 0.8, F: 3 ± 0.7 clusters/burst; p < 0.01). No sex differences in AP baroreflex sensitivity gain were detected during DBP rises (M: -0.08 ± 0.09, F: -0.30 ± 0.07 clusters/burst/mmHg; p = 0.14) or falls (M: -0.08 ± 0.08, F: -0.02 ± 0.08 clusters/burst/mmHg; p = 0.09). These data suggest that 1) hysteresis exists in baroreflex regulation of medium-sized but not small or large sympathetic APs firing under baseline conditions and 2) in line with earlier integrated MSNA studies, compared to females, males demonstrate greater resting sympathetic outflow from greater sympathetic AP discharge and more AP clusters firing per burst in periods of rising and falling DBPs. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Abstract In this article, we highlight the contributions of passive experiments that address important exercise‐related questions in integrative physiology and medicine. Passive experiments differ from active experiments in that passive experiments involve limited or no active intervention to generate observations and test hypotheses. Experiments of nature and natural experiments are two types of passive experiments. Experiments of nature include research participants with rare genetic or acquired conditions that facilitate exploration of specific physiological mechanisms. In this way, experiments of nature are parallel to classical “knockout” animal models among human research participants. Natural experiments are gleaned from data sets that allow population‐based questions to be addressed. An advantage of both types of passive experiments is that more extreme and/or prolonged exposures to physiological and behavioral stimuli are possible in humans. In this article, we discuss a number of key passive experiments that have generated foundational medical knowledge or mechanistic physiological insights related to exercise. Both natural experiments and experiments of nature will be essential to generate and test hypotheses about the limits of human adaptability to stressors like exercise. © 2023 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 13:4879‐4907, 2023.

The purpose of sympathetic neuronal discharge and the recruitment of neuronal subpopulations for human circulatory homeostasis remains unknown. This study tested the hypothesis that sympathetic neuronal discharge and recruitment patterns regulate neuropeptide Y (NPY) bioavailability. Across baseline and an intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion (α2-adrenergic agonist) sympathetic action potential (AP) frequency and total sympathetic AP clusters were associated with NPY bioavailability. This is the first study to report that sympathetic neuronal discharge and recruitment patterns regulate NPY bioavailability to support circulatory homeostasis in humans.

This study provides a novel understanding on baroreflex control of efferent sympathetic nervous system activity during competing stressors: baroreflex loading and peripheral chemoreflex activation. We show chemoreflex activation buffers baroreflex-mediated reductions in sympathetic nervous system activity. More importantly, baroreflex loading reduced baroreflex threshold gain of sympathetic action potential clusters and this reduction withstood chemoreflex activation. These data suggest the arterial baroreflex holds a primary regulatory role over medium-sized sympathetic neurons despite competing chemoreflex signals.

AbstractThe present study investigated the impact of central α2‐adrenergic mechanisms on sympathetic action potential (AP) discharge, recruitment and latency strategies. We used the microneurographic technique to record muscle sympathetic nerve activity and a continuous wavelet transform to investigate postganglionic sympathetic AP firing during a baseline condition and an infusion of a α2‐adrenergic receptor agonist, dexmedetomidine (10 min loading infusion of 0.225 µg kg−1; maintenance infusion of 0.1–0.5 µg kg h−1) in eight healthy individuals (28 ± 7 years, five females). Dexmedetomidine reduced mean pressure (92 ± 7 to 80 ± 8 mmHg, P < 0.001) but did not alter heart rate (61 ± 13 to 60 ± 14 bpm; P = 0.748). Dexmedetomidine reduced sympathetic AP discharge (126 ± 73 to 27 ± 24 AP 100 beats−1, P = 0.003) most strongly for medium‐sized APs (normalized cluster 2: 21 ± 10 to 5 ± 5 AP 100 beats−1; P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine progressively de‐recruited sympathetic APs beginning with the largest AP clusters (12 ± 3 to 7 ± 2 clusters, P = 0.002). Despite de‐recruiting large AP clusters with shorter latencies, dexmedetomidine reduced AP latency across remaining clusters (1.18 ± 0.12 to 1.13 ± 0.13 s, P = 0.002). A subset of six participants performed a Valsalva manoeuvre (20 s, 40 mmHg) during baseline and the dexmedetomidine infusion. Compared to baseline, AP discharge (Δ 361 ± 292 to Δ 113 ± 155 AP 100 beats−1, P = 0.011) and AP cluster recruitment elicited by the Valsalva manoeuvre were lower during dexmedetomidine (Δ 2 ± 1 to Δ 0 ± 2 AP clusters, P = 0.041). The reduction in sympathetic AP latency elicited by the Valsalva manoeuvre was not affected by dexmedetomidine (Δ –0.09 ± 0.07 to Δ –0.07 ± 0.14 s, P = 0.606). Dexmedetomidine reduced baroreflex gain, most strongly for medium‐sized APs (normalized cluster 2: –6.0 ± 5 to –1.6 ± 2 % mmHg−1; P = 0.008). These data suggest that α2‐adrenergic mechanisms within the central nervous system modulate sympathetic postganglionic neuronal discharge, recruitment and latency strategies in humans. imageKey points Sympathetic postganglionic neuronal subpopulations innervating the human circulation exhibit complex patterns of discharge, recruitment and latency. However, the central neural mechanisms governing sympathetic postganglionic discharge remain unclear. This microneurographic study investigated the impact of a dexmedetomidine infusion (α2‐adrenergic receptor agonist) on muscle sympathetic postganglionic action potential (AP) discharge, recruitment and latency patterns. Dexmedetomidine infusion inhibited the recruitment of large and fast conducting sympathetic APs and attenuated the discharge of medium sized sympathetic APs that fired during resting conditions and the Valsalva manoeuvre. Dexmedetomidine infusion elicited shorter sympathetic AP latencies during resting conditions but did not affect the reductions in latency that occurred during the Valsalva manoeuvre. These data suggest that α2‐adrenergic mechanisms within the central nervous system modulate sympathetic postganglionic neuronal discharge, recruitment and latency strategies in humans.

The central neural mechanisms affecting sympathetic neuronal discharge strategies supporting homeostatic adjustments in human muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) remain unclear. This study investigated the hypothesis that central alpha-2 adrenergic mechanisms affect sympathetic action potential (AP) discharge, recruitment, and latency patterns within human MSNA (peroneal nerve microneurography and continuous wavelet transform). An alpha-2 adrenergic agonist (dexmedetomidine) was infused in eight healthy male and female participants (5 females; 28 ± 7years). Data were recorded during a 5-minute resting control condition, a 10-minute intravenous dexmedetomidine loading dose (0.225 μg/kg), and a dexmedetomidine maintenance dose (~0.1 μg/kg/hr). Data are reported as mean (SD) for the 5-minute control condition and 2-minutes of the dexmedetomidine infusion when MSNA bursting activity was demonstrably reduced. Two-tailed paired t-tests were performed. Dexmedetomidine reduced mean pressure (92 ± 7 to 80 ± 8 mmHg; P < 0.01) but did not affect heart rate (61 ± 13 to 60 ± 14 bpm; P = 0.75). Dexmedetomidine reduced integrated MSNA burst frequency (14 ± 6 to 4 ± 3 bursts/min; P < 0.01), sympathetic AP frequency (75 ± 46 to 16 ± 14 AP/min; P < 0.01), APs per burst (5 ± 1 to 4 ± 1 AP/burst; P = 0.01), AP clusters per burst (3.5 ± 0.7 to 3.0 ± 0.7 clusters/burst; P = 0.03), and de-recruited the largest AP clusters (12 ± 3 to 7 ± 2 AP clusters; P < 0.01). Despite de-recruiting large AP clusters with short conduction times, dexmedetomidine elicited shorter sympathetic AP conduction times (1.18 ± 0.12 to 1.14 ± 0.13 s; P = 0.03). Six participants performed a Valsalva Maneuver (20 s, 40 mmHg mouth pressure) during the control condition and during the dexmedetomidine maintenance dose. Data are reported as mean (SD) change (Δ) from the 2-minute period preceding the Valsalva Maneuver to the Valsalva Maneuver for each condition. During the control condition, Valsalva Maneuver increased AP frequency (Δ 311 ± 317 AP/min; P = 0.048), recruited larger previously silent AP clusters (Δ 2 ± 1 AP clusters; P < 0.01), and elicited shorter AP conduction times (Δ ‑0.09 ± 0.07 s; P = 0.02). Compared to the control condition, Valsalva Maneuver performed during the dexmedetomidine maintenance dose condition elicited lesser increases in AP frequency (Δ 116 ± 189 AP/min; P vs. control = 0.02) and lesser recruitment of larger previously silent AP clusters (Δ 0 ± 1 AP clusters; P vs. control = 0.02). Dexmedetomidine did not affect the latency reduction elicited by Valsalva Maneuver (Δ ‑0.07 ± 0.14 s; P vs. control = 0.61). These data suggest that human central alpha-2 adrenergic mechanisms affect: i) sympathetic postganglionic neuronal discharge and recruitment patterns, and ii) synaptic delays within the sympathetic neurocircuitry influencing AP latency. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.